Articles | Volume 17, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3721-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3721-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Sep 2023
Research article |
| 01 Sep 2023
| 01 Sep 2023
Assimilating CryoSat-2 freeboard to improve Arctic sea ice thickness estimates
Nationalt Center for Klimaforskning, Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
Till A. S. Rasmussen
Nationalt Center for Klimaforskning, Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Lars Stenseng
DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej Bygning 328, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Related authors
Imke Sievers, Henriette Skourup, and Till A. S. Rasmussen
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-122, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-122, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for TC
Short summary
Short summary
To derive sea ice thickness (SIT) from satellite freeboard (FB) observations, assumptions about snow thickness, snow density, sea ice density and water density are needed. These parameters are impossible to observe alongside FB, so many existing products use empirical values. In this study, modeled values are used instead. The modeled values and otherwise commonly used empirical values are evaluated against in situ observations. In a further analysis, the influence on the SIT is quantified.
Imke Sievers, Andrea M. U. Gierisch, Till A. S. Rasmussen, Robinson Hordoir, and Lars Stenseng
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
To predict Arctic sea ice models are used. Many ice models exists. They all are skill full, but give different results. Often this differences result from forcing as for example air temperature. Other differences result from the way the physical equations are solved in the model. In this study two commonly used models are compared under equal forcing, to find out how much the models differ under similar external forcing. The results are compared to observations and to eachother.
Till Andreas Soya Rasmussen, Jacob Poulsen, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Ruchira Sasanka, Anthony P. Craig, Elizabeth Clare Hunke, and Stefan Rethmeier
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-40, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-40, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models (ESM) today strive towards better quality based on improved resolution and improved physics. One of the limiting factors is the super computers at hand and how to utilize these. This study focus on a refactorization of one part of a sea ice model (CICE), namely the dynamics. The study shows that the performance can be significantly reduced, which means that one can either run the same simulations much cheaper or advance the system according to what is needed.
Jean-Francois Lemieux, William Lipscomb, Anthony Craig, David A. Bailey, Elizabeth Hunke, Philippe Blain, Till A. S. Rasmussen, Mats Bentsen, Frederic Dupont, David Hebert, and Richard Allard
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-239, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-239, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
We present the latest version of the CICE model. CICE solves equations that describe the dynamics and the growth/melt of sea ice. To do so, the domain is divided in grid cells and the variables are positioned at specific locations in the cells. A new implementation (C-grid) is presented with the velocity located on cell edges. Compared to the previous B-grid, the C-grid allows a natural coupling with some oceanic and atmospheric models. It also allows the transport of ice in narrow channels.
Imke Sievers, Henriette Skourup, and Till A. S. Rasmussen
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-122, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-122, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for TC
Short summary
Short summary
To derive sea ice thickness (SIT) from satellite freeboard (FB) observations, assumptions about snow thickness, snow density, sea ice density and water density are needed. These parameters are impossible to observe alongside FB, so many existing products use empirical values. In this study, modeled values are used instead. The modeled values and otherwise commonly used empirical values are evaluated against in situ observations. In a further analysis, the influence on the SIT is quantified.
Imke Sievers, Andrea M. U. Gierisch, Till A. S. Rasmussen, Robinson Hordoir, and Lars Stenseng
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-84, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
To predict Arctic sea ice models are used. Many ice models exists. They all are skill full, but give different results. Often this differences result from forcing as for example air temperature. Other differences result from the way the physical equations are solved in the model. In this study two commonly used models are compared under equal forcing, to find out how much the models differ under similar external forcing. The results are compared to observations and to eachother.
Torben Schmith, Jacob Woge Nielsen, Till Andreas Soya Rasmussen, and Henrik Feddersen
Ocean Sci., 14, 1435–1447, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1435-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1435-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Using the Baltic Sea as an example, the benefit of increased wave model resolution as opposed to ensemble forecasting is examined, on the premise that the extra computational effort tends to be of the same order of magnitude in both cases. For offshore waters, an ensemble mean is shown to outperform high-resolution modeling. However, for nearshore or shallow waters, where fine-scale depth or coastal features gain importance, this is not necessarily found to be the case.
