Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5579-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5579-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Nov 2025
Research article |
| 12 Nov 2025
| 12 Nov 2025
Multitemporal analysis of Sentinel-1 backscatter during snowmelt using high-resolution field measurements and radiative transfer modelling
Francesca Carletti
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Carlo Marin
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
Chiara Ghielmini
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Mathias Bavay
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
Michael Lehning
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Related authors
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
Francesca Carletti, Adrien Michel, Francesca Casale, Alice Burri, Daniele Bocchiola, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3447–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High Alpine catchments are dominated by the melting of seasonal snow cover and glaciers, whose amount and seasonality are expected to be modified by climate change. This paper compares the performances of different types of models in reproducing discharge among two catchments under present conditions and climate change. Despite many advantages, the use of simpler models for climate change applications is controversial as they do not fully represent the physics of the involved processes.
Hongxiang Yu, Li Guang, Benjamin Walter, Jianping Huang, Ning Huang, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 19, 5389–5402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5389-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5389-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Cornices are overhanging snow accumulations that form on mountain crests. Using wind-tunnel experiments and high-speed photography, the study tracks particle trajectories around cornices and finds distinct differences between edge and surface deposition. A static adhesion model for edge deposition was developed and validated to predict how particle size and shape affect adhesion. The work clarifies the microdynamics of early cornice growth and provides a foundation for avalanche modeling.
Tiziana Lazzarina Zendrini, Luca Carturan, Michael Lehning, Mathias Bavay, Federico Cazorzi, Paolo Gabrielli, Nander Wever, and Giancarlo Dalla Fontana
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5186, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5186, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
By combining in situ mass balance data with a physics‐based snow model at Mt. Ortles, in the Italian Alps, we investigate snow accumulation, erosion and melt processes, and their sensitivity to air temperature. We found that wind erosion is currently the major ablation process at this high-elevation site, whereas melt plays a minor role. Quickly rising air temperature is affecting this partitioning and suggests a future shift from an erosion-dominated to a melt-dominated mass balance regime.
Elizaveta Sharaborova, Michael Lehning, Nander Wever, Marcia Phillips, and Hendrik Huwald
The Cryosphere, 19, 4277–4301, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4277-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4277-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global warming provokes permafrost to thaw, damaging landscapes and infrastructure. This study explores methods to slow this thawing at an alpine site. We investigate different methods based on passive and active cooling. The best approach mixes both methods and manages heat flow, potentially allowing excess energy to be used locally.
Mahdi Jafari and Michael Lehning
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3035, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how air moves within snow in Arctic regions and how this affects the snow's structure. Using a new method that links two computer models, we found that cold weather can trigger air movement inside the snow, creating vertical channels and changing the snow's density and temperature. These changes are not captured by traditional models, so our work helps improve how snow and climate processes are simulated in cold environments.
Valentina Premier, Francesca Moschini, Jesús Casado-Rodríguez, Davide Bavera, Carlo Marin, and Alberto Pistocchi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2157, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Earth observation-derived snow cover data is valuable for evaluating and improving snow modules in hydrological models. We propose a novel calibration of LISFLOOD’s snowmelt coefficient by minimizing errors between observed and modeled snow cover fraction, enhancing pixel-scale accuracy. While basin-scale performance shows minor discrepancies, a more realistic snow module leads to shifts in the timing and magnitude of snowmelt and total runoff, thus affecting the water balance.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research revisits a classic scientific technique, melting calorimetry, to measure snow liquid water content. This study shows with a novel uncertainty propagation framework that melting calorimetry, traditionally less trusted than freezing calorimetry, can produce accurate results. The study defines optimal experiment parameters and a robust field protocol. Melting calorimetry has the potential to become a valuable tool for validating other liquid water content measuring techniques.
Sonja Wahl, Benjamin Walter, Franziska Aemisegger, Luca Bianchi, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 18, 4493–4515, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wind-driven airborne transport of snow is a frequent phenomenon in snow-covered regions and a process difficult to study in the field as it is unfolding over large distances. Thus, we use a ring wind tunnel with infinite fetch positioned in a cold laboratory to study the evolution of the shape and size of airborne snow. With the help of stable water isotope analyses, we identify the hitherto unobserved process of airborne snow metamorphism that leads to snow particle rounding and growth.
Dylan Reynolds, Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Justine Berg, Tobias Jonas, Michael Haugeneder, and Rebecca Mott
The Cryosphere, 18, 4315–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about atmospheric variables is needed to produce simulations of mountain snowpacks. We present a model that can represent processes that shape mountain snowpack, focusing on the accumulation of snow. Simulations show that this model can simulate the complex path that a snowflake takes towards the ground and that this leads to differences in the distribution of snow by the end of winter. Overall, this model shows promise with regard to improving forecasts of snow in mountains.
