Articles | Volume 12, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018
Research article
 | 
06 Jul 2018
Research article |  | 06 Jul 2018

Glacio-hydrological melt and run-off modelling: application of a limits of acceptability framework for model comparison and selection

Jonathan D. Mackay, Nicholas E. Barrand, David M. Hannah, Stefan Krause, Christopher R. Jackson, Jez Everest, and Guðfinna Aðalgeirsdóttir

Viewed

Total article views: 7,960 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,970 2,825 165 7,960 181 236
  • HTML: 4,970
  • PDF: 2,825
  • XML: 165
  • Total: 7,960
  • BibTeX: 181
  • EndNote: 236
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,960 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,440 with geography defined and 520 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 25 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We apply a framework to compare and objectively accept or reject competing melt and run-off process models. We found no acceptable models. Furthermore, increasing model complexity does not guarantee better predictions. The results highlight model selection uncertainty and the need for rigorous frameworks to identify deficiencies in competing models. The application of this approach in the future will help to better quantify model prediction uncertainty and develop improved process models.
Share