Articles | Volume 14, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2715-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2715-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Brief communication
| 
27 Aug 2020
Brief communication |
| 27 Aug 2020
| 27 Aug 2020
Brief communication: Evaluating Antarctic precipitation in ERA5 and CMIP6 against CloudSat observations
Marie-Laure Roussel
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS/École Normale Supérieure – PSL Research University/École Polytechnique – IPP, Paris, France
Florentin Lemonnier
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS/École Normale Supérieure – PSL Research University/École Polytechnique – IPP, Paris, France
Christophe Genthon
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS/École Normale Supérieure – PSL Research University/École Polytechnique – IPP, Paris, France
Gerhard Krinner
Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France
Viewed
Total article views: 3,513 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Feb 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,422 | 990 | 101 | 3,513 | 112 | 108 |
- HTML: 2,422
- PDF: 990
- XML: 101
- Total: 3,513
- BibTeX: 112
- EndNote: 108
Total article views: 2,721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 27 Aug 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,960 | 697 | 64 | 2,721 | 73 | 69 |
- HTML: 1,960
- PDF: 697
- XML: 64
- Total: 2,721
- BibTeX: 73
- EndNote: 69
Total article views: 792 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Feb 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 462 | 293 | 37 | 792 | 39 | 39 |
- HTML: 462
- PDF: 293
- XML: 37
- Total: 792
- BibTeX: 39
- EndNote: 39
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,513 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,259 with geography defined
and 254 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,721 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,576 with geography defined
and 145 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 792 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 683 with geography defined
and 109 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
31 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The capability of CMIP6 models on seasonal precipitation extremes over Central Asia Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106364
- The performance of CMIP6 models in simulating surface energy fluxes over global continents S. Liu et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06595-5
- Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise T. Edwards et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y
- The Antarctic Amplification Based on MODIS Land Surface Temperature and ERA5 A. Xie et al. 10.3390/rs15143540
- The Representation of Sea Salt Aerosols and Their Role in Polar Climate Within CMIP6 R. Lapere et al. 10.1029/2022JD038235
- Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale W. Xiong et al. 10.3390/w14071122
- The sensitivity of landfast sea ice to atmospheric forcing in single-column model simulations: a case study at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica F. Gu et al. 10.5194/tc-16-1873-2022
- Polar amplification comparison among Earth’s three poles under different socioeconomic scenarios from CMIP6 surface air temperature A. Xie et al. 10.1038/s41598-022-21060-3
- Empirical projection of global sea level in 2050 driven by Antarctic and Greenland ice mass variations D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad13b8
- Cross-Evaluation of Soil Moisture Based on the Triple Collocation Method and a Preliminary Application of Quality Control for Station Observations in China W. Xiong et al. 10.3390/w14071054
- Climate projections over the Antarctic Peninsula region to the end of the 21st century. Part III: clouds and extreme precipitation A. Chyhareva & S. Krakovska 10.33275/1727-7485.2.2022.699
- Evaluation of coastal Antarctic precipitation in LMDz6 global atmospheric model using ground-based radar observations F. Lemonnier et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2021-67-2-147-164
- Assessment of future Antarctic amplification of surface temperature change under different Scenarios from CMIP6 J. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s11629-022-7646-5
- Recent progress in atmospheric modeling over the Andes – part I: review of atmospheric processes J. Martinez et al. 10.3389/feart.2024.1427783
- Large-scale and regional climatic influences on surface temperature and precipitation in the South Shetland Islands, northern Antarctic Peninsula C. TORRES et al. 10.1590/0001-3765202320230685
- Evaluation of atmospheric circulations for dynamic downscaling in CMIP6 models over East Asia S. Song et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06465-0
- Historical fidelity and future change of Amundsen Sea Low under 1.5 °C–4 °C global warming in CMIP6 M. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105533
- Projected changes in Antarctic daily temperature in CMIP6 under different warming scenarios during two future periods J. Zhu et al. 10.1071/ES22008
- Extreme precipitation records in Antarctica S. González‐Herrero et al. 10.1002/joc.8020
- Bayesian assessment of CMIP6 surface net radiation predictions for Köppen–Geiger climate zones Z. Liu 10.1002/joc.8152
- Disentangling the drivers of future Antarctic ice loss with a historically calibrated ice-sheet model V. Coulon et al. 10.5194/tc-18-653-2024
- Projection on elevation-dependent and latitude-dependent warming over Antarctica from CMIP6 under different socioeconomic scenarios J. Zhu et al. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104327
- Evaluation and Optimization of Low Impact Development Designs for Sustainable Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate Y. Abduljaleel & Y. Demissie 10.3390/w13202889
- Assessment of Antarctic sea ice area and concentration in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 models F. Casagrande et al. 10.1002/joc.7916
- Revisiting temperature sensitivity: how does Antarctic precipitation change with temperature? L. Nicola et al. 10.5194/tc-17-2563-2023
- New insights on the interannual surface mass balance variability on the South Shetland Islands glaciers, northerly Antarctic Peninsula C. Torres et al. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104506