Gwendolyn Dasser, Valentin T. Bickel, Marius Rüetschi, Mylène Jacquemart, Mathias Bavay, Elisabeth D. Hafner, Alec van Herwijnen, and Andrea Manconi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1510, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding snowpack wetness is crucial for predicting wet snow avalanches, but detailed data is often limited to certain locations. Using satellite radar, we monitor snow wetness spatially continuously. By combining different radar tracks from Sentinel-1, we improved spatial resolution and tracked snow wetness over several seasons. Our results indicate higher snow wetness to correlate with increased wet snow avalanche activity, suggesting our method can help identify potential risk areas.
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Domine, Nander Wever, Adrien Michel, Michael Lehning, and Pierre-Erik Isabelle
The Cryosphere, 18, 2783–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations over several winters at two boreal sites in eastern Canada show that rain-on-snow (ROS) events lead to the formation of melt–freeze layers and that preferential flow is an important water transport mechanism in the sub-canopy snowpack. Simulations with SNOWPACK generally show good agreement with observations, except for the reproduction of melt–freeze layers. This was improved by simulating intercepted snow microstructure evolution, which also modulates ROS-induced runoff.
Daniela Brito Melo, Armin Sigmund, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 18, 1287–1313, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1287-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow saltation – the transport of snow close to the surface – occurs when the wind blows over a snow-covered surface with sufficient strength. This phenomenon is represented in some climate models; however, with limited accuracy. By performing numerical simulations and a detailed analysis of previous works, we show that snow saltation is characterized by two regimes. This is not represented in climate models in a consistent way, which hinders the quantification of snow transport and sublimation.
Riccardo Barella, Mathias Bavay, Francesca Carletti, Nicola Ciapponi, Valentina Premier, and Carlo Marin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2892, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry, traditionally confined to school labs, this paper demonstrates its application in the field for accurate measurement of liquid water content in snow. Dispelling misconceptions about measurement uncertainty, it provide a robust protocol and quantifies associated uncertainties. The findings endorse the broader adoption of melting calorimetry for quantification of snow liquid water content in operational context.
Dylan Reynolds, Ethan Gutmann, Bert Kruyt, Michael Haugeneder, Tobias Jonas, Franziska Gerber, Michael Lehning, and Rebecca Mott
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The challenge of running geophysical models is often compounded by the question of where to obtain appropriate data to give as input to a model. Here we present the HICAR model, a simplified atmospheric model capable of running at spatial resolutions of hectometers for long time series or over large domains. This makes physically consistent atmospheric data available at the spatial and temporal scales needed for some terrestrial modeling applications, for example seasonal snow forecasting.
Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Giacomo Bertoldi, Riccardo Barella, Claudia Notarnicola, and Lorenzo Bruzzone
The Cryosphere, 17, 2387–2407, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2387-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2387-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The large amount of information regularly acquired by satellites can provide important information about SWE. We explore the use of multi-source satellite data, in situ observations, and a degree-day model to reconstruct daily SWE at 25 m. The results show spatial patterns that are consistent with the topographical features as well as with a reference product. Being able to also reproduce interannual variability, the method has great potential for hydrological and ecological applications.
Hongxiang Yu, Guang Li, Benjamin Walter, Michael Lehning, Jie Zhang, and Ning Huang
The Cryosphere, 17, 639–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-639-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow cornices lead to the potential risk of causing snow avalanche hazards, which are still unknown so far. We carried out a wind tunnel experiment in a cold lab to investigate the environmental conditions for snow cornice accretion recorded by a camera. The length growth rate of the cornices reaches a maximum for wind speeds approximately 40 % higher than the threshold wind speed. Experimental results improve our understanding of the cornice formation process.
Varun Sharma, Franziska Gerber, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 719–749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-719-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Most current generation climate and weather models have a relatively simplistic description of snow and snow–atmosphere interaction. One reason for this is the belief that including an advanced snow model would make the simulations too computationally demanding. In this study, we bring together two state-of-the-art models for atmosphere (WRF) and snow cover (SNOWPACK) and highlight both the feasibility and necessity of such coupled models to explore underexplored phenomena in the cryosphere.