E. Darelius, I. Fer, T. Rasmussen, C. Guo, and K. M. H. Larsen
Ocean Sci., 11, 855–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-855-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-855-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Quasi-regular eddies are known to be generated in the outflow of dense water through the Faroe Bank Channel. One year long mooring records from the plume region show that (1) the energy associated with the eddies varies by a factor of 10 throughout the year and (2) the frequency of the eddies shifts between 3 and 6 days and is related to the strength of the outflow. Similar variability is shown by a high-resolution regional model and the observations agree with theory on baroclinic instability.
K. Lindbäck, R. Pettersson, S. H. Doyle, C. Helanow, P. Jansson, S. S. Kristensen, L. Stenseng, R. Forsberg, and A. L. Hubbard
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 331–338, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-331-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-331-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Data Assimilation
Assimilation of satellite swaths versus daily means of sea ice concentration in a regional coupled ocean–sea ice model
Local analytical optimal nudging for assimilating AMSR2 sea ice concentration in a high-resolution pan-Arctic coupled ocean (HYCOM 2.2.98) and sea ice (CICE 5.1.2) model
Towards improving short-term sea ice predictability using deformation observations
The effects of assimilating a sub-grid-scale sea ice thickness distribution in a new Arctic sea ice data assimilation system
Arctic sea ice data assimilation combining an ensemble Kalman filter with a novel Lagrangian sea ice model for the winter 2019–2020
Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM)
A Bayesian approach towards daily pan-Arctic sea ice freeboard estimates from combined CryoSat-2 and Sentinel-3 satellite observations
Estimating parameters in a sea ice model using an ensemble Kalman filter
Impact of assimilating sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness and snow depth in a coupled ocean–sea ice modelling system
Estimation of sea ice parameters from sea ice model with assimilated ice concentration and SST
Impact of assimilating a merged sea-ice thickness from CryoSat-2 and SMOS in the Arctic reanalysis
Marina Durán Moro, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, Thomas Lavergne, Laurent Bertino, Yvonne Gusdal, Silje Christine Iversen, and Jozef Rusin
The Cryosphere, 18, 1597–1619, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1597-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1597-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Individual satellite passes instead of daily means of sea ice concentration are used to correct the sea ice model forecast in the Barents Sea. The use of passes provides a significantly larger improvement of the forecasts even after a 7 d period due to the more precise information on temporal and spatial variability contained in the passes. One major advantage of the use of satellite passes is that there is no need to wait for the daily mean availability in order to update the forecast.
Keguang Wang, Alfatih Ali, and Caixin Wang
The Cryosphere, 17, 4487–4510, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4487-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4487-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A simple, efficient. and accurate data assimilation method, local analytical optimal nudging (LAON), is introduced to assimilate high-resolution sea ice concentration in a pan-Arctic high-resolution coupled ocean and sea ice model. The method provides a new vision by nudging the model evolution to the optimal estimate forwardly, continuously, and smoothly. This method is applicable to the general nudging theory and applications in physics, Earth science, psychology, and behavior sciences.
Anton Korosov, Pierre Rampal, Yue Ying, Einar Ólason, and Timothy Williams
The Cryosphere, 17, 4223–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4223-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4223-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is possible to compute sea ice motion from satellite observations and detect areas where ice converges (moves together), forms ice ridges or diverges (moves apart) and opens leads. However, it is difficult to predict the exact motion of sea ice and position of ice ridges or leads using numerical models. We propose a new method to initialise a numerical model from satellite observations to improve the accuracy of the forecasted position of leads and ridges for safer navigation.
Nicholas Williams, Nicholas Byrne, Daniel Feltham, Peter Jan Van Leeuwen, Ross Bannister, David Schroeder, Andrew Ridout, and Lars Nerger
The Cryosphere, 17, 2509–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2509-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Observations show that the Arctic sea ice cover has reduced over the last 40 years. This study uses ensemble-based data assimilation in a stand-alone sea ice model to investigate the impacts of assimilating three different kinds of sea ice observation, including the novel assimilation of sea ice thickness distribution. We show that assimilating ice thickness distribution has a positive impact on thickness and volume estimates within the ice pack, especially for very thick ice.
