Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6229-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6229-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
27 Nov 2025
Research article |
| 27 Nov 2025
| 27 Nov 2025
Buoy measurements of strong waves in ice amplitude modulation: a signature of the impact of sea ice closedness on waves in ice attenuation
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Trygve Halsne
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Bergen, Norway
Ana Carrasco
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Anton Korosov
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway
Joey Voermans
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Patrik Bohlinger
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Bergen, Norway
Jens Boldingh Debernard
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Malte Müller
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Øyvind Breivik
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Bergen, Norway
The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Takehiko Nose
The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
Gaute Hope
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Bergen, Norway
Fabrice Collard
OceanDataLab, Locmaria-Plouzane, France
Sylvain Herlédan
OceanDataLab, Locmaria-Plouzane, France
Tsubasa Kodaira
The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
Nick Hughes
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Tromsø, Norway
Qin Zhang
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Tromsø, Norway
Kai Håkon Christensen
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Alexander Babanin
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Lars Willas Dreyer
The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Cyril Palerme
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Lotfi Aouf
Météo France, CNRM-CNRS, UMR-3589, Toulouse, France
Konstantinos Christakos
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Bergen, Norway
Atle Jensen
The University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Johannes Röhrs
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Aleksey Marchenko
The University Center in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
Graig Sutherland
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, Canada
Trygve Kvåle Løken
Nord University, Bodø, Norway
Takuji Waseda
The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
Related authors
Are Frode Kvanum, Cyril Palerme, Malte Müller, Jean Rabault, and Nick Hughes
The Cryosphere, 19, 4149–4166, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4149-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4149-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies have shown that machine learning models are effective at predicting sea ice concentration, yet few have explored the development of such models in an operational context. In this study, we present the development of a machine learning forecasting system which can predict sea ice concentration at 1 km resolution up to 3 d ahead using real-time operational data. The developed forecasts predict the sea ice edge position with better accuracy than physical and baseline forecasts.
Graig Sutherland, Victor de Aguiar, Lars-Robert Hole, Jean Rabault, Mohammed Dabboor, and Øyvind Breivik
The Cryosphere, 16, 2103–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2103-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2103-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The marginal ice zone (MIZ), which is the transition region between the open ocean and the dense pack ice, is a very dynamic region comprising a mixture of ice and ocean conditions. Using novel drifters deployed in various ice conditions in the MIZ, several material transport models are tested with two operational ice–ocean prediction systems. A new general transport equation, which uses both the ice and ocean solutions, is developed that reduces the error in drift prediction for our case study.
Joey J. Voermans, Qingxiang Liu, Aleksey Marchenko, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Takuji Waseda, Takehiko Nose, Tsubasa Kodaira, Jingkai Li, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have shown through field experiments that the amount of wave energy dissipated in landfast ice, sea ice attached to land, is much larger than in broken ice. By comparing our measurements against predictions of contemporary wave–ice interaction models, we determined which models can explain our observations and which cannot. Our results will improve our understanding of how waves and ice interact and how we can model such interactions to better forecast waves and ice in the polar regions.
Joey J. Voermans, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Aleksey Marchenko, Clarence O. Collins III, Mohammed Dabboor, Graig Sutherland, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we demonstrate the existence of an observational threshold which identifies when waves are most likely to break sea ice. This threshold is based on information from two recent field campaigns, supplemented with existing observations of sea ice break-up. We show that both field and laboratory observations tend to converge to a single quantitative threshold at which the wave-induced sea ice break-up takes place, which opens a promising avenue for operational forecasting models.
Lise Seland Graff, Jerry Tjiputra, Ada Gjermundsen, Andreas Born, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Heiko Goelzer, Yan-Chun He, Petra Margaretha Langebroek, Aleksi Nummelin, Dirk Olivié, Øyvind Seland, Trude Storelvmo, Mats Bentsen, Chuncheng Guo, Andrea Rosendahl, Dandan Tao, Thomas Toniazzo, Camille Li, Stephen Outten, and Michael Schulz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1671–1698, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1671-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The magnitude of future Arctic amplification is highly uncertain. Using the Norwegian Earth System Model, we explore the effect of improving the representation of clouds, ocean eddies, the Greenland ice sheet, sea ice, and ozone on the projected Arctic winter warming in a coordinated experiment set. These improvements all lead to enhanced projected Arctic warming, with the largest changes found in the sea ice retreat regions and the largest uncertainty found on the Atlantic side.
Are Frode Kvanum, Cyril Palerme, Malte Müller, Jean Rabault, and Nick Hughes
The Cryosphere, 19, 4149–4166, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4149-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4149-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies have shown that machine learning models are effective at predicting sea ice concentration, yet few have explored the development of such models in an operational context. In this study, we present the development of a machine learning forecasting system which can predict sea ice concentration at 1 km resolution up to 3 d ahead using real-time operational data. The developed forecasts predict the sea ice edge position with better accuracy than physical and baseline forecasts.
Cédric Penard, Flavien Gouillon, Xavier Delaunay, and Sylvain Herlédan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2983, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2983, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we propose a novel approach, called chunkindex, that was designed to improve the access to time series from native NetCDF (Network Common Data Form) files in the cloud. The advantage of our approach is that it keeps existing data as they are without requiring any reformatting. The idea is to reduce the amount of data read from the NetCDF file by creating sub-chunks that allow extracting smaller portions of compressed data without reading the entire chunk.
Kai Håkon Christensen, Jon Albretsen, Lars Asplin, Håvard Guldbrandsen Frøysa, Yvonne Gusdal, Silje Christine Iversen, Mari Fjalstad Jensen, Ingrid Askeland Johnsen, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Pål Næverlid Sævik, Anne Dagrun Sandvik, Magne Simonsen, Jofrid Skarðhamar, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, and Marta Trodahl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3986, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3986, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes "Norkyst", the operational coastal ocean forecasting system for mainland Norway, which is now in version 3. The system produces five day forecasts of ocean currents, temperature, salinity, and sea surface height every day, and we also maintain an archive of historical data going back to 2012. We show that the outputs of Norkyst have sufficient quality so that it's intended use as a free public service supporting scientists, ocean managers, and industry is justified.
Xianghui Dong, Qingxiang Liu, Stefan Zieger, Alberto Alberello, Ali Abdolali, Jian Sun, Kejian Wu, and Alexander V. Babanin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5801–5823, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5801-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5801-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean surface wave research is vital for coastal management, marine ecology, and ocean engineering. This study simulates waves along the Australian coast using advanced physical and numerical schemes. Model verification with altimeter and buoy data shows good performance. A two-step parameterization improves accuracy in the complex Great Barrier Reef. This study will help us better understand coastal wave climates and assess sea states, enabling us to better develop, protect, and use the sea.
Anton Korosov, Léo Edel, Heather Regan, Thomas Lavergne, Emily Jane Down, and Signe Aaboe
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-477, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-477, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new long-term record of Arctic sea ice age spanning from 1991 to 2024. Using satellite data and a new tracking method, it maps fractions of sea ice from first- to sixth-year and includes uncertainty estimates. The dataset shows a decline in older ice and more first-year ice, it agrees well with buoy data, and supports Arctic monitoring, climate research, navigation, and model evaluation.
Joey J. Voermans, Alexander D. Fraser, Jill Brouwer, Michael H. Meylan, Qingxiang Liu, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 19, 3381–3395, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3381-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3381-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Limited measurements of waves in sea ice exist, preventing our understanding of wave attenuation in sea ice under a wide range of ice conditions. Using satellite observations from ICESat-2, we observe an overall linear increase in the wave attenuation rate with distance into the marginal ice zone. While attenuation may vary greatly locally, this finding may provide opportunities for the modeling of waves in sea ice at global and climate scales when such fine detail may not be needed.