- Future projections of temperature and precipitation for Antarctica K. Tewari et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac43e2
- Assessing the simulation of snowfall at Dumont d'Urville, Antarctica, during the YOPP‐SH special observing campaign M. Roussel et al. 10.1002/qj.4463
- Present and Future of Rainfall in Antarctica É. Vignon et al. 10.1029/2020GL092281
- Evaluation of Historical Simulations of CMIP6 Models for Temperature and Precipitation in Guatemala P. Rivera 10.1007/s41748-022-00333-x
- Projecting irrigation demand under IPCC climate change scenarios using WEAP modeling in the Rechna Doab, Pakistan H. Khan & Z. Bin Zahid 10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100040
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The capability of CMIP6 models on seasonal precipitation extremes over Central Asia Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106364
- The performance of CMIP6 models in simulating surface energy fluxes over global continents S. Liu et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06595-5
- Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise T. Edwards et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y
- The Antarctic Amplification Based on MODIS Land Surface Temperature and ERA5 A. Xie et al. 10.3390/rs15143540
- The Representation of Sea Salt Aerosols and Their Role in Polar Climate Within CMIP6 R. Lapere et al. 10.1029/2022JD038235
- Evaluation of IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation-Phase Partitioning on the Global Scale W. Xiong et al. 10.3390/w14071122
- The sensitivity of landfast sea ice to atmospheric forcing in single-column model simulations: a case study at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica F. Gu et al. 10.5194/tc-16-1873-2022
- Polar amplification comparison among Earth’s three poles under different socioeconomic scenarios from CMIP6 surface air temperature A. Xie et al. 10.1038/s41598-022-21060-3
- Empirical projection of global sea level in 2050 driven by Antarctic and Greenland ice mass variations D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad13b8
- Cross-Evaluation of Soil Moisture Based on the Triple Collocation Method and a Preliminary Application of Quality Control for Station Observations in China W. Xiong et al. 10.3390/w14071054
- Climate projections over the Antarctic Peninsula region to the end of the 21st century. Part III: clouds and extreme precipitation A. Chyhareva & S. Krakovska 10.33275/1727-7485.2.2022.699
- Evaluation of coastal Antarctic precipitation in LMDz6 global atmospheric model using ground-based radar observations F. Lemonnier et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2021-67-2-147-164
- Assessment of future Antarctic amplification of surface temperature change under different Scenarios from CMIP6 J. Zhu et al. 10.1007/s11629-022-7646-5
- Recent progress in atmospheric modeling over the Andes – part I: review of atmospheric processes J. Martinez et al. 10.3389/feart.2024.1427783
- Large-scale and regional climatic influences on surface temperature and precipitation in the South Shetland Islands, northern Antarctic Peninsula C. TORRES et al. 10.1590/0001-3765202320230685
- Evaluation of atmospheric circulations for dynamic downscaling in CMIP6 models over East Asia S. Song et al. 10.1007/s00382-022-06465-0
- Historical fidelity and future change of Amundsen Sea Low under 1.5 °C–4 °C global warming in CMIP6 M. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105533
- Projected changes in Antarctic daily temperature in CMIP6 under different warming scenarios during two future periods J. Zhu et al. 10.1071/ES22008
- Extreme precipitation records in Antarctica S. González‐Herrero et al. 10.1002/joc.8020
- Bayesian assessment of CMIP6 surface net radiation predictions for Köppen–Geiger climate zones Z. Liu 10.1002/joc.8152
- Disentangling the drivers of future Antarctic ice loss with a historically calibrated ice-sheet model V. Coulon et al. 10.5194/tc-18-653-2024
- Projection on elevation-dependent and latitude-dependent warming over Antarctica from CMIP6 under different socioeconomic scenarios J. Zhu et al. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104327
- Evaluation and Optimization of Low Impact Development Designs for Sustainable Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate Y. Abduljaleel & Y. Demissie 10.3390/w13202889
- Assessment of Antarctic sea ice area and concentration in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and Phase 6 models F. Casagrande et al. 10.1002/joc.7916
- Revisiting temperature sensitivity: how does Antarctic precipitation change with temperature? L. Nicola et al. 10.5194/tc-17-2563-2023
- New insights on the interannual surface mass balance variability on the South Shetland Islands glaciers, northerly Antarctic Peninsula C. Torres et al. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104506
- Future projections of temperature and precipitation for Antarctica K. Tewari et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac43e2
- Assessing the simulation of snowfall at Dumont d'Urville, Antarctica, during the YOPP‐SH special observing campaign M. Roussel et al. 10.1002/qj.4463
- Present and Future of Rainfall in Antarctica É. Vignon et al. 10.1029/2020GL092281
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Evaluation of Historical Simulations of CMIP6 Models for Temperature and Precipitation in Guatemala P. Rivera 10.1007/s41748-022-00333-x
- Projecting irrigation demand under IPCC climate change scenarios using WEAP modeling in the Rechna Doab, Pakistan H. Khan & Z. Bin Zahid 10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100040
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Short summary
The Antarctic precipitation is evaluated against space radar data in the most recent climate model intercomparison CMIP6 and reanalysis ERA5. The seasonal cycle is mostly well reproduced, but relative errors are higher in areas of complex topography, particularly in the higher-resolution models. At continental and regional scales all results are biased high, with no significant progress in the more recent models. Predicting Antarctic contribution to sea level still requires model improvements.
The Antarctic precipitation is evaluated against space radar data in the most recent climate...
