Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
Comment/reply
 | 
21 Jul 2017
Comment/reply |  | 21 Jul 2017

Reply to “Basal buoyancy and fast-moving glaciers: in defense of analytic force balance” by C. J. van der Veen (2016)

Terence J. Hughes

Viewed

Total article views: 2,243 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,263 803 177 2,243 114 171
  • HTML: 1,263
  • PDF: 803
  • XML: 177
  • Total: 2,243
  • BibTeX: 114
  • EndNote: 171
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,243 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,139 with geography defined and 104 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Jul 2024
Short summary
Two approaches to ice-sheet modeling are available. Analytical modeling is the traditional approach. It solves the force (momentum), mass, and energy balances to obtain three-dimensional solutions over time. Geometrical modeling employs simple geometry to solve the force and mass balance in one dimension along ice flow. It is useful primarily to provide the first-order physical basis of ice-sheet modeling for students with little background in mathematics. The two approaches are compared.