Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3381-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3381-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Finely resolved along-track wave attenuation estimates in the Antarctic marginal ice zone from ICESat-2
Joey J. Voermans
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Alexander D. Fraser
Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, nipaluna / Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, nipaluna / Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia
Jill Brouwer
Australian Antarctic Program Partnership, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, nipaluna / Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, nipaluna / Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia
now at: NCMI Engineering and Technology, CSIRO, Hobart, 7001 Tasmania, Australia
Michael H. Meylan
School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, 2308 NSW, Australia
Qingxiang Liu
Frontier Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System (FDOMES) and Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Alexander V. Babanin
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Related authors
Jean Rabault, Trygve Halsne, Ana Carrasco, Anton Korosov, Joey Voermans, Patrik Bohlinger, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Malte Müller, Øyvind Breivik, Takehiko Nose, Gaute Hope, Fabrice Collard, Sylvain Herlédan, Tsubasa Kodaira, Nick Hughes, Qin Zhang, Kai Haakon Christensen, Alexander Babanin, Lars Willas Dreyer, Cyril Palerme, Lotfi Aouf, Konstantinos Christakos, Atle Jensen, Johannes Röhrs, Aleksey Marchenko, Graig Sutherland, Trygve Kvåle Løken, and Takuji Waseda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We observe strongly modulated waves-in-ice significant wave height using buoys deployed East of Svalbard. We show that these observations likely cannot be explained by wave-current interaction or tide-induced modulation alone. We also demonstrate a strong correlation between the waves height modulation, and the rate of sea ice convergence. Therefore, our data suggest that the rate of sea ice convergence and divergence may modulate wave in ice energy dissipation.
Joey J. Voermans, Qingxiang Liu, Aleksey Marchenko, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Takuji Waseda, Takehiko Nose, Tsubasa Kodaira, Jingkai Li, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have shown through field experiments that the amount of wave energy dissipated in landfast ice, sea ice attached to land, is much larger than in broken ice. By comparing our measurements against predictions of contemporary wave–ice interaction models, we determined which models can explain our observations and which cannot. Our results will improve our understanding of how waves and ice interact and how we can model such interactions to better forecast waves and ice in the polar regions.
Joey J. Voermans, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Aleksey Marchenko, Clarence O. Collins III, Mohammed Dabboor, Graig Sutherland, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we demonstrate the existence of an observational threshold which identifies when waves are most likely to break sea ice. This threshold is based on information from two recent field campaigns, supplemented with existing observations of sea ice break-up. We show that both field and laboratory observations tend to converge to a single quantitative threshold at which the wave-induced sea ice break-up takes place, which opens a promising avenue for operational forecasting models.
Robert Massom, Phillip Reid, Stephen Warren, Bonnie Light, Donald Perovich, Luke Bennetts, Petteri Uotila, Siobhan O'Farrell, Michael Meylan, Klaus Meiners, Pat Wongpan, Alexander Fraser, Alessandro Toffoli, Giulio Passerotti, Peter Strutton, Sean Chua, and Melissa Fedrigo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3166, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3166, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean waves play a previously-neglected role in the rapid annual melting of Antarctic sea ice by flooding and pulverising floes, removing the snow cover and reducing the albedo by an estimated 0.38–0.54 – to increase solar absorption and enhance the vertical melt rate by up to 5.2 cm/day. Ice algae further decrease the albedo, to increase the melt-rate enhancement to up to 6.1 cm/day. Melting is accelerated by four previously-unconsidered wave-driven positive feedbacks.
Xianghui Dong, Qingxiang Liu, Stefan Zieger, Alberto Alberello, Ali Abdolali, Jian Sun, Kejian Wu, and Alexander V. Babanin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-698, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-698, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean surface wave research is vital for coastal management, marine ecology, and ocean engineering. This study simulates waves along the Australian coast using advanced physical and numerical schemes. Model verification with altimeter and buoy data shows good performance. A two-step parameterization improves accuracy in the complex Great Barrier Reef. This study will help us better understand coastal wave climates and assess sea states, enabling us to better develop, protect, and use the sea.
