**Research article**
28 Jun 2021

**Research article** | 28 Jun 2021

# Sea ice thickness from air-coupled flexural waves

Rowan Romeyn Alfred Hanssen Bent Ole Ruud and Tor Arne Johansen

^{1},

^{1},

^{2},

^{2,3}

**Rowan Romeyn et al.**Rowan Romeyn Alfred Hanssen Bent Ole Ruud and Tor Arne Johansen

^{1},

^{1},

^{2},

^{2,3}

^{1}Department of Geosciences, University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway^{2}Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway^{3}Department of Arctic Geology, The University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway

^{1}Department of Geosciences, University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway^{2}Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway^{3}Department of Arctic Geology, The University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway

**Correspondence**: Rowan Romeyn (rowan.romeyn@uit.no)

**Correspondence**: Rowan Romeyn (rowan.romeyn@uit.no)

Received: 25 Feb 2021 – Discussion started: 04 Mar 2021 – Revised: 27 May 2021 – Accepted: 01 Jun 2021 – Published: 28 Jun 2021

Air-coupled flexural waves (ACFWs) appear as wave trains of constant frequency that arrive in advance of the direct air wave from an impulsive source travelling over a floating ice sheet. The frequency of these waves varies with the flexural stiffness of the ice sheet, which is controlled by a combination of thickness and elastic properties. We develop a theoretical framework to understand these waves, utilizing modern numerical and Fourier methods to give a simpler and more accessible description than the pioneering yet unwieldy analytical efforts of the 1950s. Our favoured dynamical model can be understood in terms of linear filter theory and is closely related to models used to describe the flexural waves produced by moving vehicles on floating plates. We find that air-coupled flexural waves are a real and measurable component of the total wave field of floating ice sheets excited by impulsive sources, and we present a simple closed-form estimator for the ice thickness based on observable properties of the air-coupled flexural waves. Our study is focused on first-year sea ice of ∼ 20–80 cm thickness in Van Mijenfjorden, Svalbard, that was investigated through active source seismic experiments over four field campaigns in 2013, 2016, 2017 and 2018. The air-coupled flexural wave for the sea ice system considered in this study occurs at a constant frequency thickness product of ∼ 48 Hz m. Our field data include ice ranging from ∼ 20–80 cm thickness with corresponding air-coupled flexural frequencies from 240 Hz for the thinnest ice to 60 Hz for the thickest ice. While air-coupled flexural waves for thick sea ice have received little attention, the readily audible, higher frequencies associated with thin ice on freshwater lakes and rivers are well known to the ice-skating community and have been reported in popular media. The results of this study and further examples from lake ice suggest the possibility of non-contact estimation of ice thickness using simple, inexpensive microphones located above the ice sheet or along the shoreline. While we have demonstrated the use of air-coupled flexural waves for ice thickness monitoring using an active source acquisition scheme, naturally forming cracks in the ice are also shown as a potential impulsive source that could allow passive recording of air-coupled flexural waves.

The term “air-coupled flexural wave” (ACFW) was coined by Press et al. (1951) to describe wave trains of constant frequency, varying with the flexural stiffness of a floating ice sheet, that arrive in advance of the pressure waves produced by an explosive source. The coupling in the case of air-coupled flexural waves is set up between pressure waves in air and flexural waves in the solid that have phase velocity equal to the speed of sound in air. Flexural waves propagating in a floating ice sheet are a class of guided elastic waves analogous to bending waves in rods or beams and the Lamb waves of a free plate. Greenhill (1886) published one of the earliest mathematical descriptions of flexural waves in a floating ice sheet and also discussed the concept of coupling between waves in air and water, which was further developed in Greenhill (1916). Several studies have used the dispersion of ice flexural waves (IFWs) to estimate ice elastic parameters; of these we highlight in particular the early work of Ewing and Crary (1934) and the study of Yang and Yates (1995) that advanced the use of transform methods in this field. Passive seismic studies of flexural wave dispersion are also emerging as an effective means to continuously monitor sea ice properties using array-based wave field transform methods (Moreau et al., 2020a) and noise interferometry and Bayesian inversion of dispersion curves (Moreau et al., 2020b).

Despite their commendable efforts to develop a theoretical foundation for the air-coupled flexural wave (Press and Ewing, 1951), the term has not been widely used since the initial investigation period in the 1950s and the study of Hunkins (1960). This may be because the theory developed by Press and Ewing (1951) is cumbersome, being built-up using demanding analytical integration methods at a time when computing power to handle more convenient numerical methods did not exist. We think this is unfortunate since the term “air-coupled flexural wave” gives a concise description of the physical mechanism that produces these waves. Furthermore, their monochromatic frequency is attractive from an experimental standpoint since it can be estimated from a single time series more readily than the precise time-frequency evolution of the highly dispersive ice flexural wave. Air-coupled flexural waves may therefore provide a simple and effective means to estimate the flexural rigidity of a floating ice sheet and to study variation in ice thickness, for the case when the elastic properties of the ice sheet are assumed or independently estimated.

## 1.1 A convergence of fields

Coupling between air and surface or guided waves is not limited to the case of a floating ice sheet and can be anticipated in all cases when the phase velocity of the medium below the air can attain the speed of sound in air (Haskell, 1951; Novoselov et al., 2020; Press and Oliver, 1955). For example, one of the strongest air waves ever recorded was produced by the volcanic eruption of Krakatoa in 1883, which travelled around the globe three times. It was not until the concept of air-coupled surface waves emerged that the extent of tidal waves associated with the eruption could be adequately explained, in which previous explanations had to invoke multiple coincidental local earthquakes at different locations to explain the observed arrivals of gravity waves in the ocean (Ewing and Press, 1955). The correlation of the major tide-gauge disturbances with the arrival of the first or second airwave from the Krakatoa eruption has since been explained by waves propagating in a realistically coupled atmosphere–ocean system (Garrett, 1970; Harkrider and Press, 1967).

The idea of coupling between air and surface waves also exists in other fields under different terminological guises. In the field of structural acoustics, the frequency at which the free bending wave becomes equal to the speed of sound in air is called the critical frequency and is closely related to the coincidence frequency at which the speeds of the free and forced bending waves are equal (Renji et al., 1997). An understanding of the coupling between air waves and bending waves in structures therefore permits the design of advanced components like the honeycomb sandwich composite panels that are used in aerospace applications when one may wish to minimize the vibration response of the panels to acoustic excitation (Renji et al., 1997). Coupling between air and guided waves in engineered structures, like concrete slabs, is also relevant to non-contact applications of non-destructive testing (e.g. Harb and Yuan, 2018; Zhu, 2008).