Océane Hames, Mahdi Jafari, David Nicholas Wagner, Ian Raphael, David Clemens-Sewall, Chris Polashenski, Matthew D. Shupe, Martin Schneebeli, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6429–6449, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6429-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents an Eulerian–Lagrangian snow transport model implemented in the fluid dynamics software OpenFOAM, which we call snowBedFoam 1.0. We apply this model to reproduce snow deposition on a piece of ridged Arctic sea ice, which was produced during the MOSAiC expedition through scan measurements. The model appears to successfully reproduce the enhanced snow accumulation and deposition patterns, although some quantitative uncertainties were shown.
Francesca Carletti, Adrien Michel, Francesca Casale, Alice Burri, Daniele Bocchiola, Mathias Bavay, and Michael Lehning
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3447–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
High Alpine catchments are dominated by the melting of seasonal snow cover and glaciers, whose amount and seasonality are expected to be modified by climate change. This paper compares the performances of different types of models in reproducing discharge among two catchments under present conditions and climate change. Despite many advantages, the use of simpler models for climate change applications is controversial as they do not fully represent the physics of the involved processes.
David N. Wagner, Matthew D. Shupe, Christopher Cox, Ola G. Persson, Taneil Uttal, Markus M. Frey, Amélie Kirchgaessner, Martin Schneebeli, Matthias Jaggi, Amy R. Macfarlane, Polona Itkin, Stefanie Arndt, Stefan Hendricks, Daniela Krampe, Marcel Nicolaus, Robert Ricker, Julia Regnery, Nikolai Kolabutin, Egor Shimanshuck, Marc Oggier, Ian Raphael, Julienne Stroeve, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 16, 2373–2402, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on measurements of the snow cover over sea ice and atmospheric measurements, we estimate snowfall and snow accumulation for the MOSAiC ice floe, between November 2019 and May 2020. For this period, we estimate 98–114 mm of precipitation. We suggest that about 34 mm of snow water equivalent accumulated until the end of April 2020 and that at least about 50 % of the precipitated snow was eroded or sublimated. Further, we suggest explanations for potential snowfall overestimation.
Joel Fiddes, Kristoffer Aalstad, and Michael Lehning
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1753–1768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1753-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study describes and evaluates a new downscaling scheme that addresses the need for hillslope-scale atmospheric forcing time series for modelling the local impact of regional climate change on the land surface in mountain areas. The method has a global scope and is able to generate all model forcing variables required for hydrological and land surface modelling. This is important, as impact models require high-resolution forcings such as those generated here to produce meaningful results.
Adrien Michel, Bettina Schaefli, Nander Wever, Harry Zekollari, Michael Lehning, and Hendrik Huwald
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1063–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1063-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an extensive study of climate change impacts on river temperature in Switzerland. Results show that, even for low-emission scenarios, water temperature increase will lead to adverse effects for both ecosystems and socio-economic sectors throughout the 21st century. For high-emission scenarios, the effect will worsen. This study also shows that water seasonal warming will be different between the Alpine regions and the lowlands. Finally, efficiency of models is assessed.
Mathias Bavay, Michael Reisecker, Thomas Egger, and Daniela Korhammer
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 365–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most users struggle with the configuration of numerical models. This can be improved by relying on a GUI, but this requires a significant investment and a specific skill set and does not fit with the daily duties of model developers, leading to major maintenance burdens. Inishell generates a GUI on the fly based on an XML description of the required configuration elements, making maintenance very simple. This concept has been shown to work very well in our context.
Xiaodan Wu, Kathrin Naegeli, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Dujuan Ma, Jingping Wang, and Stefan Wunderle
The Cryosphere, 15, 4261–4279, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4261-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We performed a comprehensive accuracy assessment of an Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer global area coverage snow-cover extent time series dataset for the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region. The sensor-to-sensor consistency, the accuracy related to snow depth, elevations, land-cover types, slope, and aspects, and topographical variability were also explored. Our analysis shows an overall accuracy of 94 % in comparison with in situ station data, which is the same with MOD10A1 V006.
Pirmin Philipp Ebner, Franziska Koch, Valentina Premier, Carlo Marin, Florian Hanzer, Carlo Maria Carmagnola, Hugues François, Daniel Günther, Fabiano Monti, Olivier Hargoaa, Ulrich Strasser, Samuel Morin, and Michael Lehning
The Cryosphere, 15, 3949–3973, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3949-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A service to enable real-time optimization of grooming and snow-making at ski resorts was developed and evaluated using both GNSS-measured snow depth and spaceborne snow maps derived from Copernicus Sentinel-2. The correlation to the ground observation data was high. Potential sources for the overestimation of the snow depth by the simulations are mainly the impact of snow redistribution by skiers, compensation of uneven terrain, or spontaneous local adaptions of the snow management.
