Dear Authors,

Both referees examined your responses to their initial comments and agreed that your revised manuscript was strongly improved. I am thus delighted to accept your paper for publication in our journal.

That said, anonymous Referee #2 is right in suggesting that a shortened version of the manuscript would have more impact on its readers. I understand this come rather late in the review process and I do not want to condition publication to the 25% shortening suggested by reviewer #2. However, when doing a final check (some typos remain), I recommand that you try to make the text sharper.

I still have myself a few minor, mostly technical, comments listed below. Thanks for considering them before uploading the final files for copy-editing.

Do not hesitate to contact me if you have some further questions.

Thanks a lot for choosing TC to publish your work.

Best regards,

Etienne Berthier

P4.15 parenthesis not closed
P5.8 delete space before comma.
Are all table necessary in the main article? Think if some (Table 3 and 4 in particular) could be moved to the supplement.
P20.13. “least absolute residual regression” does not sound familiar to me. Double check.
Figure 10a. Y-axis title should be "change"
P27.17 "users of" (I think)
P33.4 isolated coma to be removed.