Articles | Volume 14, issue 6
The Cryosphere, 14, 1919–1935, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020
The Cryosphere, 14, 1919–1935, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1919-2020
Research article
15 Jun 2020
Research article | 15 Jun 2020

Improving sub-canopy snow depth mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles: lidar versus structure-from-motion techniques

Phillip Harder et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,711 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,813 857 41 2,711 38 44
  • HTML: 1,813
  • PDF: 857
  • XML: 41
  • Total: 2,711
  • BibTeX: 38
  • EndNote: 44
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Dec 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Dec 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,315 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,233 with geography defined and 82 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Download
Short summary
Unmanned-aerial-vehicle-based (UAV) structure-from-motion (SfM) techniques have the ability to map snow depths in open areas. Here UAV lidar and SfM are compared to map sub-canopy snowpacks. Snow depth accuracy was assessed with data from sites in western Canada collected in 2019. It is demonstrated that UAV lidar can measure the sub-canopy snow depth at a high accuracy, while UAV-SfM cannot. UAV lidar promises to quantify snow–vegetation interactions at unprecedented accuracy and resolution.