Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
The Cryosphere, 15, 1537–1550, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1537-2021
The Cryosphere, 15, 1537–1550, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1537-2021

Research article 26 Mar 2021

Research article | 26 Mar 2021

Radiocarbon dating of alpine ice cores with the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction

Radiocarbon dating of alpine ice cores with the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction
Ling Fang1,2,3, Theo M. Jenk1,3, Thomas Singer1,2,3, Shugui Hou4,5, and Margit Schwikowski1,2,3 Ling Fang et al.
  • 1Laboratory for Environmental Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
  • 3Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
  • 4School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
  • 5School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Correspondence: Theo M. Jenk (theo.jenk@psi.ch)

Abstract

High-alpine glaciers are valuable archives of past climatic and environmental conditions. The interpretation of the preserved signal requires a precise chronology. Radiocarbon (14C) dating of the water-insoluble organic carbon (WIOC) fraction has become an important dating tool to constrain the age of ice cores from mid-latitude and low-latitude glaciers. However, in some cases this method is restricted by the low WIOC concentration in the ice. In this work, we report first 14C dating results using the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction, which is present at concentrations of at least a factor of 2 higher than the WIOC fraction. We evaluated this new approach by comparison to the established WIO14C dating based on parallel ice core sample sections from four different Eurasian glaciers covering an age range of several hundred to around 20 000 years; 14C dating of the two fractions yielded comparable ages, with WIO14C revealing a slight, barely significant, systematic offset towards older ages comparable in magnitude with the analytical uncertainty. We attribute this offset to two effects of about equal size but opposite in direction: (i) in-situ-produced 14C contributing to the DOC resulting in a bias towards younger ages and (ii) incompletely removed carbonates from particulate mineral dust (14C-depleted) contributing to the WIOC fraction with a bias towards older ages. The estimated amount of in-situ-produced 14C in the DOC fraction is smaller than the analytical uncertainty for most samples. Nevertheless, under extreme conditions, such as very high altitude and/or low snow accumulation rates, DO14C dating results need to be interpreted cautiously. While during DOC extraction the removal of inorganic carbon is monitored for completeness, the removal for WIOC samples was so far only assumed to be quantitative, at least for ice samples containing average levels of mineral dust. Here we estimated an average removal efficiency of 98±2 %, resulting in a small offset of the order of the current analytical uncertainty. Future optimization of the removal procedure has the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of WIO14C dating. With this study we demonstrate that using the DOC fraction for 14C dating not only is a valuable alternative to the use of WIOC but also benefits from a reduced required ice mass of typically ∼250g to achieve comparable precision of around ±200 years. This approach thus has the potential of pushing radiocarbon dating of ice forward even to remote regions where the carbon content in the ice is particularly low.

1 Introduction

For a meaningful interpretation of the recorded palaeoclimate signals in ice cores from glacier archives, an accurate chronology is essential. Annual layer counting, supported by and tied to independent time markers such as the 1963 nuclear fallout horizon evident by a peak maximum in tritium or other radioisotopes or distinct signals from known volcanic eruptions in the past, is the fundamental and most accurate technique used for ice core dating. However, for ice cores from high-alpine glaciers this approach is limited to a few centuries only because of the exceptionally strong thinning of annual layers in the vicinity of the bedrock. Most of the current analytical techniques do not allow high enough sampling resolution for resolving seasonal fluctuations or detecting distinct single events in this depth range. Ice flow models, which are widely used to retrieve full-depth age scales (e.g. Nye, 1963; Bolzan, 1985; Thompson et al., 2006), also fail in the deepest part of high-alpine glaciers due to the assumption of steady-state conditions and the complexity of glacial flow and bedrock geometry limiting realistic modelling of strain rates. Even with 3D models, which require extensive geometrical data, it is highly challenging to simulate a reasonable bottom age (e.g. Licciulli et al., 2020). This emphasizes the need for an absolute dating tool applicable to the oldest bottom parts of cores from these sites.