Cyril Palerme, Johannes Röhrs, Thomas Lavergne, Jozef Rusin, Are Frode Kvanum, Atle Macdonald Sørensen, Arne Melsom, Julien Brajard, Martina Idžanović, Marina Durán Moro, and Malte Müller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2001, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present MET-AICE, a sea ice prediction system based on artificial intelligence techniques that has been running operationally since March 2024. The forecasts are produced daily and provide sea ice concentration predictions for the next 10 days. We evaluate the MET-AICE forecasts from the first year of operation, and we compare them to forecasts produced by a physically-based model (Barents-2.5km). We show that MET-AICE is skillful and provides more accurate forecasts than Barents-2.5km.
Åsmund Bakketun, Jostein Blyverket, and Malte Müller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1693, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Obtaining accurate estimates of seasonal snow conditions requires a combination of observations and numerical models. We use a model accounting for the vertical structure of the snow, and a data assimilation method representing varying uncertainty of the model in time and space. Compared to existing products, neglecting these considerations, our system produced improved estimates of seasonal snow conditions. Snow mass estimates suggest a potential impact on derived hydrological applications.
Léo Edel, Jiping Xie, Anton Korosov, Julien Brajard, and Laurent Bertino
The Cryosphere, 19, 731–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-731-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-731-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a new method to estimate Arctic sea ice thickness from 1992 to 2010 using a combination of machine learning and data assimilation. By training a machine learning model on data from 2011 to 2022, past errors in sea ice thickness can be corrected, leading to improved estimations. This approach provides insights into historical changes in sea ice thickness, showing a notable decline from 1992 to 2022, and offers a valuable resource for future studies.
Manuel García-León, José María García-Valdecasas, Lotfi Aouf, Alice Dalphinet, Juan Asensio, Stefania Angela Ciliberti, Breogán Gómez, Víctor Aquino, Roland Aznar, and Marcos Sotillo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-657, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-657, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate short-term wave forecasts are key for coastal activities. These forecasts rely on wind and currents as forcing, which in this work were both enhanced using neural networks (NNs) trained with satellite and radar data. Tested at three European sites, the NN-corrected winds were 35 % more accurate, and currents also improved. This led to improved IBI wave model predictions of wave height and period by 10 % and 17 %, respectively; even correcting under extreme events.
Anton Korosov, Yue Ying, and Einar Ólason
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 885–904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have developed a new method to improve the accuracy of sea ice models, which predict how ice moves and deforms due to wind and ocean currents. Traditional models use parameters that are often poorly defined. The new approach uses machine learning to fine-tune these parameters by comparing simulated ice drift with satellite data. The method identifies optimal settings for the model by analysing patterns in ice deformation. This results in more accurate simulations of sea ice drift forecasting.
Mateusz Matuszak, Johannes Röhrs, Pål Erik Isachsen, and Martina Idžanović
Ocean Sci., 21, 401–418, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-401-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-401-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Lagrangian coherent structures (LCSs) describe material transport in ocean flow by describing transport and accumulation regions. We discuss the implications of model flow field uncertainty for finite-time Lyapunov exponents (FTLEs), which under certain conditions approximate LCSs. FTLEs add value to forecasting when they are certain and long-lived. Averaging FTLEs reveals where they are more certain and long-lived, often influenced by bottom topography.
Einar Ólason, Guillaume Boutin, Timothy Williams, Anton Korosov, Heather Regan, Jonathan Rheinlænder, Pierre Rampal, Daniela Flocco, Abdoulaye Samaké, Richard Davy, Timothy Spain, and Sean Chua
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3521, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces a new version of the neXtSIM sea-ice model. NeXtSIM is unique among sea-ice models in how it represents sea-ice dynamics, focusing on features such as cracks and ridges and how these impact interactions between the atmosphere and ocean where sea ice is present. The new version introduces some physical parameterisations and model options detailed and explained in the paper. Following the paper's publication, the neXtSIM code will be released publicly for the first time.
Alisée A. Chaigneau, Angélique Melet, Aurore Voldoire, Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea, Guillaume Reffray, Stéphane Law-Chune, and Lotfi Aouf
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4031–4048, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate-change-induced sea level rise increases the frequency of extreme sea levels. We analyze projected changes in extreme sea levels for western European coasts produced with high-resolution models (∼ 6 km). Unlike commonly used coarse-scale global climate models, this approach allows us to simulate key processes driving coastal sea level variations, such as long-term sea level rise, tides, storm surges induced by low atmospheric surface pressure and winds, waves, and their interactions.
Alice Laloue, Malek Ghantous, Yannice Faugère, Alice Dalphinet, and Lotfi Aouf
State Planet, 4-osr8, 6, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-4-osr8-6-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-4-osr8-6-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite altimetry shows that daily mean significant wave heights (SWHs) and extreme SWHs have increased in the Southern Ocean, the South Atlantic, and the southern Indian Ocean over the last 2 decades. In winter in the North Atlantic, SWH has increased north of 45°N and decreased south of 45°N. SWHs likely to be exceeded every 100 years have also increased in the North Atlantic and the eastern tropical Pacific. However, this study also revealed the need for longer and more consistent series.
Andreas Stokholm, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Tore Wulf, Anton Korosov, Roberto Saldo, Leif Toudal Pedersen, David Arthurs, Ionut Dragan, Iacopo Modica, Juan Pedro, Annekatrien Debien, Xinwei Chen, Muhammed Patel, Fernando Jose Pena Cantu, Javier Noa Turnes, Jinman Park, Linlin Xu, Katharine Andrea Scott, David Anthony Clausi, Yuan Fang, Mingzhe Jiang, Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan, Neil Curtis Brubacher, Armina Soleymani, Zacharie Gousseau, Michał Smaczny, Patryk Kowalski, Jacek Komorowski, David Rijlaarsdam, Jan Nicolaas van Rijn, Jens Jakobsen, Martin Samuel James Rogers, Nick Hughes, Tom Zagon, Rune Solberg, Nicolas Longépé, and Matilde Brandt Kreiner
The Cryosphere, 18, 3471–3494, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3471-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The AutoICE challenge encouraged the development of deep learning models to map multiple aspects of sea ice – the amount of sea ice in an area and the age and ice floe size – using multiple sources of satellite and weather data across the Canadian and Greenlandic Arctic. Professionally drawn operational sea ice charts were used as a reference. A total of 179 students and sea ice and AI specialists participated and produced maps in broad agreement with the sea ice charts.
Alvise Benetazzo, Trygve Halsne, Øyvind Breivik, Kjersti Opstad Strand, Adrian H. Callaghan, Francesco Barbariol, Silvio Davison, Filippo Bergamasco, Cristobal Molina, and Mauro Bastianini
Ocean Sci., 20, 639–660, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-639-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-639-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the behaviour of air bubble plumes in the upper ocean in various stormy conditions. We conducted a field experiment in the North Adriatic Sea using high-resolution sonar. We found that bubble penetration depths respond rapidly to wind and wave forcings and can be triggered by the cooling of the water masses. We also found a strong connection between bubble depths and theoretical CO2 gas transfer. Our findings have implications for air–sea interaction studies.
Cyril Palerme, Thomas Lavergne, Jozef Rusin, Arne Melsom, Julien Brajard, Are Frode Kvanum, Atle Macdonald Sørensen, Laurent Bertino, and Malte Müller
The Cryosphere, 18, 2161–2176, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-2161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice forecasts are operationally produced using physically based models, but these forecasts are often not accurate enough for maritime operations. In this study, we developed a statistical correction technique using machine learning in order to improve the skill of short-term (up to 10 d) sea ice concentration forecasts produced by the TOPAZ4 model. This technique allows for the reduction of errors from the TOPAZ4 sea ice concentration forecasts by 41 % on average.
Qin Zhang and Nick Hughes
The Cryosphere, 17, 5519–5537, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5519-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5519-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To alleviate tedious manual image annotations for training deep learning (DL) models in floe instance segmentation, we employ a classical image processing technique to automatically label floes in images. We then apply a DL semantic method for fast and adaptive floe instance segmentation from high-resolution airborne and satellite images. A post-processing algorithm is also proposed to refine the segmentation and further to derive acceptable floe size distributions at local and global scales.
Laust Færch, Wolfgang Dierking, Nick Hughes, and Anthony P. Doulgeris
The Cryosphere, 17, 5335–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5335-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5335-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Icebergs in open water are a risk to maritime traffic. We have compared six different constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detectors on overlapping C- and L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images for the detection of icebergs in open water, with a Sentinel-2 image used for validation. The results revealed that L-band gives a slight advantage over C-band, depending on which detector is used. Additionally, the accuracy of all detectors decreased rapidly as the iceberg size decreased.
Trygve Halsne, Kai Håkon Christensen, Gaute Hope, and Øyvind Breivik
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6515–6530, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6515-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6515-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Surface waves that propagate in oceanic or coastal environments get influenced by their surroundings. Changes in the ambient current or the depth profile affect the wave propagation path, and the change in wave direction is called refraction. Some analytical solutions to the governing equations exist under ideal conditions, but for realistic situations, the equations must be solved numerically. Here we present such a numerical solver under an open-source license.
Anton Korosov, Pierre Rampal, Yue Ying, Einar Ólason, and Timothy Williams
The Cryosphere, 17, 4223–4240, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4223-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4223-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is possible to compute sea ice motion from satellite observations and detect areas where ice converges (moves together), forms ice ridges or diverges (moves apart) and opens leads. However, it is difficult to predict the exact motion of sea ice and position of ice ridges or leads using numerical models. We propose a new method to initialise a numerical model from satellite observations to improve the accuracy of the forecasted position of leads and ridges for safer navigation.
Johannes Röhrs, Yvonne Gusdal, Edel S. U. Rikardsen, Marina Durán Moro, Jostein Brændshøi, Nils Melsom Kristensen, Sindre Fritzner, Keguang Wang, Ann Kristin Sperrevik, Martina Idžanović, Thomas Lavergne, Jens Boldingh Debernard, and Kai H. Christensen
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5401–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A model to predict ocean currents, temperature, and sea ice is presented, covering the Barents Sea and northern Norway. To quantify forecast uncertainties, the model calculates ensemble forecasts with 24 realizations of ocean and ice conditions. Observations from satellites, buoys, and ships are ingested by the model. The model forecasts are compared with observations, and we show that the ocean model has skill in predicting sea surface temperatures.
Alisée A. Chaigneau, Stéphane Law-Chune, Angélique Melet, Aurore Voldoire, Guillaume Reffray, and Lotfi Aouf
Ocean Sci., 19, 1123–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1123-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1123-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Wind waves and swells are major drivers of coastal environment changes and can drive coastal marine hazards such as coastal flooding. In this paper, by using numerical modeling along the European Atlantic coastline, we assess how present and future wave characteristics are impacted by sea level changes. For example, at the end of the century under the SSP5-8.5 climate change scenario, extreme significant wave heights are higher by up to +40 % due to the effect of tides and mean sea level rise.
Manuel Aghito, Loris Calgaro, Knut-Frode Dagestad, Christian Ferrarin, Antonio Marcomini, Øyvind Breivik, and Lars Robert Hole
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2477–2494, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2477-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The newly developed ChemicalDrift model can simulate the transport and fate of chemicals in the ocean and in coastal regions. The model combines ocean physics, including transport due to currents, turbulence due to surface winds and the sinking of particles to the sea floor, with ocean chemistry, such as the partitioning, the degradation and the evaporation of chemicals. The model will be utilized for risk assessment of ocean and sea-floor contamination from pollutants emitted from shipping.
Heather Regan, Pierre Rampal, Einar Ólason, Guillaume Boutin, and Anton Korosov
The Cryosphere, 17, 1873–1893, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Multiyear ice (MYI), sea ice that survives the summer, is more resistant to changes than younger ice in the Arctic, so it is a good indicator of sea ice resilience. We use a model with a new way of tracking MYI to assess the contribution of different processes affecting MYI. We find two important years for MYI decline: 2007, when dynamics are important, and 2012, when melt is important. These affect MYI volume and area in different ways, which is important for the interpretation of observations.
Karina von Schuckmann, Audrey Minière, Flora Gues, Francisco José Cuesta-Valero, Gottfried Kirchengast, Susheel Adusumilli, Fiammetta Straneo, Michaël Ablain, Richard P. Allan, Paul M. Barker, Hugo Beltrami, Alejandro Blazquez, Tim Boyer, Lijing Cheng, John Church, Damien Desbruyeres, Han Dolman, Catia M. Domingues, Almudena García-García, Donata Giglio, John E. Gilson, Maximilian Gorfer, Leopold Haimberger, Maria Z. Hakuba, Stefan Hendricks, Shigeki Hosoda, Gregory C. Johnson, Rachel Killick, Brian King, Nicolas Kolodziejczyk, Anton Korosov, Gerhard Krinner, Mikael Kuusela, Felix W. Landerer, Moritz Langer, Thomas Lavergne, Isobel Lawrence, Yuehua Li, John Lyman, Florence Marti, Ben Marzeion, Michael Mayer, Andrew H. MacDougall, Trevor McDougall, Didier Paolo Monselesan, Jan Nitzbon, Inès Otosaka, Jian Peng, Sarah Purkey, Dean Roemmich, Kanako Sato, Katsunari Sato, Abhishek Savita, Axel Schweiger, Andrew Shepherd, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Leon Simons, Donald A. Slater, Thomas Slater, Andrea K. Steiner, Toshio Suga, Tanguy Szekely, Wim Thiery, Mary-Louise Timmermans, Inne Vanderkelen, Susan E. Wjiffels, Tonghua Wu, and Michael Zemp
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1675–1709, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Earth's climate is out of energy balance, and this study quantifies how much heat has consequently accumulated over the past decades (ocean: 89 %, land: 6 %, cryosphere: 4 %, atmosphere: 1 %). Since 1971, this accumulated heat reached record values at an increasing pace. The Earth heat inventory provides a comprehensive view on the status and expectation of global warming, and we call for an implementation of this global climate indicator into the Paris Agreement’s Global Stocktake.
Sasan Tavakoli and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 17, 939–958, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have tried to develop some new wave–ice interaction models by considering two different types of forces, one of which emerges in the ice and the other of which emerges in the water. We have checked the ability of the models in the reconstruction of wave–ice interaction in a step-wise manner. The accuracy level of the models is acceptable, and it will be interesting to check whether they can be used in wave climate models or not.
Pedro Duarte, Jostein Brændshøi, Dmitry Shcherbin, Pauline Barras, Jon Albretsen, Yvonne Gusdal, Nicholas Szapiro, Andreas Martinsen, Annette Samuelsen, Keguang Wang, and Jens Boldingh Debernard
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4373–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4373-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4373-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice models are often implemented for very large domains beyond the regions of sea ice formation, such as the whole Arctic or all of Antarctica. In this study, we implement changes in the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model, allowing it to be implemented for relatively small regions within the Arctic or Antarctica and yet considering the presence and influence of sea ice outside the represented areas. Such regional implementations are important when spatially detailed results are required.
Graig Sutherland, Victor de Aguiar, Lars-Robert Hole, Jean Rabault, Mohammed Dabboor, and Øyvind Breivik
The Cryosphere, 16, 2103–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2103-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2103-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The marginal ice zone (MIZ), which is the transition region between the open ocean and the dense pack ice, is a very dynamic region comprising a mixture of ice and ocean conditions. Using novel drifters deployed in various ice conditions in the MIZ, several material transport models are tested with two operational ice–ocean prediction systems. A new general transport equation, which uses both the ice and ocean solutions, is developed that reduces the error in drift prediction for our case study.
Joey J. Voermans, Qingxiang Liu, Aleksey Marchenko, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Takuji Waseda, Takehiko Nose, Tsubasa Kodaira, Jingkai Li, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have shown through field experiments that the amount of wave energy dissipated in landfast ice, sea ice attached to land, is much larger than in broken ice. By comparing our measurements against predictions of contemporary wave–ice interaction models, we determined which models can explain our observations and which cannot. Our results will improve our understanding of how waves and ice interact and how we can model such interactions to better forecast waves and ice in the polar regions.
Cyril Palerme and Malte Müller
The Cryosphere, 15, 3989–4004, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3989-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Methods have been developed for calibrating sea ice drift forecasts from an operational prediction system using machine learning algorithms. These algorithms use predictors from sea ice concentration observations during the initialization of the forecasts, sea ice and wind forecasts, and some geographical information. Depending on the calibration method, the mean absolute error is reduced between 3.3 % and 8.0 % for the direction and between 2.5 % and 7.1 % for the speed of sea ice drift.
Timothy Williams, Anton Korosov, Pierre Rampal, and Einar Ólason
The Cryosphere, 15, 3207–3227, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3207-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3207-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
neXtSIM (neXt-generation Sea Ice Model) includes a novel and extremely realistic way of modelling sea ice dynamics – i.e. how the sea ice moves and deforms in response to the drag from winds and ocean currents. It has been developed over the last few years for a variety of applications, but this paper represents its first demonstration in a forecast context. We present results for the time period from November 2018 to June 2020 and show that it agrees well with satellite observations.
Marcel Kleinherenbrink, Anton Korosov, Thomas Newman, Andreas Theodosiou, Alexander S. Komarov, Yuanhao Li, Gert Mulder, Pierre Rampal, Julienne Stroeve, and Paco Lopez-Dekker
The Cryosphere, 15, 3101–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3101-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3101-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Harmony is one of the Earth Explorer 10 candidates that has the chance of being selected for launch in 2028. The mission consists of two satellites that fly in formation with Sentinel-1D, which carries a side-looking radar system. By receiving Sentinel-1's signals reflected from the surface, Harmony is able to observe instantaneous elevation and two-dimensional velocity at the surface. As such, Harmony's data allow the retrieval of sea-ice drift and wave spectra in sea-ice-covered regions.
Yu Zhang, Tingting Zhu, Gunnar Spreen, Christian Melsheimer, Marcus Huntemann, Nick Hughes, Shengkai Zhang, and Fei Li
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-85, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-85, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an algorithm for ice-water classification using Sentinel-1 data during melting seasons in the Fram Strait. The proposed algorithm has the OA of nearly 90 % with STD less than 10 %. The comparison of sea ice concentration demonstrate that it can provide detailed information of sea ice with the spatial resolution of 1km. The time series shows the average June to September sea ice area does not change so much in 2015–2017 and 2019–2020, but it has a significant decrease in 2018.
Marzieh H. Derkani, Alberto Alberello, Filippo Nelli, Luke G. Bennetts, Katrin G. Hessner, Keith MacHutchon, Konny Reichert, Lotfi Aouf, Salman Khan, and Alessandro Toffoli
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1189–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1189-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1189-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Southern Ocean has a profound impact on the Earth's climate system. Its strong winds, intense currents, and fierce waves are critical components of the air–sea interface. The scarcity of observations in this remote region hampers the comprehension of fundamental physics, the accuracy of satellite sensors, and the capabilities of prediction models. To fill this gap, a unique data set of simultaneous observations of winds, surface currents, and ocean waves in the Southern Ocean is presented.
Ann Keen, Ed Blockley, David A. Bailey, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Mitchell Bushuk, Steve Delhaye, David Docquier, Daniel Feltham, François Massonnet, Siobhan O'Farrell, Leandro Ponsoni, José M. Rodriguez, David Schroeder, Neil Swart, Takahiro Toyoda, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Martin Vancoppenolle, and Klaus Wyser
The Cryosphere, 15, 951–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compare the mass budget of the Arctic sea ice in a number of the latest climate models. New output has been defined that allows us to compare the processes of sea ice growth and loss in a more detailed way than has previously been possible. We find that that the models are strikingly similar in terms of the major processes causing the annual growth and loss of Arctic sea ice and that the budget terms respond in a broadly consistent way as the climate warms during the 21st century.
Øyvind Seland, Mats Bentsen, Dirk Olivié, Thomas Toniazzo, Ada Gjermundsen, Lise Seland Graff, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Alok Kumar Gupta, Yan-Chun He, Alf Kirkevåg, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Kjetil Schanke Aas, Ingo Bethke, Yuanchao Fan, Jan Griesfeller, Alf Grini, Chuncheng Guo, Mehmet Ilicak, Inger Helene Hafsahl Karset, Oskar Landgren, Johan Liakka, Kine Onsum Moseid, Aleksi Nummelin, Clemens Spensberger, Hui Tang, Zhongshi Zhang, Christoph Heinze, Trond Iversen, and Michael Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6165–6200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6165-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The second version of the coupled Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) is presented and evaluated. The temperature and precipitation patterns has improved compared to NorESM1. The model reaches present-day warming levels to within 0.2 °C of observed temperature but with a delayed warming during the late 20th century. Under the four scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5), the warming in the period of 2090–2099 compared to 1850–1879 reaches 1.3, 2.2, 3.1, and 3.9 K.
Joey J. Voermans, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Aleksey Marchenko, Clarence O. Collins III, Mohammed Dabboor, Graig Sutherland, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we demonstrate the existence of an observational threshold which identifies when waves are most likely to break sea ice. This threshold is based on information from two recent field campaigns, supplemented with existing observations of sea ice break-up. We show that both field and laboratory observations tend to converge to a single quantitative threshold at which the wave-induced sea ice break-up takes place, which opens a promising avenue for operational forecasting models.
