Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018
Research article
 | 
06 Jul 2018
Research article |  | 06 Jul 2018

Glacio-hydrological melt and run-off modelling: application of a limits of acceptability framework for model comparison and selection

Jonathan D. Mackay, Nicholas E. Barrand, David M. Hannah, Stefan Krause, Christopher R. Jackson, Jez Everest, and Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir

Viewed

Total article views: 5,586 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,458 2,013 115 5,586 96 94
  • HTML: 3,458
  • PDF: 2,013
  • XML: 115
  • Total: 5,586
  • BibTeX: 96
  • EndNote: 94
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,586 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,167 with geography defined and 419 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 21 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We apply a framework to compare and objectively accept or reject competing melt and run-off process models. We found no acceptable models. Furthermore, increasing model complexity does not guarantee better predictions. The results highlight model selection uncertainty and the need for rigorous frameworks to identify deficiencies in competing models. The application of this approach in the future will help to better quantify model prediction uncertainty and develop improved process models.