Sukun Cheng, Yumeng Chen, Ali Aydoğdu, Laurent Bertino, Alberto Carrassi, Pierre Rampal, and Christopher K. R. T. Jones
The Cryosphere, 17, 1735–1754, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work studies a novel application of combining a Lagrangian sea ice model, neXtSIM, and data assimilation. It uses a deterministic ensemble Kalman filter to incorporate satellite-observed ice concentration and thickness in simulations. The neXtSIM Lagrangian nature is handled using a remapping strategy on a common homogeneous mesh. The ensemble is formed by perturbing air–ocean boundary conditions and ice cohesion. Thanks to data assimilation, winter Arctic sea ice forecasting is enhanced.
Emma K. Fiedler, Matthew J. Martin, Ed Blockley, Davi Mignac, Nicolas Fournier, Andy Ridout, Andrew Shepherd, and Rachel Tilling
The Cryosphere, 16, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice thickness (SIT) observations derived from CryoSat-2 satellite measurements have been successfully used to initialise an ocean and sea ice forecasting model (FOAM). Other centres have previously used gridded and averaged SIT observations for this purpose, but we demonstrate here for the first time that SIT measurements along the satellite orbit track can be used. Validation of the resulting modelled SIT demonstrates improvements in the model performance compared to a control.
William Gregory, Isobel R. Lawrence, and Michel Tsamados
The Cryosphere, 15, 2857–2871, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2857-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2857-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite measurements of radar freeboard allow us to compute the thickness of sea ice from space; however attaining measurements across the entire Arctic basin typically takes up to 30 d. Here we present a statistical method which allows us to combine observations from three separate satellites to generate daily estimates of radar freeboard across the Arctic Basin. This helps us understand how sea ice thickness is changing on shorter timescales and what may be causing these changes.
Yong-Fei Zhang, Cecilia M. Bitz, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Nancy S. Collins, Timothy J. Hoar, Kevin D. Raeder, and Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth
The Cryosphere, 15, 1277–1284, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1277-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice models suffer from large uncertainties arising from multiple sources, among which parametric uncertainty is highly under-investigated. We select a key ice albedo parameter and update it by assimilating either sea ice concentration or thickness observations. We found that the sea ice albedo parameter is improved by data assimilation, especially by assimilating sea ice thickness observations. The improved parameter can further benefit the forecast of sea ice after data assimilation stops.
Sindre Fritzner, Rune Graversen, Kai H. Christensen, Philip Rostosky, and Keguang Wang
The Cryosphere, 13, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-491-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-491-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, a coupled ocean and sea-ice ensemble-based assimilation system is used to assess the impact of different observations on the assimilation system. The focus of this study is on sea-ice observations, including the use of satellite observations of sea-ice concentration, sea-ice thickness and snow depth for assimilation. The study showed that assimilation of sea-ice thickness in addition to sea-ice concentration has a large positive impact on the coupled model.
Siva Prasad, Igor Zakharov, Peter McGuire, Desmond Power, and Martin Richard
The Cryosphere, 12, 3949–3965, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3949-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3949-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A numerical sea ice model, CICE, was used along with data assimilation to derive sea ice parameters in the region of Baffin Bay, Hudson Bay and Labrador Sea. The modelled ice parameters were compared with parameters estimated from remote-sensing data. The ice concentration, thickness and freeboard estimates from the model assimilated with both ice concentration and SST were found to be within the uncertainty of the observations except during March.
Jiping Xie, François Counillon, and Laurent Bertino
The Cryosphere, 12, 3671–3691, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3671-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3671-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We use the winter sea-ice thickness dataset CS2SMOS merged from two satellites SMOS and CryoSat-2 for assimilation into an ice–ocean reanalysis of the Arctic, complemented by several other ocean and sea-ice measurements, using an Ensemble Kalman Filter. The errors of sea-ice thickness are reduced by 28% and the improvements persists through the summer when observations are unavailable. Improvements of ice drift are however limited to the Central Arctic.
