Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
TC | Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
The Cryosphere, 14, 1703–1712, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1703-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Cryosphere, 14, 1703–1712, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1703-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 29 May 2020

Research article | 29 May 2020

Horizontal ice flow impacts the firn structure of Greenland's percolation zone

Horizontal ice flow impacts the firn structure of Greenland's percolation zone
Rosemary Leone1, Joel Harper1, Toby Meierbachtol1, and Neil Humphrey2 Rosemary Leone et al.
  • 1Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
  • 2Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

Correspondence: Joel Harper (joel@mso.umt.edu)

Abstract
Back to toptop

One-dimensional simulations of firn evolution neglect horizontal advection from ice flow, which transports the firn column across climate gradients as it is buried by accumulation. Using a suite of model runs, we demonstrate the impacts of horizontal advection on the development of firn density, temperature, and the stratigraphy of melt features through the Greenland ice sheet percolation zone. The simulations isolate processes in synthetic runs and investigate four specific transects and an ice core site. Relative to one-dimensional simulations, the horizontal advection process tends to increase the pore close-off depth, reduce the heat content, and decrease the frequency of melt features with depth by emplacing firn sourced from higher locations under increasingly warm and melt-affected surface conditions. Preservation of the advected pore space and cold content is strongly dependent upon the depth of meltwater infiltration. Horizontal ice flow interacts with topography, climate gradients, and meltwater infiltration to influence the evolution of the firn column structure; the interaction between these variables modulates the impact of horizontal advection on firn at locations around Greenland. Pore close-off and firn temperature are mainly impacted in the lowermost 20–30 km of the percolation zone, which may be relevant to migration of the lower percolation zone. Relatively high in the percolation zone, however, the stratigraphy of melt features can have an advection-derived component that should not be conflated with changing climate.

1 Introduction
Back to toptop

Summer melting of bare ice, epitomized by stream networks and moulins, represents a relatively small portion of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) periphery since about 90 % of the ice sheet's area is a perennially snow-covered accumulation zone (e.g., Ettema et al., 2009). A large fraction of the snow-covered region also experiences melt (Fig. 1): between 50 % and 80 % of the area melted during summers of the period 1958–2009 (Fettweis et al., 2011), for example. Further, the inland extent and duration of melting have demonstrated increasing trends and have frequently established new records (Mote, 2007; Tedesco, 2007; Tedesco et al., 2013). Melting of the accumulation zone (i.e., the percolation zone) is therefore an increasingly important aspect of the ice sheet, and so too are the glaciological processes governing the snow and firn interactions with surface climate.

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1703/2020/tc-14-1703-2020-f01

Figure 1Maps of Greenland. (a) Facies delineated based on modeled 1980–2016 average surface melt (Noël et al., 2018): ablation zone (blue) with melt exceeding accumulation; percolation zone (red), the upper limit of which defined by melt conditions at Crawford Point, where infiltration has not warmed firn (Humphrey et al., 2012); dry zone (gray). (b) Velocity field from Joughin et al. (2010) with top and bottom of percolation zone shown in (a), delineated by black contour lines. Thick black lines through the percolation zone show study transects, where E is EGIG, J is Jakobshavn, K is K-transect, and H is Helheim (see Table 1).

Meltwater from the lower accumulation zone may run off from its point of origin (e.g., Machguth et al., 2016), while at higher elevations the water may simply infiltrate into cold snow and firn to fill underlying pore space, forming ice when it refreezes (e.g., Braithwaite et al., 1994; Harper et al., 2012) or remaining liquid if it does not (e.g., Forster et al., 2014; Humphrey et al., 2012). The capacity of the firn column to accommodate meltwater is dependent on its thermal state, its density, and structure of ice layers. However, many aspects of the processes governing firn's structural and thermal evolution and whether meltwater is retained remain unclear. While current model fidelity prevents confident constraint on the amount of melt retained in the percolation zone, existing estimates are that 40 %–50 % of the meltwater generated never escapes (van Angelen et al., 2013; Janssens and Huybrechts, 2000; Reijmer et al., 2012).

The percolation zone is a region with relatively high horizontal motion compared to submergence rate (cf. divide regions) (Fig. 1). Ice sheet flow displaces the firn column to lower elevation, where it is buried by subsequent winter layers experiencing higher-intensity summer melt. Thus, the deep firn column's structural makeup and thermal state result from a climate that varies in both time and space. Ice motion potentially impacts the structure of the firn column, including the amount of deep pore space that could absorb meltwater and act as a source of associated latent heat. Further, it may have implications for the interpretation of melt feature stratigraphy within ice cores collected from these regions.

Here we investigate the role that horizontal motion plays in driving the structural evolution of the firn layer in Greenland's percolation zone. We utilize previous approaches for modeling firn densification and meltwater infiltration, but we extend our analysis to include horizontal advection of the domain due to ice flow. Climate and ice flow are highly variable around the ice sheet, but sparse observational data, computational limitations, and questions of fidelity surrounding models for meltwater infiltration in firn prevent us from simulating the entire ice sheet with a high level of confidence. Our purpose here is therefore to test for the importance of ice flow to firn structure in Greenland's percolation zone because ice flow has largely been overlooked and is not currently included in regional climate model simulations of firn evolution. To explore this process, we focus our investigation on synthetic modeling of isolated processes, four differing transects of the GrIS percolation zone, and partitioning the signal of climate change from an advection signal within an ice core from the percolation zone.

2 Methods
Back to toptop

2.1 Model description

Air temperature, accumulation rate, and melt–refreezing processes drive the evolution of the density and thermal structure of the percolation zone's firn column (e.g., Herron and Langway, 1980; Reeh et al., 2005). The spatial gradients in these parameters, coupled with the speed at which the ice moves through the gradients, also impact evolution of the firn column. We simulate these processes in a thermomechanically coupled framework for firn densification and heat transfer, including meltwater penetration and refreezing, that also incorporates horizontal displacement of the firn column due to ice motion.

2.1.1 Firn densification

The rate of change of firn densification is described by its material derivative:

(1)DρDt=ρt+uρ,

where ρ is firn density and u is the velocity vector. Many existing densification models are based on the empirical assumption that the proportional density change is linearly related to the change in overlying load (Robin, 1958), and ours is no different. As rate parameters, we use the empirical constants developed by Herron and Langway (1980) for dry snow densification based upon the relatively simplistic formulation with few tuning parameters and favorable comparison with other densification schemes (Lundin et al., 2017). The total densification rate is therefore

(2)DρDt=c0ρi-ρifρρcc1ρi-ρifρc<ρ,

where the critical density ρc equals 550 kg m−3, and temperature- and accumulation-dependent constants c0 and c1 are defined as

(3)c0=11ρiρwbexp-10160RTifρρcc1=575ρiρwb0.5exp-21400RTifρc<ρ.

In Eq. (3), R is the gas constant (8.314 JK-1mol-1), accumulation rate b is in ice equivalent units, and T is the absolute temperature.

2.1.2 Temperature evolution

Firn temperature is simulated using the standard heat transfer equation, including latent heat additions from meltwater refreezing (see Sect. 2.1.3):

(4)ρcTt=KT-ρcuT+S,

where c is the specific heat capacity of ice, taken to be 2100 Jkg-1K-1, and S reflects latent heat release from refreezing. In Eq. (4), K is the thermal conductivity, which we prescribe to be density-dependent following Arthern and Wingham (1998) (K=2.1(ρ/ρi)2).

2.1.3 Melt infiltration schemes

Modeling complex and heterogeneous meltwater infiltration in firn with high fidelity remains an outstanding problem of critical importance and is beyond the scope of this project. Our approach is to implement three existing infiltration schemes which vary in complexity and reflect a range of approximations. The first model considers only shallow infiltration, assuming that all meltwater refreezes in the top annual layer (Reeh et al., 2005). The second implements a standard bucket method (Kuipers Munneke et al., 2014; Ligtenberg et al., 2018), allowing meltwater infiltration as far as permitted by thresholds for cold content and irreducible water content (the latter of which is defined following Coléou and Lesaffre, 1998). Meltwater percolates until reaching either a firn layer in which the available liquid water fails to exceed the layer's irreducible water content or the pore close-off density; any remaining meltwater runs off instantaneously. The third infiltration model implements a continuum approach (Meyer and Hewitt, 2017), simulating the physics of water flow based on Darcy's law and treating both saturated and unsaturated conditions.

2.1.4 Numerical methods

We implement horizontal advection in modeling exercises using an approach that is Lagrangian in the horizontal and Eulerian in the vertical. One-dimensional firn profiles are initiated with conditions characteristic of the dry snow zone and are transported through the percolation zone along a flow line following a prescribed horizontal velocity. Because porous firn is confined to relatively shallow depths (cf. ice sheet thickness), vertical shear is negligible, and the horizontal velocity can be assumed to be equivalent to the surface value. Horizontal motion is therefore simulated by translating spatially varying surface conditions (temperature and accumulation rate) to time-varying boundary conditions following the prescribed velocity, and Eqs. (1) and (4) remain restricted to the vertical dimension.

This approach implicitly captures the horizontal advection terms in Eqs. (1) and (4) but neglects any influence of along-flow velocity variations on firn structure. Firn densification rates may be influenced by mass changes arising from strain thinning or thickening as well as stress enhancement induced by horizontal deviatoric stresses (Alley and Bentley, 1988), but they are likely to be negligible around the GrIS percolation zone (Supplement Sect. S1.1).

In addition, our modeling approach neglects horizontal heat diffusion. To assess the consequences of this, we tested our Lagrangian approach against an explicit 2D model for densification and heat transport including horizontal diffusion in an Eulerian framework. Results from these tests yielded negligibly different results (Supplement Sect. S1.2; Fig. S1). We therefore continue with our Lagrangian approach, which streamlines computational efficiency and permits flexible implementation of various melt infiltration schemes.

Changes in temperature and density were coupled together along with vertical velocity and solved using the finite element library FeniCS (Logg et al., 2012) with Galerkin's method. Dirichlet boundaries for state variables temperature, density (ρ0=360kg m−3), and vertical velocity (following the accumulation rate as wsfc=-bρiρ0) are imposed at the model surface, and vertical gradients in these variables are set to 0 at the model base. The model domain in all experiments is 80 m in the vertical; mass added to the model surface from accumulation is balanced by mass exiting the domain at the model base. We use a time step of 1 year in all simulations.