At the coincidence frequency, a plate excited to vibration by travelling acoustic waves is acoustically transparent and maximally transmitting (Bhattacharya et al., 1971). A fascinating manifestation of this property is well known in the world of wild ice skating. Chasing perfectly smooth, newly frozen ice, typically in the ∼ 4–5 cm thickness range, these skaters flex the ice with their body weight and crack it with their skates. The acoustic waves produced by this cracking propagate over the ice surface and are maximally transmitted due to constructive interference with ice flexural waves at the frequency where the phase velocity of the flexural waves in the ice is equal to the speed of sound in air. When the ice is thin, this occurs in the audible frequency range and produces distinctive tones that have captured significant media attention (Griffin, 2018; Rankin, 2018). This phenomenon is analogous to the air-coupled flexural waves of Press et al. (1951), occurring within a different part of the frequency–flexural-stiffness spectrum.

## 1.2 A general theory – moving loads on floating plates

We now consider the closely related topic of moving vehicles travelling over floating ice sheets. The topic of moving loads on floating plates has received considerable attention due to the importance of roads on floating sea, river and lake ice that are traversed by vehicles from snow scooters to semi-trailers (Takizawa, 1988; Van der Sanden and Short, 2017; Wilson, 1955). Aircraft take-off and landing on floating ice (Matiushina et al., 2016; Yeung and Kim, 2000) or large man-made floating structures (Kashiwagi, 2004) have also received significant attention. A major focus of many of these studies is the so-called critical load speed, at which vehicle speed coincides simultaneously with the flexural phase and group velocities, and the ice deflection can grow very large over time (Wilson, 1955). In general, these studies are geared towards understanding the critical load speed so that vehicular transit at that speed may be avoided (e.g. Schulkes and Sneyd, 1988). Further studies have shown that the build-up of large enough deflections to break the ice may be limited by two-dimensional spreading (Nugroho et al., 1999), viscous effects (Wang et al., 2004), acceleration/deceleration through the critical speed (Miles and Sneyd, 2003) and/or non-linearities (Dinvay et al., 2019). Interestingly, a complementary field of study also exists that focuses on leveraging the resonant flexural waves produced by moving hovercraft to enhance their effectiveness as icebreakers (Hinchey and Colbourne, 1995; Kozin et al., 2017). Submarines surfacing in ice-covered waters may also seek to weaken or break the ice before surfacing by creating flexural gravity waves (Kozin and Pogorelova, 2008), which has been studied via an adaption of the theoretical framework to include moving loads in the water column under a floating plate.

We propose that the air-coupled flexural wave phenomenon can be understood as a special case of the more general paradigm of moving loads on floating plates, in which the load speed is equal to the speed of sound in air. Furthermore, we hope to highlight the close physical relationship between phenomena spanning from Arctic seismic experiments to wild ice skating, ice roads, floating runways, structural acoustics and the eruption of Krakatoa. Our study was also motivated from the pragmatic standpoint that the monochromatic air-coupled flexural wave frequency is readily estimated from single sensor time series and can be related directly to ice thickness and rigidity. While other studies have focussed on measuring the dispersion of ice flexural waves in order to estimate ice physical properties (e.g. DiMarco et al., 1993; Moreau et al., 2020a; Yang and Yates, 1995), we present an additional alternative that is straightforward to implement and effective for both point and line explosive seismic sources.

In this study we investigate a series of active-source seismic experiments conducted in the innermost part of Van Mijenfjorden, on the island of Spitsbergen, in the high-Arctic Svalbard archipelago. The experiments were conducted during the spring season, when sea ice is best developed, in 2013, 2016, 2017 and 2018, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Detonating cord of the type “Nobelcord”, containing 40 g Pentrit (PETN) per metre, was laid on the ice surface in various lengths or coiled into point-like charges to provide the seismic source. An example of the detonation of a point charge is shown in Fig. 2. These explosive charges produce a strong air wave that propagates radially over the ice surface, in addition to energy that travels horizontally through the ice, or downwards through the water column where it may be reflected back to the surface by layers of contrasting acoustic impedance. The sum of all of these modes of propagation gives the complex seismic wave field that was recorded using line arrays of geophones installed on the ice surface. For the majority of the experiments, the geophones were arranged in-line with the source, but we also include oblique arrangements from the 2013 campaign that employed a cross-type array (see Fig. 1).

The main purpose of these experiments was to test different acquisition designs for reflection seismic surveying of sub-seabed sediments, as reported by Johansen et al. (2019), an objective which is made difficult by the flexural wave energy propagating through the ice. Various source and receiver arrangements were tested including airguns, hydrophones and ocean bottom seismometers. However, in this study we focus on the subset of experiments employing explosive sources and vertical-component gimballed geophones deployed on top of the ice. This acquisition setup is operationally the simplest under field conditions but leads to the strongest recordings of ice flexural waves. While the flexural wave energy is regarded as bothersome coherent noise from the context of sub-seabed reflection surveying, it constitutes the primary signal in the present study and is used to estimate the ice thickness.

## 3.1 General wave field solution

In this study we approximate the air–ice–water system by a thin elastic
plate resting on an incompressible inviscid fluid of finite depth, *H*, that
corresponds to the widely used “simplest acceptable” mathematical model
advocated by Squire et al. (1996). The plate extends infinitely along
the horizontal *x* and *y* axes, and the vertical axis, *z*, is positive downwards with
its origin at the upper undisturbed water surface. We impose the constraint
that the fluid must satisfy the Laplace equation, ∇^{2}*ϕ*=0, where *ϕ* is the velocity potential in the fluid. In addition, we
impose a non-cavitation condition at the ice–water interface, ${\left.\frac{\partial \mathit{\varphi}}{\partial z}\right|}_{z=b}=\frac{\partial \mathit{\zeta}}{\partial t}$, where *b* is the draught of the ice and a normal flow condition
at the sea bottom, ${\left.\frac{\partial \mathit{\varphi}}{\partial z}\right|}_{z=H}=\mathrm{0}$, where $\mathit{\zeta}\left(x,y,t\right)$ is the vertical
deflection of the plate's neutral surface. The linear spatio-temporal
dynamics of the system is described by the partial differential equation
(e.g. Squire et al., 1996)

Here, $D=\frac{E{h}^{\mathrm{3}}}{\mathrm{12}\left(\mathrm{1}-{\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}$ is the plate
flexural stiffness, *E* is Young's modulus, *h* is the plate thickness, *σ* is
Poisson's ratio, *ρ*_{w} is the water density, *ρ*_{l} is the
plate density, *g*=9.81 m s^{−2} is the acceleration due to gravity, and
$f(x,y,t)$ is the applied external spatio-temporal force. The solution to Eq. (1) gives useful insight into the dynamics of the air-coupled flexural wave,
and an illustrative example is given in Sect. 5.1.

