Articles | Volume 17, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4343-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4343-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measuring the spatiotemporal variability in snow depth in subarctic environments using UASs – Part 1: Measurements, processing, and accuracy assessment
Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
Leo-Juhani Meriö
Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
Anton Kuzmin
Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, 80101, Finland
Pasi Korpelainen
Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, 80101, Finland
Pertti Ala-aho
Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
Timo Kumpula
Department of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, 80101, Finland
Bjørn Kløve
Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
Hannu Marttila
Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90570, Finland
Related authors
Leo-Juhani Meriö, Anssi Rauhala, Pertti Ala-aho, Anton Kuzmin, Pasi Korpelainen, Timo Kumpula, Bjørn Kløve, and Hannu Marttila
The Cryosphere, 17, 4363–4380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4363-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Information on seasonal snow cover is essential in understanding snow processes and operational forecasting. We study the spatiotemporal variability in snow depth and snow processes in a subarctic, boreal landscape using drones. We identified multiple theoretically known snow processes and interactions between snow and vegetation. The results highlight the applicability of the drones to be used for a detailed study of snow depth in multiple land cover types and snow–vegetation interactions.
Shaakir Shabir Dar, Eric Klein, Pertti Ala-aho, Hannu Marttila, Sonja Wahl, and Jeffrey Welker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2724, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using laser based instruments, we observed snow turning directly to vapor inside the pack and at its surface. In cold, calm weather vapor moves slowly upward; on warmer, windy days air pushes vapor deeper into the snow. These dynamics control snow loss and must be included in hydrological and climate models.
Teemu Juselius-Rajamäki, Sanna Piilo, Susanna Salminen-Paatero, Emilia Tuomaala, Tarmo Virtanen, Atte Korhola, Anna Autio, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-Aho, Annalea Lohila, and Minna Väliranta
Biogeosciences, 22, 3047–3071, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3047-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3047-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation can be used to infer the potential climate feedback of peatlands. New studies have shown the recent expansion of peatlands, but their plant community succession has not been studied. Although generally described as dry bog-type vegetation, our results show that peatland margins in a subarctic fen began as wet fen with high methane emissions and shifted to bog-type peatland area only after the Little Ice Age. Thus, they have acted as a carbon source for most of their history.
Maiju Ylönen, Hannu Marttila, Anton Kuzmin, Pasi Korpelainen, Timo Kumpula, and Pertti Ala-Aho
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1297, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1297, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We collected snow depth maps four times during the winter from two different sites and used them as input for a model to predict daily snow depth and snow water equivalent (SWE). Our results show similar snow depth patterns in different sites, where snow depths are the highest in forests and forest gaps and the lowest in open areas. The results can extend operational snow course measurements and their temporal and spatial coverage, helping hydrological forecasting and water resource management.
Eeva Järvi-Laturi, Teemu Tahvanainen, Eero Koskinen, Efrén López-Blanco, Juho Lämsä, Hannu Marttila, Mikhail Mastepanov, Riku Paavola, Maria Väisänen, and Torben Røjle Christensen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-217, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-217, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our research investigates how plant community composition influences methane emissions in a northern boreal rich fen. We measured methane fluxes year-round using manual chambers across 36 plots. Our findings suggest that sedges, particularly Carex rostrata, significantly impact the fluxes throughout the year. This study enhances our understanding of vegetation-driven methane emissions, providing valuable insights for predicting future changes in peatland methane emissions.
Filip Muhic, Pertti Ala-Aho, Matthias Sprenger, Björn Klöve, and Hannu Marttila
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4861–4881, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4861-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4861-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The snowmelt event governs the hydrological cycle of sub-arctic areas. In this study, we conducted a tracer experiment on a forested hilltop in Lapland to identify how high-volume infiltration events modify the soil water storage. We found that a strong tracer signal remained in deeper soil layers after the experiment and over the winter, but it got fully displaced during the snowmelt. We propose a conceptual infiltration model that explains how the snowmelt homogenizes the soil water storage.
