the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Investigation of spatiotemporal variability of melt pond fraction and its relationship with sea ice extent during 2000–2017 using a new data
Abstract. The accurate knowledge of variations of melt ponds is important for understanding Arctic energy budget due to its albedo-transmittance-melt feedback. In this study, we develop and validate a new method for retrieving melt pond fraction (MPF) from the MODIS surface reflectance. We construct an ensemble-based deep neural network and use in-situ observations of MPF from multi-sources to train the network. The results show that our derived MPF is in good agreement with the observations, and relatively outperforms the MPF retrieved by University of Hamburg. Built on this, we create a new MPF data from 2000 to 2017 (the longest data in our knowledge), and analyze the spatial and temporal variability of MPF. It is found that the MPF has significant increasing trends from late July to early September, which is largely contributed by the MPF over the first-year sea ice. The analysis based on our MPF during 2000–2017 confirms that the integrated MPF to late June does promise to improve the prediction skill of seasonal Arctic sea ice minimum. However, our MPF data shows concentrated significant correlations first appear in a band, extending from the eastern Beaufort Sea, through the central Arctic, to the northern East Siberian and Laptev Seas in early-mid June, and then shifts towards large areas of the Beaufort Sea, Canadian Arctic, the northern Greenland Sea and the central Arctic basin.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(5274 KB)
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Very good approach but with a major flaw', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Sep 2019
-
AC1: 'Preliminary response to comments by Anonymous Referee #1', Yifan Ding, 24 Sep 2019
-
RC2: 'Problem of different spatial scales and correlated measurements.', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2019
- AC2: 'Response to reviewer1', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
-
RC2: 'Problem of different spatial scales and correlated measurements.', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2019
-
AC1: 'Preliminary response to comments by Anonymous Referee #1', Yifan Ding, 24 Sep 2019
-
SC1: 'Comment to tc-2019-208 by Stefan Kern', Stefan Kern, 05 Nov 2019
- AC3: 'Response to the short comments', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
-
RC3: 'Comment on tc-2019-208', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Response to reviewer2', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Very good approach but with a major flaw', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Sep 2019
-
AC1: 'Preliminary response to comments by Anonymous Referee #1', Yifan Ding, 24 Sep 2019
-
RC2: 'Problem of different spatial scales and correlated measurements.', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2019
- AC2: 'Response to reviewer1', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
-
RC2: 'Problem of different spatial scales and correlated measurements.', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Sep 2019
-
AC1: 'Preliminary response to comments by Anonymous Referee #1', Yifan Ding, 24 Sep 2019
-
SC1: 'Comment to tc-2019-208 by Stefan Kern', Stefan Kern, 05 Nov 2019
- AC3: 'Response to the short comments', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
-
RC3: 'Comment on tc-2019-208', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Response to reviewer2', Yifan Ding, 08 Mar 2020
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,090 | 488 | 89 | 1,667 | 109 | 81 |
- HTML: 1,090
- PDF: 488
- XML: 89
- Total: 1,667
- BibTeX: 109
- EndNote: 81
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1