The Cryosphere
The Cryosphere
TC
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
Research article
 | 
15 Jun 2020
Research article |  | 15 Jun 2020

Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques

Phillip Harder, John W. Pomeroy, and Warren D. Helgason

Viewed

Total article views: 5,578 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,888 1,557 133 5,578 136 189
  • HTML: 3,888
  • PDF: 1,557
  • XML: 133
  • Total: 5,578
  • BibTeX: 136
  • EndNote: 189
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Dec 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,578 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,992 with geography defined and 586 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Unmanned-aerial-vehicle-based (UAV) structure-from-motion (SfM) techniques have the ability to map snow depths in open areas. Here UAV lidar and SfM are compared to map sub-canopy snowpacks. Snow depth accuracy was assessed with data from sites in western Canada collected in 2019. It is demonstrated that UAV lidar can measure the sub-canopy snow depth at a high accuracy, while UAV-SfM cannot. UAV lidar promises to quantify snow–vegetation interactions at unprecedented accuracy and resolution.
Read more
Share