Cited articles
Achammer, T. and Denoth, A.: Snow dielectric properties: from DC to microwave X-band, Annals of Glaciology, 19, 92–96, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500011034, 1994. a
Anttila, K., Manninen, T., Karjalainen, T., Lahtinen, P., Riihelä, A., and Siljamo, N.: The temporal and spatial variability in submeter scale surface roughness of seasonal snow in Sodankylä Finnish Lapland in 2009–2010, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119, 9236–9252, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021597, 2014. a, b
Arslan, A., Wang, H., Pulliainen, J., and Hallikainen, M.: Scattering from wet snow by applying strong fluctuation theory, Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 17, 1009–1024, https://doi.org/10.1163/156939303322519081, 2003. a
Avanzi, F., Hirashima, H., Yamaguchi, S., Katsushima, T., and De Michele, C.: Observations of capillary barriers and preferential flow in layered snow during cold laboratory experiments, The Cryosphere, 10, 2013–2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2013-2016, 2016. a, b
Barella, R., Marin, C., Mattia, C., Gianinetto, M., Moranduzzo, T., and Notarnicola, C.: A Low-Cost Portable Automatic System for Snow Surface Roughness Measurements Based on Digital Photography, in: 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, 5562–5565, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553989, 2021. a
Barella, R., Bavay, M., Carletti, F., Ciapponi, N., Premier, V., and Marin, C.: Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry: a field protocol for liquid water content measurement in snow, The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d
Barella, R., Bavay, M., Carletti, F., Mazza, A., Scheidt, K. T., Walter, B., and Marin, C.: Characterizing Snow Roughness: A Novel Low-Cost Portable Tool Based on Charuco Board and Digital Photography, SSRN Electronic Journal [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5333224, 2025. a, b, c
Bartelt, P. and Lehning, M.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning: Part I: numerical model, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 35, 123–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00074-5, 2002. a
Bellaire, S., van Herwijnen, A., Mitterer, C., and Schweizer, J.: On forecasting wet-snow avalanche activity using simulated snow cover data, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 144, 28–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.09.013, 2017. a
Beniston, M. and Stoffel, M.: Rain-on-snow events, floods and climate change in the Alps: Events may increase with warming up to 4°C and decrease thereafter, Science of The Total Environment, 571, 228–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.146, 2016. a
Beniston, M., Farinotti, D., Stoffel, M., Andreassen, L. M., Coppola, E., Eckert, N., Fantini, A., Giacona, F., Hauck, C., Huss, M., Huwald, H., Lehning, M., López-Moreno, J.-I., Magnusson, J., Marty, C., Morán-Tejéda, E., Morin, S., Naaim, M., Provenzale, A., Rabatel, A., Six, D., Stötter, J., Strasser, U., Terzago, S., and Vincent, C.: The European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and future challenges, The Cryosphere, 12, 759–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-759-2018, 2018. a
Benninga, H.-J. F., van der Velde, R., and Su, Z.: Sentinel-1 soil moisture content and its uncertainty over sparsely vegetated fields, Journal of Hydrology X, 9, 100066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100066, 2020. a
Brangers, I., Marshall, H.-P., De Lannoy, G., Dunmire, D., Mätzler, C., and Lievens, H.: Tower-based C-band radar measurements of an alpine snowpack, The Cryosphere, 18, 3177–3193, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3177-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d
Brogioni, M., Pettinato, S., Macelloni, G., Paloscia, S., Pampaloni, P., Pierdicca, N., and Ticconi, F.: Sensitivity of bistatic scattering to soil moisture and surface roughness of bare soils, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31, 4227–4255, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903232808, 2010. a
Carletti, F.: multitemporal-s1-backscattering, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17542638, 2025. a
Carletti, F., Bavay, M., Ghielmini, C., Bonardi, M., Leibersperger, P., Philippe, V. M., Bozzoli, M., Marin, C., Steijn, C., Geiser, M., Bertoldi, G., Grünenfelder, L. N., Premier, V., and Barella, R.: SnowTinel high-temporal-resolution ground truth dataset for SAR remote sensing of snow, Envidat [data set], https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.574, 2025. a
Chang, W., Ding, K.-H., Tsang, L., and Xu, X.: Microwave Scattering and Medium Characterization for Terrestrial Snow With QCA–Mie and Bicontinuous Models: Comparison Studies, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 3637–3648, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2522438, 2016. a, b
Conger, S. M. and McClung, D. M.: Comparison of density cutters for snow profile observations, Journal of Glaciology, 55, 163–169, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309788609038, 2009. a
Copernicus: Copernicus data hub, https://scihub.copernicus.eu/, last access: 20 July 2025. a