Cited articles
Aouf, L., Dalphinet, A., Hauser, D., Delaye, L., Tison, C., Chapron, B., Hermozo, L., and Tourain, C.: On the assimilation of CFOSAT wave data in the wave model MFWAM: Verification phase, in: IGARSS 2019-2019 IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Yokohama, Japan 28 July–2 August 2019, 7959–7961, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900180, 2019. a
Aouf, L., Bedossa, E., Law Chune, S., Rabault, J., Carasco, A., and Hauser, D.: On the validation of wave/ice interactions in the model MFWAM: Analysis with CFOSAT data, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 18430, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-18430, 2024. a
Bailey, D., DuVivier, A., Holland, M., Hunke, E., Lipscomb, B., Briegleb, B., Bitz, C., and Schramm, J.: CESM CICE5 Users Guide, Release CESM CICE5, CICE-Consortium, https://app.readthedocs.org/projects/cesmcice/downloads/pdf/latest/ (last access: November 2025), 2018. a
Batrak, Y., Kourzeneva, E., and Homleid, M.: Implementation of a simple thermodynamic sea ice scheme, SICE version 1.0-38h1, within the ALADIN–HIRLAM numerical weather prediction system version 38h1, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3347–3368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3347-2018, 2018. a
Bengtsson, L., Andrae, U., Aspelien, T., Batrak, Y., Calvo, J., de Rooy, W., Gleeson, E., Hansen-Sass, B., Homleid, M., Hortal, M., Ivarsson, K.-I., Lenderink, G., Niemelä, S., Pagh Nielsen, K., Onvlee, J., Rontu, L., Samuelsson, P., Santos Muñoz, D., Subias, A., Tijm, S., Toll, V., Yang, X., and Ødegaard Køltzow, M.: The HARMONIE–AROME model configuration in the ALADIN–HIRLAM NWP system, Monthly Weather Review, 145, 1919–1935, 2017. a
Bennetts, L. and Squire, V.: Wave scattering by multiple rows of circular ice floes, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 639, 213–238, 2009. a
Bennetts, L. G., Peter, M. A., Squire, V., and Meylan, M. H.: A three-dimensional model of wave attenuation in the marginal ice zone, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005982, 2010. a
Bennetts, L. G., Williams, T. D., and Porter, R.: A thin-plate approximation for ocean wave interactions with an ice shelf, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 984, A48, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.200, 2024. a
Bôas, A. B. V., Cornuelle, B. D., Mazloff, M. R., Gille, S. T., and Ardhuin, F.: Wave-Current Interactions at Meso- and Submesoscales: Insights from Idealized Numerical Simulations, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50, 3483–3500, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0151.1, 2020. a
Bohlinger, P., Breivik, Ø., Economou, T., and Müller, M.: A novel approach to computing super observations for probabilistic wave model validation, Ocean Modelling, 139, 101404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101404, 2019. a
Bohlinger, P., Carrasco, A., and Saetra, Ø.: Arctic Ocean Wave analysis and Forecast Product ARCTIC_ANALYSIS_FORECAST_WAV_002_014, https://documentation.marine.copernicus.eu/QUID/CMEMS-ARC-QUID-002-014.pdf (last access: September 2025), 2024. a
bohlinger: wavy, GitHub [data set], https://github.com/bohlinger/wavy, 2025. a
Breivik, Ø., Carrasco, A., Haakenstad, H., Aarnes, O. J., Behrens, A., Bidlot, J.-R., Björkqvist, J., Bohlinger, P., Furevik, B., Staneva, J., and Reistad, M.: The impact of a reduced high-wind Charnock parameter on wave growth with application to the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Arctic Ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 127, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018196, 2022. a
Brenner, S. and Horvat, C.: Scaling simulations of local wind-waves amid sea ice floes, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 129, e2024JC021629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021629, 2024. a
Budikova, D.: Role of Arctic sea ice in global atmospheric circulation: A review, Global and Planetary Change, 68, 149–163, 2009. a
Cavaleri, L., Alari, V., Benetazzo, A., Bjorkqvist, J.-V., Breivik, O., Davis, J., Hope, G., Kleven, A., Leirvik, F., Nordam, T., Rabault, J., Rainville, E. J., Rikka, S., Seldal, T. I., and Thomson, J.: More room at the top: how small buoys help reveal the detailed dynamics of the air-sea interface, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, E1063–E1076, https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-24-0120.1, 2025. a
Collard, F., Quartly, G., Konik, M., Johannessen, J., Korosov, A., Chapron, B., Piollé, J., Herlédan, S., Darecki, M., Isar, A., and Nafornita, C.: Ocean Virtual Laboratory: A new way to explore multi-sensor synergy demonstrated over the Agulhas region, in: Proceedings of Sentinel-3 for Science Workshop, 2–5 June 2015, Venice, Italy, ESA, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297739110_Ocean_Virtual_Laboratory_A_new_way_to_explore_multi-sensor_synergy_demonstrated_over_the_Agulhas_region (last access: November 2025), 2015. a
Collard, F., Marié, L., Nouguier, F., Kleinherenbrink, M., Ehlers, F., and Ardhuin, F.: Wind-Wave Attenuation in Arctic Sea Ice: A Discussion of Remote Sensing Capabilities, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127, e2022JC018654, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018654, 2022. a
Collins III, C. O., Rogers, W. E., Marchenko, A., and Babanin, A. V.: In situ measurements of an energetic wave event in the Arctic marginal ice zone, Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 1863–1870, 2015. a
Dai, H.-J., McWilliams, J. C., and Liang, J.-H.: Wave-driven mesoscale currents in a marginal ice zone, Ocean Modelling, 134, 1–17, 2019. a
Dalphinet, A., Aouf, L., Low-Chune, S., Tressol, M., and Fernandez, E.: Product user manual for global ocean wave analysis and forecasting product issue 1.3, https://documentation.marine.copernicus.eu/PUM/CMEMS-GLO-PUM-001-027.pdf (last access: November 2025), 2022. a
Doble, M., Mercer, D. J., Meldrum, D., and Peppe, O. C.: Wave measurements on sea ice: developments in instrumentation, Annals of Glaciology, 44, 108–112, 2006. a
Dodet, G., Piolle, J.-F., Quilfen, Y., Abdalla, S., Accensi, M., Ardhuin, F., Ash, E., Bidlot, J.-R., Gommenginger, C., Marechal, G., Passaro, M., Quartly, G., Stopa, J., Timmermans, B., Young, I., Cipollini, P., and Donlon, C.: The Sea State CCI dataset v1: towards a sea state climate data record based on satellite observations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1929–1951, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1929-2020, 2020. a
Dreyer, L. W., Rabault, J., Jensen, A., Dæhlen, I., Kristoffersen, Y., Breivik, Ø., and Hope, G.: Direct in-situ observations of wave-induced floe collisions in the deeper Marginal Ice Zone, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 240, 104642, ISSN 0165-232X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2025.104642, 2025. a, b, c
Duarte, P., Brændshøi, J., Shcherbin, D., Barras, P., Albretsen, J., Gusdal, Y., Szapiro, N., Martinsen, A., Samuelsen, A., Wang, K., and Debernard, J. B.: Implementation and evaluation of open boundary conditions for sea ice in a regional coupled ocean (ROMS) and sea ice (CICE) modeling system, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4373–4392, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4373-2022, 2022. a
Dumont, D.: Marginal ice zone dynamics: history, definitions and research perspectives, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380, 20210253, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0253, 2022. a
Fritzner, S., Graversen, R., Christensen, K. H., Rostosky, P., and Wang, K.: Impact of assimilating sea ice concentration, sea ice thickness and snow depth in a coupled ocean–sea ice modelling system, The Cryosphere, 13, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-491-2019, 2019. a
Fritzner, S. M., Graversen, R. G., Wang, K., and Christensen, K. H.: Comparison between a multi-variate nudging method and the ensemble Kalman filter for sea-ice data assimilation, Journal of Glaciology, 64, 387–396, 2018. a
Gao, X., Fan, P., Jin, J., He, J., Song, M., Zhang, H., Fei, K., Zhang, M., and Zeng, Q.: Evaluation of Sea Ice Simulation of CAS-ESM 2.0 in Historical Experiment, Atmosphere, 13, 1056, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071056, 2022. a
Gao, Y., Sun, J., Li, F., He, S., Sandven, S., Yan, Q., Zhang, Z., Lohmann, K., Keenlyside, N., Furevik, T., and Lingling, S.: Arctic sea ice and Eurasian climate: A review, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 32, 92–114, 2015. a
Gemmrich, J. and Garrett, C.: The signature of inertial and tidal currents in offshore wave records, Journal of physical oceanography, 42, 1051–1056, 2012. a
