Articles | Volume 19, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2507-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2507-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Aspect controls on the spatial redistribution of snow water equivalence through the lateral flow of liquid water in a subalpine catchment
Kori L. Mooney
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82072, USA
Natural Resources Conservation Service, Salt Lake City, UT, 84138, USA
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 82072, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Tate G. Meehan, Ahmad Hojatimalekshah, Hans-Peter Marshall, Elias J. Deeb, Shad O'Neel, Daniel McGrath, Ryan W. Webb, Randall Bonnell, Mark S. Raleigh, Christopher Hiemstra, and Kelly Elder
The Cryosphere, 18, 3253–3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a critical parameter for yearly water supply forecasting and can be calculated by multiplying the snow depth by the snow density. We combined high-spatial-resolution snow depth information with ground-based radar measurements to solve for snow density. Extrapolated density estimates over our study area resolved detailed patterns that agree with the known interactions of snow with wind, terrain, and vegetation and were utilized in the calculation of SWE.
Jack Tarricone, Ryan W. Webb, Hans-Peter Marshall, Anne W. Nolin, and Franz J. Meyer
The Cryosphere, 17, 1997–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1997-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Mountain snowmelt provides water for billions of people across the globe. Despite its importance, we cannot currently measure the amount of water in mountain snowpacks from satellites. In this research, we test the ability of an experimental snow remote sensing technique from an airplane in preparation for the same sensor being launched on a future NASA satellite. We found that the method worked better than expected for estimating important snowpack properties.
Ryan W. Webb, Keith Jennings, Stefan Finsterle, and Steven R. Fassnacht
The Cryosphere, 15, 1423–1434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1423-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1423-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We simulate the flow of liquid water through snow and compare results to field experiments. This process is important because it controls how much and how quickly water will reach our streams and rivers in snowy regions. We found that water can flow large distances downslope through the snow even after the snow has stopped melting. Improved modeling of snowmelt processes will allow us to more accurately estimate available water resources, especially under changing climate conditions.
Ryan W. Webb, Steven R. Fassnacht, and Michael N. Gooseff
The Cryosphere, 12, 287–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-287-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-287-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We observed how snowmelt is transported on a hillslope through multiple measurements of snow and soil moisture across a small headwater catchment. We found that snowmelt flows through the snow with less infiltration on north-facing slopes and infiltrates the ground on south-facing slopes. This causes an increase in snow water equivalent at the base of the north-facing slope by as much as 170 %. We present a conceptualization of flow path development to improve future investigations.
Related subject area
Discipline: Snow | Subject: Snow Hydrology
Exploring how Sentinel-1 wet-snow maps can inform fully distributed physically based snowpack models
Impact of intercepted and sub-canopy snow microstructure on snowpack response to rain-on-snow events under a boreal canopy
Towards large-scale daily snow density mapping with spatiotemporally aware model and multi-source data
Drone-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) application to snow hydrology
Natural climate variability is an important aspect of future projections of snow water resources and rain-on-snow events
Two-dimensional liquid water flow through snow at the plot scale in continental snowpacks: simulations and field data comparisons
Fractional snow-covered area: scale-independent peak of winter parameterization
Seasonal components of freshwater runoff in Glacier Bay, Alaska: diverse spatial patterns and temporal change
Bertrand Cluzet, Jan Magnusson, Louis Quéno, Giulia Mazzotti, Rebecca Mott, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 18, 5753–5767, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use novel wet-snow maps from Sentinel-1 to evaluate simulations of a snow-hydrological model over Switzerland. These data are complementary to available in situ snow depth observations as they capture a broad diversity of topographic conditions. Wet-snow maps allow us to detect a delayed melt onset in the model, which we resolve thanks to an improved parametrization. This paves the way to further evaluation, calibration, and data assimilation using wet-snow maps.