Radioactive isotopes contained in the ice offer the opportunity to obtain absolute ages of an ice sample. For millennial-scale ice cores, 14C dating is the technique of choice. With a half-life of 5370 years, dating in the age range from ∼250 years to up to 10 half-lives is theoretically possible, covering the time range accessible by alpine glaciers in the vast majority of cases (Uglietti et al., 2016). The 14C dating approach using water-insoluble organic carbon (WIOC) from glacier ice has become a well-established technique for ice core dating, and its accuracy was recently validated (Uglietti et al., 2016). Ice samples from mid- and low-latitude glaciers can now be dated with a reasonable uncertainty of 10 %–20 %. Ice sample masses of 200–800 g are usually selected to aim for >10µg carbon for 14C analysis with accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), whereby the respective mass depends on sample age and organic carbon concentrations (Jenk et al., 2007, 2009; Sigl et al., 2009; Uglietti et al., 2016; Hoffmann et al., 2018). Accordingly, the low WIOC concentration in some glaciers and in polar regions and the related large demands of ice mass put a limit to this application. Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in glacier ice are a factor of 2–8 higher compared to typical WIOC concentrations (Legrand et al., 2007, 2013; May et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2021). Using the DOC fraction for 14C dating could therefore reduce the required amount of ice or, for sample sizes similar to what would be needed for 14C dating by WIOC, improve the achievable analytical (dating) precision, which strongly depends on the absolute carbon mass even for state-of-the-art micro-radiocarbon dating. The underlying hypothesis of applying the DOC fraction for 14C dating is the same as for the WIO14C dating approach (Jenk et al., 2006, 2007, 2009). DOC in ice is composed of atmospheric water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) contained in carbonaceous aerosol particles and organic gases taken up during precipitation (Legrand et al., 2013). WSOC is formed in the atmosphere by oxidation of gases emitted from the biosphere or from anthropogenic sources (Legrand et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2021) and subsequent condensation of the less volatile products. Carbonaceous aerosols transported in the atmosphere can be deposited on a glacier by wet and dry deposition. Before the industrial revolution, these organic carbon species, then entirely of non-fossil origin, contain the contemporary atmospheric 14C signal of the time when the snow deposited on the glacier (Jenk et al., 2006). For both WIOC and WSOC, carbon from biomass burning and oceanic organic matter can potentially introduce a reservoir effect (sources of aged carbon). The mixed age of trees in Swiss forests today is estimated to be slightly less than 40 years (Mohn et al., 2008). Back in time, prior to extensive human forest management, the mixed age of trees in Europe was likely older, and the mean age of old-growth-forest wood ranged from around 70 to 300 years depending on the region, i.e. the tree species present (Gavin, 2001; Zhang et al., 2017). Prior to the use of fossil fuels about 50 % of WIOC is estimated to originate from biomass burning (Minguillon et al., 2011). For biogenic DOC, May et al. (2013) estimated a turnover time of around 3 to 5 years, corresponding to a 20 % contribution from biomass burning. With a mean age of burned material (aged wood plus grass and bushes) of 150±100 years, this results in a potential inbuilt age from biomass burning for WIOC and DOC of 75±50 and 30±20 years, respectively. Such an inbuilt age is negligible considering the analytical uncertainty, which is similarly the case for a bias from oceanic sources since concentrations of marine organic tracers are more than 1 order of magnitude lower than terrestrial tracers for the vast majority of glacier sites. This conclusion is supported by the fact that Uglietti et al. (2016) did not identify such a bias when comparing WIO14C ages with ages derived by independent methods.

For analysing DO14C in ice cores, one of the major limitations is the relatively low extraction efficiency, ranging from 64 % (Steier et al., 2013) to 96 % (May et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2019), and the high risk of sample contamination (Legrand et al., 2013) potentially introduced during drilling, storage and sample processing. A first attempt to use DOC for 14C dating of ice samples was conducted by May (2009) using a set-up for a combined analysis of both the DOC and WIOC fraction with subsequent radiocarbon micro-analysis. However, these first results suggested a potential in situ production of 14C in the DOC fraction based on the obtained super-modern F14C values (i.e. F14C values higher than ever observed in the recent or past ambient atmosphere). Building on these initial findings, May (2009) questioned the applicability of the DOC fraction for radiocarbon dating. Although the in situ 14C production of 14CO and 14CO2 in air bubbles contained in polar ice has been studied thoroughly and is well understood (Van de Wal et al., 1994; Lal et al., 1997; Smith et al., 2000), possible mechanisms of 14C in situ production followed by formation of organic compounds are not, and only few studies exist to date (Woon, 2002; Hoffmann, 2016). To further explore the potential of DO14C for dating ice, a DOC extraction set-up for radiocarbon analyses was designed and built at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI). In order to minimize potential contamination, the entire system is protected from ambient air by inert gas (helium) flow or vacuum. To maximize the oxidation efficiency, the PSI DOC methodology applies an ultraviolet (UV) photochemical oxidation step supported by addition of Fenton's reagent. The set-up has been characterized by a high extraction efficiency of 96 % and a low overall process blank being superior in the resulting blank-to-sample ratio compared to other systems (Fang et al., 2019). The system can handle samples with volumes of up to ∼350mL. With this volume, samples with DOC concentrations as low as 25–30 µg kg−1 can be analysed, yielding the minimal carbon mass required for reliable 14C analysis (∼10µg C). Pooling samples from several subsequent extractions would be feasible, allowing dating of samples with lower DOC concentration. In this study, we evaluate 14C dating with the DOC fraction by comparing to results from the well-established and validated WIO14C dating method. This is not only analytically highly challenging but also challenging because of the very limited availability of the precious sampling material needed in a rather large quantity (total for both fractions >500g), ideally covering a wide range of ages, from a few hundred to several thousands of years. Here, we succeeded in analysing such parallel samples from four different Eurasian glaciers.

