Articles | Volume 9, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1343-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1343-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 Jul 2015
Research article |
| 22 Jul 2015
Site-level model intercomparison of high latitude and high altitude soil thermal dynamics in tundra and barren landscapes
Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM) and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
S. Chadburn
Earth System Sciences, Laver Building, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
N. Chaudhary
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
L. H. Hajdu
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
A. Marmy
Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
S. Peng
CNRS and Université Grenoble Alpes, LGGE, 38041, Grenoble, France
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Potsdam, Germany
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
A. D. Friend
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
G. Krinner
CNRS and Université Grenoble Alpes, LGGE, 38041, Grenoble, France
M. Langer
CNRS and Université Grenoble Alpes, LGGE, 38041, Grenoble, France
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Potsdam, Germany
P. A. Miller
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
C. Beer
Department of Applied Environmental Science (ITM) and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Viewed
Total article views: 6,007 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Sep 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,221 | 2,546 | 240 | 6,007 | 380 | 226 | 295 |
- HTML: 3,221
- PDF: 2,546
- XML: 240
- Total: 6,007
- Supplement: 380
- BibTeX: 226
- EndNote: 295
Total article views: 4,519 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Jul 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,683 | 1,627 | 209 | 4,519 | 380 | 198 | 275 |
- HTML: 2,683
- PDF: 1,627
- XML: 209
- Total: 4,519
- Supplement: 380
- BibTeX: 198
- EndNote: 275
Total article views: 1,488 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Sep 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 538 | 919 | 31 | 1,488 | 28 | 20 |
- HTML: 538
- PDF: 919
- XML: 31
- Total: 1,488
- BibTeX: 28
- EndNote: 20
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Short summary
This paper compares the performance of different land models in estimating soil thermal regimes at distinct cold region landscape types. Comparing models with different processes reveal the importance of surface insulation (snow/moss layer) and soil internal processes (heat/water transfer). The importance of model processes also depend on site conditions such as high/low snow cover, dry/wet soil types.
This paper compares the performance of different land models in estimating soil thermal regimes...
