the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements
Abstract. The mass balance of many Alaskan glaciers is perturbed by debris cover. Yet the effect of debris on glacier response to climate change in Alaska has largely been overlooked. In three companion papers we assess the role of debris, ice dynamics, and surface processes in thinning Kennicott Glacier. In Part A, we report in situ measurements from the glacier surface. In Part B, we develop a method to delineate ice cliffs using high-resolution imagery and produce distributed mass balance estimates. In Part C we explore feedbacks that contribute to glacier thinning.
Here in Part A, we describe data collected in the summer of 2011. We measured debris thickness (109 locations), sub-debris melt (74), and ice cliff backwasting (60) data from the debris-covered tongue. We also measured air-temperature (3 locations) and internal-debris temperature (10). The mean debris thermal conductivity was 1.06 W (m C)−1, increasing non-linearly with debris thickness. Mean debris thicknesses increase toward the terminus and margin where surface velocities are low. Despite the relatively high air temperatures above thick debris, the melt-insulating effect of debris dominates. Sub-debris melt rates ranged from 6.5 cm d−1 where debris is thin to 1.25 cm d−1 where debris is thick near the terminus. Ice cliff backwasting rates varied from 3 to 14 cm d−1 with a mean of 7.1 cm d−1 and tended to increase as elevation declined and debris thickness increased. Ice cliff backwasting rates are similar to those measured on debris-covered glaciers in High Mountain Asia and the Alps.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(5359 KB)
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Anderson et al.', David Rounce, 16 Oct 2019
- AC1: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC2: 'Review of Anderson et al., Part A', Evan Miles, 29 Oct 2019
- AC2: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Anderson et al.', David Rounce, 16 Oct 2019
- AC1: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
-
RC2: 'Review of Anderson et al., Part A', Evan Miles, 29 Oct 2019
- AC2: 'Thank you kindly for your thoughtful review!', Leif Anderson, 15 Feb 2020
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
918 | 345 | 86 | 1,349 | 95 | 89 |
- HTML: 918
- PDF: 345
- XML: 86
- Total: 1,349
- BibTeX: 95
- EndNote: 89
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1