Articles | Volume 20, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4313-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-4313-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Climatology and Interannual Variations in Arctic Winter Sea Ice Leads in the ICESat-2 Era
Mengnan Zhao
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
JANUS Research Group, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA, USA
Christopher Little
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
JANUS Research Group, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, 131 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA, USA
Nathan Kurtz
Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Rachel Tilling
Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Jesse Wimert
Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD, USA
KBR, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Related authors
Rui M. Ponte, E. Nishchitha S. Silva, Ou Wang, Ichiro Fukumori, and Mengnan Zhao
Ocean Sci., 22, 2179–2196, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean bottom pressure (pb) is a key variable for monitoring the ocean circulation, yet global space gravimetry observations offer limited coverage in space and time. Our work examines how to improve estimates of pb by optimally combining information in available data with an ocean circulation model. Results indicate that gravimetry data contain information complementary to that available in other ocean datasets and are thus important for determining variations in pb and related circulations.
Lara Börger, Michael Schindelegger, Mengnan Zhao, Rui M. Ponte, Anno Löcher, Bernd Uebbing, Jean-Marc Molines, and Thierry Penduff
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 75–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-75-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-75-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flows in the ocean are driven either by atmospheric forces or by small-scale internal disturbances that are inherently chaotic. We use computer simulation results to show that these chaotic oceanic disturbances can attain spatial scales large enough to alter the motion of Earth's pole of rotation. Given their size and unpredictable nature, the chaotic signals are a source of uncertainty when interpreting observed year-to-year polar motion changes in terms of other processes in the Earth system.
Patrick C. Taylor, Armin Sorooshian, Rei Ueyama, Sebastian Schmidt, Ihab Abboud, Quincy Allison, Kevin Barry, Sebastian Becker, Holly A. Bender, Joseph R. Bennett, James B. Blair, Niklas Bohn, Linette Boisvert, Matthew D. Brown, Roelof Bruintjes, Anthony Bucholtz, Megan Buzanowicz, Brian Cairns, Filippo Calì Quaglia, Eduard Chemyakin, Bo Chen, Gao Chen, Hong Chen, Yu-Wen Chen, Zezhen Cheng, Swarup China, Dan Chirica, Yonghoon Choi, Peter Colarco, Brian Collister, Ewan Crosbie, Maurice J. Cross, Janet Daniels, Paul DeMott, Joshua P. DiGangi, Alcide Giorgio di Sarra, Glenn S. Diskin, Erica K. Dolinar, Eva-Lou Edwards, Samuel Ephraim, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Francesca Gallo, Lan Gao, José Luis Gómez-Amo, Daisy Gonzalez, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Pawan Gupta, Ivan Heckman, Michael Hendrickson, Miguel Ricardo A. Hilario, Ken Hirata, Michelle Hofton, Andrew L. Holen, Ulas Im, Alia L. Khan, Ralph Kahn, Alexei V. Korolev, Sonia Kreidenweis, Thomas Krumpen, Nathan Kurtz, Leslie Lait, Bradley Lamkin, Jack Landy, Nurun Nahar Lata, Paul Lawson, Samuel LeBlanc, Sean Leavor, Jing Li, Thorsten Markus, Hal Maring, Andreas H. Massling, Camille Mavis, Flynn McGinnity, Kerry Meyer, Gabriel Mojica, Richard H. Moore, Parker Morris, Giovanni Muscari, Vikas Nataraja, Amin R. Nehrir, Athanasios Nenes, Edward P. Nowottnick, Matteo Ottaviani, Chelsea Parker, Ryan Patnaude, Michael Perez, Russell J. Perkins, Colten Peterson, Alek Petty, Stevie Phothisane, Chris Polashenski, Kerri A. Pratt, Kayla M. Preisler, John Prytherch, David Rabine, Jens Redemann, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Joseph S. Schlosser, Vanessa Selimovic, Michael A. Shook, Morgan Silverman, Henrik Skov, Alexander Smirnov, Cassidy Soloff, Amy Solomon, Snorre Stamnes, Azusa Takeishi, David R. Thompson, K. Lee Thornhill, Rachel Tilling, Michael Tjernström, Monica Tosco, Pedro C. Valdelomar, David Van Gilst, Jian Wang, Zhien Wang, Andrzej Wasilewski, Manfred Wendisch, Brent Wilder, Edward L. Winstead, Albert Wu, Peng Xian, Lauren M. Zamora, Jiaoshi Zhang, Lei Zhang, Lu Zhang, Luke Ziemba, and Paquita Zuidema
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-241, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This article summarizes the data sets collected during the Arctic Radiation Cloud aerosol Sea ice Interaction eXperiment (ARCSIX), NASA's most comprehensive Arctic field campaign to date. The overarching goal was to quantify the contributions of surface, clouds, aerosol particles, and precipitation to summer sea ice melt. This paper describes the ARCSIX implementation including the flight strategy, instruments, complementary data sets, access, and usage details.
