Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-2-557-2008
https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-2-557-2008
14 Jul 2008
 | 14 Jul 2008
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal TC but the revision was not accepted.

Applicability of the Shallow Ice Approximation inferred from model inter-comparison using various glacier geometries

M. Schäfer, O. Gagliardini, F. Pattyn, and E. Le Meur

Abstract. This paper presents an inter-comparison of three different models applied to various glacier geometries. The three models are built on different approximations of the Stokes equations, from the well known Shallow Ice Approximation (SIA) to the full-Stokes (FS) solution with an intermediate higher-order (HO) model which incorporates longitudinal stresses. The studied glaciers are synthetic geometries, but two of them are constructed so as to mimic a valley glacier and a volcano glacier. For each class of glacier, the bedrock slope and/or the aspect ratio are varied. First, the models are compared in a diagnostic way for a fixed and given geometry. Here the SIA surface velocity can overestimate the FS velocity by a factor of 5 to a factor of 10. Then, the free surface is allowed to evolve and the time-dependent evolution of the glacier is studied. As a result, the difference between the models decreases, but can still be as large as a factor of 1.5 to 2. This decrease can be explained by a negative feedback for the SIA which overestimates velocities.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Schäfer, O. Gagliardini, F. Pattyn, and E. Le Meur
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Schäfer, O. Gagliardini, F. Pattyn, and E. Le Meur
M. Schäfer, O. Gagliardini, F. Pattyn, and E. Le Meur

Viewed

Total article views: 3,703 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,832 743 128 3,703 119 123
  • HTML: 2,832
  • PDF: 743
  • XML: 128
  • Total: 3,703
  • BibTeX: 119
  • EndNote: 123
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024