Table 1Approximate conditions taken from RACMO2.3p2 (Noël et al., 2018) along the four transects used in the study.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.2 Model experiments

The influence of horizontal advection on firn structure at depth is dependent on ice flow speed and spatial gradients in climate forcings (temperature, melt, and accumulation). We conducted an initial test of model sensitivity to each of these variables to understand, in isolation, the influence of changes in these processes on firn structure. We then applied the model to four flow line transects across GrIS percolation zone representing a spectrum of ice sheet and climate conditions. Finally, we performed a model test at a site in the upper percolation zone to investigate the influence of horizontal advection on melt feature interpretation.

2.2.1 Sensitivity analysis

Synthetic sensitivity tests were performed over an 80 km model domain with spatially invariant surface slope, horizontal velocity, and accumulation rate. Melt rates were assumed to increase linearly from 0 at the inland boundary to a specified fraction of accumulation at the lower model boundary. Horizontal velocity, accumulation rate, and melt rate were varied around a base scenario of 100 m a−1, 0.5 m a−1 ice equivalent, and 85 % of accumulation, respectively. Baseline conditions were chosen to approximately match conditions along the EGIG transect. Horizontal velocities, accumulation rate, and total melt were then varied across ranges of values spanning the conditions that may occur in the GrIS percolation zone: velocity was varied from 0 to 500 m a−1, accumulation from 0.1 to 1.0 m a−1 ice equivalent, and melt from 0 % to 85 % of the accumulation rate. For each combination of horizontal velocity, accumulation rate, and melt forcing, we also imposed three different surface temperature gradients based on surface slopes of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 with a temperature lapse rate of 7.4 Ckm-1 (Fausto et al., 2009). Sensitivity test results were compared against 1D results at the end of the 80 km model domain. Further details of the metric of comparison are presented in the Supplement (Sect. S2).

2.2.2 Greenland transects

Our modeling approach was implemented at four test transects (Fig. 1) around the GrIS percolation zone: (1) the well-studied EGIG transect in the western GrIS, (2) a transect feeding Jakobshavn Isbræ, (3) the K-transect in the southwestern GrIS, and (4) a transect extending into Helheim Glacier. These four study profiles were selected to capture a wide variety of ice sheet conditions (Table 1). The inland extent of the percolation zone was selected to correspond with the location where melt, as a fraction of accumulation rate, is equal to the value at Crawford Point (Fig. 1); a choice based on temperature measurements indicating melt infiltration at Crawford Point is insufficient to warm the firn above the annual average temperature (Humphrey et al., 2012). The initial condition for the interior boundary of each transect was the steady-state profile based on the values given in Table 1.

Surface velocities along study transects were defined from satellite velocity data (Joughin et al., 2010), and RACMO2.3p2 (Noël et al., 2018) was used to select 1980–2016 average climate variables (Fig. S3). This time period captures the increase in GrIS melt since the late 20th century (Fettweis et al., 2011). In addition to the transect simulations incorporating horizontal ice flow, in each transect we also completed 1D simulations at 600–1700 locations spaced at annual displacements (calculated from surface velocities) along the flow line. The latter were used for baseline comparisons of the effects of including or neglecting horizontal advection of the firn column.

2.2.3 Impact on core stratigraphy

A commonly used metric for quantifying changing climate conditions from firn cores is the annual increment of surface melt, or melt feature percent (MFP) (Graeter et al., 2018; Kameda et al., 1995; Koerner, 1977; Trusel et al., 2018). To investigate the role that horizontal advection can play in MFP records from the percolation zone, we simulated the conditions leading to Crawford Point (69.877 N, 47.0102 W; 1997 m elevation), located along the EGIG line. This site is relatively high in the percolation zone; in recent decades the average summer at this site has experienced about 15 d of melt (Mote, 2007). Multiple shallow cores have been collected for density and temperature measurements (Harper et al., 2012; Humphrey et al., 2012), and in 2007 a deep core was collected and interpreted within the context of GrIS melt history (Higgins, 2012). The site therefore offers an opportunity to assess the role of horizontal advection in the interpretation of melt history in a core profiling the full firn column of the percolation zone.

We modeled the 2D firn evolution along a flow line beginning 22 km inland and ending at Crawford Point using datasets for the modern state. This transect extent is chosen to ensure that the simulated conditions at Crawford Point contain no remnants of the initial condition. Ice surface geometry (Morlighem et al., 2017) and mean (1980–2016) melt and snowfall values from RACMO2.3p2 (Noël et al., 2018) were used to determine spatial climate gradients. As with the other Greenland transects (Sect. 2.3.2), horizontal advection during burial is represented by present-day velocity datasets (Joughin et al., 2010). We employ the Reeh et al. (2005) model for infiltration to be consistent with past MFP observational studies, which assume all annual melt is confined to the corresponding annual layer (e.g., Graeter et al., 2018; Kameda et al., 1995; Trusel et al., 2018). We assume the spatial gradients in input datasets have not changed over the century timescale required to simulate firn conditions at the bottom of the firn column. The validity of this assumption is unknown and perhaps tenuous; our intention, however, is a demonstration of the horizontal advection process constrained by ice sheet conditions. Furthermore, if there are in fact large time changes in gradients, this only increases complexity in the signal created by horizontal advection.

3 Results
Back to toptop

3.1 Sensitivity tests

Including 2D horizontal advection in simulations of the percolation zone yields greater air content in the firn column and increased depth to pore close-off compared to 1D results (Figs. 2, S2). Surface speeds approaching the upper limit of what may be expected in the GrIS percolation zone generate a firn column with air content that can differ from 1D simulations by 80 %. Yet, while greater ice flow speed clearly influences horizontal advection-based results, the impacts are strongly modulated by the magnitudes and gradients in other variables. For example, the impact of horizontal advection is also a function of accumulation, with smaller accumulations causing a 25 %–35 % increase in the depth to pore close-off and total air content in 2D simulations relative to the 1D model runs. This stems from a reduced densification rate under smaller annual increments of overburden and thus longer preservation of cold and porous firn that becomes deeply buried firn further down-glacier. Adding melt gradients to the scenarios exacerbates the effect, with wet surface conditions overlying dryer conditions at depth.

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1703/2020/tc-14-1703-2020-f02

Figure 2Example sensitivity test. Modeled differences between 1D and 2D for ice speed using a dry-firn model (black), Reeh model (red), tipping-bucket model (blue), and continuum model (green). Base accumulation is 0.5 m a−1, approximately the average value of the EGIG transect shown in Fig. 1. Each simulation is run with surface slopes of 0.3 (dotted), 0.6 (solid), and 0.8 (dash-dotted) to represent different climate gradients that may exist around the GrIS.

Download

In addition to surface climate variables, changes to the density structure by including horizontal advection are sensitive to the choice of meltwater infiltration scheme. The largest changes to density (and therefore air content) in the presence of advection occur in the Reeh et al. (2005) infiltration scheme. In contrast, firn air content results from the bucket scheme and continuum model are far less sensitive to advection (Fig. 2). The changes to air content from advection in these infiltration schemes are approximately half of those in the Reeh et al. (2005) scheme across all tested velocities.

Adding horizontal advection to simulations also decreases the firn temperature; the temperature profile and temperature at pore close-off reflect advected firn from higher, colder conditions. Heat content is strongly influenced by the choice of meltwater routing scheme: for example, under very high accumulation and melt, the bucket method yields deep penetration of water and warmer firn temperature at depth (cf. the 1D case) (Fig. S2). Steeper topography yields larger along-flow gradients in melt, temperature, and accumulation, causing greater disparities between 2D advection and 1D profile simulations. The ice flow speed has potential to impact simulations with 2D advection, but importantly, the magnitude is strongly modulated by the values and gradients in other variables. Interestingly, while meltwater infiltration and refreezing amplifies the difference between 1D and 2D advection simulations of firn density, the release of latent heat eliminates advected cold content, thereby reducing the thermal disparities between 1D and 2D simulations (Fig. S2).

3.2 Transects

The most significant differences between the 1D and 2D model simulations are along the lowermost 20–30 km of our four sample transects. By including ice flow in these firn simulations, the density decreases by >50kg m−3 for the EGIG, Jakobshavn, and Helheim transects (Figs. 3, S4, S5), resulting in increases in pore close-off depth of up to 8, 13, and 19 m, respectively. The commensurate impacts on total air content in the firn column can also be large: for example, along the EGIG transect it changes by ∼50 % in the lower 10 km and by 7 %–25 % along the next 10–20 km.

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1703/2020/tc-14-1703-2020-f03

Figure 3Calculated difference between 2D- and 1D-simulated firn properties in the percolation zone through the four study transects with the bucket method meltwater infiltration scheme: (a) EGIG line, (b) Jakobshavn, (c) Helheim, and (d) K-transect. The top panel in each transect shows surface topography (black) and pore close-off depth (red dashed). The middle panel shows density differences (2D  1D), and the bottom panel shows temperature differences. Different transect lengths reflect different percolation zone extents based on the definition stated in the text.

Download

The different melt infiltration schemes yield variable impacts. As in the sensitivity testing, the largest impact is with the Reeh et al. (2005) scheme, under which the inclusion of horizontal advection in simulations increases the firn column air content by up to several meters from a 1D simulation (Fig. 4). In contrast, the air content changes are almost always less than 1 m in the continuum scheme, which allows for deep meltwater penetration.

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1703/2020/tc-14-1703-2020-f04

Figure 4Simulated difference between integrated firn air content 2D and 1D modeling schemes in the lowest 30 km of (a) EGIG, (b) Jakobshavn, (c) Helheim, and (d) K-transect. Differences are presented for each meltwater infiltration scheme: Reeh et al. (2005) (dotted), bucket method (solid), and continuum (dash-dotted).

Download

Local changes in surface slope along the transects both enhance and diminish the impacts of horizontal advection on the underlying firn structure, complicating the 2D geometry of the firn layer within the percolation zone. This is exemplified in both EGIG and Jakobshavn transects (Fig. 3). A flattening of the surface profile near 20 km (EGIG) and 30 km (Jakobshavn) means that snow accumulates under similar climate conditions over many kilometers. This generates a deep firn density structure that is more similar to 1D profiles as the firn is buried and horizontally advected through the transect. These flat regions terminate abruptly with a sharp increase in slope and therefore climate gradients as well. This results in deep firn with densities that are reduced by 20–30 kg m−3 compared to 1D simulations. In contrast to the EGIG and Jakobshavn transects, the changes to density structure throughout the K-transect are comparatively small. Surface speeds are consistently ∼18 %–50 % of the values along the EGIG and Jakobshavn counterparts (Table 1); such slow velocity all but eliminates the impact of ice flow (Fig. 3d).

The process of horizontal advection generates colder firn temperature profiles. Along the EGIG transect, horizontal advection decreases firn temperatures at the depth to pore close-off by 1.0–1.5 C in the lower 15 km and by 0.8–1.0 C in the next 20 km. With the high speeds, steep topography, and heavy melt of the lowermost reaches of Jakobshavn and Helheim transects, firn temperatures were reduced by as much as 3 C by including horizontal advection.

3.3 Impact on core stratigraphy

Firn deposited along the first ∼5 km above Crawford Point reflects a region with very low slope and essentially no climate gradient caused by elevation (Fig. 5a). Consequently, MFP values are relatively constant in the upper ∼50 m of the firn column, indicating that horizontal advection is inconsequential to firn structure over depths that are equivalent to recent decades at this site (Fig. 5b).

https://www.the-cryosphere.net/14/1703/2020/tc-14-1703-2020-f05

Figure 5(a) Surface topography and modeled flow lines extending inland from Crawford Point. The horizontal distance scale is kilometers from Crawford Point. The bottom panel (b) shows the modeled change in MFP over time (bottom axis) and with depth (top axis) resulting from ice flow alone. Depth scale in (b) corresponds to firn depth in (a). Time trends in MFP at Crawford Point arising from simulated ice flow are shown for the full time (or depth) period (blue) and for the firn profile below 50 m (orange). Time trends in MFP measured in a Crawford Point ice core and reported by Higgins (2012) for the entire period (green) and the 1900–2007 period (red) are shown for reference.

Download

Below ∼50 m depth, however, there is an abrupt inflection to continuously decreasing MFP to the bottom of the core (Fig. 5b). Horizontal advection generates a decline in MFP of approximately 7 percentage points from 50 m depth to the end of the core. Presented in terms of simulated age (rather than depth), this amounts to an apparent reduction in melting of 0.04 percentage points per year that arises from horizontal ice flow and not time changes in climate. As discussed below, this is a nontrivial magnitude when scaled against changes in melt arising from warming climate.

4 Discussion
Back to toptop

4.1 Uncertainty due to infiltration

The choice of meltwater infiltration scheme has a large effect on the simulated impacts of horizontal advection of firn in the percolation zone and is a key uncertainty in the fidelity of model results. In reality, water moves vertically as a wetting front propagating downward from the surface (Colbeck, 1975) but also by complex and inhomogeneous infiltration processes (Marsh and Woo, 1984; Pfeffer and Humphrey, 1996), and it can be routed horizontally along impermeable ice layers (e.g., Machguth et al., 2016). With so little known about deep infiltration, none of our schemes are likely to be entirely accurate: the Reeh et al. (2005) scheme only allows melt penetration within the annual snow increment, which is known to be incorrect, especially low in the percolation zone, where melt rates are high (e.g., Humphrey et al., 2012); the continuum model (Meyer and Hewitt, 2017) uses the most complex physics but has large uncertainties for coefficients of permeability and grain sizes; and the bucket model (Kuipers Munneke et al., 2014; Ligtenberg et al., 2018) disregards the complex physics governing flow of water through the firn matrix, simplifying the problem to just density and cold content and assuming the flow of meltwater is instantaneous.

With horizontal advection of firn tending to move open pore space underneath an increasingly melting surface, the depth and quantity of infiltration are key: the deeper melt penetrates, the more the deep pore space is “overprinted” by surface melt and not preserved. Alternatively, infiltration that is limited to shallow depths enhances the disparity between deep firn and that nearer to the surface. Our suite of model runs show that, in the lower percolation zone, the choice of infiltration scheme has nearly equivalent impact on the total air content as the incorporation of ice flow.

4.2 Spatial variability of firn structure

Simulation results demonstrate the changing influence of horizontal advection on firn structure in response to changing climate gradients and ice speed as the firn parcel traverses the percolation zone. Transect modeling indicates that along any given flow line the influence of advection tends to increase towards the lower percolation zone; this is an intuitive result considering that surface speed and slope (a proxy for climate gradients) both increase substantially relative to the upper percolation zone and that the surface experiences heavy melt (Supplement Fig. S3). Sensitivity testing showed that each of these factors amplifies differences between 2D and 1D representations of deep firn structure.

Transect modeling also reveals that ice flow introduces variability in firn structure around the ice sheet, not just along individual flow lines. Surface speeds within the GrIS percolation zone shown in Fig. 1 vary from nearly 0 to more than 1000 m a−1. The K-transect as well as the EGIG and Jakobshavn transects demonstrates the differences in firn structure that can develop regionally across western Greenland as a result of ice flow patterns (Fig. 3). However, the EGIG and Jakobshavn simulations show that advection can also influence firn structure at a more local scale. Despite being separated by just ∼40 km, differences in surface speed develop between the two transects in the lower 20–30 km as ice in the Jakobshavn transect accelerates towards the margin (Fig. S3). This results in a simulated firn column that is 5–10 m thicker compared to the nearby EGIG profile at the same elevation. While the local gradients in ice speed are perhaps greater here than nearly anywhere else on the ice sheet, the local and regional differences in our simulated transects illustrate that differences in deep firn structure are likely to exist in regions of the GrIS percolation zone with otherwise similar climate conditions purely as a result of differences in ice flow patterns and topography that dictate spatial gradients in climate.

4.3 Melt feature stratigraphy

A 152 m long ice core collected at Crawford Point in 2007 (Higgins, 2012; Porter and Mosley-Thompson, 2014) offers the opportunity to compare measured data against our modeled depth change in MFP stemming from horizontal advection. The core age extends back to the year 1765 based on seasonal isotope variations, and the modeled flow field shows the bottom of the core originated ∼260 years prior and about ∼22 km up the flow line (Fig. 5a). Thus, the flow model age estimate at the core bottom is within 7 % of the age determined by isotope methods. Higgins (2012) measured an overall trend of increasing MFP from 1765 to 2007 of 0.08 percentage points per year. However, melt events prior to 1900 were minor and infrequent; the more recent trend from 1900 to 2007 therefore increased to 0.11 percentage points per year.

The horizontal advection signal is also highly dependent on the defined time period but for another reason: different time periods sample different spatial gradients of the ice sheet surface as firn moves across the percolation zone. At Crawford Point, the MFP signal in firn from recent decades has almost no influence from horizontal advection because this firn has formed along a local flat region in the topography extending about 5 km upflow from the site (Fig. 5a). Further inland, surface elevation (and therefore climate) gradients increase. Older firn sourced from these regions displays less melt and a lower MFP.

Over the period 1765–2007, an MFP trend of 0.08 percentage points per year was observed in the core (Higgins, 2012) compared to 0.03 percentage points per year in our model that includes ice flow but no warming. This indicates that more than one-third of the MFP trend over the entire core can be attributed to advection (Fig. 5b). However, focusing on the more recent period of 1900–2007, our simulation indicates a reduction in the advection-controlled MFP trend to 0.02 percentage points per year. The decreased influence of advection on the MFP trend in this recent interval, coupled with the increasing MFP events measured in the core, supports the conclusion that climate has warmed during this period. Nevertheless, our results illustrate that the stratigraphy of melt features along an ice core from the percolation zone can have a complex spatial component that should be evaluated to properly interpret temporal change.

While the MFP trend at Crawford Point is impacted by horizontal advection, simulated profiles of firn density and temperature have little influence from the advection process relative to lower on the transect (Fig. 3). This result may seem counterintuitive. However, the density and temperature fields evolve over a time–space continuum, whereas the MFP record represents a small time trend in the occurrence of discrete events. Occasional thin ice layers, which are easily identified in cores, can have little impact on the bulk density of the core. Further, the magnitude of trends sets the importance of horizontal advection in an MFP record. In the Crawford case, the multidecadal trend in MFP due to changing melt is a fraction of a percentage point per year, an important indicator of changing climate but not large enough to completely mask the signal from horizontal advection. Thus, because important climate change signals can be on par with the advection signal, the process should be considered in interpretations of MFP records.

Certainly some locations in the percolation zone may yield ice cores with MFP trends that are not significantly impacted by ice flow. But considering the potential for ice flow to obscure climate trends, a simple procedure for quantifying this effect has utility. If the present ice sheet state (speed, accumulation, and melt rates) is assumed to be constant in time, an apparent climate signal at any core site can be quantified from spatially extensive datasets of the above variables. At a dated core depth corresponding to a time t years before present, the firn parcel originated at a location x(t), which is the integral of the spatially varying velocity v along the flow line over t years, up-glacier from the core location:

(5)xt=-0tv(x)dt.

The MFP at time t can therefore be determined from the accumulation and melt conditions at this up-glacier location:

(6)MFPx=mxbx

Equations (5) and (6) can thus be combined to generate a time series of the MFP at a core site that represents the signature of climate gradients having been advected down-glacier by ice flow, the component of the MFP that could incorrectly be interpreted as time-changing climate.

5 Conclusions
Back to toptop

Elevated horizontal ice flow in the percolation zone compared to ice divides results in a firn column that is not always well represented by 1D models for time-evolving density and temperature. The impacts of horizontal advection are highly variable around the ice sheet, but accounting for horizontal advection in simulations can change the firn's air content by tens of percent and the temperature can differ by several degrees. Lower accumulation, higher velocity, higher melt, and steeper topography (which drives climate gradients) all increase the mismatch between surface and deep conditions, exacerbating the shortcomings of a 1D simulation. The horizontal advection process thus has greatest influence on firn evolution in the lower accumulation zone (e.g., 20–30 km) – a nexus of conditions that are likely migrating upward as climate warms but are also subject to the greatest uncertainty regarding melt infiltration processes.

The 2D evolution of firn in the percolation zone is influenced by topography: horizontally invariant firn is generated in flat regions, whereas local hills and swales enhance the 2D influences from horizontal advection. The deeper meltwater penetrates, the more pore space is filled by surface melt, and the advected deep pore space and cold content are not preserved. The stratigraphy of melt features along an ice core from the percolation zone can have a strong spatially derived component. Melt feature stratigraphy can be impacted by horizontal advection high in the percolation zone, where firn density and temperature are relatively unaffected by ice flow. This effect must be evaluated to properly interpret temporal changes in ice cores related to climate, especially over decadal and longer timescales.

Code and data availability
Back to toptop
Code and data availability. 

All model simulations are available at https://github.com/um-qssi/Firn_advection (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3860190), last access: 7 January 2020 (Leorosie, 2020).