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Domine, Nander Wever, Adrien Michel, Michael Lehning, and Pierre-Erik Isabelle
The Cryosphere, 18, 2783–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2783-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations over several winters at two boreal sites in eastern Canada show that rain-on-snow (ROS) events lead to the formation of melt–freeze layers and that preferential flow is an important water transport mechanism in the sub-canopy snowpack. Simulations with SNOWPACK generally show good agreement with observations, except for the reproduction of melt–freeze layers. This was improved by simulating intercepted snow microstructure evolution, which also modulates ROS-induced runoff.
Huadong Wang, Xueliang Zhang, Pengfeng Xiao, Tao Che, Zhaojun Zheng, Liyun Dai, and Wenbo Luan
The Cryosphere, 17, 33–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-33-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-33-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The geographically and temporally weighted neural network (GTWNN) model is constructed for estimating large-scale daily snow density by integrating satellite, ground, and reanalysis data, which addresses the importance of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and a nonlinear relationship between snow density and impact variables, as well as allows us to understand the spatiotemporal pattern and heterogeneity of snow density in different snow periods and snow cover regions in China from 2013 to 2020.
Eole Valence, Michel Baraer, Eric Rosa, Florent Barbecot, and Chloe Monty
The Cryosphere, 16, 3843–3860, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3843-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3843-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The internal properties of the snow cover shape the annual hygrogram of northern and alpine regions. This study develops a multi-method approach to measure the evolution of snowpack internal properties. The snowpack hydrological property evolution was evaluated with drone-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements. In addition, the combination of GPR observations and time domain reflectometry measurements is shown to be able to be adapted to monitor the snowpack moisture over winter.
Michael Schirmer, Adam Winstral, Tobias Jonas, Paolo Burlando, and Nadav Peleg
The Cryosphere, 16, 3469–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Rain is highly variable in time at a given location so that there can be both wet and dry climate periods. In this study, we quantify the effects of this natural climate variability and other sources of uncertainty on changes in flooding events due to rain on snow (ROS) caused by climate change. For ROS events with a significant contribution of snowmelt to runoff, the change due to climate was too small to draw firm conclusions about whether there are more ROS events of this important type.
Ryan W. Webb, Keith Jennings, Stefan Finsterle, and Steven R. Fassnacht
The Cryosphere, 15, 1423–1434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1423-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1423-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We simulate the flow of liquid water through snow and compare results to field experiments. This process is important because it controls how much and how quickly water will reach our streams and rivers in snowy regions. We found that water can flow large distances downslope through the snow even after the snow has stopped melting. Improved modeling of snowmelt processes will allow us to more accurately estimate available water resources, especially under changing climate conditions.
Nora Helbig, Yves Bühler, Lucie Eberhard, César Deschamps-Berger, Simon Gascoin, Marie Dumont, Jesus Revuelto, Jeff S. Deems, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 15, 615–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability in snow depth in mountains is driven by interactions between topography, wind, precipitation and radiation. In applications such as weather, climate and hydrological predictions, this is accounted for by the fractional snow-covered area describing the fraction of the ground surface covered by snow. We developed a new description for model grid cell sizes larger than 200 m. An evaluation suggests that the description performs similarly well in most geographical regions.
Ryan L. Crumley, David F. Hill, Jordan P. Beamer, and Elizabeth R. Holzenthal
The Cryosphere, 13, 1597–1619, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1597-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1597-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate the historical (1980–2015) and projection scenario (2070–2099) components of freshwater runoff to Glacier Bay, Alaska, using a modeling approach. We find that many of the historically snow-dominated watersheds in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve may transition towards rainfall-dominated hydrographs in a projection scenario under RCP 8.5 conditions. The changes in timing and volume of freshwater entering Glacier Bay will affect bay ecology and hydrochemistry.
Cited articles
Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Painter, T. H., Dettinger, M. D., Rice, R., and Dozier, J.: Mountain hydrology of the western United States, Water Resour. Res., 42, W08432, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004387, 2006.
Bartelt, P. and Lehning, M.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part I: numerical model, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 123–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00074-5, 2002.
