Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
The Cryosphere, 10, 371–384, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016

Special issue: Intercomparison of methods to characterise snow...

The Cryosphere, 10, 371–384, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016

Research article 15 Feb 2016

Research article | 15 Feb 2016

Intercomparison of snow density measurements: bias, precision, and vertical resolution

Martin Proksch et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Martin Proksch on behalf of the Authors (12 Nov 2015)  Author's response
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (03 Dec 2015) by Florent Dominé
AR by Martin Proksch on behalf of the Authors (27 Jan 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (04 Feb 2016) by Florent Dominé
Download
Short summary
Density is a fundamental property of porous media such as snow. During the MicroSnow Davos 2014 workshop, different approaches (box-, wedge- and cylinder-type density cutters, micro-computed tomography) to measure snow density were applied in a controlled laboratory environment and in the field. In general, results suggest that snow densities measured by different methods agree within 9 %. However, the density profiles resolved by the measurement methods differed considerably.