Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025
Brief communication
 | 
27 Jun 2025
Brief communication |  | 27 Jun 2025

Brief communication: Not as dirty as they look, flawed airborne and satellite snow spectra

Edward H. Bair, Dar A. Roberts, David R. Thompson, Philip G. Brodrick, Brenton A. Wilder, Niklas Bohn, Christopher J. Crawford, Nimrod Carmon, Carrie M. Vuyovich, and Jeff Dozier

Related authors

Do we still need reflectance? From radiance to snow properties in mountainous terrain: a case study with the EMIT imaging spectrometer
Niklas Bohn, Edward H. Bair, Philip G. Brodrick, Nimrod Carmon, Robert O. Green, Thomas H. Painter, and David R. Thompson
The Cryosphere, 19, 1279–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, 2025
Short summary
How do tradeoffs in satellite spatial and temporal resolution impact snow water equivalent reconstruction?
Edward H. Bair, Jeff Dozier, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, William Kleiber, and Robert E. Davis
The Cryosphere, 17, 2629–2643, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of E3SM land model snow simulations over the western United States
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Timbo Stillinger, Edward Bair, Yu Gu, and L. Ruby Leung
The Cryosphere, 17, 673–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-673-2023, 2023
Short summary
Landsat, MODIS, and VIIRS snow cover mapping algorithm performance as validated by airborne lidar datasets
Timbo Stillinger, Karl Rittger, Mark S. Raleigh, Alex Michell, Robert E. Davis, and Edward H. Bair
The Cryosphere, 17, 567–590, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-567-2023, 2023
Short summary
Improving snow albedo modeling in the E3SM land model (version 2.0) and assessing its impacts on snow and surface fluxes over the Tibetan Plateau
Dalei Hao, Gautam Bisht, Karl Rittger, Edward Bair, Cenlin He, Huilin Huang, Cheng Dang, Timbo Stillinger, Yu Gu, Hailong Wang, Yun Qian, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 75–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Snow | Subject: Remote Sensing
Evaluation of the Snow Climate Change Initiative (Snow CCI) snow-covered area product within a mountain snow water equivalent reanalysis
Haorui Sun, Yiwen Fang, Steven A. Margulis, Colleen Mortimer, Lawrence Mudryk, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2017–2036, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mapping seasonal snow melting in Karakoram using SAR and topographic data
Shiyi Li, Lanqing Huang, Philipp Bernhard, and Irena Hajnsek
The Cryosphere, 19, 1621–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1621-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Do we still need reflectance? From radiance to snow properties in mountainous terrain: a case study with the EMIT imaging spectrometer
Niklas Bohn, Edward H. Bair, Philip G. Brodrick, Nimrod Carmon, Robert O. Green, Thomas H. Painter, and David R. Thompson
The Cryosphere, 19, 1279–1302, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1279-2025, 2025
Short summary
Temporal stability of a new 40-year daily AVHRR land surface temperature dataset for the pan-Arctic region
Sonia Dupuis, Frank-Michael Göttsche, and Stefan Wunderle
The Cryosphere, 18, 6027–6059, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-6027-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-6027-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating snow depth retrievals from Sentinel-1 volume scattering over NASA SnowEx sites
Zachary Hoppinen, Ross T. Palomaki, George Brencher, Devon Dunmire, Eric Gagliano, Adrian Marziliano, Jack Tarricone, and Hans-Peter Marshall
The Cryosphere, 18, 5407–5430, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5407-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5407-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Agenzia Spaziale Italiana: PRISMA Level 1 Data [data set], https://prisma.asi.it (last access: September 2022), 2023. 
Bair, E. H., Stillinger, T., and Dozier, J.: Snow Property Inversion from Remote Sensing (SPIReS): A generalized multispectral unmixing approach with examples from MODIS and Landsat 8 OLI, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 59, 7270–7284, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.3040328, 2021. 
Bair, E. H., Dozier, J., Stern, C., LeWinter, A., Rittger, K., Savagian, A., Stillinger, T., and Davis, R. E.: Divergence of apparent and intrinsic snow albedo over a season at a sub-alpine site with implications for remote sensing, The Cryosphere, 16, 1765–1778, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1765-2022, 2022. 
Bohn, N., Bair, E. H., Brodrick, P. G., Carmon, N., Green, R. O., Painter, T. H., and Thompson, D. R.: The Pitfalls of Ignoring Topography in Snow Retrievals: A Case Study with EMIT, SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4671920, 2024. 
Carmon, N., Berk, A., Bohn, N., Brodrick, P. G., Kalashnikova, O., Nguyen, H., Thompson, D. R., and Turmon, M.: Unified topographic and atmospheric correction for remote imaging spectroscopy, Front. Remote Sens., 3, 916155, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.916155, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
Key to the success of future satellite missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that an artifact, called the hook, is often mistaken for soot or dust. Instead, it is caused by three amplifying effects: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, and (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are presented.
Share