Darychuk, S. E., Shea, J. M., Menounos, B., Chesnokova, A., Jost, G., and Weber, F.: Snowmelt characterization from optical and synthetic-aperture radar observations in the La Joie Basin, British Columbia, The Cryosphere, 17, 1457–1473, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1457-2023, 2023. a, b
Denoth, A.: Snow dielectric measurements, Advances in Space Research, 9, 233–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(89)90491-2, 1989. a
Denoth, A.: An electronic device for long-term snow wetness recording, Annals of Glaciology, 19, 104–106, https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500011058, 1994. a
Denoth, A., Foglar, A., Weiland, P., Mätzler, C., Aebischer, H., Tiuri, M., and Sihvola, A.: A comparative study of instruments for measuring the liquid water content of snow, Journal of Applied Physics, 56, 2154–2160, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334215, 1984. a, b
Dingman, S.: Physical Hydrology, Waveland Press, Incorporated, ISBN 9781478611189, https://books.google.ch/books?id=hhWojwEACAAJ (last access: 20 July 2025), 2015. a
Donahue, C., Skiles, S. M., and Hammonds, K.: Mapping liquid water content in snow at the millimeter scale: an intercomparison of mixed-phase optical property models using hyperspectral imaging and in situ measurements, The Cryosphere, 16, 43–59, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-43-2022, 2022. a, b
Endrizzi, S., Gruber, S., Dall'Amico, M., and Rigon, R.: GEOtop 2.0: simulating the combined energy and water balance at and below the land surface accounting for soil freezing, snow cover and terrain effects, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2831–2857, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2831-2014, 2014. a
Fassnacht, S., Williams, M., and Corrao, M.: Changes in the surface roughness of snow from millimetre to metre scales, Ecological Complexity, 6, 221–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.05.003, 2009. a
FPGA Company: SLF InfraSnow Sensor, https://fpga-company.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/InfraSnow-User-Manual-Version-1.01.pdf, last access: 20 July 2025. a
Fromm, R., Baumgärtner, S., Leitinger, G., Tasser, E., and Höller, P.: Determining the drivers for snow gliding, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1891–1903, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1891-2018, 2018. a
Fung, A., Li, Z., and Chen, K.: Backscattering from a randomly rough dielectric surface, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30, 356–369, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.134085, 1992. a
Gagliano, E., Shean, D., Henderson, S., and Vanderwilt, S.: Capturing the Onset of Mountain Snowmelt Runoff Using Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar, Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105303,2023. a, b
Gergely, M., Wolfsperger, F., and Schneebeli, M.: Simulation and Validation of the InfraSnow: An Instrument to Measure Snow Optically Equivalent Grain Size, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 4236–4247, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2280502, 2014. a
Günther, D., Marke, T., Essery, R., and Strasser, U.: Uncertainties in Snowpack Simulations – Assessing the Impact of Model Structure, Parameter Choice, and Forcing Data Error on Point-Scale Energy Balance Snow Model Performance, Water Resources Research, 55, 2779–2800, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403, 2019. a
Hallikainen, M., Ulaby, F., and Abdelrazik, M.: Dielectric properties of snow in the 3 to 37 GHz range, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 34, 1329–1340, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1986.1143757, 1986. a, b
HannaInstrumentsInc.: HI98501 (Checktemp®) Instruction Manual, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA, https://www.documentation.hannainst.com/manuals/preview/1431 (last access: 07 November 2025), 2018. a
Husman, S. D. R., Hu, Z., Wouters, B., Munneke, P. K., Veldhuijsen, S., and Lhermitte, S.: Remote Sensing of Surface Melt on Antarctica: Opportunities and Challenges, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16, 2462–2480, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3216953, 2023. a
Karbou, F., Veyssière, G., Coleou, C., Dufour, A., Gouttevin, I., Durand, P., Gascoin, S., and Grizonnet, M.: Monitoring Wet Snow Over an Alpine Region Using Sentinel-1 Observations, Remote Sensing, 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030381, 2021. a
Kattelmann, R. and Dozier, J.: Observations of snowpack ripening in the Sierra Nevada, California, U.S.A., Journal of Glaciology, 45, 409–416, https://doi.org/10.3189/S002214300000126X, 1999. a
Kawashima, K., Endo, T., and Takeuchi, Y.: A portable calorimeter for measuring liquid-water content of wet snow, Annals of Glaciology, 26, 103–106, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-103-106, 1998. a
Kinar, N. J. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Measurement of the physical properties of the snowpack, Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 481–544, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000481, 2015. a, b
Koch, F., Prasch, M., Schmid, L., Schweizer, J., and Mauser, W.: Measuring Snow Liquid Water Content with Low-Cost GPS Receivers, Sensors, 14, 20975–20999, https://doi.org/10.3390/s141120975, 2014. a, b
Krol, Q., Scherrer, E., Skuntz, M., Codd, S., Hansen, A., and Seymour, J.: Rapid MRI profiling of liquid water content in snow: Melt and stability during first wetting and rain on snow events, in: Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Montana State University Library, Tromsø, Norway, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/objects/ISSW2024_O3.11.pdf (last access: 20 July 2025), 2024. a
Leduc-Leballeur, M., Picard, G., Mialon, A., Arnaud, L., Lefebvre, E., Possenti, P., and Kerr, Y.: Modeling L-Band Brightness Temperature at Dome C in Antarctica and Comparison With SMOS Observations, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53, 4022–4032, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2388790, 2015. a
Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: a detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrological Processes, 20, 2111–2128, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6204, 2006. a
Lehning, M., Grünewald, T., and Schirmer, M.: Mountain snow distribution governed by an altitudinal gradient and terrain roughness, Geophysical Research Letters, 38, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048927, 2011. a
Lin, C.-C., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Schüttemeyer, D., Davidson, M. W. J., Kern, M., Kontu, A., Lemmetyinen, J., Pulliainen, J., Wiesmann, A., Werner, C. L., Mätzler, C., Schneebeli, M., Proksch, M., and Nagler, T.: Active Microwave Scattering Signature of Snowpack – Continuous Multiyear SnowScat Observation Experiments, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9, 3849–3869, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2560168, 2016. a
Lodigiani, M., Marin, C., and Pasian, M.: Mixed Analytical-Numerical Modeling of Radar Backscattering for Seasonal Snowpacks, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 18, 3461–3471, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3521612, 2025. a, b
Lombardo, M., Fees, A., Udke, A., Meusburger, K., van Herwijnen, A., Schweizer, J., and Lehmann, P.: Capillary suction across the soil-snow interface as a mechanism for the formation of wet basal layers under gliding snowpacks, Journal of Glaciology, 1–46, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2025.2, 2025. a
Lund, J., Forster, R. R., Deeb, E. J., Liston, G. E., Skiles, S. M., and Marshall, H.-P.: Interpreting Sentinel-1 SAR Backscatter Signals of Snowpack Surface Melt/Freeze, Warming, and Ripening, through Field Measurements and Physically-Based SnowModel, Remote Sensing, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164002, 2022. a, b, c
Lundberg, A., Granlund, N., and Gustafsson, D.: Towards automated `Ground truth' snow measurements – a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland, Hydrological Processes, 24, 1955–1970, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658, 2010. a
Magagi, R. and Bernier, M.: Optimal conditions for wet snow detection using RADARSAT SAR data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, 221–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00104-9, 2003. a
Manninen, T., Anttila, K., Karjalainen, T., and Lahtinen, P.: Automatic snow surface roughness estimation using digital photos, Journal of Glaciology, 58, 993–1007, https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J144, 2012. a, b, c
Marin, C., Bertoldi, G., Premier, V., Callegari, M., Brida, C., Hürkamp, K., Tschiersch, J., Zebisch, M., and Notarnicola, C.: Use of Sentinel-1 radar observations to evaluate snowmelt dynamics in alpine regions, The Cryosphere, 14, 935–956, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-935-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q
Marty, C. and Meister, R.: Long-term snow and weather observations at Weissfluhjoch and its relation to other high-altitude observatories in the Alps, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0584-3, 2012. a
Meloche, J., Langlois, A., Rutter, N., Royer, A., King, J., Walker, B., Marsh, P., and Wilcox, E. J.: Characterizing tundra snow sub-pixel variability to improve brightness temperature estimation in satellite SWE retrievals, The Cryosphere, 16, 87–101, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-87-2022, 2022. a
Meloche, J., Leroux, N. R., Montpetit, B., Vionnet, V., and Derksen, C.: Radar-equivalent snowpack: reducing the number of snow layers while retaining their microwave properties and bulk snow mass, The Cryosphere, 19, 2949–2962, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2949-2025, 2025. a
Miranda, N., Meadows, P., Hajduch, G., Pilgrim, A., Piantanida, R., Giudici, D., Small, D., Schubert, A., Husson, R., Vincent, P., Mouche, A., Johnsen, H., and Palumbo, G.: The Sentinel-1A instrument and operational product performance status, in: 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2824–2827, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326402, 2015. a
Mitchell, K. A. and Tiedje, T.: Growth and fluctuations of suncups on alpine snowpacks, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001724, 2010. a
Moldestad, D. A.: Characterisation of liquid water content and snow density in a cross-country race ski track, Bulletin of glaciological research, 22, 39–49, 2005. a
