21 Mar 2023
 | 21 Mar 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal TC.

The Ability of Hydrologic-Land Surface Models to Concurrently Simulate Permafrost and Hydrology

Mohamed S. Abdelhamed, Mohamed E. Elshamy, Saman Razavi, and Howard S. Wheater

Abstract. Hydrologic-land surface models (H-LSMs) provide physically-based understanding and predictions of the current and future states of the world’s vast high-latitude permafrost regions. Two major challenges, however, hamper their parametrization and validation when concurrently representing hydrology and permafrost. One is the high computational complexity, exacerbated by the need to include a deep soil profile to adequately capture the freeze/thaw cycles and heat storage. The other is that soil-temperature data are severely limited, and traditional model validation, based on streamflow, can show the right fit to these data for the wrong reasons. There are few observational sites for such vast, heterogeneous regions, and remote sensing provides only limited support. In light of these challenges, we develop 16 parametrizations of a Canadian H-LSM, MESH, for the sub-arctic Liard River Basin and validate them using three data sources: streamflows at multiple gauges, soil temperature profiles from few available boreholes, and multiple permafrost maps. The different parametrizations favor different sources of data and it is challenging to configure a model faithful to all three data sources, which are at times inconsistent with each other. Overall, the results show that: (1) surface insulation through snow cover primarily regulates permafrost dynamics after model initialization effects decay over, relatively long time and (2) different parametrizations yield different partitioning patterns of solid-vs-liquid soil-water and produce different low-flow but similar high-flow regimes. We conclude that, given data scarcity, an ensemble of model parametrizations is essential to provide a reliable picture of the current states and future spatio-temporal co-evolution of permafrost and hydrology.

Mohamed S. Abdelhamed et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-20', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Apr 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on tc-2023-20 - Complete Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 May 2023
  • RC3: 'Comment on tc-2023-20', Anonymous Referee #3, 08 May 2023

Mohamed S. Abdelhamed et al.

Model code and software

MESH-Model Environment and Climate Change Canada

Mohamed S. Abdelhamed et al.


Total article views: 404 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
282 108 14 404 37 4 6
  • HTML: 282
  • PDF: 108
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 404
  • Supplement: 37
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 406 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 406 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 09 Jun 2023
Short summary
Prior to any climate change assessment, it is necessary to assess the ability of available models to reliably reproduce observed permafrost and hydrology. Following a progressive approach, various model set-ups were developed and evaluated against different data sources. The study shows that different model set-ups favour different sources of data and it is challenging to configure a model faithful to all data sources, which are at times inconsistent with each other.