Group, T. W.: The WAM model – A third generation ocean wave prediction model, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18, 1775–1810, 1988. a
Günther, H., Hasselmann, S., and Janssen, P.: Wamodel Cycle 4 (revised version) (tech. Rep. No. 4), https://scispace.com/pdf/the-wam-model-cycle-4-revised-version-2t3jv6ss2u.pdf (last access: November 2025), 1992. a
Halsne, T., Bohlinger, P., Christensen, K. H., Carrasco, A., and Breivik, Ø.: Resolving regions known for intense wave–current interaction using spectral wave models: A case study in the energetic flow fields of Northern Norway, Ocean Modelling, 176, 102071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.102071, 2022. a, b, c
Halsne, T., Christensen, K. H., Hope, G., and Breivik, Ø.: Ocean wave tracing v.1: a numerical solver of the wave ray equations for ocean waves on variable currents at arbitrary depths, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6515–6530, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6515-2023, 2023. a, b
Halsne, T., Benetazzo, A., Barbariol, F., Christensen, K. H., Carrasco, A., and Breivik, Ø.: Wave modulation in a strong tidal current and its impact on extreme waves, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 54, 131–151, 2024. a
Herman, A.: Wave-induced stress and breaking of sea ice in a coupled hydrodynamic discrete-element wave–ice model, The Cryosphere, 11, 2711–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2711-2017, 2017. a
Herman, A.: Wave-Induced Surge Motion and Collisions of Sea Ice Floes: Finite-Floe-Size Effects, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 123, 7472–7494, 2018. a
Herman, A., Evers, K.-U., and Reimer, N.: Floe-size distributions in laboratory ice broken by waves, The Cryosphere, 12, 685–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-685-2018, 2018. a
Herman, A., Cheng, S., and Shen, H. H.: Wave energy attenuation in fields of colliding ice floes – Part 1: Discrete-element modelling of dissipation due to ice–water drag, The Cryosphere, 13, 2887–2900, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2887-2019, 2019. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., , Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a
Holthuijsen, L. H. and Tolman, H. L.: Effects of the Gulf Stream on ocean waves, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 96, 12755–12771, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC00901, 1991. a
Horvat, C.: Floes, the marginal ice zone and coupled wave-sea-ice feedbacks, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380, 20210252, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0252, 2022. a
Horvat, C., Tziperman, E., and Campin, J.-M.: Interaction of sea ice floe size, ocean eddies, and sea ice melting, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 8083–8090, 2016. a
Horvat, C., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., and Petty, A.: Observing waves in sea ice with ICESat-2, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL087629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087629, 2020. a
Howard, S. L. and Padman, L.: Arc2kmTM: Arctic 2 kilometer Tide Model, Arctic Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.18739/A2PV6B79W, 2021. a
Iwasaki, S.: Increase in the wave power caused by decreasing sea ice over the Sea of Okhotsk in winter, Scientific Reports, 13, 2539, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29692-9, 2023. a
Ji, S.-y., Wang, A.-l., Su, J., and Yue, Q.-j.: Experimental studies on elastic modulus and flexural strength of sea ice in the Bohai Sea, Journal of Cold Regions Engineering, 25, 182–195, 2011. a
Karulina, M., Marchenko, A., Karulin, E., Sodhi, D., Sakharov, A., and Chistyakov, P.: Full-scale flexural strength of sea ice and freshwater ice in Spitsbergen Fjords and North-West Barents Sea, Applied Ocean Research, 90, 101853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101853, 2019. a, b
Kenyon, K. E.: Wave refraction in ocean currents, Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 18, 1023–1034, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(71)90006-4, 1971. a
Kodaira, T., Katsuno, T., Nose, T., Itoh, M., Rabault, J., Hoppmann, M., Kimizuka, M., and Waseda, T.: An affordable and customizable wave buoy for the study of wave-ice interactions: design concept and results from field deployments, Coastal Engineering Journal, 66, 74–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2249243, 2023. a
Kohout, A. and Williams, M.: Waves in-ice observations made during the SIPEX II voyage of the Aurora Australis, 2012, Australian Antarctic Data Centre, https://doi.org/10.4225/15/53266BEC9607F, updated 2015, 2013. a
Kohout, A., Williams, M., Toyota, T., Lieser, J., and Hutchings, J.: In situ observations of wave-induced sea ice breakup, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 131, 22–27, 2016. a
Kohout, A. L. and Meylan, M. H.: An elastic plate model for wave attenuation and ice floe breaking in the marginal ice zone, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 113, C09016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004434, 2008. a
Kohout, A. L., Williams, M., Dean, S., and Meylan, M.: Storm-induced sea-ice breakup and the implications for ice extent, Nature, 509, 604–607, 2014. a
Kohout, A. L., Smith, M., Roach, L. A., Williams, G., Montiel, F., and Williams, M. J.: Observations of exponential wave attenuation in Antarctic sea ice during the PIPERS campaign, Annals of Glaciology, 61, 196–209, 2020. a
Kowalik, Z. and Marchenko, A.: Tidal Motion Enhancement on Spitsbergen Bank, Barents Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 128, e2022JC018539, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018539, 2023. a
Kwok, R., Hunke, E. C., Maslowski, W., Menemenlis, D., and Zhang, J.: Variability of sea ice simulations assessed with RGPS kinematics, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004783, 2008. a, b, c, d
Liu, M., Zhang, X., Chen, P., Wang, J., and Zhong, S.: Arctic Sea-ice Type Recognition Based on the Surface Wave Investigation and Monitoring Instrument of the China-French Ocean Satellite, in: 2021 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS), 2362–2369, IEEE, Hangzhou, China, 21–25 November 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/PIERS53385.2021.9695052, 2021. a
Løken, T. K., Rabault, J., Jensen, A., Sutherland, G., Christensen, K. H., and Müller, M.: Wave measurements from ship mounted sensors in the Arctic marginal ice zone, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 182, 103207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103207, 2021. a
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. and Stewart, R.: Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications, Deep-Sea Res Pt. II, 11, 529–562, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(64)90001-4, 1964. a
Marchenko, A.: Wave attenuation in marginal ice zone of Arctic pack ice to the north of Spitsbergen, in: ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE–I, ISOPE, Sapporo, Japan, 10–15 June 2018, ISBN 978-1-880653-87-6, https://onepetro.org/ISOPEIOPEC/proceedings-abstract/ISOPE18/ISOPE18/ISOPE-I-18-349/20595 (last access: November 2025), 2018. a
Marchenko, A., Kvamstad, B., Fjørtoft, K., Hoyland, K., and Brazhnikov, D.: Characteristics of Ice Drift in the Western Barents Sea Reconstructed by the Data of Ice Trackers Deployed on Drifting Ice of the Barents Sea in 2008 and 2010, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions, POAC11-147, Montreal, Canada, 10–14 July 2011, ISSN 0376-6756, https://www.sintef.no/en/publications/publication/894950/ (last access: November 2025), 2011. a
Marchenko, A., Morozov, E., and Muzylev, S.: Measurements of sea-ice flexural stiffness by pressure characteristics of flexural-gravity waves, Annals of Glaciology, 54, 51–60, 2013. a
Marchenko, A., Wadhams, P., Collins, C., Rabault, J., and Chumakov, M.: Wave-ice interaction in the north-west barents sea, Applied Ocean Research, 90, 101861, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101861, 2019. a
Marchenko, A., Haase, A., Jensen, A., Lishman, B., Rabault, J., Evers, K.-U., Shortt, M., and Thiel, T.: Laboratory investigations of the bending rheology of floating saline ice and physical mechanisms of wave damping in the hsva hamburg ship model basin ice tank, Water, 13, 1080, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081080, 2021a. a
Marchenko, A., Morozov, E., Kozlov, I., and Frey, D.: High-amplitude internal waves southeast of Spitsbergen, Continental Shelf Research, 227, 104523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104523, 2021b. a