Alexander Störmer, Timo Kumpula, Miguel Villoslada, Pasi Korpelainen, Henning Schumacher, and Benjamin Burkhard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2862, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2862, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow has a major impact on palsa development, yet understanding its distribution at small scale remains limited. We used LiDAR UAS and ground truth data in combination with machine learning to model snow distribution at three palsa sites. We identified extremes in snow depth corresponding to palsa topography, providing insights into the influence of snow distribution on their formation. The results demonstrate the applicability of machine learning for modeling snow distribution at a small scale.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements, and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Clemens von Baeckmann, Annett Bartsch, Helena Bergstedt, Aleksandra Efimova, Barbara Widhalm, Dorothee Ehrich, Timo Kumpula, Alexander Sokolov, and Svetlana Abdulmanova
The Cryosphere, 18, 4703–4722, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4703-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4703-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Lakes are common features in Arctic permafrost areas. Land cover change following their drainage needs to be monitored since it has implications for ecology and the carbon cycle. Satellite data are key in this context. We compared a common vegetation index approach with a novel land-cover-monitoring scheme. Land cover information provides specific information on wetland features. We also showed that the bioclimatic gradients play a significant role after drainage within the first 10 years.
Marco M. Lehmann, Josie Geris, Ilja van Meerveld, Daniele Penna, Youri Rothfuss, Matteo Verdone, Pertti Ala-Aho, Matyas Arvai, Alise Babre, Philippe Balandier, Fabian Bernhard, Lukrecija Butorac, Simon Damien Carrière, Natalie C. Ceperley, Zuosinan Chen, Alicia Correa, Haoyu Diao, David Dubbert, Maren Dubbert, Fabio Ercoli, Marius G. Floriancic, Teresa E. Gimeno, Damien Gounelle, Frank Hagedorn, Christophe Hissler, Frédéric Huneau, Alberto Iraheta, Tamara Jakovljević, Nerantzis Kazakis, Zoltan Kern, Karl Knaebel, Johannes Kobler, Jiří Kocum, Charlotte Koeber, Gerbrand Koren, Angelika Kübert, Dawid Kupka, Samuel Le Gall, Aleksi Lehtonen, Thomas Leydier, Philippe Malagoli, Francesca Sofia Manca di Villahermosa, Chiara Marchina, Núria Martínez-Carreras, Nicolas Martin-StPaul, Hannu Marttila, Aline Meyer Oliveira, Gaël Monvoisin, Natalie Orlowski, Kadi Palmik-Das, Aurel Persoiu, Andrei Popa, Egor Prikaziuk, Cécile Quantin, Katja T. Rinne-Garmston, Clara Rohde, Martin Sanda, Matthias Saurer, Daniel Schulz, Michael Paul Stockinger, Christine Stumpp, Jean-Stéphane Venisse, Lukas Vlcek, Stylianos Voudouris, Björn Weeser, Mark E. Wilkinson, Giulia Zuecco, and Katrin Meusburger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-409, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-409, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This study describes a unique large-scale isotope dataset to study water dynamics in European forests. Researchers collected data from 40 beech and spruce forest sites in spring and summer 2023, using a standardized method to ensure consistency. The results show that water sources for trees change between seasons and vary by tree species. This large dataset offers valuable information for understanding plant water use, improving ecohydrological models, and mapping water cycles across Europe.
Umer Saleem, Ali Torabi Haghighi, Björn Klöve, and Mourad Oussalah
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1170, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
This paper discusses the impact of citizen science and remote sensing on water quality monitoring. It explores applications combining citizen science with tools like microwave and optical systems, assessing parameters and techniques via apps such as EyeOnWater and HydroColor. It highlights the transformative potential in addressing water quality research gaps.
Getnet Demil, Ali Torabi Haghighi, Björn Klöve, and Mourad Oussalah
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1158, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1158, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
This review explores using advanced image-based methods to estimate snow parameters for water resource management. Deep learning and satellite imagery improve accuracy in predicting snowmelt and depth. Challenges like data availability persist; addressing them requires novel deep learning architectures and better data synchronization. Integration of image-based approaches can revolutionize snow hydrology modeling and environmental management.
Danny Croghan, Pertti Ala-Aho, Jeffrey Welker, Kaisa-Riikka Mustonen, Kieran Khamis, David M. Hannah, Jussi Vuorenmaa, Bjørn Kløve, and Hannu Marttila
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1055–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1055-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1055-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The transport of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from land into streams is changing due to climate change. We used a multi-year dataset of DOC and predictors of DOC in a subarctic stream to find out how transport of DOC varied between seasons and between years. We found that the way DOC is transported varied strongly seasonally, but year-to-year differences were less apparent. We conclude that the mechanisms of transport show a higher degree of interannual consistency than previously thought.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Matthieu Lafaysse, Giulia Mazzotti, Pertti Ala-aho, Hannu Marttila, Bertrand Cluzet, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, Pasi Kolari, Aaron Boone, Mathieu Fructus, and Samuli Launiainen
The Cryosphere, 18, 231–263, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The snowpack has a major impact on the land surface energy budget. Accurate simulation of the snowpack energy budget is difficult, and studies that evaluate models against energy budget observations are rare. We compared predictions from well-known models with observations of energy budgets, snow depths and soil temperatures in Finland. Our study identified contrasting strengths and limitations for the models. These results can be used for choosing the right models depending on the use cases.