Rui M. Ponte, E. Nishchitha S. Silva, Ou Wang, Ichiro Fukumori, and Mengnan Zhao
Ocean Sci., 22, 2179–2196, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-2179-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean bottom pressure (pb) is a key variable for monitoring the ocean circulation, yet global space gravimetry observations offer limited coverage in space and time. Our work examines how to improve estimates of pb by optimally combining information in available data with an ocean circulation model. Results indicate that gravimetry data contain information complementary to that available in other ocean datasets and are thus important for determining variations in pb and related circulations.
Xinlong Liu, Stuart Paul Corney, Rachel Louise Tilling, and Petra Heil
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-662, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-662, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Antarctic sea-ice thickness from satellites depends on how snow is treated. We compared four widely used CryoSat-2 radar products for winters 2013–2018 on the same map grid. All show similar large-scale patterns, but each gives systematically higher or lower values, with the biggest differences in the snowier western Weddell Sea. Year-to-year changes are similar across products, yet these offsets can shift thickness estimates, so users should account for product choice and snow assumptions.
Lara Börger, Michael Schindelegger, Mengnan Zhao, Rui M. Ponte, Anno Löcher, Bernd Uebbing, Jean-Marc Molines, and Thierry Penduff
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 75–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-75-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-75-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flows in the ocean are driven either by atmospheric forces or by small-scale internal disturbances that are inherently chaotic. We use computer simulation results to show that these chaotic oceanic disturbances can attain spatial scales large enough to alter the motion of Earth's pole of rotation. Given their size and unpredictable nature, the chaotic signals are a source of uncertainty when interpreting observed year-to-year polar motion changes in terms of other processes in the Earth system.
Michael Studinger, Benjamin E. Smith, Nathan Kurtz, Alek Petty, Tyler Sutterley, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 18, 2625–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use green lidar data and natural-color imagery over sea ice to quantify elevation biases potentially impacting estimates of change in ice thickness of the polar regions. We complement our analysis using a model of scattering of light in snow and ice that predicts the shape of lidar waveforms reflecting from snow and ice surfaces based on the shape of the transmitted pulse. We find that biased elevations exist in airborne and spaceborne data products from green lidars.
Steven Fons, Nathan Kurtz, and Marco Bagnardi
The Cryosphere, 17, 2487–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Antarctic sea ice thickness is an important quantity in the Earth system. Due to the thick and complex snow cover on Antarctic sea ice, estimating the thickness of the ice pack is difficult using traditional methods in radar altimetry. In this work, we use a waveform model to estimate the freeboard and snow depth of Antarctic sea ice from CryoSat-2 and use these values to calculate sea ice thickness and volume between 2010 and 2021 and showcase how the sea ice pack has changed over this time.
Robert Ricker, Steven Fons, Arttu Jutila, Nils Hutter, Kyle Duncan, Sinead L. Farrell, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
The Cryosphere, 17, 1411–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1411-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Information on sea ice surface topography is important for studies of sea ice as well as for ship navigation through ice. The ICESat-2 satellite senses the sea ice surface with six laser beams. To examine the accuracy of these measurements, we carried out a temporally coincident helicopter flight along the same ground track as the satellite and measured the sea ice surface topography with a laser scanner. This showed that ICESat-2 can see even bumps of only few meters in the sea ice cover.
Emma K. Fiedler, Matthew J. Martin, Ed Blockley, Davi Mignac, Nicolas Fournier, Andy Ridout, Andrew Shepherd, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 16, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice thickness (SIT) observations derived from CryoSat-2 satellite measurements have been successfully used to initialise an ocean and sea ice forecasting model (FOAM). Other centres have previously used gridded and averaged SIT observations for this purpose, but we demonstrate here for the first time that SIT measurements along the satellite orbit track can be used. Validation of the resulting modelled SIT demonstrates improvements in the model performance compared to a control.
Isolde A. Glissenaar, Jack C. Landy, Alek A. Petty, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Julienne C. Stroeve
The Cryosphere, 15, 4909–4927, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists can estimate sea ice thickness using satellites that measure surface height. To determine the sea ice thickness, we also need to know the snow depth and density. This paper shows that the chosen snow depth product has a considerable impact on the findings of sea ice thickness state and trends in Baffin Bay, showing mean thinning with some snow depth products and mean thickening with others. This shows that it is important to better understand and monitor snow depth on sea ice.