In order to solve for the spatio-temporal deflection of the ice surface, we apply the three-dimensional Fourier transform (FT), defined as

for an arbitrary spatio-temporal function $p\left(x,y,t\right)$. The wave
number vector $\mathit{k}=\left[\begin{array}{c}{k}_{x}\\ {k}_{y}\end{array}\right]$ is decomposed in the *x* and *y* directions, ${k}^{\mathrm{2}}={\left|\mathit{k}\right|}^{\mathrm{2}}={k}_{x}^{\mathrm{2}}+{k}_{y}^{\mathrm{2}}$, and *i* denotes the imaginary
unit. By applying the FT defined in Eq. (2) to the spatio-temporal fields in
Eq. (1), we find that the solution for the deflection in Fourier space is
given by

where $G\left({k}_{x},{k}_{y},\mathit{\omega}\right)=D{k}^{\mathrm{4}}+{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{w}}g-{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{l}}h{\mathit{\omega}}^{\mathrm{2}}-\left(\frac{{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{w}}{\mathit{\omega}}^{\mathrm{2}}}{k}\right)\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\mathrm{coth}\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\left(kH\right)$.
Recalling linear filter theory, the form of Eq. (3) highlights that the
floating ice plate simply acts as a linear filter on an arbitrary
spatio-temporal input signal. This formulation is also attractive because the
physical significance of the different terms in the denominator are clearly
preserved: *D**k*^{4} expresses the bending forces in the plate, *ρ*_{w}*g*
is due to the plate buoyancy, *ρ*_{l}*h**ω*^{2} is the plate
acceleration, and $\left(\frac{{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{w}}{\mathit{\omega}}^{\mathrm{2}}}{k}\right)\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\mathrm{coth}\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\left(kH\right)$ arises due to the constraint of finite water depth.

The general solution for the resulting spatio-temporal deflection wave field, $\mathit{\zeta}\left(x,y,t\right)$, is then given by the full three-dimensional inverse FT of $Z\left({k}_{x},{k}_{y},\mathit{\omega}\right)$ as

## 3.2 Ring delta function source for radial symmetry

To exploit spatial symmetry and reduce the dimensionality of the problem, we approximate the explosive source as a ring-shaped Dirac delta pulse expanding outwards from the origin with radial symmetry. This allows us to reduce the spatial dimensionality of the problem by using the radial coordinate $r=\sqrt{{x}^{\mathrm{2}}+{y}^{\mathrm{2}}}$ and representing the propagating air wave source using the ring delta function,

where *c*_{air} is the speed of sound in air. By performing a partial
Fourier transform of Eq. (5) with respect to time, *t*, we obtain the
spatio-frequency representation of the source as

so the spatio-frequency deflection wave field can be written as

where

The spatio-temporal deflection wave field in radial coordinates then becomes

When evaluating Eq. (9) numerically, we substitute ${G}_{\mathrm{0}}\left(\mathit{\omega}\right)\to {G}_{\mathrm{0}}\left(\mathit{\omega}+i\mathit{\gamma}\right)$, where *γ*>0, which
avoids dividing by zero and gives a tuneable heuristic damping parameter for
wave attenuation and dissipation.

## 3.3 Dispersion relation

The dispersion relation for the propagating wave field in the ice sheet is given by the wavenumber and frequency pairs that satisfy the equation

The solution of Eq. (10) gives the general dispersion relation (e.g. Squire et al., 1996)

This dispersion relation is complete in the sense that it retains all physical mechanisms included in the dynamical model Eq. (1), and it is well known from previous studies (e.g. Greenhill, 1886; Squire et al., 1996). At typical vehicle speeds and wavelengths that have been the main focus of moving load on floating plate studies, the plate acceleration may be safely neglected (e.g. Schulkes and Sneyd, 1988; Wang et al., 2004) giving the approximate dispersion relation

Another common assumption is to assume infinite water depth, *H*, which causes
the hyperbolic tangent term to approach unity. However, when the load moves
at the speed of sound in air, plate flexural waves with much shorter
wavelengths are resonant, and it becomes important to retain the plate
acceleration term. The common approximations that are valid at typical
vehicle speeds may lead to significant inaccuracies when estimating physical
properties of the floating ice sheet from estimates of air-coupled flexural
wave frequency.

Figure 3 compares the full dispersion relation (Eq. 11)
with the approximation that neglects water depth and plate acceleration (Eq. 12). Air-coupled waves are excited when the phase velocity is equal to
the speed of sound in air, shown as the horizontal red line in Fig. 3. With
finite water depth *H* (black line in Fig. 3), we see that only flexural waves
are coupled to the air wave. Gravity waves have been observed in landfast
sea ice (Sutherland and Rabault, 2016) and may theoretically couple to
the air wave for the case of an infinite fluid (dashed blue line in Fig. 3),
but the coupled wave is likely unobservable in practice. The air-coupled
flexural waves arrive in advance of the air wave because the group velocity,
$\partial \mathit{\omega}/\partial k$, is larger
than the phase velocity for a given frequency (dashed magenta line in Fig. 3). The air-coupled flexural frequency is insensitive to water depths
>3.2 m, in this example, but is significantly affected by the
plate acceleration term. Including the effect of plate acceleration
increases the air-coupled flexural frequency by ∼ 23 % using
physical properties relevant to our field data (see
Table 1). While studies of moving vehicles on
floating plates may safely ignore the effect of plate acceleration, we show
that it is important to include it when the considered load is moving at the
speed of sound in air.

A key attraction of air-coupled flexural waves is the ability to use the time series recorded by a single sensor to estimate ice thickness. This is possible because, as illustrated by our dynamical model, the phase velocity of the air-coupled flexural wave is equal to the speed of sound in air. This is similar to studies of ice roads and runways, in which the fact that the speed of the vehicle is known raises the potential for routine monitoring of ice flexural rigidity using a single sensor (Squire et al., 1988). The frequency of the air-coupled flexural wave is estimated from the high amplitude, monochromatic segment of the time series that directly precedes the air wave arrival. The air-coupled flexural frequency can then be directly related to the physical properties of the floating ice sheet using the dispersion relation introduced in the previous section.

## 4.1 Air wave arrival and velocity estimation

Since the arrival time of the air wave increases linearly with horizontal
offset between the seismic source and receiver, we can estimate its arrival
time and velocity using the linear Radon transform, also referred to as the
slant-stack or *τ*-*p* transform (Yilmaz, 2001). When the independent
variable is source-to-receiver offset, energy with a constant velocity
follows a linear trajectory. Under the linear Radon transform, energy
corresponding to a specific velocity and origin time is stacked along this
trajectory to form a single point in the transform space. For a given
explosive charge (see Fig. 4a), we compute the linear Radon transform for
offset-sorted geophone signals and estimate the velocity (*c*_{air}) and
intercept (*t*_{int}) that correspond to the air wave by picking the local
maximum of the transform magnitude (see Fig. 4b). The estimated arrival time of the air wave at
a given geophone, *t*_{air}, is then given by
${t}_{\mathrm{air}}=\frac{d}{{C}_{\mathrm{air}}}+{t}_{\mathrm{int}}$, where *d* is the source-to-receiver
offset.

