Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3253-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3253-2025
Brief communication
 | 
25 Aug 2025
Brief communication |  | 25 Aug 2025

Brief communication: Representation of heat conduction into ice in marine ice shelf melt modelling

Jonathan Wiskandt and Nicolas C. Jourdain

Related authors

Basal melt rates and ocean circulation under the Ryder Glacier ice tongue and their response to climate warming: a high-resolution modelling study
Jonathan Wiskandt, Inga Monika Koszalka, and Johan Nilsson
The Cryosphere, 17, 2755–2777, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2755-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2755-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Adcroft, A. J., Hill, C., Campin, J. M., Marshall, J., and Heimbach, P.: Overview of the formulation and numerics of the MIT GCM, in: Proceedings of the ECMWF seminar series on Numerical Methods, Recent developments in numerical methods for atmosphere and ocean modelling, ECMWF, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/7642-overview-formulation-and-numerics-mit-gcm (last access: 4 July 2023), 139–149, 2004. a, b
Comeau, D., Asay-Davis, X. S., Begeman, C. B., Hoffman, M. J., Lin, W., Petersen, M. R., Price, S. F., Roberts, A. F., Van Roekel, L. P., Veneziani, M., Wolfe, J. D., Fyke, J. G., Ryngler, T. D., and Tuner, A. T.: The DOE E3SM v1.2 cryosphere configuration: description and simulated Antarctic ice-shelf basal melting, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 14, e2021MS002468,https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002468, 2022. a
Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765–789, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-765-2017, 2017. a
De Rydt, J. and Naughten, K.: Geometric amplification and suppression of ice-shelf basal melt in West Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 18, 1863–1888, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1863-2024, 2024. a, b
Dinniman, M. S., Asay-Davis, X. S., Galton-Fenzi, B. K., Holland, P. R., Jenkins, A., and Timmermann, R.: Modeling ice shelf/ocean interaction in Antarctica: a review, Oceanography, 29, 144–153, 2016. a
Download
Short summary
In ocean models, submarine melt of ice shelves is parameterized based on the heat budget at the ice–ocean interface. The heat budget includes the ocean heat transport, the heat conducted into the ice, and the heat available for melting. Here we compare three different approaches to estimating the heat conduction into the ice. We show that the most used approximation is not the most accurate one: it overestimates the melt by up to 25 % compared to the more accurate approximations.
Share