72 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A numerical study of process complexity in permafrost dominated regions R. Lakshmiprasad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2024.104399
2. Possible effect of flow velocity on thawing rock-water-ice systems under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions T. Heinze https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102940
3. Hydrologic Impacts of Thawing Permafrost—A Review M. Walvoord & B. Kurylyk https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.01.0010
4. A Unified Pipe Network Model for coupled thermo-hydraulic transport in frozen fractured rock: Formulation, validation and application S. Hammoum & P. Cacciari https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.108791
5. Soil moisture redistribution and its effect on inter-annual active layer temperature and thickness variations in a dry loess terrace in Adventdalen, Svalbard C. Schuh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-635-2017
6. Modeling the role of preferential snow accumulation in through talik development and hillslope groundwater flow in a transitional permafrost landscape E. Jafarov et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadd30
7. Influence of injection mode on transport properties in kilometer-scale three-dimensional discrete fracture networks J. Hyman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017151
8. Modeling Aspect‐Controlled Evolution of Ground Thermal Regimes on Montane Hillslopes M. Rush et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006126
9. The evolution of Arctic permafrost over the last 3 centuries from ensemble simulations with the CryoGridLite permafrost model M. Langer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-363-2024
10. Drying of tundra landscapes will limit subsidence-induced acceleration of permafrost thaw S. Painter et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212171120
11. Non-local modelling of freezing and thawing of unsaturated soils P. Nikolaev et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104614
12. Modeling the spatiotemporal variability in subsurface thermal regimes across a low-relief polygonal tundra landscape J. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2241-2016
13. Using field observations to inform thermal hydrology models of permafrost dynamics with ATS (v0.83) A. Atchley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015
14. Groundwater flow and heat transport for systems undergoing freeze-thaw: Intercomparison of numerical simulators for 2D test cases C. Grenier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.02.001
15. Influences and interactions of inundation, peat, and snow on active layer thickness A. Atchley et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068550
16. Guidelines for cold‐regions groundwater numerical modeling P. Lamontagne‐Hallé et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1467
17. A model of local thermal non-equilibrium during infiltration T. Heinze & J. Blöcher https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103394
18. Finite element analysis of heat and mass transfer in unsaturated freezing soils: Formulation and verification Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104848
19. Large-Scale Optimization-Based Non-negative Computational Framework for Diffusion Equations: Parallel Implementation and Performance Studies J. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-016-0250-5
20. A Coupled Thermal‐Hydraulic‐Mechanical Approach to Modeling the Impact of Roadbed Frost Loading on Water Main Failure X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030933
21. Stochastic fracture generation and thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling in an equivalent continuum framework for enhanced geothermal systems H. Gatz-Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2026.105391
22. Development and Verification of a Numerical Library for Solving Global Terrestrial Multiphysics Problems G. Bisht & W. Riley https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001560
23. Feedbacks Between Surface Deformation and Permafrost Degradation in Ice Wedge Polygons, Arctic Coastal Plain, Alaska C. Abolt et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005349
24. Numerical Study of Coupled Water and Vapor Flow, Heat Transfer, and Solute Transport in Variably‐Saturated Deformable Soil During Freeze‐Thaw Cycles X. Huang & D. Rudolph https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032146
25. Major Issues in Simulating Some Arctic Snowpack Properties Using Current Detailed Snow Physics Models: Consequences for the Thermal Regime and Water Budget of Permafrost F. Domine et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001445
26. The importance of freeze–thaw cycles for lateral tracer transport in ice-wedge polygons E. Jafarov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-851-2022
27. Initialization of thermal models in cold and warm permafrost C. Ross et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0013
28. Predicting radionuclide behavior in deep geological repositories using graph convolutional long short-term memory D. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139195
29. A Review of Hydrological Models Applied in the Permafrost-Dominated Arctic Region M. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100401
30. The effect of seasonally frozen ground on rainfall infiltration and groundwater discharge in Qinghai Lake Basin, China C. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1495763
31. Integrated Hydrologic Modelling of Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions in Cold Regions X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.721009
32. A regularization strategy for discontinuity when modelling coupled water and heat flow in freezing unsaturated soil J. Blöcher & M. Kuraz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106299
33. Rain, Snow and Frozen Soil: Open Questions from a Porescale Perspective with Implications for Geohazards I. Baselt & T. Heinze https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11090375
34. Coupled thermal-hydraulic model of the continental subsurface: theory, regimes, and reduced solver M. Rostami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136412
35. Impact of degrading permafrost on subsurface solute transport pathways and travel times A. Frampton & G. Destouni https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016689
36. Modeling Reactive Solute Transport in Permafrost‐Affected Groundwater Systems A. Mohammed et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028771
