To the authors,

You have thoroughly responded to the comments of the reviewers. The comments were also largely positive and supportive of publication. Therefore I would kindly ask you to submit a revised version of your manuscript for further minor revisions.

Best regards,
Alex

To the authors,

You have done a thorough job responding to the reviewers' comments, which were largely positive. I believe the manuscript is near ready for publication, following some minor additional changes, listed below. Along with these suggestions, I would recommend the authors read the text carefully again, to shorten some sentences where possible and ensure all typos/errors are fixed. Also, please make sure all figures are clearly and fully described in the captions, with some examples for improvement listed below.

Best regards,
Alex

Minor comments:

L11: sea level rise => sea-level rise [and throughout the manuscript]

L20: satellite measurements, show => satellite measurements. The downscaled product shows ... with respect to the original ...

L30: as well as => and

L38: 2013)., => 2013),

L81: GrisSpecifically => Specifically

L88: downscale => downscaled

P5L27: No.l et al. => Noel et al.

P5L39: Parallelizing such => Parallelizing this

P5L43: downscaling directly SMB => downscaling SMB directly

P5L50: consists in => consists of [and throughout the manuscript]

P6L62: the DEM are => the DEM is

P7L91: being such scales => as such scales are

P7L09: F ollowing => Following

P10L80: where no DEM => with no DEM

P12L59: a mass conservation => mass conservation

Figure 3: if Celcius, units should be "°C", not "C"

Figure 3, caption: blue dot reported to every map => blue dot shown on each map

Figure 3, caption: MAR grid reported => MAR grid shown

Figure 3, caption: No blue dots are shown in Figure 3, please revise the caption.

Figure 6: Please improve the caption and/or labels. It is not clear what the colors of the lines correspond to.