It looks like the concerns of the referees have been addressed in your responses. The manuscript should be in good shape for final revisions.

Best
Ben

The revisions look really good and do a great job of responding to the referees comments. Thanks!

I have just a few editorial comments, and one personal note. These corrections shouldn't take much time and are really quite minor. Again, ice job.

P11 L 40: “Their topography influences the surrounding SMB, by inducing snowfall, especially on the windward side of an ice rise,Xand blowing snow by alternating the wind speed patterns “ : this sentence is a little confusing. Should it say something like “and by influencing the deposition of blowing snow…”
P11 L55 “as well as “ -> “or about”
P12 L69: “them and how well” -> “them, and how well”
P12 L70: comma after ‘addition’
P13 L104: “reflected on” -> “reflected from”
P15 L156 Complicated sentence should be broken in half:
“RACMO2 is a state of the art regional atmospheric climate model. Similar to, for example MAR (Agosta et al., 2019) and COSMO-CLM (Souverijns et al., 2019), it is able to provide accurate SMB simulations in polar regions.
P16 L206: “the amount and contrasts “ -> “the amount and the contrasts”
P20 L252: linear->linearly
287 : As it happens, I was on the trip to Roosevelt Island (at age 25, working on my Master’s degree) and made similar measurements with a high-frequency radar. There was indeed an accumulation minimum just at the summit of the island. This has never been published (as far as I know), but I thought you might like to know.

Thanks for a smooth review process, and congratulations on a great paper.