Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-895-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-895-2016
Research article
 | 
26 Apr 2016
Research article |  | 26 Apr 2016

Improved GRACE regional mass balance estimates of the Greenland ice sheet cross-validated with the input–output method

Zheng Xu, Ernst J. O. Schrama, Wouter van der Wal, Michiel van den Broeke, and Ellyn M. Enderlin

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Zheng Xu on behalf of the Authors (27 Dec 2015)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (06 Jan 2016) by Etienne Berthier
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (13 Jan 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (24 Jan 2016)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (02 Feb 2016) by Etienne Berthier
AR by Zheng Xu on behalf of the Authors (09 Mar 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 Mar 2016) by Etienne Berthier
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (29 Mar 2016)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (29 Mar 2016) by Etienne Berthier
AR by Zheng Xu on behalf of the Authors (07 Apr 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (11 Apr 2016) by Etienne Berthier
AR by Zheng Xu on behalf of the Authors (18 Apr 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
In this paper, we compare the regional mass changes of the Greenland ice sheet between the solutions based on GRACE data and input/output method. Differences are found in some regions and indicate errors in those solutions. Therefore we improve our GRACE and IOM solutions by applying a simulation. We show the improved regional mass changes approximations are more consistent in regions. The remaining difference in the northwester Greenland is due to the underestimated uncertainty in IOM solution.