Articles | Volume 19, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3033-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3033-2025
Research article
 | 
13 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 13 Aug 2025

Investigating the impact of reanalysis snow input on an observationally calibrated snow-on-sea-ice reconstruction

Alex Cabaj, Paul J. Kushner, and Alek A. Petty

Viewed

Total article views: 6,832 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,024 1,109 699 6,832 32 207 346
  • HTML: 5,024
  • PDF: 1,109
  • XML: 699
  • Total: 6,832
  • Supplement: 32
  • BibTeX: 207
  • EndNote: 346
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,832 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,691 with geography defined and 141 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 21 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
The output of snow-on-sea-ice models is influenced by the choice of snowfall input used. We ran such a model with different snowfall inputs and calibrated it to observations, produced a new calibrated snow product, and regionally compared the model outputs to outputs from another snow-on-sea-ice model. The two models agree best on the seasonal cycle of snow in the central Arctic Ocean. Observational comparisons highlight ongoing challenges in estimating the depth and density of snow on Arctic sea ice.
Share