Jean Rabault, Trygve Halsne, Ana Carrasco, Anton Korosov, Joey Voermans, Patrik Bohlinger, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Malte Müller, Øyvind Breivik, Takehiko Nose, Gaute Hope, Fabrice Collard, Sylvain Herlédan, Tsubasa Kodaira, Nick Hughes, Qin Zhang, Kai Haakon Christensen, Alexander Babanin, Lars Willas Dreyer, Cyril Palerme, Lotfi Aouf, Konstantinos Christakos, Atle Jensen, Johannes Röhrs, Aleksey Marchenko, Graig Sutherland, Trygve Kvåle Løken, and Takuji Waseda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07619, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We observe strongly modulated waves-in-ice significant wave height using buoys deployed East of Svalbard. We show that these observations likely cannot be explained by wave-current interaction or tide-induced modulation alone. We also demonstrate a strong correlation between the waves height modulation, and the rate of sea ice convergence. Therefore, our data suggest that the rate of sea ice convergence and divergence may modulate wave in ice energy dissipation.
Kazuya Kusahara, Daisuke Hirano, Masakazu Fujii, Alexander D. Fraser, Takeshi Tamura, Kohei Mizobata, Guy D. Williams, and Shigeru Aoki
The Cryosphere, 18, 43–73, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-43-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-43-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on the Totten and Moscow University ice shelves, East Antarctica. We used an ocean–sea ice–ice shelf model to better understand regional interactions between ocean, sea ice, and ice shelf. We found that a combination of warm ocean water and local sea ice production influences the regional ice shelf basal melting. Furthermore, the model reproduced the summertime undercurrent on the upper continental slope, regulating ocean heat transport onto the continental shelf.
Lingwei Zhang, Tessa R. Vance, Alexander D. Fraser, Lenneke M. Jong, Sarah S. Thompson, Alison S. Criscitiello, and Nerilie J. Abram
The Cryosphere, 17, 5155–5173, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5155-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Physical features in ice cores provide unique records of past variability. We identified 1–2 mm ice layers without bubbles in surface ice cores from Law Dome, East Antarctica, occurring on average five times per year. The origin of these bubble-free layers is unknown. In this study, we investigate whether they have the potential to record past atmospheric processes and circulation. We find that the bubble-free layers are linked to accumulation hiatus events and meridional moisture transport.
Jiangyu Li, Shaoqing Zhang, Qingxiang Liu, Xiaolin Yu, and Zhiwei Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6393–6412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6393-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6393-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ocean surface waves play an important role in the air–sea interface but are rarely activated in high-resolution Earth system simulations due to their expensive computational costs. To alleviate this situation, this paper designs a new wave modeling framework with a multiscale grid system. Evaluations of a series of numerical experiments show that it has good feasibility and applicability in the WAVEWATCH III model, WW3, and can achieve the goals of efficient and high-precision wave simulation.
Sasan Tavakoli and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 17, 939–958, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We have tried to develop some new wave–ice interaction models by considering two different types of forces, one of which emerges in the ice and the other of which emerges in the water. We have checked the ability of the models in the reconstruction of wave–ice interaction in a step-wise manner. The accuracy level of the models is acceptable, and it will be interesting to check whether they can be used in wave climate models or not.
Jill Brouwer, Alexander D. Fraser, Damian J. Murphy, Pat Wongpan, Alberto Alberello, Alison Kohout, Christopher Horvat, Simon Wotherspoon, Robert A. Massom, Jessica Cartwright, and Guy D. Williams
The Cryosphere, 16, 2325–2353, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2325-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The marginal ice zone is the region where ocean waves interact with sea ice. Although this important region influences many sea ice, ocean and biological processes, it has been difficult to accurately measure on a large scale from satellite instruments. We present new techniques for measuring wave attenuation using the NASA ICESat-2 laser altimeter. By measuring how waves attenuate within the sea ice, we show that the marginal ice zone may be far wider than previously realised.
