Dear authors,

Thank you for your responses and updated manuscript. I will proceed with an additional round of reviews for this manuscript.

All the best
Wesley Van Wychen

Dear authors,
Thank you for the revised version of your manuscript, both original reviewers has re-reviewed the work and both appreciate the improvements that have been made in the work. However, both reviewers have identified points that require some additional revision. I agree with these assessments. Please review the revisions that are suggested in the updated reviewer reports.

All the best,
Wesley Van Wychen

Dear authors,
Both reviewers are positive about the work and the changes that you have made to the manuscript. One of the reviewers has a few minor revisions suggested, which I am asking you to address.

Dear authors,
Thank you for these revisions. I have reviewed the responses and I have a few more changes that need to be made to the manuscript. Please find them below:

L116: ICEat-2  ICESat-2
L139-142: at Line 139 you note that image acquisitions do not exceed 90 days, then at the end of this paragraph you note that intervals range from 3 to 45 days. In light of the latter information, it is not necessary to mention 90 days at all. Also, can the authors provide some comment, is there enough displacement in image displacements of 3 days?
L144: it is mentioned that the data is aggregated into annual and monthly timescales, please provide details and describe how this was done. With regard to annual aggregation, why not simply use the ITS-LIVE annual composite products?
L241: This sentence about Figure 3 should be provided before the figure at the end of the last paragraph.
Figure 4: Please update the colour map used. Stretching the velocity values only over red I find difficult to read, especially for the tributary surge 2004. Figure caption will need to be updated to reflect the new colour map.
L385: when you are describing surface lowering, please make sure that you are reporting these as negative values. You note a elevation decline of 1.6, but make this -1.6 so that it is clearer to the reader that the elevation is lowering at this time. Check throughout the manuscript to be consistent.
The figure caption for Figure 7 should include a statement about the data presented, if it is openly available from the Hugonnet paper, then the authors need to make that clear in the caption.
L436: ‘glacier extent’ should be ‘the glacier extent’
Figure 9: The colour of the text needs to be updated on this figure, so that it is easier to read when it is placed over the glacier outlines. Also, make sure that the figure labels: (a), (b) (c)… are all placed in the top left corner of each pane, rather than at the bottom.
L462: corroborated by the ASTER
L487: change additional context to more context
Figure 11, for (a) and (b) move the labels to the top-left side of the map
L593: After the initiation of the 1980 surge


All the best
Wesley Van Wychen

Dear authors,
Thank you for your revisions and addressing the comments received.