## 4.2 Thomson multitaper estimation of air-coupled flexural frequency

The frequency of the air-coupled flexural wave is estimated from segments of the recorded time series which precede the arrival of the air wave (see Fig. 4c). We take the derivative of the time series to suppress low frequencies and linearly increase the gain of high frequencies and apply a Hamming window taper. For each time series, the Thomson multitaper power spectral density (Thomson, 1982) is then estimated using a time-half-bandwidth product of 2 and a zero-padded Fourier transform length of 4096 samples. Thomson's estimator utilizes a set of orthonormal data tapers called discrete prolate spheroidal sequences to control spectral leakage and stabilize the estimate through an inherent variance reduction (Hanssen, 1997). The air-coupled flexural frequency (see Fig. 4d) is then estimated from the multitaper power spectral density maximum. We only estimate the air-coupled flexural frequency for source-to-receiver offsets > 125 m because higher-velocity sub-seabed reflections arrive around the same time as the air wave and create too much interference at nearer offsets (see Fig. 5).

## 4.3 Closed-form estimator of ice thickness

Once we have estimated the frequency of the air-coupled flexural wave
(*ω*_{f}) we can estimate the ice thickness using the dispersion
relation (Eq. 11) rearranged as

where ${k}_{\mathrm{f}}={\mathit{\omega}}_{\mathrm{f}}/{c}_{\mathrm{air}}$ is the wavenumber corresponding
to the air-coupled flexural wave. The inclusion of the plate acceleration
term means that we are left with a non-linear relation for the plate
thickness, *h*, in terms of the plate elastic properties and the constant
flexural frequency and wavenumber. We may either estimate the ice thickness
by the non-linear numerical optimization of Eq. (13), using, for example, the bisection
method, or we may rearrange Eq. (13) to give the cubic polynomial form

which has one real, positive root corresponding to the plate thickness, *h*.
Since Eq. (14) has a standard cubic form, a closed-form analytical solution
can be derived. We followed the modified Cardan's solution method outlined
by Nickalls (1993) to derive the following estimator,

where $a=\frac{E{k}_{\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{5}}}{\mathrm{12}{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{w}}\left(\mathrm{1}-{\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}$, $b={\mathit{\omega}}_{\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{2}}{k}_{\mathrm{f}}\frac{{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{l}}}{{\mathit{\rho}}_{\mathrm{w}}}$ and $c=\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}g{k}_{\mathrm{f}}-{\mathit{\omega}}_{\mathrm{f}}^{\mathrm{2}}\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\mathrm{coth}\phantom{\rule{0.125em}{0ex}}\left({k}_{\mathrm{f}}H\right)$. We have confirmed that non-linear numerical optimization of Eq. (13), polynomial root finding of Eq. (14) and the closed form of Eq. (15) all give identical results.

Air-coupled flexural waves appear to be a robust part of the wave field excited by explosive sources on floating sea ice and were observed for all four field campaigns, in spite of thin, variable snow covers. Furthermore, Fig. 5 illustrates that since the air-coupled flexural wave precedes the arrival of the air wave, it is recorded equally well for both point and line sources. This is significant because much of our field data employed line sources in order to attenuate the trailing low-frequency ice flexural waves that are an unwanted noise component from the perspective of reflection seismic surveying (Johansen et al., 2019).

## 5.1 Solution of the full dynamical model

It is only strictly necessary to consider the solution to the dispersion
relation in order to estimate ice properties from flexural wave
observations. However, it is also beneficial to consider the solution to the
dynamical equation (Eq. 1) in order to demonstrate that the key physics
involved in the propagation of air-coupled flexural waves are represented by
the model. To this end, we evaluated Eq. (9) numerically using an inverse
fast Fourier transform (IFFT) with *N*=2^{19} discrete points, a temporal
sampling interval, $\mathrm{d}t=\mathrm{2.5}\times {\mathrm{10}}^{-\mathrm{4}}$ s, and a numerical
attenuation/damping parameter, *γ*=25. Figure 6 shows a portion of the modelled radially symmetric expanding wave field
produced by a propagating ring delta loading that we use as an approximation
of the air wave expanding outwards from a point explosive charge and pushing
downwards on the ice sheet. We see that the ice sheet is deflected downwards
underneath and behind the air wave. The negative deflection decays smoothly
and extends to a position around 300 m behind the load, although this is
outside the figure view. Ahead of the air wave, the ice surface is elevated,
and we see a high amplitude, constant frequency wave train that corresponds
to the air-coupled flexural wave, which decays gradually with distance ahead
of the load due to the inclusion of numerical damping in the model.

To compare the solutions of the full dynamical model result with field data, we calculate the velocity response of the plate at a given offset by numerical time differentiation of the output from Eq. (9) and compare that directly to the recorded geophone time series at the same offset. We find that local velocity estimates calculated from our solutions to the dynamical model are very similar to the real waveforms recorded by geophones, as illustrated by the example in Fig. 7. This increases our confidence that we understand the underlying physics that describe the excitation of air-coupled flexural waves in floating ice sheets.

## 5.2 Ice thickness estimation from air-coupled flexural waves

As summarized in Table 1, ice thicknesses calculated
using Eq. (15) from the estimated air-coupled flexural frequencies and
air wave velocities show very good agreement with ice thicknesses measured
in boreholes. Notably, this good agreement was achieved across all four
field seasons with a single set of elastic properties that are realistic
for sea ice. This is partly because ice thickness is an extrinsic property
that has a dominant effect on the air-coupled flexural frequency (stemming
from the fact that *D*∝*h*^{3}); i.e., the 20–80 cm thickness range
from this study corresponds to a 400 % variation in air-coupled flexural
frequency. By contrast, variation of intrinsic material properties, i.e.,
Young's modulus (1.7–5.7 GPa) and Poisson's ratio (0.33–0.39) as reported by Timco and Weeks (2010), for first-year sea ice would give
∼ 60 % and ∼ 2 % variation in air-coupled
flexural frequency, respectively. The combined effects of water and ice
density variation over the ranges given in Table 1
would only produce a variation of ∼ 0.3 % in air-coupled
flexural frequency, while water depth has no effect for depths >3.2 m. Temperature variation over the range −20 to +2 ^{∘}C would
cause the speed of sound in air to vary from 318–332 m s^{−1}, resulting in
∼ 8 % variation in air-coupled flexural frequency. The
apparent speed of sound in air at the measurement location is also affected
by horizontal wind velocity, and gusts may lead to a variation of ±5 m s^{−1}
over timescales of minutes (e.g. Franke and Swenson, 1989).
However, as described in Sect. 4.1, we estimate the apparent velocity of
the air wave for each shot, which should ensure that our air-coupled
flexural thickness estimates are independent of changes in wind and
temperature over time.