Bishay, K., Bjarke, N. R., Modi, P., Pflug, J. M., and Livneh, B.: Can Remotely Sensed Snow Disappearance Explain Seasonal Water Supply?, Water, 15, 1147, https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061147, 2023.
Bonnell, R., McGrath, D., Williams, K., Webb, R., Fassnacht, S. R., and Marshall, H.-P.: Spatiotemporal Variations in Liquid Water Content in a Seasonal Snowpack: Implications for Radar Remote Sensing, Remote Sensing, 13, 4223, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214223, 2021.
Bradford, J., Harper, J., and Brown, J.: Complex dielectric permittivity measurements from ground-penetrating radar data to estimate snow liquid water content in the pendular regime, Water Resour. Res., 45, W08403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007341, 2009.
Brooks, P. D., Gelderloos, A., Wolf, M. A., Jamison, L. R., Strong, C., Solomon, D. K., Bowen, G. J., Burian, S., Tai, X., Arens, S., Briefer, L., Kirkham, T., and Stewart, J.: Groundwater-Mediated Memory of Past Climate Controls Water Yield in Snowmelt-Dominated Catchments, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR030605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030605, 2021.
Clow, D. W.: Changes in the Timing of Snowmelt and Streamflow in Colorado: A Response to Recent Warming, J. Climate, 23, 2293–2306, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2951.1, 2010.
Co, M.: Colorado Hazard Mapping: LiDAR, Colorado Water Conservation Board [data set], https://coloradohazardmapping.com/lidarDownload (last access: 12 October 2022), 2016.
Currier, W., Pflug, J., Mazzotti, G., Jonas, T., Deems, J., Bormann, K., Painter, T., Hiemstra, C., Gelvin, A., Uhlmann, Z., Spaete, L., Glenn, N., and Lundquist, J.: Comparing Aerial Lidar Observations With Terrestrial Lidar and Snow-Probe Transects From NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6285–6294, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024533, 2019.
Díaz, C. L. P., Muñoz, J., Lakhankar, T., Khanbilvardi, R., and Romanov, P.: Proof of Concept: Development of Snow Liquid Water Content Profiler Using CS650 Reflectometers at Caribou, ME, USA, Sensors, 17, 647, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030647, 2017.
Dingman, S. L.: Physical Hydrology, 3, Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove, IL, ISBN 1-4786-1118-9, 2015.
Elder, K., Dozier, J., and Michaelsen, J.: Snow Accumulation and Distribution in an Alpine Watershed, Water Resour. Res., 27, 1541–1552, 1991.
Eiriksson, D., Whitson, M., Luce, C. H., Marshall, H. P., Bradford, J., Benner, S. G., Black, T., Hetrick, H., and McNamara, J. P.: An evaluation of the hydrologic relevance of lateral flow in snow at hillslope and catchment scales, Hydrol. Process., 27, 640–654, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9666, 2013.
Erickson, T. A., Williams, M. W., and Winstral, A.: Persistence of topographic controls on the spatial distribution of snow in rugged mountain terrain, Colorado, United States, Water Resour. Res., 41, W04014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003wr002973, 2005.
Fassnacht, S. R.: A Call for More Snow Sampling, Geosciences, 11, 435, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11110435, 2021.
Fassnacht, S. R., Brown, K. S. J., Blumberg, E. J., Moreno, J. I. L., Covino, T. P., Kappas, M., Huang, Y., Leone, V., and Kashipazha, A. H.: Distribution of snow depth variability, Front. Earth Sci., 12, 683–692, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0714-z, 2018.
Guiot, A., Karbou, F., James, G., and Durand, P.: Insights into Segmentation Methods Applied to Remote Sensing SAR Images for Wet Snow Detection, Geosciences, 13, 193, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070193, 2023.
Heilig, A., Mitterer, C., Schmid, L., Wever, N., Schweizer, J., Marshall, H. P., and Eisen, O.: Seasonal and diurnal cycles of liquid water in snow-Measurements and modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 120, 2139–2154, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003593, 2015.