2 Sample preparation and 14C analysis

To validate the DOC 14C dating technique, a total of 17 ice sections from the deep parts of ice cores from the four glaciers Colle Gnifetti, Belukha, Chongce (Core 1) and Shule Nanshan (SLNS) were selected (Fig. 1). They were sampled in parallel to directly compare DOC and WIOC concentrations and 14C dating results. The high-alpine glacier Colle Gnifetti is located in the Monte Rosa massif of the Swiss Alps, close to the Italian border. A 76 m long core was retrieved from the glacier saddle in September 2015 at an altitude of 4450 ma.s.l. (455545.7′′ N, 75230.5′′ E; Sigl et al., 2018), only 16 m away from the location of a previously dated core obtained in 2003 (Jenk et al., 2009). The low annual net accumulation rate at this site (∼0.45mw.e.yr-1) provides access to old ice covering the Holocene (Jenk et al., 2009). Four samples were selected from the bottom 4 m closest to bedrock (72–76 m depth). The Belukha core was drilled in May/June 2018 from the saddle between the two summits of Belukha (494827.7′′ N, 863446.5′′ E; 4055 ma.s.l.), the highest mountain in the Altai mountain range. The bedrock was reached, and the total length of the core is 160 m. Three samples were analysed from the deepest part (158–160 m). Seven and three samples were analysed from the deep parts of SLNS and Chongce, respectively. The SLNS ice core was retrieved in May 2010 from the southern slope of the Shule Nanshan (384219.35′′ N, 971559.70′′ E; 5337 ma.s.l.). The bedrock was reached, and the total length of the ice core is 81.05 m (Hou et al., 2020). The Chongce ice cap is located in the western Kunlun Mountains on the north-western Tibetan Plateau, covering an area of 163.06 km2 with a volume of 38.16 km3 (Hou et al., 2018). The ice analysed in this study was sampled from Chongce Core 1, one of three ice cores drilled in October 2012 (35145.77′′ N, 81715.34′′ E; 6010 ma.s.l.). Two of those cores reached bedrock with lengths of 133.8 m (Core 1) and 135.8 m (Core 2). In 2013, two more ice cores were recovered from a higher altitude of 6100 ma.s.l., reaching bedrock with lengths of 216.6 m (Core 4) and 208.6 m (Core 5) (Hou et al., 2018). The annual net accumulation rate is about 0.14 mw.e.yr-1 for Core 3, located less than 2 km away from Core 1. A summary of the metadata for the study sites and ice cores can be found in the Supplement (Table S1) and details about sampling depths and sample sizes in Tables 1 and 2. No results from any of the cores analysed in this study have been published previously.

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f01

Figure 1Location of the four glaciers Colle Gnifetti, Belukha, Chongce and Shule Nanshan (SLNS). Map made from MATLAB R2019b geobasemap. Colle Gnifetti is located in the Monte Rosa massif in the Swiss Alps; Belukha glacier in the Altai mountain range, Russia; the Chongce ice cap on the north-western Tibetan Plateau, China; and the SLNS at the southern slope of the Shule Nanshan, China.