Leo-Juhani Meriö, Anssi Rauhala, Pertti Ala-aho, Anton Kuzmin, Pasi Korpelainen, Timo Kumpula, Bjørn Kløve, and Hannu Marttila
The Cryosphere, 17, 4363–4380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4363-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4363-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Information on seasonal snow cover is essential in understanding snow processes and operational forecasting. We study the spatiotemporal variability in snow depth and snow processes in a subarctic, boreal landscape using drones. We identified multiple theoretically known snow processes and interactions between snow and vegetation. The results highlight the applicability of the drones to be used for a detailed study of snow depth in multiple land cover types and snow–vegetation interactions.
Mariana Verdonen, Alexander Störmer, Eliisa Lotsari, Pasi Korpelainen, Benjamin Burkhard, Alfred Colpaert, and Timo Kumpula
The Cryosphere, 17, 1803–1819, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1803-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1803-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study revealed a stable and even decreasing thickness of thaw depth in peat mounds with perennially frozen cores, despite overall rapid permafrost degradation within 14 years. This means that measuring the thickness of the thawed layer – a commonly used method – is alone insufficient to assess the permafrost conditions in subarctic peatlands. The study showed that climate change is the main driver of these permafrost features’ decay, but its effect depends on the peatland’s local conditions.
Cited articles
Adams, M. S., Bühler, Y., and Fromm, R.: Multitemporal Accuracy and Precision Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Photogrammetry for Slope-Scale Snow Depth Maps in Alpine Terrain, Pure Appl. Geophys., 175, 3303–3324, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1748-y, 2018.
Ahmad, A. and Quegan, S.: Analysis of maximum likelihood classification on multispectral data, Appl. Math. Sci., 6, 6425–6436, 2012.
Aurela, M., Lohila, A., Tuovinen, J. P., Hatakka, J., Penttilä, T., and Laurila, T.: Carbon dioxide and energy flux measurements in four northern-boreal ecosystems at Pallas, Boreal Environ. Res., 20, 455–473, 2015.
Avanzi, F., Bianchi, A., Cina, A., De Michele, C., Maschio, P., Pagliari, D., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., Piras, M., and Rossi, L.: Centimetric accuracy in snow depth using unmanned aerial system photogrammetry and a multistation, Remote Sens., 10, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050765, 2018.
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005.
Benassi, F., Dall'Asta, E., Diotri, F., Forlani, G., di Cella, U. M., Roncella, R., and Santise, M.: Testing accuracy and repeatability of UAV blocks oriented with gnss-supported aerial triangulation, Remote Sens., 9, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020172, 2017.
Boelman, N. T., Liston, G. E., Gurarie, E., Meddens, A. J. H., Mahoney, P. J., Kirchner, P. B., Bohrer, G., Brinkman, T. J., Cosgrove, C. L., Eitel, J. U. H., Hebblewhite, M., Kimball, J. S., Lapoint, S., Nolin, A. W., Pedersen, S. H., Prugh, L. R., Reinking, A. K., and Vierling, L. A.: Integrating snow science and wildlife ecology in Arctic-boreal North America, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 010401, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeec1, 2019.
Bolkas, D.: Assessment of GCP Number and Separation Distance for Small UAS Surveys with and without GNSS-PPK Positioning, J. Surv. Eng., 145, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000283, 2019.
Brasington, J., Langham, J., and Rumsby, B.: Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport, Geomorphology, 53, 299–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00320-3, 2003.
Bring, A., Fedorova, I., Dibike, Y., Hinzman, L., Mård, J., Mernild, S. H., Prowse, T., Semenova, O., Stuefer, S. L., and Woo, M. K.: Arctic terrestrial hydrology: A synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 621–649, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003131, 2016.
Broxton, P. D. and van Leeuwen, W. J. D.: Structure from motion of multi-angle RPAS imagery complements larger-scale airborne lidar data for cost-effective snow monitoring in mountain forests, Remote Sens., 12, 2311, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142311, 2020.
Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Bösch, R., and Stoffel, A.: Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations, The Cryosphere, 10, 1075–1088, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1075-2016, 2016.
Bühler, Y., Adams, M. S., Stoffel, A., and Boesch, R.: Photogrammetric reconstruction of homogenous snow surfaces in alpine terrain applying near-infrared UAS imagery, Int. J. Remote Sens., 38, 3135–3158, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1275060, 2017.
Carey, S. K., Tetzlaff, D., Seibert, J., Soulsby, C., Buttle, J., Laudon, H., McDonnell, J., McGuire, K., Caissie, D., Shanley, J., Kennedy, M., Devito, K. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Inter-comparison of hydro-climatic regimes across northern catchments: Synchronicity, resistance and resilience, Hydrol. Process., 24, 3591–3602, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7880, 2010.
Cimoli, E., Marcer, M., Vandecrux, B., Bøggild, C. E., Williams, G., and Simonsen, S. B.: Application of low-cost UASs and digital photogrammetry for high-resolution snow depth mapping in the Arctic, Remote Sens., 9, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111144, 2017.
Colomina, I. and Molina, P.: Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review, ISPRS J. Photogramm., 92, 79–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013, 2014.
Currier, W. R., Pflug, J., Mazzotti, G., Jonas, T., Deems, J. S., Bormann, K. J., Painter, T. H., Hiemstra, C. A., Gelvin, A., Uhlmann, Z., Spaete, L., Glenn, N. F., and Lundquist, J. D.: Comparing Aerial Lidar Observations With Terrestrial Lidar and Snow-Probe Transects From NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6285–6294, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024533, 2019.
Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H., and Finnegan, D. C.: Lidar measurement of snow depth: A review, J. Glaciol., 59, 467–479, https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J154, 2013.
De Michele, C., Avanzi, F., Passoni, D., Barzaghi, R., Pinto, L., Dosso, P., Ghezzi, A., Gianatti, R., and Della Vedova, G.: Using a fixed-wing UAS to map snow depth distribution: an evaluation at peak accumulation, The Cryosphere, 10, 511–522, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-511-2016, 2016.
Demiroglu, O. C., Lundmark, L., Saarinen, J., and Müller, D. K.: The last resort? Ski tourism and climate change in Arctic Sweden, J. Tour. Futur., 6, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-05-2019-0046, 2019.
Dharmadasa, V., Kinnard, C., and Baraër, M.: An Accuracy Assessment of Snow Depth Measurements in Agro-Forested Environments by UAV Lidar, Remote Sens., 14, 1649, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071649, 2022.
Dietz, A. J., Kuenzer, C., Gessner, U., and Dech, S.: Remote sensing of snow – a review of available methods, Int. J. Remote Sens., 33, 4094–4134, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.640964, 2012.
Duffy, J. P., Cunliffe, A. M., DeBell, L., Sandbrook, C., Wich, S. A., Shutler, J. D., Myers-Smith, I. H., Varela, M. R., and Anderson, K.: Location, location, location: considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging environments, Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv., 4, 7–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.58, 2018.
Fernandes, R., Prevost, C., Canisius, F., Leblanc, S. G., Maloley, M., Oakes, S., Holman, K., and Knudby, A.: Monitoring snow depth change across a range of landscapes with ephemeral snowpacks using structure from motion applied to lightweight unmanned aerial vehicle videos, The Cryosphere, 12, 3535–3550, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3535-2018, 2018.
Forlani, G., Dall'Asta, E., Diotri, F., di Cella, U. M., Roncella, R., and Santise, M.: Quality assessment of DSMs produced from UAV flights georeferenced with on-board RTK positioning, Remote Sens., 10, 311, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020311, 2018.
Frei, A., Tedesco, M., Lee, S., Foster, J., Hall, D. K., Kelly, R., and Robinson, D. A.: A review of global satellite-derived snow products, Adv. Space Res., 50, 1007–1029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.021, 2012.
Grünewald, T. and Lehning, M.: Are flat-field snow depth measurements representative? A comparison of selected index sites with areal snow depth measurements at the small catchment scale, Hydrol. Process., 29, 1717–1728, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10295, 2015.
Gunn, G. E., Jones, B. M., and Rangel, R. C.: Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle Retrieval of Snow Depth Over Freshwater Lake Ice Using Structure From Motion, Front. Remote Sens., 2, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.675846, 2021.
Harder, P., Schirmer, M., Pomeroy, J., and Helgason, W.: Accuracy of snow depth estimation in mountain and prairie environments by an unmanned aerial vehicle, The Cryosphere, 10, 2559–2571, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2559-2016, 2016.