Cited articles
Aaboe, S., Down, E. J., and Eastwood, S.: Product User Manual for the Global
sea-ice edge and type Product, Norwegian Meteorological Institute: Oslo,
Norway, https://osisaf-hl.met.no/sites/osisaf-hl/files/user_manuals/osisaf_cdop3_ss2_pum_sea-ice-edge-type_v3p1.pdf (last access: 30 August 2023), 2021. a
BGEP (Beaufort Gyre Exploration Program): https://www2.whoi.edu/site/beaufortgyre/, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution last access: 29 June 2022. a
Blockley, E. W., Martin, M. J., McLaren, A. J., Ryan, A. G., Waters, J., Lea, D. J., Mirouze, I., Peterson, K. A., Sellar, A., and Storkey, D.: Recent development of the Met Office operational ocean forecasting system: an overview and assessment of the new Global FOAM forecasts, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2613–2638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2613-2014, 2014. a
Bloom, S., Takacs, L., Da Silva, A., and Ledvina, D.: Data assimilation using
incremental analysis updates, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1256–1271, 1996. a
Cao, Y., Liang, S., Sun, L., Liu, J., Cheng, X., Wang, D., Chen, Y., Yu, M.,
and Feng, K.: Trans-Arctic shipping routes expanding faster than the model
projections, Global Environ. Chang., 73, 102488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102488, 2022. a
Cox, G. F. and Weeks, W. F.: Salinity variations in sea ice, J.
Glaciol., 13, 109–120, 1974. a
Dai, A. and Trenberth, K. E.: Estimates of freshwater discharge from
continents: Latitudinal and seasonal variations, J. Hydrometeorol.,
3, 660–687, 2002. a
Drinkwater, M. R., Francis, R., Ratier, G., and Wingham, D. J.: The European
Space Agency’s earth explorer mission CryoSat: measuring variability in the
cryosphere, Ann. Glaciol., 39, 313–320, 2004. a
Egbert, G. D. and Erofeeva, S. Y.: Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic
ocean tides, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 183–204,
2002. a
Fetterer, F. and Stewart, J. S.: U.S. National Ice Center Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice Concentration and Climatologies in Gridded Format, Version 1, Boulder, Colorado USA, National Snow and Ice Data Center [data set],
https://doi.org/10.7265/46cc-3952, 2020. a
Fiedler, E. K., Martin, M. J., Blockley, E., Mignac, D., Fournier, N., Ridout, A., Shepherd, A., and Tilling, R.: Assimilation of sea ice thickness derived from CryoSat-2 along-track freeboard measurements into the Met Office's Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM), The Cryosphere, 16, 61–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-61-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Garnier, F., Fleury, S., Garric, G., Bouffard, J., Tsamados, M., Laforge, A., Bocquet, M., Fredensborg Hansen, R. M., and Remy, F.: Advances in altimetric snow depth estimates using bi-frequency SARAL and CryoSat-2 Ka–Ku measurements, The Cryosphere, 15, 5483–5512, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5483-2021, 2021. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: Complete ERA5:
Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate,
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803,
2017. a
Hordoir, R., Skagseth, Ø., Ingvaldsen, R. B., Sandø, A. B., Löptien,
U., Dietze, H., Gierisch, A. M., Assmann, K. M., Lundesgaard, Ø., and
Lind, S.: Changes in Arctic Stratification and Mixed Layer Depth Cycle: A
Modeling Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127,
e2021JC017270, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jc017270, 2022. a
Hunke, E., Allard, R., Bailey, D. A., Blain, P., Craig, A., Dupont, F., DuVivier, A., Grumbine, R., Hebert, D., Holland, M., Jeffery, N., Lemieux, J.-F., Osinski, R., Rasmussen, T., Ribergaard, M., Roberts, A., Turner, M., Winton, M., and Rethmeier, S.: CICE-Consortium/CICE: CICE Version 6.2.0 (6.2.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4671172, 2021. a
Hunke, E., Allard, R., Bailey, D. A., Blain, P., Craig, A., Dupont, F.,
