Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.713 IF 4.713
  • IF 5-year value: 4.927 IF 5-year
    4.927
  • CiteScore value: 8.0 CiteScore
    8.0
  • SNIP value: 1.425 SNIP 1.425
  • IPP value: 4.65 IPP 4.65
  • SJR value: 2.353 SJR 2.353
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 71 Scimago H
    index 71
  • h5-index value: 53 h5-index 53
TC | Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
The Cryosphere, 13, 1051–1071, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1051-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Cryosphere, 13, 1051–1071, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1051-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 02 Apr 2019

Research article | 02 Apr 2019

A multi-season investigation of glacier surface roughness lengths through in situ and remote observation

Noel Fitzpatrick et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,453 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
956 474 23 1,453 24 23
  • HTML: 956
  • PDF: 474
  • XML: 23
  • Total: 1,453
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Nov 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,116 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 10 Aug 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Measurements of surface roughness are rare on glaciers, despite being an important control for heat exchange with the atmosphere and surface melt. In this study, roughness values were determined through measurements at multiple locations and seasons and found to vary across glacier surfaces and to differ from commonly assumed values in melt models. Two new methods that remotely determine roughness from digital elevation models returned good performance and may facilitate improved melt modelling.
Measurements of surface roughness are rare on glaciers, despite being an important control for...
Citation