Tian R. Tian, Alexander D. Fraser, Noriaki Kimura, Chen Zhao, and Petra Heil
The Cryosphere, 16, 1299–1314, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1299-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a comprehensive validation of a satellite observational sea ice motion product in Antarctica by using drifting buoys. Two problems existing in this sea ice motion product have been noticed. After rectifying problems, we use it to investigate the impacts of satellite observational configuration and timescale on Antarctic sea ice kinematics and suggest the future improvement of satellite missions specifically designed for retrieval of sea ice motion.
Jessica Cartwright, Alexander D. Fraser, and Richard Porter-Smith
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 479–490, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-479-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-479-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Due to the scale and remote nature of the polar regions, it is essential to use satellite remote sensing to monitor and understand them and their dynamics. Here we present data from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), processed in a manner proven for use in cryosphere studies. The data have been processed on three timescales (5 d, 2 d and 1 d) in order to optimise temporal resolution as each of the three MetOp satellites is launched.
Joey J. Voermans, Qingxiang Liu, Aleksey Marchenko, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Takuji Waseda, Takehiko Nose, Tsubasa Kodaira, Jingkai Li, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have shown through field experiments that the amount of wave energy dissipated in landfast ice, sea ice attached to land, is much larger than in broken ice. By comparing our measurements against predictions of contemporary wave–ice interaction models, we determined which models can explain our observations and which cannot. Our results will improve our understanding of how waves and ice interact and how we can model such interactions to better forecast waves and ice in the polar regions.
Alexander D. Fraser, Robert A. Massom, Mark S. Handcock, Phillip Reid, Kay I. Ohshima, Marilyn N. Raphael, Jessica Cartwright, Andrew R. Klekociuk, Zhaohui Wang, and Richard Porter-Smith
The Cryosphere, 15, 5061–5077, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5061-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5061-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Landfast ice is sea ice that remains stationary by attaching to Antarctica's coastline and grounded icebergs. Although a variable feature, landfast ice exerts influence on key coastal processes involving pack ice, the ice sheet, ocean, and atmosphere and is of ecological importance. We present a first analysis of change in landfast ice over an 18-year period and quantify trends (−0.19 ± 0.18 % yr−1). This analysis forms a reference of landfast-ice extent and variability for use in other studies.
Camilla K. Crockart, Tessa R. Vance, Alexander D. Fraser, Nerilie J. Abram, Alison S. Criscitiello, Mark A. J. Curran, Vincent Favier, Ailie J. E. Gallant, Christoph Kittel, Helle A. Kjær, Andrew R. Klekociuk, Lenneke M. Jong, Andrew D. Moy, Christopher T. Plummer, Paul T. Vallelonga, Jonathan Wille, and Lingwei Zhang
Clim. Past, 17, 1795–1818, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1795-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1795-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present preliminary analyses of the annual sea salt concentrations and snowfall accumulation in a new East Antarctic ice core, Mount Brown South. We compare this record with an updated Law Dome (Dome Summit South site) ice core record over the period 1975–2016. The Mount Brown South record preserves a stronger and inverse signal for the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (in austral winter and spring) compared to the Law Dome record (in summer).
Richard Porter-Smith, John McKinlay, Alexander D. Fraser, and Robert A. Massom
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3103–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3103-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3103-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study quantifies the characteristic complexity
signaturesaround the Antarctic outer coastal margin, giving a multiscale estimate of the magnitude and direction of undulation or complexity at each point location along the entire coastline. It has numerous applications for both geophysical and biological studies and will contribute to Antarctic research requiring quantitative information about this important interface.