Cited articles
Alam, A.: Determination of surface turbulent fluxes over leads in Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 102, 3331–3343, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC03606, 1997. a, b
Assmy, P., Fernández-Méndez, M., Duarte, P., Meyer, A., Randelhoff, A., Mundy, C. J., Olsen, L. M., Kauko, H. M., Bailey, A., Chierici, M., Cohen, L., Doulgeris, A. P., Ehn, J. K., Fransson, A., Gerland, S., Hop, H., Hudson, S. R., Hughes, N., Itkin, P., Johnsen, G., King, J. A., Koch, B. P., Koenig, Z., Kwasniewski, S., Laney, S. R., Nicolaus, M., Pavlov, A. K., Polashenski, C. M., Provost, C., Rösel, A., Sandbu, M., Spreen, G., Smedsrud, L. H., Sundfjord, A., Taskjelle, T., Tatarek, A., Wiktor, J., Wagner, P. M., Wold, A., Steen, H., and Granskog, M. A.: Leads in Arctic pack ice enable early phytoplankton blooms below snow-covered sea ice, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40850, 2017. a
Br\öhan, D. and Kaleschke, L.: A nine-year climatology of arctic sea ice lead orientation and frequency from AMSR-E, Remote Sens., 6, 1451–1475, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021451, 2014. a
Bush, J. W. and Woods, A. W.: An investigation of the link between lead-induced thermohaline convection and Arctic eddies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1179–1182, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL002314, 2000. a
Christensen, H. M. and Driver, O. G.: The Fractal Nature of Clouds in Global Storm-Resolving Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095746, 2021. a
Danielson, S. L., Hennon, T. D., Hedstrom, K. S., Pnyushkov, A. V., Polyakov, I. V., Carmack, E., Filchuk, K., Janout, M., Makhotin, M., Williams, W. J., and Padman, L.: Oceanic Routing of Wind-Sourced Energy Along the Arctic Continental Shelves, Front. Mar. Sci., 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00509, 2020. a
Esau, I. N.: Amplification of turbulent exchange over wide Arctic leads: Large-eddy simulation study, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007225, 2007. a
Farrell, S. L., Duncan, K., Buckley, E. M., Richter-Menge, J., and Li, R.: Mapping Sea Ice Surface Topography in High Fidelity With ICESat-2, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090708, 2020. a, b
Fukumori, I., Wang, O., Llovel, W., Fenty, I., and Forget, G.: A near-uniform fluctuation of ocean bottom pressure and sea level across the deep ocean basins of the Arctic Ocean and the Nordic Seas, Prog. Oceanogr., 134, 152–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.013, 2015. a
Gryschka, M., Gryanik, V. M., Lüpkes, C., Mostafa, Z., Sühring, M., Witha, B., and Raasch, S.: Turbulent Heat Exchange Over Polar Leads Revisited: A Large Eddy Simulation Study, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038236, 2023. a
Heorton, H. D., Feltham, D. L., and Tsamados, M.: Stress and deformation characteristics of sea ice in a high-resolution, anisotropic sea ice model, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 376, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0349, 2018. a
Herman, A.: Wave-induced stress and breaking of sea ice in a coupled hydrodynamic discrete-element wave–ice model, The Cryosphere, 11, 2711–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2711-2017, 2017. a
Herzfeld, U., Trantow, T., Lawson, M., Han, H., Buckley, E., and Farrell, S.: ICESat-2 Derived Sea Ice Melt Pond Characteristics from the Density-Dimension Algorithm, Version 3, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/LLRQ29WG4MZH, 2024. a
Hoffman, J. P., Ackerman, S. A., Liu, Y., and Key, J. R.: The detection and characterization of arctic sea ice leads with satellite imagers, Remote Sens., 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050521, 2019. a
Horvat, C. and Tziperman, E.: The evolution of scaling laws in the sea ice floe size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 122, 7630–7650, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012573, 2017. a
Johansson, A. M., Brekke, C., Spreen, G., and King, J. A.: X-, C-, and L-band SAR signatures of newly formed sea ice in Arctic leads during winter and spring, Remote Sens. Environ., 204, 162–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.032, 2018. a
Kacimi, S. and Kwok, R.: Two Decades of Arctic Sea-Ice Thickness from Satellite Altimeters: Retrieval Approaches and Record of Changes (2003–2023), Remote Sens., 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162983, 2024. a
Koo, Y., Xie, H., Kurtz, N. T., Ackley, S. F., and Wang, W.: Sea ice surface type classification of ICESat-2 ATL07 data by using data-driven machine learning model: Ross Sea, Antarctic as an example, Remote Sens. Environ., 296, 113726, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSE.2023.113726, 2023. a
