Articles | Volume 20, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-97-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-97-2026
Research article
 | 
07 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 07 Jan 2026

Simple analytical–statistical models (ASMs) for mean annual permafrost table temperature and active-layer thickness estimates

Tomáš Uxa, Filip Hrbáček, and Michaela Kňažková

Related authors

PERICLIMv1.0: a model deriving palaeo-air temperatures from thaw depth in past permafrost regions
Tomáš Uxa, Marek Křížek, and Filip Hrbáček
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1865–1884, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1865-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1865-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Aalto, J., Karjalainen, O., Hjort, J., and Luoto, M.: Statistical forecasting of current and future Circum-Arctic ground temperatures and active layer thickness, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 4889–4898, 2018. a
Anisimov, O. A., Shiklomanov, N. I., and Nelson, F. E.: Global warming and active-layer thickness: results from transient general circulation models, Glob. Planet. Change, 15, 61–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(97)00009-X, 1997. a, b
Anisimov, O. A., Shiklomanov, N. I., and Nelson, F. E.: Variability of seasonal thaw depth in permafrost regions: a stochastic modeling approach, Ecol. Model., 153, 217–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00016-9, 2002. a, b, c, d
Biskaborn, B. K., Lanckman, J.-P., Lantuit, H., Elger, K., Streletskiy, D. A., Cable, W. L., and Romanovsky, V. E.: The new database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 7, 245–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-245-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Bonnaventure, P. P. and Lamoureux, S. F.: The active layer: A conceptual review of monitoring, modelling techniques and changes in a warming climate, Prog. Phys. Geog., 37, 352–376, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313478314, 2013. a, b, c
Download
Short summary
We devised two simple models for estimating the mean annual permafrost table temperature and active-layer thickness, which are driven solely by temperatures measured in the active layer; no ground physical properties are required. The models showed deviations of less than 0.05 °C and 9 %, and can therefore be useful tools for permafrost modelling under a wide range of environmental conditions.
Share