Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-174
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-174
18 Sep 2019
 | 18 Sep 2019
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements

Leif S. Anderson, Robert S. Anderson, Pascal Buri, and William H. Armstrong

Abstract. The mass balance of many Alaskan glaciers is perturbed by debris cover. Yet the effect of debris on glacier response to climate change in Alaska has largely been overlooked. In three companion papers we assess the role of debris, ice dynamics, and surface processes in thinning Kennicott Glacier. In Part A, we report in situ measurements from the glacier surface. In Part B, we develop a method to delineate ice cliffs using high-resolution imagery and produce distributed mass balance estimates. In Part C we explore feedbacks that contribute to glacier thinning.

Here in Part A, we describe data collected in the summer of 2011. We measured debris thickness (109 locations), sub-debris melt (74), and ice cliff backwasting (60) data from the debris-covered tongue. We also measured air-temperature (3 locations) and internal-debris temperature (10). The mean debris thermal conductivity was 1.06 W (m C)−1, increasing non-linearly with debris thickness. Mean debris thicknesses increase toward the terminus and margin where surface velocities are low. Despite the relatively high air temperatures above thick debris, the melt-insulating effect of debris dominates. Sub-debris melt rates ranged from 6.5 cm d−1 where debris is thin to 1.25 cm d−1 where debris is thick near the terminus. Ice cliff backwasting rates varied from 3 to 14 cm d−1 with a mean of 7.1 cm d−1 and tended to increase as elevation declined and debris thickness increased. Ice cliff backwasting rates are similar to those measured on debris-covered glaciers in High Mountain Asia and the Alps.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Leif S. Anderson, Robert S. Anderson, Pascal Buri, and William H. Armstrong

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Leif S. Anderson, Robert S. Anderson, Pascal Buri, and William H. Armstrong
Leif S. Anderson, Robert S. Anderson, Pascal Buri, and William H. Armstrong

Viewed

Total article views: 1,218 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
821 325 72 1,218 77 72
  • HTML: 821
  • PDF: 325
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 1,218
  • BibTeX: 77
  • EndNote: 72
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,020 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,019 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Mar 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Thick rock cover (or debris) disturbs the melt of many Alaskan glaciers. Yet the effect of debris on glacier thinning in Alaska has been overlooked. In three companion papers we assess the role of debris and ice flow on the thinning of Kennicott Glacier. In Part A, we report measurements from the glacier surface. We measured surface debris thickness, melt under debris, and the rate of ice cliff backwasting. These data allow for further studies linking debris to glacier shrinkage in Alaska.