Hinckley, E.-L. S., Ebel, B. A., Barnes, R. T., Anderson, R. S., Williams, M. W., and Anderson, S. P.: Aspect control of water movement on hillslopes near the rain-snow transition of the Colorado Front Range, Hydrol. Process., 28, 74–85, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9549, 2014.
Jencso, K. G. and McGlynn, B. L.: Hierarchical controls on runoff generation: Topographically driven hydrologic connectivity, geology, and vegetation, Water Resour. Res., 47, W11527, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr010666, 2011.
Jennings, K., Winchell, T., Livneh, B., and Molotch, N.: Spatial variation of the rain-snow temperature threshold across the Northern Hemisphere, Nat. Commun., 9, 1148, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03629-7, 2018a.
Jennings, K. S., Kittel, T. G. F., and Molotch, N. P.: Observations and simulations of the seasonal evolution of snowpack cold content and its relation to snowmelt and the snowpack energy budget, The Cryosphere, 12, 1595–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1595-2018, 2018b.
Kinar, N. J. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Measurement of the physical properties of the snowpack, Rev. Geophys., 53, 481–544, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000481, 2015.
Koch, F., Prasch, M., Schmid, L., Schweizer, J., and Mauser, W.: Measuring Snow Liquid Water Content with Low-Cost GPS Receivers, Sensors, 14, 20975–20999, https://doi.org/10.3390/s141120975, 2014.
Kovacs, A., Gow, A. J., and Morey, R. M.: The in-situ dielectric constant of polar firn revisited, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 23, 245–256, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(94)00016-Q, 1995.
Li, D., Wrzesien, M., Durand, M., Adam, J., and Lettenmaier, D.: How much runoff originates as snow in the western United States, and how will that change in the future?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 6163–6172, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073551, 2017.
López-Moreno, J. I., Fassnacht, S. R., Beguería, S., and Latron, J. B. P.: Variability of snow depth at the plot scale: implications for mean depth estimation and sampling strategies, The Cryosphere, 5, 617–629, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-617-2011, 2011.
López-Moreno, J., Fassnacht, S., Heath, J., Musselman, K., Revuelto, J., Latron, J., Moran-Tejeda, E., and Jonas, T.: Small scale spatial variability of snow density and depth over complex alpine terrain: Implications for estimating snow water equivalent, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 40–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.08.010, 2013.
Lundquist, J., Dickerson-Lange, S., Lutz, J., and Cristea, N.: Lower forest density enhances snow retention in regions with warmer winters: A global framework developed from plot-scale observations and modeling, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6356–6370, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20504, 2013.
Lundy, C., Brown, R., Adams, E., Birkeland, K., and Lehning, M.: A statistical validation of the snowpack model in a Montana climate, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 33, 237–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00038-6, 2001.
Marks, D., Winstral, A., and Seyfried, M.: Simulation of terrain and forest shelter effects on patterns of snow deposition, snowmelt and runoff over a semi-arid mountain catchment, Hydrol. Process., 16, 3605–3626, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1237, 2002.
Marshall, H. and Koh, G.: FMCW radars for snow research, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 52, 118–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.008, 2008.
Marshall, H., Koh, G., Forster, R., and MacAyeal, D.: Estimating alpine snowpack properties using FMCW radar, Ann. Glaciol., 40, 157–162, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756405781813500, 2005.
Mazzotti, G., Webster, C., Quéno, L., Cluzet, B., and Jonas, T.: Canopy structure, topography, and weather are equally important drivers of small-scale snow cover dynamics in sub-alpine forests, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2099–2121, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2099-2023, 2023.
McGrath, D., Webb, R., Shean, D., Bonnell, R., Marshall, H., Painter, T., Molotch, N., Elder, K., Hiemstra, C., and Brucker, L.: Spatially extensive ground-penetrating radar snow depth observations during NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign: Comparison with in situ, airborne, and satellite observations, Water Resour. Res., 55, 10026–10036, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024907, 2019.
