Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
Comment/reply
 | 
21 Jul 2017
Comment/reply |  | 21 Jul 2017

Reply to “Basal buoyancy and fast-moving glaciers: in defense of analytic force balance” by C. J. van der Veen (2016)

Terence J. Hughes

Viewed

Total article views: 2,354 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,335 834 185 2,354 121 181
  • HTML: 1,335
  • PDF: 834
  • XML: 185
  • Total: 2,354
  • BibTeX: 121
  • EndNote: 181
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,354 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,248 with geography defined and 106 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Short summary
Two approaches to ice-sheet modeling are available. Analytical modeling is the traditional approach. It solves the force (momentum), mass, and energy balances to obtain three-dimensional solutions over time. Geometrical modeling employs simple geometry to solve the force and mass balance in one dimension along ice flow. It is useful primarily to provide the first-order physical basis of ice-sheet modeling for students with little background in mathematics. The two approaches are compared.