Articles | Volume 15, issue 8
The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021
The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021

Research article 23 Aug 2021

Research article | 23 Aug 2021

Calibration of sea ice drift forecasts using random forest algorithms

Cyril Palerme and Malte Müller

Related authors

Validation metrics for ice edge position forecasts
Arne Melsom, Cyril Palerme, and Malte Müller
Ocean Sci., 15, 615–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-615-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-615-2019, 2019
Short summary
Evaluation of CloudSat snowfall rate profiles by a comparison with in situ micro-rain radar observations in East Antarctica
Florentin Lemonnier, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine, Chantal Claud, Christophe Genthon, Claudio Durán-Alarcón, Cyril Palerme, Alexis Berne, Niels Souverijns, Nicole van Lipzig, Irina V. Gorodetskaya, Tristan L'Ecuyer, and Norman Wood
The Cryosphere, 13, 943–954, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-943-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-943-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
Multiscale variations in Arctic sea ice motion and links to atmospheric and oceanic conditions
Dongyang Fu, Bei Liu, Yali Qi, Guo Yu, Haoen Huang, and Lilian Qu
The Cryosphere, 15, 3797–3811, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3797-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3797-2021, 2021
Short summary
The flexural strength of bonded ice
Andrii Murdza, Arttu Polojärvi, Erland M. Schulson, and Carl E. Renshaw
The Cryosphere, 15, 2957–2967, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2957-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2957-2021, 2021
Short summary
Interannual variability in Transpolar Drift summer sea ice thickness and potential impact of Atlantification
H. Jakob Belter, Thomas Krumpen, Luisa von Albedyll, Tatiana A. Alekseeva, Gerit Birnbaum, Sergei V. Frolov, Stefan Hendricks, Andreas Herber, Igor Polyakov, Ian Raphael, Robert Ricker, Sergei S. Serovetnikov, Melinda Webster, and Christian Haas
The Cryosphere, 15, 2575–2591, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2575-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2575-2021, 2021
Short summary
An inter-comparison of the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in CMIP6 models
Ann Keen, Ed Blockley, David A. Bailey, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Mitchell Bushuk, Steve Delhaye, David Docquier, Daniel Feltham, François Massonnet, Siobhan O'Farrell, Leandro Ponsoni, José M. Rodriguez, David Schroeder, Neil Swart, Takahiro Toyoda, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Klaus Wyser
The Cryosphere, 15, 951–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Refining the sea surface identification approach for determining freeboards in the ICESat-2 sea ice products
Ron Kwok, Alek A. Petty, Marco Bagnardi, Nathan T. Kurtz, Glenn F. Cunningham, Alvaro Ivanoff, and Sahra Kacimi
The Cryosphere, 15, 821–833, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-821-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-821-2021, 2021

Cited articles

Ahijevych, D., Pinto, J. O., Williams, J. K., and Steiner, M.: Probabilistic Forecasts of Mesoscale Convective System Initiation Using the Random Forest Data Mining Technique, Weather Forecast., 31, 581–599, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0113.1, 2016. a
Berkman, P. A., Fiske, G., Røyset, J.-A., Brigham, L. W., and Lorenzini, D.: Next-Generation Arctic Marine Shipping Assessments, Springer International Publishing, 241–268, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25674-6_11, 2020. a
Bleck, R.: An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates, Ocean Model., 4, 55–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(01)00012-9, 2002. a
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, 2001. a, b
Cavalieri, D. J. and Parkinson, C. L.: Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010, The Cryosphere, 6, 881–889, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-881-2012, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Methods have been developed for calibrating sea ice drift forecasts from an operational prediction system using machine learning algorithms. These algorithms use predictors from sea ice concentration observations during the initialization of the forecasts, sea ice and wind forecasts, and some geographical information. Depending on the calibration method, the mean absolute error is reduced between 3.3 % and 8.0 % for the direction and between 2.5 % and 7.1 % for the speed of sea ice drift.