McGrath, D., Bonnell, R., Zeller, L., Olsen-Mikitowicz, A., Bump, E., Webb, R., and Marshall, H. P.: A Time Series of Snow Density and Snow Water Equivalent Observations Derived From the Integration of GPR and UAV SfM Observations, Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 3, 886747, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.886747, 2022.
McNamara, J. P., Chandler, D., Seyfried, M., and Achet, S.: Soil moisture states, lateral flow, and streamflow generation in a semi-arid, snowmelt-driven catchment, Hydrol. Process., 19, 4023–4038, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5869, 2005.
Meehan, T. G., Hojatimalekshah, A., Marshall, H.-P., Deeb, E. J., O'Neel, S., McGrath, D., Webb, R. W., Bonnell, R., Raleigh, M. S., Hiemstra, C., and Elder, K.: Spatially distributed snow depth, bulk density, and snow water equivalent from ground-based and airborne sensor integration at Grand Mesa, Colorado, USA, The Cryosphere, 18, 3253–3276, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3253-2024, 2024.
Meromy, L., Molotch, N. P., Williams, M. W., Musselman, K. N., and Kueppers, L. M.: Snowpack-climate manipulation using infrared heaters in subalpine forests of the Southern Rocky Mountains, USA, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 203, 142–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.12.015, 2015.
Mitterer, C., Heilig, A., Sweizer, J., and Eisen, O.: Upward-looking ground-penetrating radar for measuring wet-snow properties, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 69, 129–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.06.003, 2011.
Modi, P. A., Small, E. E., Kasprzyk, J., and Livneh, B.: Investigating the Role of Snow Water Equivalent on Streamflow Predictability during Drought, J. Hydrometeorol., 23, 1607–1625, https://doi.org/10.1175/Jhm-D-21-0229.1, 2022.
Molotch, N. P. and Meromy, L.: Physiographic and climatic controls on snow cover persistence in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, Hydrol. Process., 28, 4573–4586, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10254, 2014.
Musselman, K. N., Molotch, N. P., and Brooks, P. D.: Effects of vegetation on snow accumulation and ablation in a mid-latitude sub-alpine forest, Hydrol. Process., 22, 2767–2776, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7050, 2008.
Musselman, K. N., Molotch, N. P., Margulis, S. A., Kirchner, P. B., and Bales, R. C.: Influence of canopy structure and direct beam solar irradiance on snowmelt rates in a mixed conifer forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 161, 46–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.03.011, 2012.
Nolin, A. W., Sproles, E. A., Rupp, D. E., Crumley, R. L., Webb, M. J., Palomaki, R. T., and Mar, E.: New snow metrics for a warming world, Hydrol. Process., 35, e14262, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14262, 2021.
Painter, T., Berisford, D., Boardman, J., Bormann, K., Deems, J., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., Marks, D., Mattmann, C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., Skiles, S., Seidel, F., and Winstral, A.: The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018, 2016.
Raleigh, M. and Small, E.: Snowpack density modeling is the primary source of uncertainty when mapping basin-wide SWE with lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3700–3709, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071999, 2017.
Rutter, N., Essery, R., Pomeroy, J., Altimir, N., Andreadis, K., Baker, I., Barr, A., Bartlett, P., Boone, A., Deng, H., Douville, H., Dutra, E., Elder, K., Ellis, C., Feng, X., Gelfan, A., Goodbody, A., Gusev, Y., Gustafsson, D., Hellstrom, R., Hirabayashi, Y., Hirota, T., Jonas, T., Koren, V., Kuragina, A., Lettenmaier, D., Li, W., Luce, C., Martin, E., Nasonova, O., Pumpanen, J., Pyles, R., Samuelsson, P., Sandells, M., Schadler, G., Shmakin, A., Smirnova, T., Stahli, M., Stockli, R., Strasser, U., Su, H., Suzuki, K., Takata, K., Tanaka, K., Thompson, E., Vesala, T., Viterbo, P., Wiltshire, A., Xia, K., Xue, Y., and Yamazaki, T.: Evaluation of forest snow processes models (SnowMIP2), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D06111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011063, 2009.