DuVivier, A., Grumbine, R., Hebert, D., Holland, M., Jeffery, N., Lemieux,
J.-F., Osinski, R., Rasmussen, T., Ribergaard, M., Roberts, A., Turner, M.,
and Winton, M.: CICE-Consortium/Icepack: Icepack 1.2.5, Zenodo,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4671132, 2021b. a, b
Hunke, E., Allard, R., Bailey, D. A., Blain, P., Craig, A., Dupont, F.,
DuVivier, A., Grumbine, R., Hebert, D., Holland, M., Jeffery, N., Lemieux,
J.-F., Osinski, R., Rasmussen, T., Ribergaard, M., Roberts, A., Turner, M.,
Winton, M., and Rethmeier, S.: CICE Version 6.2.0,
https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/CICE/tree/CICE6.2.0 (last access: 12 April 2021),
2021a. a, b, c
Ivanova, N., Tonboe, R., and Pedersen, L.: SICCI Product Validation and
Algorithm Selection Report (PVASR)–Sea Ice Concentration, Technical Report, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2204.0649,
2013. a
Ivanova, N., Johannessen, O. M., Pedersen, L. T., and Tonboe, R. T.: Retrieval
of Arctic Sea Ice Parameters by Satellite Passive Microwave Sensors: A
Comparison of Eleven Sea Ice Concentration Algorithms, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote, 52, 7233–7246,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2310136, 2014. a
Jackson, K., Wilkinson, J., Maksym, T., Meldrum, D., Beckers, J., Haas, C., and
Mackenzie, D.: A novel and low-cost sea ice mass balance buoy, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 2676–2688, 2013. a
Kaminski, T., Kauker, F., Toudal Pedersen, L., Voßbeck, M., Haak, H., Niederdrenk, L., Hendricks, S., Ricker, R., Karcher, M., Eicken, H., and Gråbak, O.: Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis: impact of sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products on sea ice forecast performance, The Cryosphere, 12, 2569–2594, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2569-2018, 2018. a, b
Kern, S., Khvorostovsky, K., Skourup, H., Rinne, E., Parsakhoo, Z. S., Djepa, V., Wadhams, P., and Sandven, S.: The impact of snow depth, snow density and ice density on sea ice thickness retrieval from satellite radar altimetry: results from the ESA-CCI Sea Ice ECV Project Round Robin Exercise, The Cryosphere, 9, 37–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-37-2015, 2015. a, b
Kern, S., Rösel, A., Pedersen, L. T., Ivanova, N., Saldo, R., and Tonboe, R. T.: The impact of melt ponds on summertime microwave brightness temperatures and sea-ice concentrations, The Cryosphere, 10, 2217–2239, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2217-2016, 2016. a
King, J., Skourup, H., Hvidegaard, S. M., Rösel, A., Gerland, S., Spreen,
G., Polashenski, C., Helm, V., and Liston, G. E.: Comparison of freeboard
retrieval and ice thickness calculation from ALS, ASIRAS, and CryoSat-2 in
the Norwegian Arctic to field measurements made during the N-ICE2015
expedition, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 1123–1141, 2018. a, b
Kurtz, N. T., Farrell, S. L., Studinger, M., Galin, N., Harbeck, J. P., Lindsay, R., Onana, V. D., Panzer, B., and Sonntag, J. G.: Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data, The Cryosphere, 7, 1035–1056, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1035-2013, 2013. a
Kurtz, N. T. and Farrell, S. L.: Large-scale surveys of snow depth on Arctic
sea ice from Operation IceBridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L20505, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049216, 2011. a, b
Kwok, R. and Cunningham, G.: Variability of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume
from CryoSat-2, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 373, 20140157, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0157, 2015. a
Kwok, R., Panzer, B., Leuschen, C., Pang, S., Markus, T., Holt, B., and
Gogineni, S.: Airborne surveys of snow depth over Arctic sea ice, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, C11018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007371, 2011. a