Murfitt, J., Duguay, C., Picard, G., and Lemmetyinen, J.: Forward modelling of synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) backscatter during lake ice melt conditions using the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer (SMRT) model, The Cryosphere, 18, 869–888, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-869-2024, 2024. a, b
Mätzler, C.: Applications of the interaction of microwaves with the natural snow cover, Remote Sensing Reviews, 2, 259–387, https://doi.org/10.1080/02757258709532086, 1987. a, b
Naderpour, R., Schwank, M., Houtz, D., Werner, C., and Mätzler, C.: Wideband Backscattering From Alpine Snow Cover: A Full-Season Study, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3112772, 2022. a
Nagler, T., Rott, H., Ripper, E., Bippus, G., and Hetzenecker, M.: Advancements for Snowmelt Monitoring by Means of Sentinel-1 SAR, Remote Sensing, 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040348, 2016. a, b, c, d
Perla, R. and Banner, J.: Calibration of capacitive cells for measuring water in snow, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 15, 225–231, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(88)90069-9, 1988. a
Pfeffer, W. T. and Humphrey, N. F.: Formation of ice layers by infiltration and refreezing of meltwater, Annals of Glaciology, 26, 83–91, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG26-1-83-91, 1998. a
Picard, G., Sandells, M., and Löwe, H.: SMRT: an active–passive microwave radiative transfer model for snow with multiple microstructure and scattering formulations (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2763–2788, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2763-2018, 2018. a, b
Picard, G., Leduc-Leballeur, M., Banwell, A. F., Brucker, L., and Macelloni, G.: The sensitivity of satellite microwave observations to liquid water in the Antarctic snowpack, The Cryosphere, 16, 5061–5083, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-5061-2022, 2022a. a, b
Picard, G., Löwe, H., and Mätzler, C.: Brief communication: A continuous formulation of microwave scattering from fresh snow to bubbly ice from first principles, The Cryosphere, 16, 3861–3866, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3861-2022, 2022b. a
Picard, G., Löwe, H., Domine, F., Arnaud, L., Larue, F., Favier, V., Le Meur, E., Lefebvre, E., Savarino, J., and Royer, A.: The Microwave Snow Grain Size: A New Concept to Predict Satellite Observations Over Snow-Covered Regions, AGU Advances, 3, e2021AV000630, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000630, 2022c. a, b, c
Porod, G.: Die Röntgenkleinwinkelstreuung von dichtgepackten kolloiden Systemen, Kolloid-Zeitschrift, 124, 83–114, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01512792, 1951. a
Post, A. and LaChapelle, E. R.: Glacier ice, University of Toronto Press, ISBN 0-295-97910-0, 2000. a
Proksch, M., Mätzler, C., Wiesmann, A., Lemmetyinen, J., Schwank, M., Löwe, H., and Schneebeli, M.: MEMLS3&a: Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks adapted to include backscattering, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2611–2626, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2611-2015, 2015. a
Proksch, M., Rutter, N., Fierz, C., and Schneebeli, M.: Intercomparison of snow density measurements: bias, precision, and vertical resolution, The Cryosphere, 10, 371–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016, 2016. a, b
Quegan, S. and Yu, J. J.: Filtering of multichannel SAR images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 2373–2379, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.964973, 2001. a
Quéno, L., Vionnet, V., Cabot, F., Vrécourt, D., and Dombrowski-Etchevers, I.: Forecasting and modelling ice layer formation on the snowpack due to freezing precipitation in the Pyrenees, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 146, 19–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.007, 2018. a
Raleigh, M. S., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015. a
Rott, H., Scheiblauer, S., Wuite, J., Krieger, L., Floricioiu, D., Rizzoli, P., Libert, L., and Nagler, T.: Penetration of interferometric radar signals in Antarctic snow, The Cryosphere, 15, 4399–4419, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4399-2021, 2021. a
Sandells, M., Löwe, H., Picard, G., Dumont, M., Essery, R., Floury, N., Kontu, A., Lemmetyinen, J., Maslanka, W., Morin, S., Wiesmann, A., and Mätzler, C.: X-Ray Tomography-Based Microstructure Representation in the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer Model, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3086412, 2022. a
Schmid, L., Heilig, A., Mitterer, C., Schweizer, J., Maurer, H., Okorn, R., and Eisen, O.: Continuous snowpack monitoring using upward-looking ground-penetrating radar technology, Journal of Glaciology, 60, 509–525, https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J084, 2014. a
Schwerdt, M., Schmidt, K., Tous Ramon, N., Klenk, P., Yague-Martinez, N., Prats-Iraola, P., Zink, M., and Geudtner, D.: Independent System Calibration of Sentinel-1B, Remote Sensing, 9, 511, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060511, 2017. a
Shi, J. and Dozier, J.: Inferring snow wetness using C-band data from SIR-C's polarimetric synthetic aperture radar, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33, 905–914, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.406676, 1995. a, b, c, d
Shi, J., Dozier, J., and Rott, H.: Deriving snow liquid water content using C-band polarimetric SAR, in: Proceedings of IGARSS '93 – IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 3, 1038–1041, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322643, 1993. a
Smith, C. D., Kontu, A., Laffin, R., and Pomeroy, J. W.: An assessment of two automated snow water equivalent instruments during the WMO Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment, The Cryosphere, 11, 101–116, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-101-2017, 2017. a
Soriot, C., Picard, G., Prigent, C., Frappart, F., and Domine, F.: Year-round sea ice and snow characterization from combined passive and active microwave observations and radiative transfer modeling, Remote Sensing of Environment, 278, 113061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113061, 2022. a
Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E., Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., Traver, I. N., Deghaye, P., Duesmann, B., Rosich, B., Miranda, N., Bruno, C., L'Abbate, M., Croci, R., Pietropaolo, A., Huchler, M., and Rostan, F.: GMES Sentinel-1 mission, Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028, 2012. a
Ulaby, F. T. and Stiles, W. H.: Microwave response of snow, Advances in Space Research, 1, 131–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(81)90389-6, 1981. a, b
Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., and K., F. A.: Microwave Remote Sensing. Active and Passive, Vol. 3. From Theory to Applications, Norwood, MA: Artech House Inc., ISBN 0 89006 192 0, Geological Magazine, 124, p. 88, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800015831, 1987. a
Veyssière, G., Karbou, F., Morin, S., Lafaysse, M., and Vionnet, V.: Evaluation of Sub-Kilometric Numerical Simulations of C-Band Radar Backscatter over the French Alps against Sentinel-1 Observations, Remote Sensing, 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010008, 2019. a, b, c
Viviroli, D. and Weingartner, R.: The hydrological significance of mountains: from regional to global scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 1017–1030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-1017-2004, 2004. a
Wever, N., Würzer, S., Fierz, C., and Lehning, M.: Simulating ice layer formation under the presence of preferential flow in layered snowpacks, The Cryosphere, 10, 2731–2744, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2731-2016, 2016. a
Wiesmann, A. and Mätzler, C.: Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks, Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 307–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00046-2, 1999. a, b
Williams, L. D. and Gallagher, J. G.: The Relation of Millimeter-Wavelength Backscatter to Surface Snow Properties, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-25, 188–194, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1987.289817, 1987. a
Wolfsperger, F., Fierz, C., and Schneebeli, M.: Evaluation of the InfraSnow: a handheld device to measure snow specific surface area (SSA), in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Snow 2022, Davos, Switzerland, 2022, Poster presented at the International Symposium on Snow 2022, Davos, September 29, 2022, 2022. a, b
Wolfsperger, F., Geisser, M., Ziegler, S., and Löwe, H.: A new handheld capacitive sensor to measure snow density and liquid water content, in: Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop 2023, Bend, Oregon, USA, 1532–1536, https://arc.lib.montana.edu/snow-science/item/3092 (last access: 07 November 2025), 2023. a, b, c
Würzer, S., Jonas, T., Wever, N., and Lehning, M.: Influence of Initial Snowpack Properties on Runoff Formation during Rain-on-Snow Events, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17, 1801–1815, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0181.1, 2016. a
Yueh, S. H., Dinardo, S. J., Akgiray, A., West, R., Cline, D. W., and Elder, K.: Airborne Ku-Band Polarimetric Radar Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Snow Cover, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47, 3347–3364, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2022945, 2009. a
Zuanon, N.: IceCube, a portable and reliable instrument for snow specific surface area measurement in the field, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:128982547 (last access: 20 July 2025), 2013. a
Short summary
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet-snow properties for satellite applications. With it, we validate links between Sentinel-1 backscatter and snowmelt stages and investigate scattering mechanisms through a radiative transfer model. We disclose the influence of liquid water content and surface roughness at different melting stages and address future challenges, such as capturing large-scale scattering mechanisms and enhancing radiative transfer modules for wet snow.
This work presents the first high-resolution dataset of wet-snow properties for satellite...
