Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2016-224
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2016-224

  31 Oct 2016

31 Oct 2016

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal TC. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Relationship of Permafrost Cryofacies to Varying Surface and Subsurface Terrain Conditions in the Brooks Range and foothills of Northern Alaska, USA

Andrew W. Balser1, Jeremy B. Jones2, and M. Torre Jorgenson3 Andrew W. Balser et al.
  • 1ERDC-CRREL, Fort Wainwright, AK, 99703 USA
  • 2Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775 USA
  • 3Alaska Ecoscience, Fairbanks, AK, 99709 USA

Abstract. Permafrost landscape responses to climate change and disturbance impact local ecology and global greenhouse gas concentrations, but the nature and magnitude of response is linked with vegetation, terrain and permafrost properties that vary markedly across landscapes. As a subsurface property, permafrost conditions are difficult to characterize across landscapes, and modeled estimates rely upon relationships among permafrost characteristics and surface properties. While a general relationship among landscape and permafrost properties has been recognized throughout the Arctic, the nature of these relationships is poorly documented in many regions, limiting modeling capability. We examined relationships among terrain, vegetation and permafrost within the Brooks Range and foothills of northern Alaska using field data from diverse sites and multiple factor analysis ordination. Terrain, vegetation and permafrost conditions were correlated throughout the region, with field sites falling into four statistically-separable groups based on ordination results. Our results identify index variables for honing field sampling and statistical analysis, illustrate the nature of relationships in the region, support future modeling of permafrost properties, and suggest a state factor approach for organizing data and ideas relevant for modeling of permafrost properties at a regional scale.

Andrew W. Balser et al.

 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Andrew W. Balser et al.

Andrew W. Balser et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 885 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
518 265 102 885 65 108
  • HTML: 518
  • PDF: 265
  • XML: 102
  • Total: 885
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 108
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 833 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 833 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
The permafrost carbon feedback is an important climate change feedback, but quantifying the effect across the Arctic is difficult because permafrost includes a very broad variety of properties among landscapes which respond differently to climate perturbations. Permafrost properties are integrally linked with surface vegetation and terrain properties, but the relationships are complex. We test the ability to characterize these relationships spatially across landscapes in northern Alaska.