Landy, J. C., Tsamados, M., and Scharien, R. K.: A facet-based numerical model
for simulating SAR altimeter echoes from heterogeneous sea ice surfaces, IEEE
T. Geosci. Remote, 57, 4164–4180, 2019. a
Landy, J. C., Dawson, G. J., Tsamados, M., Bushuk, M., Stroeve, J. C., Howell,
S. E., Krumpen, T., Babb, D. G., Komarov, A. S., Heorton, H. D., Belter, B. S., Jakob, H., and Yevgeny, A.: A
year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2, Nature, 609,
517–522, 2022. a
Laxon, S., Peacock, N., and Smith, D.: High interannual variability of sea ice
thickness in the Arctic region, Nature, 425, 947–950, 2003. a
Laxon, S. W., Giles, K. A., Ridout, A. L., Wingham, D. J., Willatt, R., Cullen,
R., Kwok, R., Schweiger, A., Zhang, J., Haas, C., Hendricks, S., Krishfield, R., Kurtz, N., Farrell, S., and Davidson, M.: CryoSat-2 estimates
of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
732–737, 2013. a, b, c, d
Lei, R., Cheng, B., Hoppmann, M., and Zuo, G.: Snow depth and sea ice thickness
derived from the measurements of SIMBA buoys deployed in the Arctic Ocean
during the Legs 1a, 1, and 3 of the MOSAiC campaign in 2019–2020, PANGAEA [data set],
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.938244, 2021. a, b
Lellouche, J.-M., Greiner, E., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Garric, G., Melet, A.,
Drévillon, M., Bricaud, C., Hamon, M., Le Galloudec, O., Regnier, C.,
Candela, T., Testut, C.-E., Gasparin, F., Ruggiero, G., Benkiran, M., Drillet, Y., and Le Traon, P.-Y.: The Copernicus global 1/12° oceanic and sea ice GLORYS12 reanalysis,
Front. Earth Sci., 9, 585, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.698876, 2021. a
Liston, G. E., Itkin, P., Stroeve, J., Tschudi, M., Stewart, J. S., Pedersen,
S. H., Reinking, A. K., and Elder, K.: A Lagrangian snow-evolution system for
sea-ice applications (SnowModel-LG): Part I–Model description, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015913, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015913, 2020. a
Madec, G., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Ethé, C., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lévy, C., Lovato, T., Martin, N., Masson, S., Mocavero, S., Rousset, C., Storkey, D., Vancoppenolle, M., Müeller, S., Nurser, G., Bell, M., and Samson, G.:
NEMO ocean engine, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878122, 2017. a, b
Mallett, R. D. C., Lawrence, I. R., Stroeve, J. C., Landy, J. C., and Tsamados, M.: Brief communication: Conventional assumptions involving the speed of radar waves in snow introduce systematic underestimates to sea ice thickness and seasonal growth rate estimates, The Cryosphere, 14, 251–260, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-251-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Martino, A. J., Neumann, T. A., Kurtz, N. T., and McLennan, D.: ICESat-2
mission overview and early performance, in: Sensors, systems, and
next-generation satellites XXIII, 11151, 68–77, SPIE, 2019. a
Mu, L., Yang, Q., Losch, M., Losa, S. N., Ricker, R., Nerger, L., and Liang,
X.: Improving sea ice thickness estimates by assimilating CryoSat-2 and SMOS
sea ice thickness data simultaneously, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 144, 529–538, 2018. a
Nerger, L., Janjić, T., Schröter, J., and Hiller, W.: A regulated
localization scheme for ensemble-based Kalman filters, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 138, 802–812, 2012. a
Nord, A., Kärnä, T., Lindenthal, A., Ljungemyr, P., Maljutenko, I.,
Falahat, S., Ringgaard, I. M., Korabel, V., Kanarik, H., Verjovkina, S.,
Jandt, S., with support of the whole
BAL MFC team: New coupled forecasting system for the baltic sea area, in: 9th
EuroGOOS International conference, Ifremer; EuroGOOS AISBL, May 2021, Brest, France, 238–244, hal-03328374v2f, 2021. a
OSI SAF: Global Sea Ice Concentration Climate Data Record v2.0 – Multimission,