The Young's modulus of 2.5±0.2 GPa given in Table 1 was constrained by observing that the median air-coupled flexural wave thickness estimate for the 2013 field season would fall outside the range of borehole-measured thicknesses for Young's modulus outside this range. The fact that this Young's modulus gives thickness estimates that fit with borehole measurements across all four field seasons indicates that the bulk, effective elastic properties of first-year sea ice in Van Mijenfjorden are relatively consistent from year to year. A somewhat higher Young's modulus of ∼ 4 GPa was reported for Van Mijenfjorden by Moreau et al. (2020a), but the deviation from the present study is likely attributable to the protected physical setting of their study site at the estuarine Vallunden lake. It is also important to highlight that all elastic properties we assume represent bulk, apparent values corresponding to the thin isotropic plate assumption, while real floating ice sheets are a composite sandwich material consisting of multiple ice layers of varying strength (Timco and Weeks, 2010).

Here we give a summary of our air-coupled flexural wave ice thickness estimates for each field season and examine them in the context of borehole measurements of ice thickness and prevailing meteorological conditions, as represented by records at the nearby Sveagruva weather station (Norwegian Meteorological Institute, 2020), which was upgraded prior to the 2017 season to include measurement of precipitation. We assume the air-coupled flexural frequency recorded at a given geophone is related to the ice thickness at the location of the geophone as this gave the strongest correlation with borehole thickness measurements.

### 5.2.1 The 2013 field season

The ice thickness estimates for the 2013 field season are summarized in
Fig. 8 and show good agreement with borehole
measurements. There is somewhat greater spread in the results on the Y line
which is likely related to the fact that the majority of the source
positions were inline with the X line and therefore oblique to the Y line
(see Fig. 1). The oblique geometry reduces the
precision of using the linear Radon transform to estimate the arrival time
and velocity of the air wave, which becomes smeared in the transform domain.
Air temperatures remained consistently <0 ^{∘}C, and the
thickness estimates are quite similar over the ∼ 3 d field
campaign, though there is some indication of ice growth with time.

### 5.2.2 The 2016 field season

The results for the 2016 field season are illustrated in Fig. 9. Some outliers are present in the flexural wave thickness estimates which are caused by interference of other spectral components for the extracted time series segments. This interference can be due to, for example, other wave modes such as sub-seabed reflections, snow scooter engine noises or instrument noise due to wind. Despite these outliers, the median thickness estimates agree well with the range of drilled thicknesses (see Table 1), although the along-profile locations of the boreholes was unfortunately not recorded for this field campaign.

### 5.2.3 The 2017 field season

The thickness estimates for the 2017 field season are shown in Fig. 10. The significant spatial thickness variation observed in boreholes is reasonably well represented by the median air-coupled flexural wave thickness estimates plotted according to geophone position, though the estimates vary more smoothly in space. This indicates that the air-coupled flexural wave varies according to the thickness and flexural rigidity of the ice in the vicinity of the geophone, likely averaged spatially in proportion with the wavelength of flexure. An alternative hypothesis that the air-coupled flexural wave is controlled by the path-averaged ice properties between the source and geophone was tested by plotting the thickness estimates at the midpoint between source and receiver. While we do not include the figure for brevity, the result is a flat profile with estimates ranging from ∼ 45–75 cm and a similar median of ∼ 57 cm. This does not reflect the real thickness variation recorded by the borehole measurements, leading us to prefer the hypothesis that the frequency of the air-coupled flexural wave is controlled by the ice thickness and flexural rigidity in the vicinity of the geophone. Indeed, we found the borehole-measured spatial variation in ice thickness could only be approximated by assuming the air-coupled flexural wave estimates lie at least 98 % towards the geophone (along the straight line from source to geophone).

We also observe that the air-coupled flexural wave thickness estimates significantly overestimate the ice thickness drilled in the two boreholes closest to land. While further field data would be needed to investigate this phenomenon in detail, it may be attributable to the effect of the land on the lateral boundary condition of the ice sheet (see Appendix A). The infinite ice sheet modelled in the present study does not include a lateral boundary, though it may be possible to heuristically approximate this effect by defining a spatially variable effective elastic modulus that increases near land.

### 5.2.4 The 2018 field season

The air-coupled flexural wave thickness estimates for the 2018 field season
are summarized in Fig. 11. The thickness estimates
agree well with the range of ice thickness measured in boreholes (see
Table 1), though the along-profile locations of the
boreholes were unfortunately not recorded for this field campaign. The most
striking feature we observe for the 2018 campaign is an increase in
ice thickness of up to ∼ 10–15 cm over the course of the
campaign (a period of ∼ 4 d). This rapid increase in
thickness is attributable to the weather event that occurred on 26–27 February, when > 0 ^{∘}C temperatures and rain led to a
significant accumulation of freshwater on top of the sea ice. This event
was significant enough that fieldwork was not possible on 27 February. The rapid decrease in air temperature on the 28th then
promptly caused the accumulated fresh surface water to freeze, a process
that occurs much more quickly than basal ice accumulation due to heat loss
through the overlying ice layer, salt rejection and eventual freezing of seawater.

It is possible to interpret the origin of the air-coupled flexural waves in several equivalent ways. (1) They are produced by the downward pressure of the air wave moving over the ice surface, i.e., the moving loads on floating plates interpretation as elaborated in Sect. 3. (2) A plate excited by a broadband pulse propagates flexural wave energy at a range of frequencies, but sound transmission from the plate is highest at the coincidence frequency (Bhattacharya et al., 1971) producing a resonance effect. (3) Alternatively, the air-coupled flexural wave can be interpreted as a class of leaky Lamb waves in which flexural wave energy radiates into the air, regulated by the phase matching condition and occurring most efficiently at the grazing angle, where the phase velocity is equal to the speed of sound in air (Brower et al., 1979; Kiefer et al., 2019; Mozhaev and Weihnacht, 2002). The observation of air-coupled flexural waves and absence of dispersive ice flexural waves on the far side of open water leads by Hunkins (1960) is consistent with the interpretation that, for explosive sources on or above the ice, air-coupled flexural waves are generated continuously by the downward pressure exerted by the air wave. The correspondence between experimental data and the solution of the full dynamical model (see Fig. 6) gives further support to this interpretation.