Harder, P., Pomeroy, J. W., and Helgason, W. D.: Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques, The Cryosphere, 14, 1919–1935, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020, 2020.
Jacobs, J. M., Hunsaker, A. G., Sullivan, F. B., Palace, M., Burakowski, E. A., Herrick, C., and Cho, E.: Snow depth mapping with unpiloted aerial system lidar observations: a case study in Durham, New Hampshire, United States, The Cryosphere, 15, 1485–1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1485-2021, 2021.
James, M. R. and Robson, S.: Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground-based image networks, Earth Surf. Process. Land., 39, 1413–1420, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3609, 2014.
Kellomäki, S., Maajärvi, M., Strandman, H., Kilpeläinen, A., and Peltola, H.: Model computations on the climate change effects on snow cover, soil moisture and soil frost in the boreal conditions over Finland, Silva Fenn., 44, 213–233, https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.455, 2010.
Kramar, V., Röning, J., Erkkilä, J., Hinkula, H., Kolli, T., and Rauhala, A.: Unmanned Aircraft Systems and the Nordic Challenges, in: New Developments and Environmental Applications of Drones, edited by: Lipping, T., Linna, P., and Narra, N., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77860-6_1, 2022.
Kuusisto, E.: Snow accumulation and snowmelt in Finland, Publications of the Water Research Institute 55, National Board of Waters, Helsinki, 149, ISBN 951-46-7494-4, 1984.
Lendzioch, T., Langhammer, J., and Jenicek, M.: TRACKING FOREST AND OPEN AREA EFFECTS ON SNOW ACCUMULATION BY UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PHOTOGRAMMETRY, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B1, 917–923, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B1-917-2016, 2016.
Levene, H.: Robust Tests for Equality of Variances, in: Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, edited by: Olkin, I., Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, 278–292, ISBN 978-0-8047-0596-7, 1960.
Lundberg, A. and Koivusalo, H.: Estimating winter evaporation in boreal forests with operational snow course data, Hydrol. Process., 17, 1479–1493, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1179, 2003.
Lundberg, A., Granlund, N., and Gustafsson, D.: Towards automated “ground truth” snow measurements-a review of operational and new measurement methods for Sweden, Norway, and Finland, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1955–1970, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7658, 2010.
Martínez-Carricondo, P., Agüera-Vega, F., Carvajal-Ramírez, F., Mesas-Carrascosa, F. J., García-Ferrer, A., and Pérez-Porras, F. J.: Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 72, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.05.015, 2018.
Marttila, H., Lohila, A., Ala-Aho, P., Noor, K., Welker, J. M., Croghan, D., Mustonen, K., Meriö, L., Autio, A., Muhic, F., Bailey, H., Aurela, M., Vuorenmaa, J., Penttilä, T., Hyöky, V., Klein, E., Kuzmin, A., Korpelainen, P., Kumpula, T., Rauhala, A. and Kløve, B.: Subarctic catchment water storage and carbon cycling – Leading the way for future studies using integrated datasets at Pallas, Finland, Hydrol. Process., 35, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14350, 2021.
Meriö, L.-J., Rauhala, A., Ala-aho, P., Kuzmin, A., Korpelainen, P., Kumpula, T., Kløve, B., and Marttila, H.: Measuring the spatiotemporal variability in snow depth in subarctic environments using UASs – Part 2: Snow processes and snow–canopy interactions, The Cryosphere, 17, 4363–4380, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4363-2023, 2023.
Mosbrucker, A. R., Major, J. J., Spicer, K. R., and Pitlick, J.: Camera system considerations for geomorphic applications of SfM photogrammetry, Earth Surf. Process. Land., 42, 969–986, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4066, 2017.
Nex, F. and Remondino, F.: UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review, Appl. Geomatics, 6, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x, 2014.
Nolin, A. W.: Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow, J. Glaciol., 56, 1141–1150, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796406077, 2010.
O'Connor, J., Smith, M. J., and James, M. R.: Cameras and settings for aerial surveys in the geosciences: Optimising image data, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 41, 325–344, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317703092, 2017.
Padró, J. C., Muñoz, F. J., Planas, J., and Pons, X.: Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 75, 130–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.10.018, 2019.
Pirinen, P., Simola, H., Aalto, J., Kaukoranta, J., Karlsson, P., and Ruuhela, R.: Tilastoja Suomen ilmastosta 1981–2010 [Climatological statistics of Finland 1981–2010], Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, 83 pp., ISBN 978-951-697-766-2, 2012.