Table 1WIOC samples analysed from Colle Gnifetti, Belukha, SLNS and Chongce ice cores.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Table 2DOC samples analysed from Colle Gnifetti, Belukha, SLNS and Chongce ice cores.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

All sampled ice sections were decontaminated in a cold room (20 C) by cutting off the surface layer (∼3mm) and each section split into two parallel samples to perform both WIOC and DOC 14C analysis. Samples for WIO14C dating were prepared following the protocol described in Uglietti et al. (2016), with a brief summary provided in the following. In order to remove potential contamination in the outer layer of the ice core, pre-cut samples from the inner part of the core were additionally rinsed with ultra-pure water (Sartorius, 18.2 MΩ cm, TOC < 5 ppb), resulting in sample masses ranging from ∼300 to 600 g (Table 1). To dissolve carbonate potentially present in the ice, melted samples were acidified with HCl to pH < 2 before being sonicated for 5 min. Subsequently, the contained particles were filtered onto pre-baked (heated at 800 C for 5 h) quartz fibre filters (Pallflex Tissueqtz-2500QAT-UP). In a second carbonate removal step, the filters were acidified three times with a total amount of 50 µL 0.2 M HCl, left for 1 h, rinsed with 5 mL ultra-pure water and finally left again for drying. These initial steps were performed in a laminar-flow box to ensure clean conditions. At the Laboratory for the Analysis of Radiocarbon with AMS (LARA) of the University of Bern, the particle samples were then combusted in a thermo-optical OC–EC (organic carbon and elemental carbon) analyser (Model4L, Sunset Laboratory Inc, USA) equipped with a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) cell to quantify the CO2 produced using the well-established Swiss 4S protocol for OC–EC separation (Zhang et al., 2012). Being coupled to a 200 kV compact accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS; MIni CArbon DAting System, MICADAS) equipped with a gas ion source via a Gas Interface System (GIS; Ruff et al., 2007; Synal et al., 2007; Szidat et al., 2014), the LARA Sunset–GIS–AMS system (Agrios et al., 2015; Agrios et al., 2017) allowed for final, direct online 14C measurements of the CO2 produced from the WIOC fraction.

For DO14C analysis, sample preparation follows the procedure described in Fang et al. (2019). After transfer of pre-cut samples to the laboratory and before being melted, samples were further decontaminated in the pre-cleaned melting vessel of the extraction set-up by rinsing with ultra-pure water (sample mass loss of about 20 %–30 %), all performed under a helium atmosphere. Simultaneously, a pre-cleaning step was applied to remove potential contamination in the system. For this, 50 mL ultra-pure water was injected into the reactor and acidified with 1 mL of 85 % H3PO4. To enhance the oxidation efficiency, 2 mL of 100 ppm FeSO4 and 1 mL of 50 mM H2O2 (Fenton's reagent) were also injected into the base water before turning on the UV lights for ∼20min, thereby monitoring the process via the online NDIR CO2 analyser. After the ice melted, the meltwater was filtrated under a helium atmosphere using a pre-baked in-line quartz fibre filter. The sample volume was determined by measuring the reactor fill level. The filtrate was acidified by mixing with the pre-treated base water. After degassing of CO2 from inorganic carbon was completed, as monitored by the CO2 detector, 1 mL of 50 mM H2O2 was injected into the reactor right before the irradiation started. During UV oxidation, water vapour was removed by cryogenic trapping at 60 C, and produced CO2 was trapped in liquid nitrogen. All steps were carried out under a constant flow of helium. The sample CO2 was further cleaned from residual water vapour and quantified manometrically before being sealed into a glass vial for offline 14C analyses. The CO2 gas from DOC in the glass vial was directly injected into the MICADAS using a cracking system for glass vials under vacuum, allowing the CO2 gas to then be carried in a helium flow to the AMS ion source (Wacker et al., 2013). Procedural blanks were determined and continuously monitored by processing and analysing frozen ultra-pure water (Sartorius, 18.2 MΩ cm, TOC < 5 ppb) similar to natural ice samples. They were prepared every time when cutting ice and then processed and analysed along with the samples at least twice a week. Procedural blanks are 1.3±0.6µg C with an F14C of 0.69±0.15 (n=76) and 1.9±1.6µg C with an F14C value of 0.68±0.13 (n=30) for WIOC and DOC, respectively.

All 14C results are expressed as fraction modern (F14C), which is the 14C /12C ratio of the sample divided by the same ratio of the modern standard referenced to the year 1950 (NIST, SRM 4990C, oxalic acid II), both being normalized to 25  in δ13C to account for isotopic fractionation. All AMS F14C values presented here are finally corrected for the system and method characteristic contributions as reported previously (e.g. Uglietti et al., 2016 and Fang et al., 2019). For WIOC analysis using the Sunset–GIS–AMS system this includes a correction for the system background, i.e. constant contamination (0.91±0.18µg C with F14C of 0.72±0.11). For the cracking system applied for DOC samples the constant contamination is 0.06±0.18µg C with F14C of 0.50±0.11. Further corrections applied account for the AMS cross-contamination (0.2 % of the previous sample) and procedural blanks (see above). All uncertainties were propagated throughout data processing until final 14C calibration. These corrections have a larger effect on low-carbon-mass samples (higher noise-to-sample ratio), resulting in a larger dating uncertainty. Therefore, we only discuss samples with a carbon mass larger than 10 µg as recommended in Uglietti et al. (2016). Radiocarbon ages are calculated following the law of radioactive decay using 5570 years as the half-life of radiocarbon; thus age equals -8033×ln (F14C), with 8033 years being Libby's mean lifetime of radiocarbon. Radiocarbon ages are given in years before present (BP), with the year of reference being 1950 (Stuiver and Polach, 1977). To obtain calibrated 14C ages, the online program OxCal v4.3.2 with the IntCal13 radiocarbon calibration curve was used (Reimer et al., 2013; Ramsey, 2017). Calibrated ages, also given in years before present, are indicated with cal BP and denote the 1σ range unless stated otherwise.

3 Results

3.1 DOC and WIOC concentrations

DOC concentrations are generally higher compared to the corresponding WIOC concentrations (Fig. 2). For all samples from the four glaciers, the DOC / WIOC concentration ratio ranges from 1.2 to 4.0, with an average of 1.9±0.6 (Table 2). This is at the lower end of previously reported average DOC / WIOC ratios of 2–8 (Legrand et al., 2007, 2013; Fang et al., 2021). This is likely explained by temporal variability because most samples in this study are several thousand years old, whereas the literature data only cover the last few centuries, including values from the industrial period, in which additional anthropogenic sources exist (e.g. fossil DOC precursors). It is interesting to note that the average DOC / WIOC ratio at Belukha (2.5) is higher compared to the other sites (at Colle Gnifetti, SLNS and Chongce it is 1.8, 1.7 and 1.6, respectively). Because the Belukha glacier is surround by extensive Siberian forests, the higher ratio may be explained by particularly high emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds. This is corroborated by the observation that DOC concentrations are highest at this site (241±82µg kg−1) (Fig. 2). Absolute concentrations of DOC and WIOC are slightly lower at Colle Gnifetti (112±12 and 63±13µg kg−1, respectively) compared to the other three glaciers (Tables 1 and 2). Mean DOC and WIOC concentrations in the ice from the Tibetan Plateau are 211±28 and 123±19µg kg−1 for SLNS and 156±40 and 99±37µg kg−1 for Chongce, respectively. The values measured for the samples from the Tibetan Plateau are higher compared to the pre-industrial (PI) average values found in European Alpine glaciers, not only compared to the few samples from Colle Gnifetti of this study, but also compared to previously reported values from the Fiescherhorn glacier, with PI DOC of  95 µg kg−1 (Fang et al., 2021) and PI WIOC of ∼30µg kg−1 (Jenk et al., 2006), respectively, and from Colle Gnifetti with PI WIOC of ∼30µg kg−1 (Legrand et al., 2007; Jenk et al., 2006).

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f02

Figure 2Comparison of results from the WIOC and DOC fractions for the four studied sites. (a) Concentrations, (b) F14C. The error bars denote the overall analytical 1σ uncertainty.

Download

3.2 Radiocarbon results

For all four sites, F14C of both fractions (WIOC and DOC) decreases with depth, indicating the expected increase in age (Fig. 2, Tables 1 and 2). For three of the sites (Colle Gnifetti, Belukha and SLNS), the corresponding DOC and WIOC fractions yielded comparable F14C values with no statistical evidence for a significant difference (Mann–Whitney U test, U=79.5, n=14, p=0.41>0.05). They scatter along the 1:1 ratio line and are significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.986, p<0.01, n=14), and both intercept (0.025±0.034) and slope (1.034±0.050) are not significantly different from 0 and 1, respectively (Fig. 3). Nevertheless, a slight systematic offset towards lower F14C values for WIOC compared to DOC seems evident if looking at Figs. 2 and 3. This is particularly obvious for the samples from Chongce, characterized by high mineral dust load and from a site of very high elevation with low net accumulation. For these samples, the F14C DOC-WIOC offset is significant (discussion in Sect. 4.2 and 4.3).