37. A coupled model for liquid water, water vapor and heat transport of saturated–unsaturated soil in cold regions: model formulation and verification M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5499-3
38. Transversely isotropic frost heave modeling with heat–moisture–deformation coupling Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00774-1
39. Physics-guided deep learning surrogate model with graph attention for long-term radionuclide transport prediction in deep geological repositories D. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140767
40. Integrated surface/subsurface permafrost thermal hydrology: Model formulation and proof‐of‐concept simulations S. Painter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018427
41. Quantifying permafrost thawing and its impact on lake storage dynamics in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau S. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132529
42. Influence of Snowpack Cold Content on Seasonally Frozen Ground and Its Hydrologic Consequences: A Case Study From Niwot Ridge, CO M. Rush & H. Rajaram https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031911
43. The Permafrost and Organic LayEr module for Forest Models (POLE-FM) 1.0 W. Hansen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2011-2023
44. Water and energy transfer modeling in a permafrost‐dominated, forested catchment of Central Siberia: The key role of rooting depth L. Orgogozo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1995
45. Improved permafrost modelling in mountain environments by including air convection in a hydrological model G. Zegers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4091-2025
46. Thermal effects of groundwater flow through subarctic fens: A case study based on field observations and numerical modeling Y. Sjöberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017571
47. Three-dimensional distribution of permafrost and responses to increasing air temperatures in the head waters of the Yellow River in High Asia A. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.110
48. A new method of hydrothermal coupling transfer in the freeze–thaw process based on water physical phase change C. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107404
49. dfnWorks: A discrete fracture network framework for modeling subsurface flow and transport J. Hyman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.001
50. Second-order accurate finite volume schemes with the discrete maximum principle for solving Richards’ equation on unstructured meshes D. Svyatskiy & K. Lipnikov https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.03.015
51. Understanding the mass, momentum, and energy transfer in the frozen soil with three levels of model complexities L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4813-2020
52. Numerical modeling and simulation of thermo-hydrologic processes in frozen soils on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101050
53. Integrating surface-active layer-permafrost hydrological processes: A systematic review and research framework G. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-6549-2026
54. A methodology for staged thermo–hydro–mechanical climatic simulations of cold regions soils A. Pekinasova et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0838
55. CHROTRAN 1.0: A mathematical and computational model for in situ heavy metal remediation in heterogeneous aquifers S. Hansen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4525-2017
56. The CryoGrid community model (version 1.0) – a multi-physics toolbox for climate-driven simulations in the terrestrial cryosphere S. Westermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2607-2023
57. Critical review of the local thermal equilibrium assumption in heterogeneous porous media: Dependence on permeability and porosity contrasts S. Hamidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.130
58. Permafrost Hydrology Research Domain: Process-Based Adjustment N. Tananaev et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010006
59. The importance of topographic gradients in alpine permafrost modeling J. Beddrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104321
60. State of the Art of Coupled Thermo–hydro-Mechanical–Chemical Modelling for Frozen Soils K. Li & Z. Yin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10164-w
61. Evaluating simplifications of subsurface process representations for field-scale permafrost hydrology models B. Gao & E. Coon https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4141-2022
62. New preconditioning strategy for Jacobian-free solvers for variably saturated flows with Richards’ equation K. Lipnikov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.04.016
63. Evaluating integrated surface/subsurface permafrost thermal hydrology models in ATS (v0.88) against observations from a polygonal tundra site A. Jan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2259-2020
64. Quantified spatial-temporal variation of the fine-scale frozen soils during 1980–2014 in the headwaters of the Yellow River (HWYR) in High Mountain Asia A. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106836
65. Coincident aboveground and belowground autonomous monitoring to quantify covariability in permafrost, soil, and vegetation properties in Arctic tundra B. Dafflon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003724
66. Coupling surface flow with high-performance subsurface reactive flow and transport code PFLOTRAN R. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104959
67. Impact of lateral groundwater flow on hydrothermal conditions of the active layer in a high-Arctic hillslope setting A. Hamm & A. Frampton https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4853-2021
68. Effect of soil property uncertainties on permafrost thaw projections: a calibration-constrained analysis D. Harp et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-341-2016
69. Advances in Permafrost Representation: Biophysical Processes in Earth System Models and the Role of Offline Models H. Matthes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2269
70. Coupling a three-dimensional subsurface flow and transport model with a land surface model to simulate stream–aquifer–land interactions (CP v1.0) G. Bisht et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4539-2017
71. Taliks: A Tipping Point in Discontinuous Permafrost Degradation in Peatlands É. Devoie et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024488
72. Permafrost modelling with OpenFOAM®: New advancements of the permaFoam solver L. Orgogozo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108541