Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4141-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4141-2022
Research article
 | 
10 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 10 Oct 2022

Evaluating simplifications of subsurface process representations for field-scale permafrost hydrology models

Bo Gao and Ethan T. Coon

Related authors

A numerical study of process complexity in permafrost-dominated regions
Radhakrishna Bangalore Lakshmiprasad, Fan Zhang, Ethan T. Coon, and Thomas Graf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3122,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3122, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
The effects of spatial and temporal resolution of gridded meteorological forcing on watershed hydrological responses
Pin Shuai, Xingyuan Chen, Utkarsh Mital, Ethan T. Coon, and Dipankar Dwivedi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2245–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2245-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating integrated surface/subsurface permafrost thermal hydrology models in ATS (v0.88) against observations from a polygonal tundra site
Ahmad Jan, Ethan T. Coon, and Scott L. Painter
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2259–2276, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020, 2020
Short summary
Estimation of subsurface porosities and thermal conductivities of polygonal tundra by coupled inversion of electrical resistivity, temperature, and moisture content data
Elchin E. Jafarov, Dylan R. Harp, Ethan T. Coon, Baptiste Dafflon, Anh Phuong Tran, Adam L. Atchley, Youzuo Lin, and Cathy J. Wilson
The Cryosphere, 14, 77–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-77-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-77-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Frozen ground | Subject: Numerical Modelling
Coupled thermo–geophysical inversion for permafrost monitoring
Soňa Tomaškovičová and Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen
The Cryosphere, 18, 321–340, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-321-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-321-2024, 2024
Short summary
Simulating ice segregation and thaw consolidation in permafrost environments with the CryoGrid community model
Juditha Aga, Julia Boike, Moritz Langer, Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen, and Sebastian Westermann
The Cryosphere, 17, 4179–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4179-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4179-2023, 2023
Short summary
Investigating the thermal state of permafrost with Bayesian inverse modeling of heat transfer
Brian Groenke, Moritz Langer, Jan Nitzbon, Sebastian Westermann, Guillermo Gallego, and Julia Boike
The Cryosphere, 17, 3505–3533, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3505-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3505-2023, 2023
Short summary
Representation of soil hydrology in permafrost regions may explain large part of inter-model spread in simulated Arctic and subarctic climate
Philipp de Vrese, Goran Georgievski, Jesus Fidel Gonzalez Rouco, Dirk Notz, Tobias Stacke, Norman Julius Steinert, Stiig Wilkenskjeld, and Victor Brovkin
The Cryosphere, 17, 2095–2118, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2095-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulating the current and future northern limit of permafrost on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Jianting Zhao, Lin Zhao, Zhe Sun, Fujun Niu, Guojie Hu, Defu Zou, Guangyue Liu, Erji Du, Chong Wang, Lingxiao Wang, Yongping Qiao, Jianzong Shi, Yuxin Zhang, Junqiang Gao, Yuanwei Wang, Yan Li, Wenjun Yu, Huayun Zhou, Zanpin Xing, Minxuan Xiao, Luhui Yin, and Shengfeng Wang
The Cryosphere, 16, 4823–4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4823-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4823-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abolt, C. J., Young, M. H., Atchley, A. L., Harp, D. R., and Coon, E. T.: Feedbacks Between Surface Deformation and Permafrost Degradation in Ice Wedge Polygons, Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 125, e2019JF005349, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005349, 2020. 
Atchley, A. L., Painter, S. L., Harp, D. R., Coon, E. T., Wilson, C. J., Liljedahl, A. K., and Romanovsky, V. E.: Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2701–2722, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015, 2015. 
Berteaux, D., Gauthier, G., Domine, F., Ims, R. A., Lamoureux, S. F., Lévesque, E., and Yoccoz, N.: Effects of changing permafrost and snow conditions on tundra wildlife: critical places and times, Arct. Sci., 3, 65–90, https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2016-0023, 2017. 
Bui, M. T., Lu, J., and Nie, L.: A Review of Hydrological Models Applied in the Permafrost-Dominated Arctic Region, Geosciences, 10, 401, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100401, 2020. 
Busey, B., Bolton, B., Wilson, C., and Cohen, L.: Surface Meteorology at Teller Site Stations, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, Ongoing from 2016, Next Generation Ecosystem Experiments Arctic Data Collection, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA [data set], https://doi.org/10.5440/1437633, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
Representing water at constant density, neglecting cryosuction, and neglecting heat advection are three commonly applied but not validated simplifications in permafrost models to reduce computation complexity at field scale. We investigated this problem numerically by Advanced Terrestrial Simulator and found that neglecting cryosuction can cause significant bias (10%–60%), constant density primarily affects predicting water saturation, and ignoring heat advection has the least impact.