the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part C: feedbacks between melt, ice dynamics, and surface processes
Abstract. The mass balance of many valley glaciers is enhanced by the presence of melt hotspots within otherwise continuous debris cover. We assess the effect of debris, melt hotspots, and ice dynamics on the thinning of Kennicott Glacier in three companion papers. In Part A we report in situ measurements from the debris-covered tongue. In Part B, we develop a method to delineate ice cliffs using high-resolution imagery and produce distributed mass balance estimates. Here in Part C we describe feedbacks controlling rapid thinning under thick debris.
Despite the extreme abundance of ice cliffs on Kennicott Glacier, average melt rates are strongly suppressed downglacier due to thick debris. The estimated melt pattern therefore appears to reflect Østrem’s curve (the debris thickness-melt relationship).
As Kennicott Glacier has thinned over the last century Østrem’s curve has manifested itself in two process domains on the glacier surface. The portion of the glacier affected by the upper-limb of Østrem’s curve corresponds to high melt, melt gradients, and ice dynamics, as well as high ice cliff and stream occurrence. The portion of the glacier affected by the lower-limb of Østrem’s curve corresponds to low melt, melt gradients, and ice dynamics, as well as high ice cliff and stream occurrence.
The upglacier end of the zone of maximum thinning on Kennicott Glacier occurs at the boundary between these process domains and the bend in Østrem’s curve. The expansion of debris upglacier appears to be linked to changes in the surface velocity pattern through time. In response to climate warming, debris itself may therefore control where rapid thinning occurs on debris-covered glaciers. Ice cliffs are most abundant at the upglacier end of the zone of maximum thinning.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(11608 KB)
-
Supplement
(711 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(11608 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(711 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Anderson et al. Part C', David Rounce, 16 Oct 2019
- AC1: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC2: 'Make one solid paper out of the three parts', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Oct 2019
- AC2: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC3: 'Review 3 of manuscript', Anonymous Referee #3, 28 Oct 2019
- AC3: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC4: 'Reviewer Comments', Martin Kirkbride, 04 Nov 2019
- AC4: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Anderson et al. Part C', David Rounce, 16 Oct 2019
- AC1: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC2: 'Make one solid paper out of the three parts', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Oct 2019
- AC2: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC3: 'Review 3 of manuscript', Anonymous Referee #3, 28 Oct 2019
- AC3: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC4: 'Reviewer Comments', Martin Kirkbride, 04 Nov 2019
- AC4: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
942 | 348 | 98 | 1,388 | 152 | 94 | 93 |
- HTML: 942
- PDF: 348
- XML: 98
- Total: 1,388
- Supplement: 152
- BibTeX: 94
- EndNote: 93
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Leif S. Anderson
William H. Armstrong
Robert S. Anderson
Pascal Buri
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(11608 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(711 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote