Dear Javier Blasco,
thank your for your final author comments for the TC Discussion phase of your manuscript. Given the reviews I am happy to consider your revised manuscript for publication in TC. Please provide a point-by-point account to the reviewer's comments accompanying the revised manuscript.
Best Regards,
Olaf Eisen

Dear Javier Blasco and co-authors,

thank you for providing a revised version for your manuscript. I find that you adequately considered the questions and comments of the reviewers adequately in your reply and revised the manuscript accordingly. I am therefore accepting your manuscript for publication in TC. Nevertheless, I have a few minor technical comments which I ask you to consider before uploading the final version (see below).

Best Regards

Olaf Eisen
Co-Editor in Chief, The Cryosphere

p3l6: 10 degree -> 10 °C

p11l3: 2000 m: clarify if you mean meter below sea level

p12l23: edit in LaTeX to: ice shelf--sea ice—ocean

p14l2: add „a“: via a subgrid

p15l16: resultion -> resolutions

SM:

Fig. 1 & 2: please move numbers below every sub-panel down a bit to not overlap with the figure, for better readibility.

Fig. 8: Why do you indicate CNRM-CM5 mass loss only as <0 but not with the actual value?

Please check the manuscript and the supplement for cases, where you miss a blank between a digit and the unit, e.g. 16km should be 16 km.