Kazuya Kusahara, Daisuke Hirano, Masakazu Fujii, Alexander D. Fraser, and Takeshi Tamura
The Cryosphere, 15, 1697–1717, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1697-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1697-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used an ocean–sea ice–ice shelf model with a 2–3 km horizontal resolution to investigate ocean–ice shelf/glacier interactions in Lützow-Holm Bay, East Antarctica. The numerical model reproduced the observed warm water intrusion along the deep trough in the bay. We examined in detail (1) water mass changes between the upper continental slope and shelf regions and (2) the fast-ice role in the ocean conditions and basal melting at the Shirase Glacier tongue.
Joey J. Voermans, Jean Rabault, Kirill Filchuk, Ivan Ryzhov, Petra Heil, Aleksey Marchenko, Clarence O. Collins III, Mohammed Dabboor, Graig Sutherland, and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we demonstrate the existence of an observational threshold which identifies when waves are most likely to break sea ice. This threshold is based on information from two recent field campaigns, supplemented with existing observations of sea ice break-up. We show that both field and laboratory observations tend to converge to a single quantitative threshold at which the wave-induced sea ice break-up takes place, which opens a promising avenue for operational forecasting models.
Alexander D. Fraser, Robert A. Massom, Kay I. Ohshima, Sascha Willmes, Peter J. Kappes, Jessica Cartwright, and Richard Porter-Smith
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2987–2999, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2987-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2987-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Landfast ice, or
fast ice, is a form of sea ice which is mechanically fastened to stationary parts of the coast. Long-term and accurate knowledge of its extent around Antarctica is critical for understanding a number of important Antarctic coastal processes, yet no accurate, large-scale, long-term dataset of its extent has been available. We address this data gap with this new dataset compiled from satellite imagery, containing high-resolution maps of Antarctic fast ice from 2000 to 2018.
Stefanie Arndt, Mario Hoppmann, Holger Schmithüsen, Alexander D. Fraser, and Marcel Nicolaus
The Cryosphere, 14, 2775–2793, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2775-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2775-2020, 2020
Cited articles
Ardhuin, F., Stopa, J., Chapron, B., Collard, F., Smith, M., Thomson, J., Doble, M., Blomquist, B., Persson, O., Collins III, C. O., and Peter Wadhams, P.: Measuring ocean waves in sea ice using SAR imagery: a quasi-deterministic approach evaluated with Sentinel-1 and in situ data, Remote Sens. Environ., 189, 211–222, 2017. a
Babanin, A. V.: Swell attenuation due to wave-induced turbulence, in: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, vol. 44892, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10-15 June 2011, 439–443, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2012-83706, 2012. a
Bateson, A. W., Feltham, D. L., Schröder, D., Wang, Y., Hwang, B., Ridley, J. K., and Aksenov, Y.: Sea ice floe size: its impact on pan-Arctic and local ice mass and required model complexity, The Cryosphere, 16, 2565–2593, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2565-2022, 2022. a
Bennetts, L. G., Shakespeare, C. J., Vreugdenhil, C. A., Foppert, A., Gayen, B., Meyer, A., Morrison, A. K., Padman, L., Phillips, H. E., Stevens, C. L., Toffoli, A., Constantinou, N. C., Cusack, J. M., Cyriac, A., Doddridge, E. W., England, M. H., Evans, D. G., Heil, P., Hogg, A. M., Holmes, R. M., Huneke, W. G. C., Jones, N. L., Keating, S. R., Kiss, A. E., Kraitzman, N., Malyarenko, A., McConnochie, C. D., Meucci, A., Montiel, F., Neme, J., Nikurashin, M., Patel, R. S., Peng, J.-P., Rayson, M., Rosevear, M. G., Sohail, T., Spence, P., and Stanley, G. J.: Closing the loops on Southern Ocean dynamics: From the circumpolar current to ice shelves and from bottom mixing to surface waves, Rev. Geophys., 62, e2022RG000781, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000781, 2024. a
