It looks like you have a good plan to respond to the comments by the referees. Please submit a revised manuscript that addresses their comments, as well as an annotated manuscript showing revisions.

Thanks for thorough responses to the referees. There are some places where the language in the MS is a little rough--
Lines 75-78: Not sore what "for instance" is meant to indicate. This phrase needs a prior general phrase so that the reader can tell what general condition the instance is of. I don't see that here.
134: another "for instance" that isn't quite clear-- the previous list of parameters seems fairly comprehensive, so it's not like those are only a few of the parameters that might be relevant.
150: "a by expert judgement merged data products" -- this seems to be garbled somehow
167: move ',for instance,' directly after the word 'wall'
174: "may shifts also" - should be "may also shift'

This is likely a partial list. Please look over the MS again to check for similar problems.

Thanks for the thorough read-through. I'm sending the paper on for production now.

Best
Ben