Dear Bryan Riel and co-authors,
Your manuscript received two detailed and critical reviews that both highlighted the novelty, thoroughness and relevance of the research and they confirm that the manuscripts seems in general to be well within the scope of TC. Both reviews were very positive but also indicated a few aspects that should be improved which mainly concerned the explanation of the methods.
Given the response of the authors, it seems that the authors will be able to address the raised points by the referees well and that the revised manuscript has a good chance to be accepted. I therefore ask the authors to undertake the planned revisions and submit a revised document.
Please also provide that point by point response.
I thank the authors for their very considerate and detailed response of how to address the points raised by the referees.

Andreas Vieli, editor
5 Dec 2020

Dear Bryan Riel and co-authors,
Your manuscript received 2 thorough, critical but very positive reviews that highlighted the novelty, thoroughness and relevance of the research. Both referees agreed that this research and manuscript would be a very valuable contribution to TC and should be published after improving some aspects which mainly concern the methods and discussion.

In their revised manuscript, the authors very carefully and satisfactorily addressed all these points and further documented and explained their revisions in their response in detail.
I am therefore very happy to accept this manuscript for publication in TC as it is and congratulate the authors for this very interesting, systematic and relevant data analysis approach on the propagation of dynamic signal on Jakobshavn Isbrae. At this stage I would also like to thank the authors for their cooperation in and their handling of the reviewing phase.
Andreas Vieli, handling editor, 18 Dec 2020