Boutin, G., Lique, C., Ardhuin, F., Rousset, C., Talandier, C., Accensi, M., and Girard-Ardhuin, F.: Towards a coupled model to investigate wave–sea ice interactions in the Arctic marginal ice zone, The Cryosphere, 14, 709–735, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-709-2020, 2020. a
Brenner, S. and Horvat, C.: Scaling simulations of local wind-waves amid sea ice floes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2024JC021629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021629, 2024. a
Brouwer, J., Fraser, A. D., Murphy, D. J., Wongpan, P., Alberello, A., Kohout, A., Horvat, C., Wotherspoon, S., Massom, R. A., Cartwright, J., and Williams, G. D.: Altimetric observation of wave attenuation through the Antarctic marginal ice zone using ICESat-2, The Cryosphere, 16, 2325–2353, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2325-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Cao, L., Liu, Q., Voermans, J., Alberello, A., and Babanin, A.: Retrieval of ocean surface wave parameters from ICESat-2 altimetry: validation and limitations., Ocean Dynam., 75, 60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-025-01700-8, 2025. a
Collard, F., Marié, L., Nouguier, F., Kleinherenbrink, M., Ehlers, F., and Ardhuin, F.: Wind-wave attenuation in Arctic sea ice: a discussion of remote sensing capabilities, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2022JC018654, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018654, 2022. a, b
Collins III, C. O., Rogers, W. E., Marchenko, A., and Babanin, A. V.: In situ measurements of an energetic wave event in the Arctic marginal ice zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1863–1870, 2015. a
Dumont, D., Kohout, A., and Bertino, L.: A wave-based model for the marginal ice zone including a floe breaking parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 116, C04001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006682, 2011. a
Eayrs, C., Holland, D., Francis, D., Wagner, T., Kumar, R., and Li, X.: Understanding the seasonal cycle of Antarctic sea ice extent in the context of longer-term variability, Rev. Geophys., 57, 1037–1064, 2019. a
Häkkinen, S.: Coupled ice-ocean dynamics in the marginal ice zones: upwelling/downwelling and eddy generation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 91, 819–832, 1986. a
Hell, M. C. and Horvat, C.: A method for constructing directional surface wave spectra from ICESat-2 altimetry, The Cryosphere, 18, 341–361, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-341-2024, 2024. a, b, c
Herman, A.: From apparent attenuation towards physics-based source terms-a perspective on spectral wave modeling in ice-covered seas, Front. Mar. Sci., 11, 1413116, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1413116, 2024. a, b, c, d
Horvat, C., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., and Petty, A.: Observing waves in sea ice with ICESat-2, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087629, 2020. a
Huntemann, M., Heygster, G., Kaleschke, L., Krumpen, T., Mäkynen, M., and Drusch, M.: Empirical sea ice thickness retrieval during the freeze-up period from SMOS high incident angle observations, The Cryosphere, 8, 439–451, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-439-2014, 2014. a, b
Jiang, H., Stopa, J. E., Wang, H., Husson, R., Mouche, A., Chapron, B., and Chen, G.: Tracking the attenuation and nonbreaking dissipation of swells using altimeters, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 121, 1446–1458, 2016. a
Kodaira, T., Katsuno, T., Nose, T., Itoh, M., Rabault, J., Hoppmann, M., Kimizuka, M., and Waseda, T.: An affordable and customizable wave buoy for the study of wave-ice interactions: design concept and results from field deployments, Coast. Eng. J., 66, 74–88, 2024. a
Kohout, A. L. and Meylan, M. H.: An elastic plate model for wave attenuation and ice floe breaking in the marginal ice zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, C09016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004434, 2008. a
Kohout, A. L., Penrose, B., Penrose, S., and Williams, M. J.: A device for measuring wave-induced motion of ice floes in the Antarctic marginal ice zone, Ann. Glaciol., 56, 415–424, 2015. a
Kwok, R., Petty, A. A., Cunningham, G., Markus, T., Hancock, D., Ivanoff, A., Wimert, J., Bagnardi, M., Kurtz, N., and ICESat 2 Science Team: ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A sea ice height, version 2, Boulder, Colorado USA, NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL07.005, 20, 2021. a
