Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-371-2016
Research article
 | 
15 Feb 2016
Research article |  | 15 Feb 2016

Intercomparison of snow density measurements: bias, precision, and vertical resolution

Martin Proksch, Nick Rutter, Charles Fierz, and Martin Schneebeli

Viewed

Total article views: 4,706 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,265 2,232 209 4,706 212 216
  • HTML: 2,265
  • PDF: 2,232
  • XML: 209
  • Total: 4,706
  • BibTeX: 212
  • EndNote: 216
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
Density is a fundamental property of porous media such as snow. During the MicroSnow Davos 2014 workshop, different approaches (box-, wedge- and cylinder-type density cutters, micro-computed tomography) to measure snow density were applied in a controlled laboratory environment and in the field. In general, results suggest that snow densities measured by different methods agree within 9 %. However, the density profiles resolved by the measurement methods differed considerably.