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f03

Figure 3Scatter plot showing the correlation between WIO14C and DO14C results for the four sites (see legend). In terms of F14(a) and calibrated ages (b). For the linear fit in both panels, the data from Chongce (open symbols) were excluded. Shaded areas indicate the 95 % confidence band.

Download

Table 3Calibrated WIO14C and DO14C ages using OxCal v4.3.2 with the Intcal13 radiocarbon calibration curve. Ages are given as the OxCal-provided μ age ±1σ, which is the calibrated mean age accounting for the age probability distribution. In addition, calibrated ages derived when applying the OxCal sequence deposition model for further constraint are shown.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

For all sites, the calibrated 14C ages from both fractions show an increase in age with depth (Table 3). The ages range from ∼0.2 to 20.3 cal kyr BP for DOC and ∼0.8 to 22.4 cal kyr BP for WIOC, respectively. In both fractions, the oldest age was derived for the sample from the deepest part of the Belukha ice core. Samples from Colle Gnifetti generally showed younger ages (<2cal kyr BP). The two ice cores from the Tibetan Plateau (SLNS and Chongce) cover a similar age span, from 0.2±0.1 to 5.5±0.3cal kyr BP in the DOC fraction. WIO14C resulted in a similar age range for the samples from SLNS (0.8±0.4 to 6.6±0.8cal kyr BP) but was considerably older for Chongce (3.1±0.7 to 11.0±1.7cal kyr BP; discussion in Sect. 4.2 and 4.3).

4 Discussion

4.1 Radiocarbon dating with the DOC fraction

In Table 3, we present the first radiocarbon dating results of ice using the DOC fraction. The DOC calibrated 14C age of ice increases with depth for all four sites, as expected for undisturbed glacier archives from the accumulation zone. For samples from three out of the four sites, our results (Sect. 3) indicate no significant difference in F14C between DOC and WIOC, with the latter fraction being validated for allowing accurate dating of the surrounding ice (Uglietti et al., 2016). With the new DO14C dating method, an average dating uncertainty of around ±200 years was achieved for samples with an absolute carbon mass of 20–60 µg and ice younger than ∼6kyr (Tables 2 and 3). The analytical uncertainty mainly arises from correction for the procedure blank introduced during sample treatment prior to AMS analysis (see Sect. 2 for details about other corrections), contributing 20 % to 70 % of the final overall dating uncertainty. The contribution thereby depends on carbon mass (larger for small samples) and sample age (larger the bigger the difference between sample and blank F14C). How the overall analytical uncertainty in F14C decreases with higher carbon mass is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. For DOC concentrations observed in this study, an initial ice mass of about 250 g was required, with about 20 %–30 % of the ice being removed during the decontamination processes inside the DOC set-up, yielding ∼200g of ice available for final analysis. Expected based on previously reported DOC / WIOC concentration ratios (Sect. 3.1), the results here confirmed that with this new technique, the required ice mass can be reduced by more than a factor of 2 compared to the mass needed for 14C dating using the WIOC fraction. Consequently, using the DOC instead of the WIOC fraction for 14C dating, a higher dating precision can be achieved for ice samples of similar mass. An additional benefit is that the DOC extraction procedure allows the removal of inorganic carbon to be monitored for completeness (see Sect. 2), which is important to avoid a potential age bias (see Sect. 4.3).

Table 4Estimate of the effect from in situ 14C production on F14C-DOC. For comparison, the measured F14C offset between DOC and WIOC is also shown.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

