Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4011-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4011-2024
Research article
 | 
05 Sep 2024
Research article |  | 05 Sep 2024

Hysteresis of idealized, instability-prone outlet glaciers in response to pinning-point buttressing variation

Johannes Feldmann, Anders Levermann, and Ricarda Winkelmann

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (27 May 2024) by Felicity McCormack
AR by Johannes Feldmann on behalf of the Authors (20 Jun 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (30 Jun 2024) by Felicity McCormack
AR by Johannes Feldmann on behalf of the Authors (02 Jul 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (19 Jul 2024) by Felicity McCormack
AR by Johannes Feldmann on behalf of the Authors (23 Jul 2024)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Here we show in simplified simulations that the (ir)reversibility of the retreat of instability-prone, Antarctica-type glaciers can strongly depend on the depth of the bed depression they rest on. If it is sufficiently deep, then the destabilized glacier does not recover from its collapsed state. Our results suggest that glaciers resting on a wide and deep bed depression, such as Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier, are particularly susceptible to irreversible retreat.