Schlumpf, M., Hendrikx, J., Stormont, J., and Webb, R.: Quantifying short-term changes in snow strength due to increasing liquid water content above hydraulic barriers, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 218, 104056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.104056, 2024.
Schmid, L., Koch, F., Heilig, A., Prasch, M., Eisen, O., Mauser, W., and Schweizer, J.: A novel sensor combination (upGPR-GPS) to continuously and nondestructively derive snow cover properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3397–3405, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063732, 2015.
Sexstone, G. A. and Fassnacht, S. R.: What drives basin scale spatial variability of snowpack properties in northern Colorado?, The Cryosphere, 8, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-329-2014, 2014.
Skiles, S., Flanner, M., Cook, J., Dumont, M., and Painter, T.: Radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 964–971, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0296-5, 2018.
Sommerfeld, R. A. and Rocchio, J. E.: Permeability measurements on new and equitemperature snow, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2485–2490, https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR01071, 1993.
Sturm, M., Goldstein, M., and Parr, C.: Water and life from snow: A trillion dollar science question, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3534–3544, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840, 2017.
Tarricone, J., Webb, R. W., Marshall, H.-P., Nolin, A. W., and Meyer, F. J.: Estimating snow accumulation and ablation with L-band interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), The Cryosphere, 17, 1997–2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1997-2023, 2023.
Teng, W., Rui, H. L., Strub, R., and Vollmer, B.: Optimal Reorganization of Nasa Earth Science Data for Enhanced Accessibility and Usability for the Hydrology Community, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 52, 825–835, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12405, 2016.
Thompson, S. S., Kulessa, B., Essery, R. L. H., and Lüthi, M. P.: Bulk meltwater flow and liquid water content of snowpacks mapped using the electrical self-potential (SP) method, The Cryosphere, 10, 433–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-433-2016, 2016.
United States, US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, National Water and Climate Center: SNOTEL site number 457, Water and Climate Information System [data set], https://wcc.sc.egov.usda.gov/nwcc/site?sitenum=457, last access: 1 March 2024.
Valt, M., Guyennon, N., Salerno, F., Petrangeli, A. B., Salvatori, R., Cianfarra, P., and Romano, E.: Predicting new snow density in the Italian Alps: A variability analysis based on 10 years of measurements, Hydrol. Process., 32, 3174–3187, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13249, 2018.
Varhola, A., Coops, N. C., Weiler, M., and Moore, R. D.: Forest canopy effects on snow accumulation and ablation: An integrative review of empirical results, J. Hydrol., 392, 219–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.009, 2010.
Vionnet, V., Guyomarc'h, G., Naaim Bouvet, F., Martin, E., Durand, Y., Bellot, H., Bel, C., and Puglièse, P.: Occurrence of blowing snow events at an alpine site over a 10-year period: Observations and modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.004, 2013.
Webb, R. W.: Using ground penetrating radar to assess the variability of snow water equivalent and melt in a mixed canopy forest, Northern Colorado, Front. Earth Sci., 11, 482–495, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0645-0, 2017.
Webb, R.: Dry Lake Watershed, CO, Hydroshare [data set] http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/4aff38a0cbb24456be4e99987e808abb, 2024.
Webb, R. and Mooney, K.: Dry Lake Transect Snow Depth 2023, Hydroshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.1347210139a945048a1a3ecd93f81dd2, 2024a.
Webb, R. and Mooney, K.: Dry Lake Observed Density 2023, Hydroshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.8e87b814ce7541e68f9c2a12a9882c09, 2024b.
Webb, R. and Mooney, K.: Dry Lake Ground Penetrating Radar TWT 2023, Hydroshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.b84c4fe4a4d04e77ade1bbae4a0c74f3, 2024c.
Webb, R. W., Fassnacht, S. R., and Gooseff, M. N.: Hydrologic flow path development varies by aspect during spring snowmelt in complex subalpine terrain, The Cryosphere, 12, 287–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-287-2018, 2018a.