Masson, D.: A Case Study of Wave–Current Interaction in a Strong Tidal Current, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 26, 359–372, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1996)026<0359:ACSOWI>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Meier, W. N. and Stroeve, J.: An updated assessment of the changing Arctic sea ice cover, Oceanography, 35, 10–19, 2022. a
Melsheimer, C. and Spreen, G.: AMSR2 ASI sea ice concentration data, Antarctic, version 5.4 (NetCDF) (July 2012–December 2019), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.898400, 2019. a
Meylan, M. and Squire, V. A.: The response of ice floes to ocean waves, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 99, 891–900, 1994. a
Mokus, N. G. A. and Montiel, F.: Wave-triggered breakup in the marginal ice zone generates lognormal floe size distributions: a simulation study, The Cryosphere, 16, 4447–4472, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4447-2022, 2022. a
Montiel, F. and Squire, V. A.: Modelling wave-induced sea ice break-up in the marginal ice zone, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473, 20170258, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0258, 2017. a
Montiel, F., Squire, V., and Bennetts, L.: Attenuation and directional spreading of ocean wave spectra in the marginal ice zone, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 790, 492–522, 2016. a
Mosig, J. E., Montiel, F., and Squire, V. A.: Comparison of viscoelastic-type models for ocean wave attenuation in ice-covered seas, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 120, 6072–6090, 2015. a
Müller, M., Batrak, Y., Kristiansen, J., Køltzow, M. A., Noer, G., and Korosov, A.: Characteristics of a convective-scale weather forecasting system for the European Arctic, Monthly Weather Review, 145, 4771–4787, 2017. a
Müller, M., Knol-Kauffman, M., Jeuring, J., and Palerme, C.: Arctic shipping trends during hazardous weather and sea-ice conditions and the Polar Code's effectiveness, NPJ Ocean Sustainability, 2, 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-023-00021-x, 2023. a
Müller, M., Rabault, J., Abdel-Fattah, D., and Sutherland, G.: Distributed observation networks in the Arctic Marginal Ice Zone to advance forecasting systems, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, BAMS–D, E1204–E1210, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-25-0082.1, 2025. a
Nilsen, F., Fer, I., Baumann, T. M., Breivik, Ø., Czyz, C., Frank, L., Kalhagen, K., Koenig, Z., Kolås, E. H., Kral, S. T., Mabrouk, B. M. A., Mo-Bjørkelund, T., Müller, M., and Rabault, J.: Pc-2 winter process cruise (wpc): Cruise report, The Nansen Legacy Report Series, No. 26, Tromsø, Norway, https://doi.org/10.7557/nlrs.6324, 2021. a, b
Nose, T., Katsuno, T., Waseda, T., Ushio, S., Rabault, J., Kodaira, T., and Voermans, J.: Observation of wave propagation over 1,000 km into Antarctica winter pack ice, Coastal Engineering Journal, 66, 115–131, https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2283243, 2023a. a
Nose, T., Rabault, J., Waseda, T., Kodaira, T., Fujiwara, Y., Katsuno, T., Kanna, N., Tateyama, K., Voermans, J., and Aleekseva, T.: A comparison of an operational wave-ice model product and drifting wave buoy observation in the central Arctic Ocean: investigating the effect of sea ice forcing in thin ice cover, Polar Research, 42, https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v42.8874, 2023b. a, b
Noyce, M., Verrinder, R., and Vichi, M.: Identification of Ice Floe Impacts in an Inertial Time Series and Implications for Wave Measurement In Pancake Ice, in: IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 149–152, IEEE, Pasadena, California, 16-21 july 2023, https://2023.ieeeigarss.org/view_paper.php?PaperNum=3333 (last access: November 2025), 2023. a
NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center: Cryosphere and Sea Ice, https://nsidc.org/learn/parts-cryosphere/sea-ice, last access: March 2024. a
Olsen, J., Hovelsrud, G. K., and Kaltenborn, B. P.: Increasing shipping in the Arctic and local communities’ engagement: A case from Longyearbyen on Svalbard, Arctic marine sustainability: arctic maritime businesses and the resilience of the marine environment, edited by: Pongrácz, E., Pavlov, V., and Hänninen, N., Arctic Marine Sustainability, Springer Polar Sciences, Springer, Cham, 305–331, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28404-6_14, 2020. a
Overland, J. E., Wood, K. R., and Wang, M.: Warm Arctic – cold continents: climate impacts of the newly open Arctic Sea, Polar Research, 30, 15787, https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v30i0.15787, 2011. a
Parkinson, C. L.: Earth from above: using color-coded satellite images to examine the global environment, University science books, University Science Books, ISBN 0935702415, ISBN 978-0935702415, 1997. a
Quilfen, Y. and Chapron, B.: Ocean Surface Wave-Current Signatures From Satellite Altimeter Measurements, Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 253–261, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081029, 2019. a
Rabault, J., Sutherland, G., Ward, B., Christensen, K. H., Halsne, T., and Jensen, A.: Measurements of waves in landfast ice using inertial motion units, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 6399–6408, 2016. a
Rabault, J., Sutherland, G., Gundersen, O., and Jensen, A.: Measurements of wave damping by a grease ice slick in Svalbard using off-the-shelf sensors and open-source electronics, Journal of Glaciology, 63, 372–381, 2017. a
Rabault, J., Sutherland, G., Gundersen, O., Jensen, A., Marchenko, A., and Breivik, Ø.: An open source, versatile, affordable waves in ice instrument for scientific measurements in the Polar Regions, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 170, 102955, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102955, 2020. a, b, c
Rabault, J., Nose, T., Hope, G., Müller, M., Breivik, Ø., Voermans, J., Hole, L. R., Bohlinger, P., Waseda, T., Kodaira, T., Katsuno, T., Johnson, M., Sutherland, G., Johansson, M., Christensen, K. H., Garbo, A., Jensen, A., Gundersen, O., Marchenko, A., and Babanin, A.: Openmetbuoy-v2021: An easy-to-build, affordable, customizable, open-source instrument for oceanographic measurements of drift and waves in sea ice and the open ocean, Geosciences, 12, 110, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12030110, 2022a. a, b, c, d
Rabault, J., Voermans, J., Brazhnikov, D., Turnbull, I., Marchenko, A., Nose, T., and Biuw, M.: Direct observations of sea ice drift and waves in ice in the period 2017–2022, Norwegian Meteorological Institute [data set], https://doi.org/10.21343/AZKY-0X44, 2022b. a
Rabault, J., Müller, M., Voermans, J., Brazhnikov, D., Turnbull, I., Marchenko, A., Biuw, M., Nose, T., Waseda, T., Johansson, M., Breivik, O., Sutherland, G., Hole, L. R., Johnson, M., Jensen, A., Gundersen, O., Kristoffersen, Y., Babanin, A., Tedesco, P., Christensen, K. H., Kristiansen, M., Hope, G., Kodaira, T., de Aguiar, V., Taelman, C., Quigley, C. P., Filchuk, K., and Mahoney, A. R.: A dataset of direct observations of sea ice drift and waves in ice, Scientific Data, 10, 251, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02160-9, 2023. a, b, c
Rabault, J., Taelman, C., Idžanović, M., Hope, G., Nose, T., Kristoffersen, Y., Jensen, A., Breivik, Ø., Bryhni, H. T., Hoppmann, M., Demchev, D., Korosov, A., Johansson, M., Eltoft, T., Dagestad, K.-F., Röhrs, J., Eriksson, L., Durán Moro, M., Rikardsen, E. S. U., Waseda, T., Kodaira, T., Lohse, J., Desjonquères, T., Olsen, S., Gundersen, O., Martins de Aguiar, V. C., Karlsen, T., Babanin, A., Voermans, J., Park, J.-W., and Müller, M.: A position and wave spectra dataset of Marginal Ice Zone dynamics collected around Svalbard in 2022 and 2023, Scientific Data, 11, 1417, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04281-1, 2024. a
Ren, H., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X.: Numerical simulations on the fracture of a sea ice floe induced by waves, Applied Ocean Research, 108, 102527, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102527, 2021. a
Roach, L. A., Bitz, C. M., Horvat, C., and Dean, S. M.: Advances in modeling interactions between sea ice and ocean surface waves, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, 4167–4181, 2019. a
Röhrs, J., Gusdal, Y., Rikardsen, E. S. U., Durán Moro, M., Brændshøi, J., Kristensen, N. M., Fritzner, S., Wang, K., Sperrevik, A. K., Idžanović, M., Lavergne, T., Debernard, J. B., and Christensen, K. H.: Barents-2.5km v2.0: an operational data-assimilative coupled ocean and sea ice ensemble prediction model for the Barents Sea and Svalbard, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5401–5426, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5401-2023, 2023. a
