Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4013-2022
Research article
 | 
07 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 07 Oct 2022

Understanding model spread in sea ice volume by attribution of model differences in seasonal ice growth and melt

Alex West, Edward Blockley, and Matthew Collins

Related authors

The sea ice component of GC5: coupling SI3 to HadGEM3 using conductive fluxes
Ed Blockley, Emma Fiedler, Jeff Ridley, Luke Roberts, Alex West, Dan Copsey, Daniel Feltham, Tim Graham, David Livings, Clement Rousset, David Schroeder, and Martin Vancoppenolle
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6799–6817, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6799-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6799-2024, 2024
Short summary
CMIP6 models overestimate sea ice melt, growth & conduction relative to ice mass balance buoy estimates
Alex Edward West and Edward William Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-121,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-121, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Using Arctic ice mass balance buoys for evaluation of modelled ice energy fluxes
Alex West, Mat Collins, and Ed Blockley
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4845–4868, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4845-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4845-2020, 2020
Short summary
Induced surface fluxes: a new framework for attributing Arctic sea ice volume balance biases to specific model errors
Alex West, Mat Collins, Ed Blockley, Jeff Ridley, and Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo
The Cryosphere, 13, 2001–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2001-2019, 2019
Short summary
The sea ice model component of HadGEM3-GC3.1
Jeff K. Ridley, Edward W. Blockley, Ann B. Keen, Jamie G. L. Rae, Alex E. West, and David Schroeder
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 713–723, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-713-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-713-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Energy Balance Obs/Modelling
A sensor-agnostic albedo retrieval method for realistic sea ice surfaces: model and validation
Yingzhen Zhou, Wei Li, Nan Chen, Yongzhen Fan, and Knut Stamnes
The Cryosphere, 17, 1053–1087, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1053-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1053-2023, 2023
Short summary
On the statistical properties of sea-ice lead fraction and heat fluxes in the Arctic
Einar Ólason, Pierre Rampal, and Véronique Dansereau
The Cryosphere, 15, 1053–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1053-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1053-2021, 2021
Short summary
New insights into radiative transfer within sea ice derived from autonomous optical propagation measurements
Christian Katlein, Lovro Valcic, Simon Lambert-Girard, and Mario Hoppmann
The Cryosphere, 15, 183–198, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-183-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-183-2021, 2021
Short summary
Sunlight, clouds, sea ice, albedo, and the radiative budget: the umbrella versus the blanket
Donald K. Perovich
The Cryosphere, 12, 2159–2165, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2159-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2159-2018, 2018
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, M., Bliss, A., and Drobot, S.: Snow Melt Onset Over Arctic Sea Ice from SMMR and SSM/I-SSMIS Brightness Temperatures, Version 3. Boulder, Colorado USA, NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center, https://doi.org/10.5067/22NFZL42RMUO (last access: October 2015), 2001, updated 2012. 
Barker, H. W. and Li, Z.: Improved simulation of clear-sky radiative transfer in the CCC-GCM, J. Climate, 8, 2213–2223, 1995. 
Bitz, C. M.: Some Aspects of Uncertainty in Predicting Sea Ice Thinning, in: Arctic Sea Ice Decline: Observations, Projections, Mechanisms, and Implications, edited by: DeWeaver, E. T., Bitz, C. M., and Tremblay, L.-B., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., https://doi.org/10.1029/180GM06, 2008. 
Bitz, C. and Lipscomb, W. H.: An energy-conserving thermodynamic model of sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 15669–15677, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900100, 1999. 
Bitz, C. M. and Roe, G. H.: A Mechanism for the High Rate of Sea Ice Thinning in the Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 17, 3623–3632, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3623:AMFTHR>2.0.CO;2, 2004. 
Download
Short summary
In this study we explore a method of examining model differences in ice volume by looking at the seasonal ice growth and melt. We use simple physical relationships to judge how model differences in key variables affect ice growth and melt and apply these to three case study models with ice volume ranging from very thin to very thick. Results suggest that differences in snow and melt pond cover in early summer are most important in causing the sea ice differences for these models.