Webb, R. W., Fassnacht, S. R., Gooseff, M. N., and Webb, S. W.: The Presence of Hydraulic Barriers in Layered Snowpacks: TOUGH2 Simulations and Estimated Diversion Lengths, Transport in Porous Media, 123, 457–476, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1079-1, 2018b.
Webb, R. W., Jennings, K., Fend, M., and Molotch, N.: Combining Ground Penetrating Radar with Terrestrial LiDAR Scanning to Estimate the Spatial Distribution of Liquid Water Content in Seasonal Snowpacks, Water Resour. Res., 54, 10339–10349, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022680, 2018c.
Webb, R. W., Wigmore, O., Jennings, K., Fend, M., and Molotch, N. P.: Hydrologic connectivity at the hillslope scale through intra-snowpack flow paths during snowmelt, Hydrol. Process., 34, 1616–1629, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13686, 2020a.
Webb, R. W., Raleigh, M. S., McGrath, D., Molotch, N. P., Elder, K., Hiemstra, C., Brucker, L., and Marshall, H. P.: Within-Stand Boundary Effects on Snow Water Equivalent Distribution in Forested Areas, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR024905, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr024905, 2020b.
Webb, R. W., Jennings, K., Finsterle, S., and Fassnacht, S. R.: Two-dimensional liquid water flow through snow at the plot scale in continental snowpacks: simulations and field data comparisons, The Cryosphere, 15, 1423–1434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1423-2021, 2021a.
Webb, R. W., Marziliano, A., McGrath, D., Bonnell, R., Meehan, T. G., Vuyovich, C., and Marshall, H.-P.: In Situ Determination of Dry and Wet Snow Permittivity: Improving Equations for Low Frequency Radar Applications, Remote Sensing, 13, 4617, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224617, 2021b.
Webb, R. W., Musselman, K. N., Ciafone, S., Hale, K. E., and Molotch, N. P.: Extending the vadose zone: Characterizing the role of snow for liquid water storage and transmission in streamflow generation, Hydrol. Process., 36, e14541, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14541, 2022.
Webb, R. W., Litvak, M. E., and Brooks, P. D.: The role of terrain-mediated hydroclimate in vegetation recovery after wildfire, Environ. Res. Lett., 18, 064036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd803, 2023.
Western Regional Climate Center: Dry Lake Colorado station, Western Regional Climate Center [data set], https://raws.dri.edu/cgi-bin/rawMAIN.pl?coCDRY, last access: 1 March 2024.
Wever, N., Fierz, C., Mitterer, C., Hirashima, H., and Lehning, M.: Solving Richards Equation for snow improves snowpack meltwater runoff estimations in detailed multi-layer snowpack model, The Cryosphere, 8, 257–274, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-257-2014, 2014.
Winstral, A., Elder, K., and Davis, R. E.: Spatial snow modeling of wind-redistributed snow using terrain-based parameters, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 524–538, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0524:Ssmowr>2.0.Co;2, 2002.
Würzer, S., Wever, N., Juras, R., Lehning, M., and Jonas, T.: Modelling liquid water transport in snow under rain-on-snow conditions – considering preferential flow, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1741–1756, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1741-2017, 2017.
Xia, Y. L., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Sheffield, J., Cosgrove, B., Wood, E., Luo, L. F., Alonge, C., Wei, H. L., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D., Koren, V., Duan, Q. Y., Mo, K., Fan, Y., and Mocko, D.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016048, 2012.
Zeinivand, H. and De Smedt, F.: Prediction of snowmelt floods with a distributed hydrological model using a physical snow mass and energy balance approach, Nat. Hazards, 54, 451–468, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9478-9, 2010.
Short summary
This study observes the movement of snow water equivalence (SWE) during mid-winter surface melt and spring snowmelt periods. We observed that the south-facing slope that experienced mid-winter surface melt events showed meltwater flowing downslope through the snow. The north-facing slope saw a similar redistribution of meltwater during the spring snowmelt period.
This study observes the movement of snow water equivalence (SWE) during mid-winter surface melt...