Articles | Volume 20, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5157-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
On thin glacial ice: New Austrian Glacier Inventory shows accelerating glacier shrinkage and 31 % area loss within two decades
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 14 Sep 2026)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 24 Mar 2026)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1241', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Jun 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Lea Hartl, 17 Jul 2026
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1241', Frank Paul, 30 Jun 2026
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Lea Hartl, 17 Jul 2026
- AC4: 'Reply on AC3', Lea Hartl, 18 Jul 2026
-
AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Lea Hartl, 17 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1241', Nina Kirchner, 01 Jul 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Lea Hartl, 17 Jul 2026
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (01 Aug 2026) by Christian Haas
AR by Lea Hartl on behalf of the Authors (05 Aug 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (08 Aug 2026) by Christian Haas
RR by Nina Kirchner (24 Aug 2026)
ED: Publish as is (25 Aug 2026) by Christian Haas
AR by Lea Hartl on behalf of the Authors (25 Aug 2026)
This is a thorough, detailed and well written design and description of the new Austrian Glacier Inventory (AGI5).
I question the value of 10-25cm orthophotography for glacier mapping - one could not identify extent to this precision even if one was in situ, and with summer melt, it would change on a daily/weekly basis - these images were captured over two summers (2022-23). However this is the resolution of the available imagery !
The round robin experiment is curiously interesting but I note that the analyst variability far exceeds the image resolution.
I identify some very minor graphic issues in the otherwise excellent figures:
Figure 1: there is no need to add 0' in each graticule label - this is simply 'noise'
Figure 7: it seems inconsistent to shorten the labels on the Vanishing Glaciers to GI3,GI5 when even in the caption, they are written in full: AGI3, AGI5 etc..
Supplementary material: the scale bar divisions on figures should be standard/round numbers e.g. 50,100 rather than 40, 45, 0.45, 0.26, 70 etc.. (figures S1,2,4,5,9)