The authors have addressed the comments from the referees, and the manuscript seems to be in good shape, except that the new text in the appendices needs some quick editing. I would also ask the authors to look carefully at how the equations have rendered in the PDF version of the article. The terms of the form lambda^{%m} in fraction numerators are not showing up correctly, which may require either modification to the authors’ source files or consultation with the publication department at TC.

338: should be “the a priori”
369: should be “one would conclude” or “one should conclude”
370, delete comma after ‘cases’
372: “with the accuracy of” should be “with accuracies of “
373: add comma after ‘respectively’
375: add comma after EAL, “in case” should be “in the case of”
386: the term “module” is not familiar to me. Do you mean “modulus”? That doesn’t entirely make sense to me. Maybe magnitude?
414: “use the measurements” should be “use measurements”
432: “determination of concentration” should be “determination of the concentration”

Thanks for the quick revisions. The paper looks good.

Best
Ben