Our results indicate that air-coupled flexural waves are affected by spatial (see Fig. 10) and temporal ice thickness variation (see Fig. 11). A high degree of spatial variability in ice thickness has been reported for first-year sea ice in Van Mijenfjorden (Sandven et al., 2010) and in the Arctic in general (Wadhams et al., 2006). Spatial resolution is likely proportional to the air-coupled flexural wavelength, though further field data including high-resolution ground truth measurements would be required to elaborate this proportionality in detail. It is also important to highlight that the air-coupled flexural frequency is affected by the elastic properties of the ice, its flexural rigidity and not just its thickness. By assuming a constant set of elastic parameters our thickness estimates may be considered “effective thicknesses” corresponding to the assumed elastic parameters and subject to the thin isotropic plate assumption. However, we also expect that the “effective thickness” for assumed elastic properties is still highly relevant when assessing the load bearing capacity of floating ice even if it were to deviate from the true thickness.

A small percentage of outliers are present in the thickness estimates that
we attribute to spectral contamination caused by the simultaneous arrival of
other wave modes with the air-coupled flexural waves. Such interference was
minimized by discarding the nearest offsets where high-velocity sub-seabed
reflections arrive at the same time as the air wave (see
Fig. 5). However, other
noise sources, such as snow scooter traffic, are difficult to avoid in
real-world data. In the rare cases that traffic noise is recorded at the
same instant as the air-coupled flexural waves, the resulting spectral
interference can prevent accurate estimation of the air-coupled flexural
frequency. Snow cover also likely decreases the efficiency of coupling
between ice and air, though this did not appear to play a major role for the
four field seasons investigated, for which gimballed *z*-component geophones were
deployed directly on top of the thin snow covers that were present.

## Air-coupled flexural wave data acquisition

In this study, we present data acquired with linear arrays of geophones and active seismic sources that were primarily acquired to test the feasibility of seismic reflection surveying on floating sea ice. It is important to emphasize that it should be possible to employ much simpler equipment to record air-coupled flexural waves. Indeed, from our results we would expect that a simple microphone, sensitive in the relevant frequency range and located in the vicinity of the desired measurement, either above the ice sheet or along the shoreline may be sufficient. In addition to low equipment cost, the potential to monitor ice thickness using a microphone positioned on land could be beneficial from the perspective of environmental monitoring, particularly early in the freezing season when the ice is too thin to be safely traversed.

The use of microphones to record air-coupled flexural waves can be
illustrated by a phenomenon that is familiar to the ice-skating community.
On thin, floating ice, skates striking or cracking the ice can excite
sonorous tones that vary in pitch according to the ice thickness
(Lundmark, 2001). These tones correspond to air-coupled flexural waves,
simply shifted to higher frequencies because of the thinner, stiffer
freshwater ice. We use the audio track from the well-known National
Geographic short film “How Skating on Thin Ice Creates Laser-Like Sounds”
(Rankin, 2018) to illustrate this. The frequency of the strong monochromatic
component corresponding to the air-coupled flexural wave is ∼ 725 Hz for the scene from 16 s to 33 s, as shown in
Fig. 12. Using Eq. (15) we
calculate that the ice was ∼ 4.3 cm thick, assuming Young's
modulus of 8.5 GPa, Poisson's ratio of 0.33, water density of 1000 kg m^{−3}, ice density of 917 kg m^{−3}, water depth of at least 0.3 m and
sound speed of 329 m s^{−1} corresponding to an air temperature of −3.9 ^{∘}C. This is in line with the measured ice thickness presented in the film and
illustrates the potential to use air-coupled flexural waves recorded by a
simple microphone to estimate ice thickness.

Detonating cord seismic sources were used for the experiments presented in this study, but other impulsive sources acting on a floating ice sheet also have the potential to excite air-coupled flexural waves. Hammer blows are an alternative active source, while crack propagation is a potential passive source that produces a sudden energy release capable of exciting propagating elastic waves in the plate and acoustic pressure waves in air. Ice quakes produced by the sudden cracking of floating ice are a well-known phenomenon (Kavanaugh et al., 2019; Moreau et al., 2020b; Olinger et al., 2019; Ruzhich et al., 2009) and are typically related to the build-up of stress by thermal, tidal and wind forces. This phenomenon has also been studied from the structural non-destructive testing perspective, for example, by Haider and Giurgiutiu (2018) who model the acoustic emission of axis-symmetric circular crested Lamb waves excited by crack propagation in a steel plate.

In order to illustrate that ice quakes are capable of producing air-coupled flexural waves, we went out and recorded a series of ice quakes around midday, 3 January 2021, at Storvatnet, Kvaløya (Norway), using the built-in microphone of a Sony a6500 digital camera. This is a relatively low-quality microphone with no shielding from wind noise, but the monochromatic air-coupled flexural waves can still be clearly discerned (in addition to the broadband impulses of the ice crack ruptures). The ice was not drilled, but its thickness was estimated to be 10–20 cm by visual assessment of vertical cracks running through the clear, black ice. The air-coupled flexural frequency of ∼ 195 Hz indicates the thickness was 16 cm, using the same physical properties for lake ice as introduced earlier. The midday occurrence of these ice quakes, when air temperature was relatively high, suggests they were caused by thermal expansion stresses (Ruzhich et al., 2009). The results of this study and the examples shown in Figs. 12 and 13 suggest that the non-contact, passive recording of air-coupled flexural waves using a single microphone may provide an additional, alternative method of passive flexural wave ice thickness estimation. This complements previously demonstrated passive seismic monitoring methods employing array-based wave field transform approaches (Moreau et al., 2020a) or noise interferometry and Bayesian inversion (Moreau et al., 2020b). The use of inexpensive single, non-contact sensors is an attractive aspect of the air-coupled flexural wave method, particularly the fact that a microphone could be placed on land when the ice is too thin to safely traverse. However, further study is needed to reveal the extent to which the temporal occurrence of ice quakes producing air-coupled flexural waves and reduced air–ice coupling due to thick snow covers may limit the practical acquisition season.

Air-coupled flexural waves were found to be a robust feature of first-year sea ice excited by explosive sources over a range of ice thicknesses up to ∼ 80 cm. The physics of these waves can be understood from a theoretical perspective that has largely developed through the study of moving vehicles on floating plates. The dynamical model that we favour is straightforward to understand in terms of linear filter theory, and we derived a closed-form solution of the dispersion relation that relates ice thickness directly to the air-coupled flexural wave frequency and air wave velocity. We tested the proposed closed-form ice thickness estimator extensively on field data from four field seasons and found a remarkably good agreement with in situ borehole measurements. The phenomenon of air-coupled flexural waves is relatively familiar to the wild ice-skating community, in which thin ice produces air-coupled flexural waves that are readily audible. Here we build on the pioneering efforts of Press and Ewing (1951), developing a more accessible theory supported by modern numerical and Fourier transform methods, to show that the same phenomenon also occurs for much thicker sea ice, simply shifted to a lower frequency regime. We have mainly presented data that were acquired for the primary purpose of reflection seismic profiling, but a key benefit of air-coupled flexural waves is that they can also be recorded with very simple equipment, such as a single microphone located either above the ice sheet or along the shoreline. Ice quakes produced by natural cracking excite air-coupled flexural waves for freshwater lake ice, which raises the potential that passive recording of air-coupled flexural waves may also be possible for sea ice.

