the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
An investigation of the influence of supraglacial debris on glacier-hydrology
Abstract. The influence of supraglacial debris on the rate and spatial distribution of glacier surface melt is well established, but its potential impact on the structure and evolution of the drainage system of extensively debris-covered glaciers has not been previously investigated. Forty-eight dye injections were conducted on Miage Glacier, Italian Alps, throughout the 2010 and 2011 ablation seasons. An efficient conduit system emanates from moulins in the mid-part of the glacier, which are downstream of a high melt area of dirty ice and patchy debris. High melt rates and runoff concentration by intermoraine troughs encourages the early-season development of a channelized system downstream of this area. Conversely, the drainage system beneath the continuously debris-covered lower ablation area is generally inefficient, with multi-peaked traces suggesting a distributed network, which likely feeds into the conduit system fed by the upglacier moulins. Drainage efficiency from the debris-covered area increased over the season but trace flow velocity remained lower than from the upper glacier moulins. Low and less-peaked melt inputs combined with the hummocky topography of the debris-covered area inhibits the formation of an efficient drainage network. These findings are relevant to regions with extensive glacial debris cover and where debris cover is expanding.
- Preprint
(5350 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0eba/d0eba6ec87085e8a4bdf18d96da973cc55cbaa78" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ec9/e0ec90fc6dc3ecaf46af4a9aeb7de44503fc84ef" alt="Supplement"
-
RC C2158: 'Is drainage from debris-covered glaciers really special? And why should we bother?', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2015
-
AC C3325: 'Author comments on points by referee 1', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3327: 'Changes to manuscript in Word in response to both referees comments', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3325: 'Author comments on points by referee 1', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
RC C3262: 'Review of Fyffe et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Mar 2016
-
AC C3326: 'Author comment on points by referee 2', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3328: 'Changes to manuscript in Word in response to both referees comments', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3326: 'Author comment on points by referee 2', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0eba/d0eba6ec87085e8a4bdf18d96da973cc55cbaa78" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0ec9/e0ec90fc6dc3ecaf46af4a9aeb7de44503fc84ef" alt="Supplement"
-
RC C2158: 'Is drainage from debris-covered glaciers really special? And why should we bother?', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2015
-
AC C3325: 'Author comments on points by referee 1', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3327: 'Changes to manuscript in Word in response to both referees comments', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3325: 'Author comments on points by referee 1', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
RC C3262: 'Review of Fyffe et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Mar 2016
-
AC C3326: 'Author comment on points by referee 2', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3328: 'Changes to manuscript in Word in response to both referees comments', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
-
AC C3326: 'Author comment on points by referee 2', Catriona Fyffe, 29 Mar 2016
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,366 | 1,161 | 153 | 2,680 | 99 | 145 |
- HTML: 1,366
- PDF: 1,161
- XML: 153
- Total: 2,680
- BibTeX: 99
- EndNote: 145