Kort, E. A., Wofsy, S. C., Daube, B. C., Diao, M., Elkins, J. W., Gao, R. S., Hintsa, E. J., Hurst, D. F., Jimenez, R., Moore, F. L., Spackman, J. R., and Zondlo, M. A.: Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north, Nat. Geosci., 5, 318–321, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1452, 2012. a
Kwok, R.: Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: Losses and coupled variability (1958–2018), Environ. Res. Lett., 13, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec, 2018. a
Kwok, R., Markus, T., Kurtz, N. T., Petty, A. A., Neumann, T. A., Farrell, S. L., Cunningham, G. F., Hancock, D. W., Ivanoff, A., and Wimert, J. T.: Surface Height and Sea Ice Freeboard of the Arctic Ocean From ICESat-2: Characteristics and Early Results, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 124, 6942–6959, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015486, 2019. a
Kwok, R., Petty, A., Bagnardi, M., Wimert, J. T., Cunningham, G. F., Hancock, D. W., Ivanoff, A., Kurtz, N., Kwok, R., Petty, A., Bagnardi, M., Wimert, J. T., Cunningham, G. F., Hancock, D. W., Ivanoff, A., and Kurtz, N.: ICE, CLOUD, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) Project Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Sea Ice Products, Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, https://doi.org/10.5067/9VT7NJWOTV3I, 2022. a, b, c, d
Liu, W., Tsamados, M., Petty, A., Jin, T., Chen, W., and Stroeve, J.: Enhanced sea ice classification for ICESat-2 using combined unsupervised and supervised machine learning, Remote Sens. Environ., 318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114607, 2025. a, b
Magruder, L. A., Neumann, T., Kurtz, N., Sutterley, T. C., Hancock, D., Vornberger, P., Robbins, J., and Smith, B.: Assessment of the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite‐2 performance against prime mission science requirements, Earth Space Sci., 12, 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004221, 2025. a
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B., Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., Jasinski, M., Kwok, R., Magruder, L., Lubin, D., Luthcke, S., Morison, J., Nelson, R., Neuenschwander, A., Palm, S., Popescu, S., Shum, C. K., Schutz, B. E., Smith, B., Yang, Y., and Zwally, J.: The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation, Remote Sens. Environ., 190, 260–273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029, 2017. a
Marsan, D., Stern, H., Lindsay, R., and Weiss, J.: Scale dependence and localization of the deformation of Arctic sea ice, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.178501, 2004. a
Maykut, G. A.: Large-scale heat exchange and ice production in the central Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 87, 7971–7984, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087IC10P07971, 1982. a
Miles, M. W. and Barry, R. G.: A 5-year satellite climatology of winter sea ice leads in the western Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 103, 21723–21734, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC01997, 1998. a, b
Muchow, M., Schmitt, A. U., and Kaleschke, L.: A lead-width distribution for Antarctic sea ice: a case study for the Weddell Sea with high-resolution Sentinel-2 images, The Cryosphere, 15, 4527–4537, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4527-2021, 2021. a
Petty, A. A., Bagnardi, M., Kurtz, N. T., Tilling, R., Fons, S., Armitage, T., Horvat, C., and Kwok, R.: Assessment of ICESat-2 Sea Ice Surface Classification with Sentinel-2 Imagery: Implications for Freeboard and New Estimates of Lead and Floe Geometry, Earth Space Sci., 8, e2020EA001 491, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001491, 2021. a, b, c, d
Qiu, Y., Li, X.-M., and Guo, H.: Spaceborne thermal infrared observations of Arctic sea ice leads at 30 m resolution, The Cryosphere, 17, 2829–2849, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2829-2023, 2023. a, b
Reiser, F., Willmes, S., and Heinemann, G.: A New Algorithm for Daily Sea Ice Lead Identification in the Arctic and Antarctic Winter from Thermal-Infrared Satellite Imagery, Remote Sens., https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.917588, 2020. a
Rothrock, D. A. and Thorndike, A. S.: Measuring the sea ice floe size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 89, 6477–6486, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC04p06477, 1984. a
Steer, A., Worby, A., and Heil, P.: Observed changes in sea-ice floe size distribution during early summer in the western Weddell Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 55, 933–942, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.12.016, 2008. a
Stern, H. L., Schweiger, A. J., Stark, M., Zhang, J., Steele, M., and Hwang, B.: Seasonal evolution of the sea-ice floe size distribution in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.305, 2018a. a, b
Stern, H. L., Schweiger, A. J., Zhang, J., and Steele, M.: On reconciling disparate studies of the sea-ice floe size distribution, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.304, 2018b. a, b