Two outlier points were observed for the 2017 field season, in which ice with
drilled thickness of 30–35 cm near land had air-coupled flexural frequency
similar to ice of 50 cm drilled thickness further seaward (see
Fig. 10). To illustrate that this may be
attributable to a lateral boundary condition effect, we approximate an ice
sheet of finite extent as a collection of arbitrarily small, uniformly
loaded, circular plates. The ice along the shoreline is represented by
assuming a clamped boundary condition, while the ice far from shore is
considered simply supported by the neighbouring plate elements. We may then
find the thicknesses of a simply supported and a clamped plate that lead to
equal maximum tangential stresses. From Hearn (1997), the
maximum tangential stress, occurring at the centre of the simply supported
plate, *σ*_{s}, and the clamped plate, *σ*_{c}, is given by

Here, *q* is the uniformly distributed load, *R* is the plate radius, *v* is
Poisson's ratio, and *h*_{s} and *h*_{c} are the thicknesses of the simply
supported and clamped plates, respectively. Equating the two expressions
gives

so that *h*_{c}≈0.63*h*_{s} for *v*=0.33. Therefore, it is anticipated
that ice 50 cm thick far from shore will experience the same maximum
tangential stress under load as ice that is $\mathrm{0.63}\times \mathrm{50}=\mathrm{32}$ cm thick at
the shoreline (consistent with the outlier points from the 2017 field
season). We may similarly equate the maximum deflections of the plates,
which also occur at the plate centres. Hearn (1997) gives the
relevant expressions for the maximum deflection of the plates as

where *E* is the Young's modulus. By equating the two deflections and
simplifying we find

which again gives *h*_{c}≈0.63*h*_{s} for *v*=0.33. Since both
tangential stress and strain are equal for a clamped plate with 63 % of
the thickness of a corresponding simply supported plate, the boundary
condition effect can also be understood as a change in effective elastic
modulus. This supports the heuristic approximation of the lateral boundary
condition effect by a spatially variable, effective elastic modulus. While
this theoretical description is simplistic since, for example, the fluid loading is
ignored, it highlights that the boundary condition of a finite plate can
play a significant role. It would be beneficial to explore this effect in
greater detail in future studies, particularly with regard to the length
scale involved in the transition from clamped to simply supported behaviour.
Accurately describing this behaviour would require the collection of more
detailed field data in the zone near the shoreline in order to constrain the
development of a more complete model, such as a full finite element
simulation.

Data and code used to produce this research can be shared upon request to the authors.

Development of theory and associated modelling was carried out by RR and AH. The field campaigns were administered and led by TAJ and BOR. Initial data preparation was conducted by BOR, while the air-coupled flexural wave data processing methodology was developed and implemented by RR. RR was responsible for analysing and visualizing the data and writing the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their detailed and constructive comments on the early manuscript versions. These comments were an important foundation that considerably improved the final result.

This research has been supported by the University of Tromsø (UiT) – The Arctic University of Norway, ARCEx partners and the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 228107). The publication charges for this article have been funded by a grant from the publication fund of UiT – The Arctic University of Norway.

This paper was edited by Christian Haas and reviewed by Ludovic Moreau and one anonymous referee.

Bhattacharya, M., Guy, R., and Crocker, M.: Coincidence effect with sound waves in a finite plate, J. Sound Vibr., 18, 157–169, 1971.

Brower, N., Himberger, D., and Mayer, W.: Restrictions on the existence of leaky Rayleigh waves, IEEE T. Son. Ultrason., 26, 306–307, 1979.

DiMarco, R., Dugan, J., Martin, W., and Tucker III, W.: Sea ice flexural rigidity: a comparison of methods, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 21, 247–255, 1993.

Dinvay, E., Kalisch, H., and Părău, E.: Fully dispersive models for moving loads on ice sheets, J. Fluid. Mech., 876, 122–149, 2019.

Ewing, M. and Crary, A.: Propagation of elastic waves in ice. Part II, Physics, 5, 181–184, 1934.

Ewing, M. and Press, F.: Tide-gage disturbances from the great eruption of Krakatoa, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 36, 53–60, 1955.

Franke, S. J. and Swenson Jr., G.: A brief tutorial on the fast field program (FFP) as applied to sound propagation in the air, Appl. Acoust., 27, 203–215, 1989.

Garrett, C.: A theory of the Krakatoa tide gauge disturbances, Tellus, 22, 43–52, 1970.

Greenhill, A.: Wave motion in hydrodynamics, Am. J. Math., 1886, 62–96, 1886.

Greenhill, G.: I. Skating on thin ice, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 31, 1–22, 1916.

Griffin, J.: The Magic (and Math) of Skating on Thin Ice without Falling In, Scientific American, available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-magic-and-math-of-skating-on-thin-ice-without-falling-in/ (last access: 16 June 2020), 2018.

Haider, M. F. and Giurgiutiu, V.: Analysis of axis symmetric circular crested elastic wave generated during crack propagation in a plate: A Helmholtz potential technique, Int. J. Solids Struct., 134, 130–150, 2018.

Hanssen, A.: Multidimensional multitaper spectral estimation, Signal Process., 58, 327–332, 1997.

Harb, M. S. and Yuan, F.-G.: Air-coupled nondestructive evaluation dissected, J. Nondestruct. Eval., 37, 1–19, 2018.

Harkrider, D. and Press, F.: The Krakatoa Air–Sea Waves: An Example of Pulse Propagation in Coupled Systems, Geophys. J. Int., 13, 149–159, 1967.

Haskell, N. A.: A note on air-coupled surface waves, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 41, 295–300, 1951.

Hearn, E. J.: Chapter 7 – Circular Plates and Diaphragms, in: Mechanics of Materials 2, 3rd Edn., edited by: Hearn, E. J., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1997.

Hinchey, M. and Colbourne, B.: Research on low and high speed hovercraft icebreaking, Can. J. Civil Eng., 22, 32–42, 1995.

Hunkins, K.: Seismic studies of sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 3459–3472, 1960.

Johansen, T. A., Ruud, B. O., Tømmerbakke, R., and Jensen, K.: Seismic on floating ice: data acquisition versus flexural wave noise, Geophys. Prospect., 67, 532–549, 2019.

Kashiwagi, M.: Transient responses of a VLFS during landing and take-off of an airplane, J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 9, 14–23, 2004.

Kavanaugh, J., Schultz, R., Andriashek, L. D., van der Baan, M., Ghofrani, H., Atkinson, G., and Utting, D. J.: A New Year's Day icebreaker: ice quakes on lakes in Alberta, Canada, Can. J. Earth Sci., 56, 183–200, 2019.