Ranquist, E. A., Steiner, M., and Argrow, B.: Exploring the Range of Weather Impacts on UAS Operations, in: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, Seattle, WA, USA, 22–26 January 2017.
Rauhala, A.: Accuracy assessment of UAS photogrammetry with GCP and PPK-assisted georeferencing, in: New Developments and Environmental Applications of Drones – Proceedings of FinDrones 2023, edited by: Westerlund, T., and Queralta, J. P., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, accepted, 2023.
Rauhala, A., Meriö, L. J., Korpelainen, P., and Kuzmin, A.: Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) snow depth mapping at the Pallas Atmosphere-Ecosystem Supersite, Fairdata [data set], https://doi.org/10.23729/43d37797-e8cf-4190-80f1-ff567ec62836, 2022.
Redpath, T. A. N., Sirguey, P., and Cullen, N. J.: Repeat mapping of snow depth across an alpine catchment with RPAS photogrammetry, The Cryosphere, 12, 3477–3497, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3477-2018, 2018.
Revuelto, J., Alonso-Gonzalez, E., Vidaller-Gayan, I., Lacroix, E., Izagirre, E., Rodríguez-López, G., and López-Moreno, J. I.: Intercomparison of UAV platforms for mapping snow depth distribution in complex alpine terrain, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 190, 103344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103344, 2021.
Sanz-Ablanedo, E., Chandler, J. H., Rodríguez-Pérez, J. R., and Ordóñez, C.: Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM photogrammetry survey as a function of the number and location of ground control points used, Remote Sens., 10, 1606, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101606, 2018.
Štroner, M., Urban, R., Křemen, T., and Braun, J.: UAV DTM acquisition in a forested area–comparison of low-cost photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) and LiDAR solutions (DJI Zenmuse L1), Eur. J. Remote Sens., 56, 2179942, https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2179942, 2023.
Stuefer, S. L., Kane, D. L., and Dean, K. M.: Snow Water Equivalent Measurements in Remote Arctic Alaska Watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025621, 2020.
Sturm, M. and Holmgren, J.: An Automatic Snow Depth Probe for Field Validation Campaigns, Water Resour. Res., 54, 9695–9701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023559, 2018.
Tomaštík, J., Mokroš, M., Surový, P., Grznárová, A., and Merganič, J.: UAV RTK/PPK method-An optimal solution for mapping inaccessible forested areas?, Remote Sens., 11, 721, https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11060721, 2019.
Tonkin, T. N. and Midgley, N. G.: Ground-control networks for image based surface reconstruction: An investigation of optimum survey designs using UAV derived imagery and structure-from-motion photogrammetry, Remote Sens., 8, 16–19, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090786, 2016.
Vander Jagt, B., Lucieer, A., Wallace, L., Turner, D., and Durand, M.: Snow Depth Retrieval with UAS Using Photogrammetric Techniques, Geosciences, 5, 264–285, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences5030264, 2015.
Veijalainen, N., Lotsari, E., Alho, P., Vehviläinen, B., and Käyhkö, J.: National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland, J. Hydrol., 391, 333–350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035, 2010.
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., and Reynolds, J. M.: “Structure-from-Motion” photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications, Geomorphology, 179, 300–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021, 2012.
Yu, J. J., Kim, D. W., Lee, E. J., and Son, S. W.: Determining the optimal number of ground control points for varying study sites through accuracy evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based 3d point clouds and digital surface models, Drones, 4, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030049, 2020.
Zhang, H., Aldana-Jague, E., Clapuyt, F., Wilken, F., Vanacker, V., and Van Oost, K.: Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 807–827, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-807-2019, 2019.
Zhang, Z., Glaser, S., Bales, R., Conklin, M., Rice, R., and Marks, D.: Insights into mountain precipitation and snowpack from a basin-scale wireless-sensor network, Water Resour. Res., 53, 6626–6641, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018825, 2017.
Short summary
Snow conditions in the Northern Hemisphere are rapidly changing, and information on snow depth is important for decision-making. We present snow depth measurements using different drones throughout the winter at a subarctic site. Generally, all drones produced good estimates of snow depth in open areas. However, differences were observed in the accuracies produced by the different drones, and a reduction in accuracy was observed when moving from an open mire area to forest-covered areas.
Snow conditions in the Northern Hemisphere are rapidly changing, and information on snow depth...