Li, J., Kohout, A. L., Doble, M. J., Wadhams, P., Guan, C., and Shen, H. H.: Rollover of apparent wave attenuation in ice covered seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 8557–8566, 2017. a
Li, J., Babanin, A. V., Liu, Q., Voermans, J. J., Heil, P., and Tang, Y.: Effects of wave-induced sea ice break-up and mixing in a high-resolution coupled ice-ocean model, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9, 365, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040365, 2021. a
Liu, Q., Rogers, W. E., Babanin, A., Li, J., and Guan, C.: Spectral modeling of ice-induced wave decay, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 50, 1583–1604, 2020. a
Liu, Q., Babanin, A.V., Rogers, W. E., Zieger, S., Young, I.R., Bidlot, J., Durrant, T., Ewans, K., Guan, C., Kirezci, C., Lemos, G., MacHutchon, K., Moon, I-J., Rapizo, H., Ribal, A., Semedo, A., and Wang, J.: Global wave hindcasts using the observation-based source terms: description and validation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002493, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002493, 2021. a, b
Manucharyan, G. E. and Thompson, A. F.: Submesoscale sea ice-ocean interactions in marginal ice zones, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 9455–9475, 2017. a
Neumann, T. A., Martino, A. J., Markus, T., Bae, S., Bock, M. R., Brenner, A. C., Brunt, K. M., Cavanaugh, J., Fernandes, S. T., Hancock, D. W., Harbeck, K., Lee, J., Kurtz, N. T., Luers, P. J., Luthcke, S. B., Magruder, L., Pennington, T. A., Ramos-Izquierdo, L., Rebold, T., Skoog, J., and Thomas, T. C.: The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite–2 Mission: a global geolocated photon product derived from the advanced topographic laser altimeter system, Remote Sens. Environ., 233, 111325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111325, 2019. a
Nose, T., Katsuno, T., Waseda, T., Ushio, S., Rabault, J., Kodaira, T., and Voermans, J.: Observation of wave propagation over 1,000 km into Antarctica winter pack ice, Coast. Eng. J., 66, 115–131, https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2023.2283243, 2023. a
Rabault, J., Nose, T., Hope, G., Müller, M., Breivik, Ø., Voermans, J., Hole, L. R., Bohlinger, P., Waseda, T., Kodaira, T., Katsuno, T., Johnson, M., Sutherland, G., Johansson, M., Christensen, K. H., Garbo, A., Jensen, A., Gundersen, O., Marchenko, A., and Babanin, A.: Openmetbuoy-v2021: an easy-to-build, affordable, customizable, open-source instrument for oceanographic measurements of drift and waves in sea ice and the open ocean, Geosciences, 12, 110, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12030110, 2022. a
Rabault, J., Müller, M., Voermans, J., Brazhnikov, D., Turnbull, I., Marchenko, A., Biuw, M., Nose, T., Waseda, T., Johansson, M., Breivik, Ø., Sutherland, G., Hole, L. R., Johnson, M., Jensen, A., Gundersen, O., Kristoffersen, Y., Babanin, A., Tedesco, P., Christensen, K. H., Kristiansen, M., Hope, G., Kodaira, T., de Aguiar, V., Taelman, C., Quigley, C. P., Filchuk, K., and Mahoney, A. R.: A dataset of direct observations of sea ice drift and waves in ice, Scientific Data, 10, 251, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02160-9, 2023. a
Rogers, W. E., Meylan, M. H., and Kohout, A. L.: Estimates of spectral wave attenuation in Antarctic sea ice, using model/data inversion, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 182, 103198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103198, 2021. a, b, c, d
Shen, H. H.: Wave-ice interaction models and experimental observations, in: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium held at Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 3–9 June 2019, Springer, 183–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80439-8_9, 2022. a
Smith, M. M., Thomson, J., Baker, M. G., Abbott, R. E., and Davis, J.: Observations of ocean surface wave attenuation in sea ice using seafloor cables, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105243, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105243, 2023. a
Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384, 2008. a, b