EUMETSAT SAF on Ocean and Sea Ice [data set], https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0008, 2017. a
OSI SAF: OSISAF: Global Sea Ice Concentration Climate Data Record v3.0 – Multimission, EUMETSAT SAF on Ocean and Sea Ice [data set], https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0014, 2022. a
Ricker, R., Hendricks, S., Helm, V., Skourup, H., and Davidson, M.: Sensitivity of CryoSat-2 Arctic sea-ice freeboard and thickness on radar-waveform interpretation, The Cryosphere, 8, 1607–1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1607-2014, 2014. a, b, c, d
Rösel, A. and Kaleschke, L.: Influence of melt ponds on microwave sensors'
sea ice concentration retrieval algorithms, in: 2012 IEEE International
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, July 2012,
Munich, Germany,
3261–3264, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350608, 2012. a
Sallila, H., Farrell, S. L., McCurry, J., and Rinne, E.: Assessment of contemporary satellite sea ice thickness products for Arctic sea ice, The Cryosphere, 13, 1187–1213, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
Smith, G. C., Liu, Y., Benkiran, M., Chikhar, K., Surcel Colan, D., Gauthier, A.-A., Testut, C.-E., Dupont, F., Lei, J., Roy, F., Lemieux, J.-F., and Davidson, F.: The Regional Ice Ocean Prediction System v2: a pan-Canadian ocean analysis system using an online tidal harmonic analysis, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1445–1467, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1445-2021, 2021. a
Tranchant, B., Testut, C.-E., Ferry, N., and Brasseur, P.: SAM2: The second
generation of Mercator assimilation system, European Operational
Oceanography: Present and Future, p. 650, ISBN 92-894-9788-2, 2006. a
Tsamados, M., Feltham, D. L., Schroeder, D., Flocco, D., Farrell, S. L., Kurtz,
N., Laxon, S. W., and Bacon, S.: Impact of variable atmospheric and oceanic
form drag on simulations of Arctic sea ice, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,
44, 1329–1353, 2014. a
Tschudi, M. A., Meier, W. N., and Stewart, J. S.: An enhancement to sea ice motion and age products at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), The Cryosphere, 14, 1519–1536, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020, 2020. a
Vernieres, G., Zhao, B., Cullather, R. I., Akella, S., Vikhliaev, Y. V., Kurtz,
N. T., and Kovach, R. M.: Assimilation of Cryosat 2 Arctic Sea-Ice Freeboard
in an Ensemble of Coupled GEOS5, American Geophysical Union, 2016, HE13A–06,
2016. a
Wingham, D., Francis, C., Baker, S., Bouzinac, C., Brockley, D., Cullen, R.,
de Chateau-Thierry, P., Laxon, S., Mallow, U., Mavrocordatos, C., Phalippou, L., Ratier, G., Rey, L., Rostan, F., Viau, P., and Wallis, D.:
CryoSat: A mission to determine the fluctuations in Earth’s land and marine
ice fields, Adv. Space Res., 37, 841–871, 2006. a
Ye, Y., Luo, Y., Sun, Y., Shokr, M., Aaboe, S., Girard-Ardhuin, F., Hui, F., Cheng, X., and Chen, Z.: Inter-comparison and evaluation of Arctic sea ice type products, The Cryosphere, 17, 279–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-279-2023, 2023. a
Zuo, H., Balmaseda, M. A., Tietsche, S., Mogensen, K., and Mayer, M.: The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis–analysis system for ocean and sea ice: a description of the system and assessment, Ocean Sci., 15, 779–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-779-2019, 2019. a
Short summary
The satellite CryoSat-2 measures freeboard (FB), which is used to derive sea ice thickness (SIT) under the assumption of hydrostatic balance. This SIT comes with large uncertainties due to errors in the observed FB, sea ice density, snow density and snow thickness. This study presents a new method to derive SIT by assimilating the FB into the sea ice model, evaluates the resulting SIT against in situ observations and compares the results to the CryoSat-2-derived SIT without FB assimilation.
The satellite CryoSat-2 measures freeboard (FB), which is used to derive sea ice thickness (SIT)...