Supplement
Back to toptop
Supplement. 

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1703-2020-supplement.

Author contributions
Back to toptop
Author contributions. 

RL, JH, and TM designed the approach, which RL then carried out. RL prepared the manuscript with contributions from JH, TM, and NH.

Competing interests
Back to toptop
Competing interests. 

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
Back to toptop
Acknowledgements. 

Funded by NSF grants 1717241 (Harper, Meierbachtol) and 1717939 (Humphrey) and a Montana NASA Space Grant Fellowship (Leone). The authors thank Jesse Johnson for discussions and Baptiste Vandecrux and an anonymous reviewer, whose careful reviews improved the manuscript.

Financial support
Back to toptop
Financial support. 

This research has been supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant no. 1717241, 1717939).

Review statement
Back to toptop
Review statement. 

This paper was edited by Stef Lhermitte and reviewed by Baptiste Vandecrux and one anonymous referee.

References
Back to toptop

Alley, R. B. and Bentley, C. R.: Ice-Core Analysis on the Siple Coast of West Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol., 11, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.3189/s0260305500006236, 1988. 

Arthern, R. J. and Wingham, D. J.: The natural fluctuations of firn densification and their effect on the geodetic determination of ice sheet mass balance, Clim. Change, 40, 605–624, 1998. 

Braithwaite, R. J., Laternser, M., and Pfeffer, W. T.: Variations of near-surface firn density in the lower accumulation area of the Greenland ice sheet, Pakitsoq, West Greenland, J. Glaciol., 40, 477–485, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002214300001234X, 1994. 

Colbeck, S. C.: A theory for water flow through a layered snowpack, Water Resour. Res., 11, 261–266, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR011i002p00261, 1975. 

Coléou, C. and Lesaffre, B.: Irreducible water saturation in snow: experimental results in a cold laboratory, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 64–68, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998aog26-1-64-68, 1998. 

Ettema, J., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Van Meijgaard, E., Van De Berg, W. J., Bamber, J. L., Box, J. E., and Bales, R. C.: Higher surface mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet revealed by high-resolution climate modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 4–8, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038110, 2009. 

Fausto, R. S., Ahlstrøm, A. P., Van As, D., Johnsen, S. J., Langen, P. L., and Steffen, K.: Improving surface boundary conditions with focus on coupling snow densification and meltwater retention in large-scale ice-sheet models of Greenland, J. Glaciol., 55, 869–878, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309790152537, 2009. 

Fettweis, X., Tedesco, M., van den Broeke, M., and Ettema, J.: Melting trends over the Greenland ice sheet (1958–2009) from spaceborne microwave data and regional climate models, The Cryosphere, 5, 359–375, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-359-2011, 2011. 

Forster, R. R., Box, J. E., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Miège, C., Burgess, E. W., Van Angelen, J. H., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Koenig, L. S., Paden, J., Lewis, C., Gogineni, S. P., Leuschen, C., and McConnell, J. R.: Extensive liquid meltwater storage in firn within the Greenland ice sheet, Nat. Geosci., 7, 95–98, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2043, 2014. 

Graeter, K. A., Osterberg, E. C., Ferris, D. G., Hawley, R. L., Marshall, H. P., Lewis, G., Meehan, T., McCarthy, F., Overly, T., and Birkel, S. D.: Ice Core Records of West Greenland Melt and Climate Forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 3164–3172, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076641, 2018. 

Harper, J., Humphrey, N., Pfeffer, W. T., Brown, J., and Fettweis, X.: Greenland ice-sheet contribution to sea-level rise buffered by meltwater storage in firn, Nature, 491, 240–243, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11566, 2012. 

Herron, M. M. and Langway, C. C.: Firn densification: an empirical model, J. Glaciol., 25, 373–385, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000015239, 1980. 

Higgins, L.: Construction and Analysis of an Ice Core-Derived Melt History from West Central Greenland (1765–2006), The Ohio State University, 100 pp., 2012. 

Humphrey, N. F., Harper, J. T., and Pfeffer, W. T.: Thermal tracking of meltwater retention in Greenland's accumulation area, J. Geophys. Res., 117, F01010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002083, 2012. 

Janssens, I. and Huybrechts, P.: The treatment of meltwater retention in mass-balance parameterizations of the Greenland ice sheet, Ann. Glaciol., 31, 133–140, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756400781819941, 2000. 

Joughin, I., Smith, B. E., Howat, I. M., Scambos, T., and Moon, T.: Greenland flow variability from ice-sheet-wide velocity mapping, J. Glaciol., 56, 415–430, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310792447734, 2010. 

Kameda, T., Arita, N., Ulii, F., and Atanabe, W.: Melt features in ice cores from Site J, southern Greenland: some implications for summer climate since AD 1550, Ann. Glaciol., 21, 51–58, 1995. 

Koerner, R. M.: Devon Island Ice Cap: Core Stratigraphy and Paleoclimate, Science, 196, 15–18, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.196.4285.15, 1977. 

Kuipers Munneke, P., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Van Angelen, J. H., and Forster, R. R.: Explaining the presence of perennial liquid water bodies in the firn of the Greenland Ice Sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 476–483, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058389, 2014. 

Leorosie: um-qssi/Firn_advection: UM-QSSI 2D Firn Advection (Version v1.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3860190, 2020. 

Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Kuipers Munneke, P., Noël, B. P. Y., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Brief communication: Improved simulation of the present-day Greenland firn layer (1960–2016), The Cryosphere, 12, 1643–1649, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1643-2018, 2018. 

Logg, A., Mardal, K.-A., and Wells, G. (Eds.): Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 723 pp., 2012. 

Lundin, J. M. D., Stevens, C. M., Arthern, R., Buizert, C., Orsi, A., Ligtenberg, S. R. M., Simonsen, S. B., Cummings, E., Essery, R., Leahy, W., Harris, P., Helsen, M. M., and Waddington, E. D.: Firn Model Intercomparison Experiment (FirnMICE), J. Glaciol., 63, 401–422, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.114, 2017. 

Machguth, H., Macferrin, M., Van As, D., Box, J. E., Charalampidis, C., Colgan, W., Fausto, R. S., Meijer, H. A. J., Mosley-Thompson, E., and Van De Wal, R. S. W.: Greenland meltwater storage in firn limited by near-surface ice formation, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 390–393, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2899, 2016. 

Marsh, P. and Woo, M.-K.: Wetting front advance and freezing of meltwater within a snow cover: 1. Observations in the Canadian Arctic, Water Resour. Res., 20, 1853–1864, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i012p01853, 1984. 

Meyer, C. R. and Hewitt, I. J.: A continuum model for meltwater flow through compacting snow, The Cryosphere, 11, 2799–2813, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2799-2017, 2017. 

Morlighem, M., Williams, C. N., Rignot, E., An, L., Arndt, J. E., Bamber, J. L., Catania, G., Chauché, N., Dowdeswell, J. A., Dorschel, B., Fenty, I., Hogan, K., Howat, I., Hubbard, A., Jakobsson, M., Jordan, T. M., Kjeldsen, K. K., Millan, R., Mayer, L., Mouginot, J., Noël, B. P. Y., O'Cofaigh, C., Palmer, S., Rysgaard, S., Seroussi, H., Siegert, M. J., Slabon, P., Straneo, F., van den Broeke, M. R., Weinrebe, W., Wood, M., and Zinglersen, K. B.: BedMachine v3: Complete Bed Topography and Ocean Bathymetry Mapping of Greenland From Multibeam Echo Sounding Combined With Mass Conservation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 11051–11061, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074954, 2017.  

Mote, T. L.: Greenland surface melt trends 1973–2007: Evidence of a large increase in 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031976, 2007. 

Noël, B., van de Berg, W. J., van Wessem, J. M., van Meijgaard, E., van As, D., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lhermitte, S., Kuipers Munneke, P., Smeets, C. J. P. P., van Ulft, L. H., van de Wal, R. S. W., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Modelling the climate and surface mass balance of polar ice sheets using RACMO2 – Part 1: Greenland (1958–2016), The Cryosphere, 12, 811–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-811-2018, 2018. 

Pfeffer, W. T. and Humphrey, N. F.: Determination of timing and location of water movement and ice-layer formation by temperature measurements in sub-freezing snow, J. Glaciol., 42, 292–304, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000004159, 1996. 

Porter, S. E. and Mosley-Thompson, E.: Exploring seasonal accumulation bias in a west central Greenland ice core with observed and reanalyzed data, J. Glaciol., 60, 1093–1100, https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG13J233, 2014. 

Reeh, N., Fisher, D. A., Koerner, R. M., and Clausen, H. B.: An empirical firn-densification model comprising ice lenses, Ann. Glaciol., 42, 101–106, 2005. 

Reijmer, C. H., van den Broeke, M. R., Fettweis, X., Ettema, J., and Stap, L. B.: Refreezing on the Greenland ice sheet: a comparison of parameterizations, The Cryosphere, 6, 743–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-743-2012, 2012. 

Robin, G. de Q.: Glaciology III: Seismic Shooting and related investigations, Norsk Polarinstitutt., 1958. 

Tedesco, M.: Snowmelt detection over the Greenland ice sheet from SSM/I brightness temperature daily variations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028466, 2007. 

Tedesco, M., Fettweis, X., Mote, T., Wahr, J., Alexander, P., Box, J. E., and Wouters, B.: Evidence and analysis of 2012 Greenland records from spaceborne observations, a regional climate model and reanalysis data, The Cryosphere, 7, 615–630, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-615-2013, 2013. 

Trusel, L. D., Das, S. B., Osman, M. B., Evans, M. J., Smith, B. E., Fettweis, X., McConnell, J. R., Noël, B. P. Y., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Nonlinear rise in Greenland runoff in response to post-industrial Arctic warming, Nature, 564, 104–108, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0752-4, 2018. 

Van Angelen, J. H., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Van Den Broeke, M. R., Fettweis, X., and Van Meijgaard, E.: Rapid loss of firn pore space accelerates 21st century Greenland mass loss, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2109–2113, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50490, 2013. 

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Horizontal ice flow transports the firn layer of Greenland’s Percolation Zone as it undergoes burial by accumulation. Here we show that the firn density and temperature fields can reflect horizontal advection of the firn column across climate gradients, the magnitude of which varies around the ice sheet. Further, time series of melt features in ice cores from the percolation zone can contain a signature from ice motion that should not be conflated with that from climate change.
Horizontal ice flow transports the firn layer of Greenland’s Percolation Zone as it undergoes...
Citation