Squire, V. A.: A fresh look at how ocean waves and sea ice interact, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 376, 20170342, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0342, 2018. a
Squire, V. A., Vaughan, G. L., and Bennetts, L. G.: Ocean surface wave evolvement in the Arctic Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L22502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040676, 2009. a
Stopa, J. E., Ardhuin, F., and Girard-Ardhuin, F.: Wave climate in the Arctic 1992–2014: seasonality and trends, The Cryosphere, 10, 1605–1629, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1605-2016, 2016. a
Stopa, J. E., Sutherland, P., and Ardhuin, F.: Strong and highly variable push of ocean waves on Southern Ocean sea ice, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5861–5865, 2018. a
Thomson, J.: Wave propagation in the marginal ice zone: connections and feedback mechanisms within the air–ice–ocean system, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 380, 20210251, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0251, 2022. a
Thomson, J., Hošeková, L., Meylan, M. H., Kohout, A. L., and Kumar, N.: Spurious rollover of wave attenuation rates in sea ice caused by noise in field measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016606, 2021. a
Toyota, T., Takatsuji, S., and Nakayama, M.: Characteristics of sea ice floe size distribution in the seasonal ice zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02616, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024556, 2006. a
Voermans, J. J., Rabault, J., Filchuk, K., Ryzhov, I., Heil, P., Marchenko, A., Collins III, C. O., Dabboor, M., Sutherland, G., and Babanin, A. V.: Experimental evidence for a universal threshold characterizing wave-induced sea ice break-up, The Cryosphere, 14, 4265–4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4265-2020, 2020. a
Voermans, J. J., Liu, Q., Marchenko, A., Rabault, J., Filchuk, K., Ryzhov, I., Heil, P., Waseda, T., Nose, T., Kodaira, T., Li, J., and Babanin, A. V.: Wave dispersion and dissipation in landfast ice: comparison of observations against models, The Cryosphere, 15, 5557–5575, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5557-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Voermans, J. J., Xu, X., and Babanin, A. V.: Validity of the wave stationarity assumption on estimates of wave attenuation in sea ice: toward a method for wave–ice attenuation observations at global scales, J. Glaciol., 69, 803–810, 2023. a
Wadhams, P., Squire, V. A., Goodman, D. J., Cowan, A. M., and Moore, S. C.: The attenuation rates of ocean waves in the marginal ice zone, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 93, 6799–6818, 1988. a
Weeks, W.: On Sea Ice, University of Alaska Press, ISBN 978-1-60223-079-8, 2010. a
Williams, T. D., Bennetts, L. G., Squire, V. A., Dumont, D., and Bertino, L.: Wave–ice interactions in the marginal ice zone. Part 2: Numerical implementation and sensitivity studies along 1D transects of the ocean surface, Ocean Model., 71, 92–101, 2013. a
Womack, A., Alberello, A., de Vos, M., Toffoli, A., Verrinder, R., and Vichi, M.: A contrast in sea ice drift and deformation between winter and spring of 2019 in the Antarctic marginal ice zone, The Cryosphere, 18, 205–229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-205-2024, 2024. a
Worby, A. P., Geiger, C. A., Paget, M. J., Van Woert, M. L., Ackley, S. F., and DeLiberty, T. L.: Thickness distribution of Antarctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, C05S92, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jc004254, 2008. a
Young, I. R., Fontaine, E., Liu, Q., and Babanin, A. V.: The wave climate of the Southern Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 50, 1417–1433, 2020. a
Short summary
Limited measurements of waves in sea ice exist, preventing our understanding of wave attenuation in sea ice under a wide range of ice conditions. Using satellite observations from ICESat-2, we observe an overall linear increase in the wave attenuation rate with distance into the marginal ice zone. While attenuation may vary greatly locally, this finding may provide opportunities for the modeling of waves in sea ice at global and climate scales when such fine detail may not be needed.
Limited measurements of waves in sea ice exist, preventing our understanding of wave attenuation...