Studinger, M., Smith, B. E., Kurtz, N., Petty, A., Sutterley, T., and Tilling, R.: Estimating differential penetration of green (532 nm) laser light over sea ice with NASA's Airborne Topographic Mapper: observations and models, The Cryosphere, 18, 2625–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2625-2024, 2024. a
Tilling, R., Ridout, A., and Shepherd, A.: Assessing the Impact of Lead and Floe Sampling on Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Estimates from Envisat and CryoSat-2, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 124, 7473–7485, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015232, 2019. a, b, c, d
Tilling, R., Egido, A., Harbeck, J., Kurtz, N., Petty, A., Ridout, A., Shepherd, A., Wimert, J., and Yi, D.: Lead and floe detection from CryoSat-2 radar and ICESat-2 laser altimetry, Earth Space Sci., 13, e2025EA004 399, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EA004399, 2026. a
Toole, J. M., Timmermans, M.-L., Perovich, D. K., Krishfield, R. A., Proshutinsky, A., and Richter-Menge, J. A.: Influences of the ocean surface mixed layer and thermohaline stratification on Arctic Sea ice in the central Canada Basin, J. Geophys. Res, 115, 10018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005660, 2010. a
Toyota, T., Takatsuji, S., and Nakayama, M.: Characteristics of sea ice floe size distribution in the seasonal ice zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024556, 2006. a, b
Toyota, T., Haas, C., and Tamura, T.: Size distribution and shape properties of relatively small sea-ice floes in the Antarctic marginal ice zone in late winter, Deep-Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 58, 1182–1193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.034, 2011. a
Vicsek, T.: Fractal growth phenomena, World Scientific, https://doi.org/10.1142/1407, 1992. a
Voermans, J. J., Rabault, J., Filchuk, K., Ryzhov, I., Heil, P., Marchenko, A., Collins III, C. O., Dabboor, M., Sutherland, G., and Babanin, A. V.: Experimental evidence for a universal threshold characterizing wave-induced sea ice break-up, The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020. a
Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Jung, T., Kaleschke, L., and Wernecke, A.: Sea ice leads in the Arctic Ocean: Model assessment, interannual variability and trends, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7019–7027, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068696, 2016a. a
Wang, Y., Holt, B., Rogers, W. E., Thomson, J., and Shen, H. H.: Wind and wave influences on sea ice floe size and leads in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas during the summer‐fall transition 2014, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 121, 1502–1525, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011349, 2016b. a, b
Wernecke, A. and Kaleschke, L.: Lead detection in Arctic sea ice from CryoSat-2: quality assessment, lead area fraction and width distribution, The Cryosphere, 9, 1955–1968, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1955-2015, 2015. a, b, c, d
Willmes, S. and Heinemann, G.: Pan-arctic lead detection from MODIS thermal infrared imagery, Ann. Glaciol., 56, 29–37, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015AoG69A615, 2015. a
Willmes, S., Heinemann, G., Meier, W., Tschudi, M., Koch, M., and Thenkabail, P. S.: Sea-Ice Wintertime Lead Frequencies and Regional Characteristics in the Arctic, 2003-2015, Remote Sens., https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010004, 2015. a, b
Willmes, S., Heinemann, G., and Schnaase, F.: Patterns of wintertime Arctic sea-ice leads and their relation to winds and ocean currents, The Cryosphere, 17, 3291–3308, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3291-2023, 2023. a, b
Zakhvatkina, N., Vladimir Smirnov, and Bychkova, I.: Satellite SAR data-based sea ice classification: An overview, Geosciences, 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9040152, 2019. a
Zhang, X., Tang, H., Zhang, J., Walsh, J. E., Roesler, E. L., Hillman, B., Ballinger, T. J., and Weijer, W.: Arctic cyclones have become more intense and longer-lived over the past seven decades, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01003-0, 2023. a
Short summary
We take advantage of ICESat-2 satellite, which measures surface heights with nominal resolution of meters to tens of meters, to characterize a near pan-Arctic winter sea ice leads, meter-scale elongated cracks in ice, from 2018 to 2024. We find that lead fractions are higher near the ice edge and sizes follow a power-law distribution. Four distinct features in the temporal evolution of lead fraction are also identified, with fraction increase associated with larger leads.
We take advantage of ICESat-2 satellite, which measures surface heights with nominal resolution...