Saetra, Ø., Halsne, T., Carrasco, A., Breivik, Ø., Pedersen, T., and Christensen, K. H.: Intense interactions between ocean waves and currents observed in the Lofoten Maelstrom, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0290.1, 2021. a, b
Shao, Z.-D. and Ke, C.-Q.: Spring–summer albedo variations of Antarctic sea ice from 1982 to 2009, Environmental Research Letters, 10, 064001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/064001, 2015. a
Shchepetkin, A. F. and McWilliams, J. C.: The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model, Ocean modelling, 9, 347–404, 2005. a
Shen, H. H., Hibler III, W. D., and Leppäranta, M.: The role of floe collisions in sea ice rheology, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 92, 7085–7096, 1987. a
Shen, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Meng, J., and Ke, C.: Sea ice classification using Cryosat-2 altimeter data by optimal classifier–feature assembly, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14, 1948–1952, 2017. a
Shi, Y., Yang, Y., Teng, Y., Sun, M., and Yun, S.: Mechanism of sea ice formation based on comprehensive observation data in Liaodong Bay, China, Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 37, 1846–1856, 2019. a
Smit, P. and Janssen, T.: The evolution of inhomogeneous wave statistics through a variable medium, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 43, 1741–1758, 2013. a
Smit, P. B. and Janssen, T. T.: Swell Propagation through Submesoscale Turbulence, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 49, 2615–2630, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0250.1, 2019. a
Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 113, C02S03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384, 2008. a
Squire, V. A.: Ocean wave interactions with sea ice: A reappraisal, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 52, 37–60, 2020. a
Squire, V. A., Dugan, J. P., Wadhams, P., Rottier, P. J., and Liu, A. K.: Of ocean waves and sea ice, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 27, 115–168, 1995. a
Sutherland, G., Rabault, J., Christensen, K. H., and Jensen, A.: A two layer model for wave dissipation in sea ice, Applied Ocean Research, 88, 111–118, 2019. a
Sutherland, G., de Aguiar, V., Hole, L.-R., Rabault, J., Dabboor, M., and Breivik, Ø.: Estimating a mean transport velocity in the marginal ice zone using ice–ocean prediction systems, The Cryosphere, 16, 2103–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2103-2022, 2022. a, b
Sutterley, T.: tsutterley/pyTMD: v2.0.8, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8347168, 2023. a
Sutterley, T. C., Markus, T., Neumann, T. A., van den Broeke, M., van Wessem, J. M., and Ligtenberg, S. R. M.: Antarctic ice shelf thickness change from multimission lidar mapping, The Cryosphere, 13, 1801–1817, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1801-2019, 2019. a
Thomson, J., Squire, V., Ackley, S., Rogers, E., Babanin, A., Guest, P., Maksym, T., Wadhams, P., Stammerjohn, S., Fairall, C., Persson, O., Doble, M., Graber, H., Shen, H., Gemmrich, J., Lehner, S., Holt, B., Williams, T., Meylan, M., and Bidlot, J.: Sea state and boundary layer physics of the emerging arctic ocean, Washington Univ Seattle Applied Physics Laboratory, Report No. APL-UW-1306, 2013. a
Thomson, J.: Wave propagation in the marginal ice zone: connections and feedback mechanisms within the air–ice–ocean system, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380, 20210251, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0251, 2022. a, b
Thomson, J., Ackley, S., Girard-Ardhuin, F., Ardhuin, F., Babanin, A., Boutin, G., Brozena, J., Cheng, S., Collins, C., Doble, M., , Fairall, C., Guest, P., Gebhardt, C., Gemmrich, J., Graber, H. C., Holt, B., Lehner, S., Lund, B., Meylan, M. H., Maksym, T., Montiel, F., Perrie, W., Persson, O., Rainville, L., Rogers, W. E., Shen, H., Shen, H., Squire, V., Stammerjohn, S., Stopa, J., Smith, M. M., Sutherland, P., and Wadhams, P.: Overview of the arctic sea state and boundary layer physics program, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123, 8674–8687, 2018. a
Thomson, J., Hošeková, L., Meylan, M. H., Kohout, A. L., and Kumar, N.: Spurious rollover of wave attenuation rates in sea ice caused by noise in field measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016606, 2021a. a
Thomson, J., Lund, B., Hargrove, J., Smith, M. M., Horstmann, J., and MacKinnon, J. A.: Wave-driven flow along a compact marginal ice zone, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2020GL090735, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090735, 2021b. a
Thomson, J., Bush, P., Castillo Contreras, V., Clemett, N., Davis, J., de Klerk, A., Iseley, E., Rainville, E. J., Salmi, B., and Talbert, J.: Development and testing of microSWIFT expendable wave buoys, Coastal Engineering Journal, 66, 168–180, https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2283325, 2023. a
Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E., Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., , Navas Traver, I., Deghaye, P., Duesmann, B., Rosich, B., Miranda, N., Bruno, C., L'Abbate, M., Croci, R., Pietropaolo, A., Huchler, M., and Rostan, F.: GMES Sentinel-1 mission, Remote sensing of environment, 120, 9–24, 2012. a
Turnbull, I. D. and Marchenko, A. V.: Deformation of an ice pack influenced by waves and topographic enhancement of tidal motion near Hopen Island in the Barents Sea, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 194, 103463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103463, 2022. a
Vincent, C. E.: The Interaction of Wind-Generated Sea Waves with Tidal Currents, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 9, 748–755, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1979)009<0748:TIOWGS>2.0.CO;2, 1979. a
Voermans, J., Babanin, A., Thomson, J., Smith, M., and Shen, H.: Wave attenuation by sea ice turbulence, Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 6796–6803, 2019. a
Voermans, J. J., Rabault, J., Filchuk, K., Ryzhov, I., Heil, P., Marchenko, A., Collins III, C. O., Dabboor, M., Sutherland, G., and Babanin, A. V.: Experimental evidence for a universal threshold characterizing wave-induced sea ice break-up, The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020. a, b
Voermans, J. J., Liu, Q., Marchenko, A., Rabault, J., Filchuk, K., Ryzhov, I., Heil, P., Waseda, T., Nose, T., Kodaira, T., Li, J., and Babanin, A. V.: Wave dispersion and dissipation in landfast ice: comparison of observations against models, The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021. a
Voermans, J. J., Rabault, J., Marchenko, A., Nose, T., Waseda, T., and Babanin, A. V.: Estimating the elastic modulus of landfast ice from wave observations, Journal of Glaciology, 69, 1823–1833, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.63, 2023. a
Wahlgren, S., Thomson, J., Biddle, L. C., and Swart, S.: Direct Observations of Wave-Sea Ice Interactions in the Antarctic Marginal Ice Zone, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 128, e2023JC019948, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC019948, 2023. a
Williams, T. D., Bennetts, L. G., Squire, V. A., Dumont, D., and Bertino, L.: Wave–ice interactions in the marginal ice zone. Part 1: Theoretical foundations, Ocean Modelling, 71, 81–91, 2013. a
Yu, J., Rogers, W. E., and Wang, D. W.: A new method for parameterization of wave dissipation by sea ice, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103582, 2022. a, b, c, d
Zhang, C. and Zhao, X.: Theoretical model for predicting the break-up of ice covers due to wave-ice interaction, Applied Ocean Research, 112, 102614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102614, 2021. a, b
Zhao, X. and Shen, H.: A diffusion approximation for ocean wave scatterings by randomly distributed ice floes, Ocean modelling, 107, 21–27, 2016. a
Zhao, X. and Shen, H. H.: Wave propagation in frazil/pancake, pancake, and fragmented ice covers, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 113, 71–80, 2015. a
Zhao, X. and Shen, H. H.: Three-layer viscoelastic model with eddy viscosity effect for flexural-gravity wave propagation through ice cover, Ocean Modelling, 131, 15–23, 2018. a
Short summary
We observe strongly modulated waves-in-ice significant wave height using buoys deployed East of Svalbard. We show that these observations likely cannot be explained by wave-current interaction or tide-induced modulation alone. We also demonstrate a strong correlation between the waves height modulation, and the rate of sea ice convergence. Therefore, our data suggest that the rate of sea ice convergence and divergence may modulate wave in ice energy dissipation.
We observe strongly modulated waves-in-ice significant wave height using buoys deployed East of...
