Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4715-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
High-frequency broadband active acoustic systems as a tool for high-latitude glacial fjord research
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 21 Oct 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 06 Nov 2024)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3025', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Dec 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Elizabeth Weidner, 24 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3025', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Jun 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Elizabeth Weidner, 24 Jun 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3025', Anonymous Referee #3, 26 Jun 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Elizabeth Weidner, 02 Jul 2025
- AC4: 'Reply on RC3', Elizabeth Weidner, 02 Jul 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (07 Jul 2025) by Elizabeth Bagshaw
AR by Elizabeth Weidner on behalf of the Authors (08 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (10 Jul 2025) by Elizabeth Bagshaw
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (31 Jul 2025)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (08 Aug 2025)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (14 Aug 2025) by Elizabeth Bagshaw
AR by Elizabeth Weidner on behalf of the Authors (15 Aug 2025)
Author's response
Manuscript
“High frequency broadband acoustic systems as a tool for high latitude glacial fjord research” by Weidner et al. describes the use of echosounders to study important, and difficult to measure, hydrodynamic features in the vicinity of a tidewater glacier. While doing so it focuses on reaching new audience that could benefit from active acoustic sampling. The total amount of study-oriented information in the manuscript is limited, with most of the content focused on advocating for the broader use of broadband acoustic scattering techniques in these environments. The topics covered are interesting, relevant, and are worthy of space in the literature. However, my view is that the manuscript contains quite a bit of redundancy and that it would benefit from some restructuring.
In addition to the structural issues, there are several topics that should be revisited. Most of these are relatively minor grammatical issues, although I also believe there are several unit errors and mistakes presented in the equations that should be revisited. These, and other issues are addressed in the following itemized list of issues that need to be revisited. Other topics worth of revisiting include choices regarding the presentation of equations and the use of specific terminology when it is unnecessary. These include several processing and unit errors presented in the appendices. If these are implemented as the equations are written, then then the processing is incorrect.
My view is that the aforementioned factors collectively undermine some of the stated objectives of introducing this technology to a new audience. However, if these issues are resolved it could be more effective in reaching a new audience.
The attached supplemental information has details regarding the recommended scope of the revision.