To the authors,

You have thoroughly addressed the comments of the reviewers, which were generally positive. I kindly invite you to submit a revised manuscript for further consideration, which carefully addresses the points they raised.

Best regards,
Alex

To the authors,

You have addressed the comments of the reviewers well. I find only minor technical points that need correcting, listed below. I therefore invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript for publication.

Best regards,
Alex

Title: ice-dynamics → ice dynamics

L17: dependant → dependent

L90: through using → using

L120: andin addition to giving an overview of recent changes, the collected data is used in our modelling study. → , which was used in our modelling study and gives an overview of recent changes.

L124: but is → but it is

L161: firstly; secondly → first, second

L241: in no way → not

L251: straddles → overlaps with the

L317: the latter which → the latter of which

L341: well the surface velocities → surface velocities well

Fig. 9b, caption: add a note that the velocity scale is different from that of Fig. 7 to reflect the higher velocities.

L400: ", which merits comment," ← This could be deleted.

L430-434: Duplicated sentence.

L444: focussed → focused

L485: sea level rise → sea-level rise

L520: developed → developed here

Figures: In many figures with a color bar, the range is from 0 to a positive value, for variables that cannot be negative (velocity, ice thickness). If technically feasible, I would suggest you remove the triangle from the lower bound to indicate the color range stops at 0.