Dear authors,

We have received the revision of your submission tc-2020-93, “Intercomparison of photogrammetric platforms for spatially continuous snow depth mapping”.

Referee #1 recommend this paper reconsidered after major revisions and Referee #2 accepted subject to minor revisions.

Based on the Reviewer 2’s recommendation and my assessment of your extensive responses to Reviewer #1, the editorial decision is that your paper may be acceptable for publication after revision by editor and referees. I find that your aggregate response is satisfactory, as you have addressed most of the reviewer’s concerns and followed most of the suggestions.
In order not to delay the processing of your manuscript, I will examine your revised manssucript and responses toghether with one referee.

You will be hearing further from the journal concerning next steps in the publication process.

Thank you once again for considering The Cryosphere for the publication of your paper.


Sincerely,
Ketil Isaksen
Editor
The Cryosphere

Dear authors,

We have received your revised manuscript and revision of your submission tc-2020-93, “Intercomparison of photogrammetric platforms for spatially continuous snow depth mapping”.

One referee and I have examined your revision and your responses. The reviewer and I agree that you prepared excellent responses. Given these responses, together with the great improvements in the manuscript and figures, I am pleased to accept your paper for publication in The Cryosphere.

Snow depth mapping is important in many disciplines, so your paper will likely be of interest to the journal’s readership. You will be hearing further from the journal concerning next steps in the publication process. In the meantime, congratulations on the acceptance!

Thank you once again for considering The Cryosphere for the publication of your paper.

Sincerely,

Ketil Isaksen
Editor
The Cryosphere