Kiefer, D. A., Ponschab, M., Rupitsch, S. J., and Mayle, M.: Calculating the full leaky Lamb wave spectrum with exact fluid interaction, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 145, 3341–3350, 2019.

Kozin, V., Zemlyak, V., and Rogozhnikova, E.: Increasing the efficiency of the resonance method for breaking an ice cover with simultaneous movement of two air cushion vehicles, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Ph.+, 58, 349–353, 2017.

Kozin, V. M. and Pogorelova, A. V.: Submarine moving close to the ice-surface conditions, Proceedings of the Eighteenth (2008) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 6–11 July 2008, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 630–637, 2008.

Lundmark, G.: Skating on thin ice-And the acoustics of infinite plates, INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, The Hague, the Netherlands, 410–413, 2001.

Matiushina, A. A., Pogorelova, A. V., and Kozin, V. M.: Effect of impact load on the ice cover during the landing of an airplane, Int. J. Offshore Polar, 26, 6–12, 2016.

Miles, J. and Sneyd, A. D.: The response of a floating ice sheet to an accelerating line load, J. Fluid Mech., 497, 435–439, 2003.

Moreau, L., Boué, P., Serripierri, A., Weiss, J., Hollis, D., Pondaven, I., Vial, B., Garambois, S., Larose, É., and Helmstetter, A.: Sea ice thickness and elastic properties from the analysis of multimodal guided wave propagation measured with a passive seismic array, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015709, 2020a.

Moreau, L., Weiss, J., and Marsan, D.: Accurate estimations of sea-ice thickness and elastic properties from seismic noise recorded with a minimal number of geophones: from thin landfast ice to thick pack ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016492, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016492, 2020b.

Mozhaev, V. and Weihnacht, M.: Subsonic leaky Rayleigh waves at liquid–solid interfaces, Ultrasonics, 40, 927–933, 2002.

Nickalls, R. W.: A new approach to solving the cubic: Cardan's solution revealed, Math. Gaz., 77, 354–359, 1993.

Norwegian Meteorological Institute: Norsk Klimaservicesenter – Observations and weather statistics, available at: https://seklima.met.no/ (last access: 14 December 2020), 2020.

Novoselov, A., Fuchs, F., and Bokelmann, G.: Acoustic-to-seismic ground coupling: coupling efficiency and inferring near-surface properties, Geophys. J. Int., 223, 144–160, 2020.

Nugroho, W. S., Wang, K., Hosking, R., and Milinazzo, F.: Time-dependent response of a floating flexible plate to an impulsively started steadily moving load, J. Fluid Mech., 381, 337–355, 1999.

Olinger, S., Lipovsky, B., Wiens, D., Aster, R., Bromirski, P., Chen, Z., Gerstoft, P., Nyblade, A. A., and Stephen, R.: Tidal and thermal stresses drive seismicity along a major Ross Ice Shelf rift, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 6644–6652, 2019.

Press, F. and Ewing, M.: Theory of air-coupled flexural waves, J. Appl. Phys., 22, 892–899, 1951.

Press, F. and Oliver, J.: Model study of air-coupled surface waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 27, 43–46, 1955.

Press, F., Crary, A., Oliver, J., and Katz, S.: Air-coupled flexural waves in floating ice, EOS T. Am. Geophys. Un., 32, 166–172, 1951.

Rankin, A.: How Skating on Thin Ice Creates Laser-Like Sounds, short film, National Geographic, available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/skating-thin-black-ice-creates-sound-nordic-spd (last access: 23 June 2021), 2018.

Renji, K., Nair, P., and Narayanan, S.: Critical and coincidence frequencies of flat panels, J. Sound Vibr., 205, 19–32, 1997.

Ruzhich, V., Psakhie, S. G., Chernykh, E., Bornyakov, S., and Granin, N.: Deformation and seismic effects in the ice cover of Lake Baikal, Russ. Geol. Geophys.+, 50, 214–221, 2009.

Sandven, S., Hansen, R. K., Eknes, E., Kvingedal, B., Bruserud, K., Nilsen, F., Wåhlin, J., Sagen, H., and Kloster, K.: NERSC Technical Report no. 294, Nansen Environmental Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway, 2010.

Schulkes, R. M. S. M. and Sneyd, A. D.: Time-dependent response of floating ice to a steadily moving load, J. Fluid Mech., 186, 25–46, 1988.

Skarðhamar, J. and Svendsen, H.: Short-term hydrographic variability in a stratified Arctic fjord, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 344, 51–60, 2010.

Squire, V., Robinson, W., Langhorne, P., and Haskell, T.: Vehicles and aircraft on floating ice, Nature, 333, 159–161, 1988.

Squire, V., Hosking, R. J., Kerr, A. D., and Langhorne, P.: Moving Loads on Ice Plates, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1996.

Sutherland, G. and Rabault, J.: Observations of wave dispersion and attenuation in landfast ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 1984–1997, 2016.

Takizawa, T.: Response of a floating sea ice sheet to a steadily moving load, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 93, 5100–5112, 1988.

Thomson, D. J.: Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis, P. IEEE, 70, 1055–1096, 1982.

Timco, G. and Frederking, R.: A review of sea ice density, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 24, 1–6, 1996.

Timco, G. W. and Weeks, W. F.: A review of the engineering properties of sea ice, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 60, 107–129, 2010.

Van der Sanden, J. and Short, N.: Radar satellites measure ice cover displacements induced by moving vehicles, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 133, 56–62, 2017.

Wadhams, P., Wilkinson, J. P., and McPhail, S.: A new view of the underside of Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L04501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025131, 2006.

Wang, K., Hosking, R., and Milinazzo, F.: Time-dependent response of a floating viscoelastic plate to an impulsively started moving load, J. Fluid Mech., 521, 295–317, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211200400179X, 2004.

Wilson, J. T.: Coupling between moving loads and flexural waves in floating ice sheets, U.S. Army Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment, SIPRE technical report no. 34, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Wilmette, Illinois, USA, 1955.

Yang, T. C. and Yates, T. W.: Flexural waves in a floating ice sheet: Modeling and comparison with data, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97, 971–977, 1995.

Yeung, R. and Kim, J.: Effects of a Translating Load on a Floating Plate – Structural Drag and Plate Deformation, J. Fluid. Struct., 14, 993–1011, 2000.

Yilmaz, Ö.: Seismic data analysis: Processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data, Society of exploration geophysicists, 2nd Edn., 938–942, 2001.

Zhu, J.: Non-contact NDT of concrete structures using air coupled sensors, Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana, Report No. NSEL-010, 2008.

- Abstract
- Introduction
- Study area and data acquisition
- Theory
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Appendix A: Possible effect of land on ice sheet lateral boundary condition
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References

- Abstract
- Introduction
- Study area and data acquisition
- Theory
- Methodology
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Appendix A: Possible effect of land on ice sheet lateral boundary condition
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References