4.2 Potential contribution of 14C in situ production to DO14C

Previous studies have suggested that 14C of the DOC fraction may be influenced by in situ production of 14C in the ice matrix (May 2009; Hoffman 2016). Induced by cosmic radiation, the production of 14C atoms within the ice matrix, i.e. by spallation of oxygen within the water molecule, is a well-known process (Lal et al., 1987; Van de Wal et al., 1994). Earlier studies have indicated that in-situ-produced 14C atoms mostly form CO, CO2 and CH4 (Petrenko et al., 2013) but also can form methanol and formic acid (Yankwich et al., 1946; Woon, 2002). The mechanism of incorporation of in-situ-produced 14C incorporation into organic molecules is not well understood (Woon, 2002; Hoffman, 2016). Hoffmann (2016) performed neutron irradiation experiments on Alpine glacier ice, showing that about 11 %–25 % of the initially produced 14C atoms entered into the DOC fraction. The resulting effect on F14C of DOC consequently depends on (i) the number of 14C atoms produced in the ice (14C in situ production); (ii) the fraction of these atoms incorporated into DOC; and because F14C is based on a 14C /12C ratio, (iii) the DOC concentration in the ice (the higher the concentration the smaller the resulting shift in F14C-DOC).

The natural neutron flux, relevant for the 14C production rate, strongly depends on altitude and latitude with a generally uniform energy distribution of the incoming neutrons (Gordon et al., 2004). The 14C in situ production in natural ice further depends on the depth in the glacier and the snow accumulation rate of the site (Lal et al., 1987), determining the total received neutron radiation. Following Lal et al. (1987), the number of in-situ-produced 14C atoms in each of our ice samples was estimated assuming an average incorporation into DOC of 18±7 % (Hoffmann, 2016) (Table 4, equations and input parameters in the Supplement). The average F14C-DOC shift for all samples is 0.044±0.033. We find a good correlation between the measured F14C DOC-WIOC offset and the 14C in-situ-caused F14C-DOC shift, which explains about 50 % of the offset (Pearson r=0.82; Fig. 4), and after correcting for, it improves the overall agreement between F14C of DOC and WIOC (Fig. 5). The shift is largest for the Chongce samples (0.109±0.048) as a result of the high production rate at 6 km altitude in combination with the low annual net accumulation rate at this site (0.14 mw.e.yr-1). The calculated shift for samples from the SLNS core, at a similar latitude but from a site lower in altitude (5 km) and experiencing higher net accumulation (0.21 mw.e.yr-1), is significantly lower, with 0.038±0.016. The samples from Belukha and Colle Gnifetti are least affected (0.013±0.006 and 0.033±0.013, respectively).

We find that while the effect of in situ 14C production causes only a negligible shift in F14C-DOC for most samples (masked by the analytical uncertainty), it can become significant for ice samples from sites of exceptionally high altitude and experiencing low annual net accumulation rates in addition, such as the Chongce ice cap (6010 ma.s.l., 0.14 mw.e.yr-1; Fig. 4). Note that for any site, the size of this effect is reduced with higher DOC concentration of the sample.

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f04

Figure 4Estimated in situ 14C offset to F14C-DOC plotted against the measured offset between F14C of the DOC and WIOC fraction.

Download

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f05

Figure 5Scatter plots showing the correlation between WIO14C and DO14C results for all samples. In terms of F14C (top) and calibrated ages (bottom). (a) Measured values as shown in Fig. 3 but with the linear fit applied to all data (Chongce included). (b) Same as (a) but DOC 14C results corrected for in situ 14C contribution. (c) Same as (a) but DOC and WIOC 14C results corrected for in situ 14C and accounting for potentially incompletely removed carbonate, respectively. An estimated average carbonate removal efficiency of 98±2 % was used here. Error bars in (a) and (b) reflect the propagated uncertainty in analysis and correction. In (b) and (c), measured values are shown as grey crosses.

Download

4.3 Potential contribution of carbonates to 14C of WIOC

Under the basic assumption that the initially emitted fractions of DOC and WIOC are of similar age, an additional contribution from 14C-depleted carbonate (low F14C) to the WIOC would cause an F14C offset between the two fractions. Previously published WIOC 14C ages from the upper parts of the Chongce Core 2 and Core 4, less than 2 and ∼6km away from Core 1, did show large scatter with no clear increase in age with depth for samples younger than 2 kyr. It was speculated that this was at least partly caused by the visible, exceptionally high loading of mineral dust on the WIOC filters (Hou et al., 2018). Such high mineral dust loading was also observed during filtration of the Chongce Core 1 samples presented here. High mineral dust content in the ice can influence 14C dating with WIOC in two ways: by affecting filtration through clogging of the filter and by potentially contributing 14C-depleted carbon from carbonate, as has been discussed in most previous studies. They all concluded that, although for dust levels typically observed in ice cores from high-elevation glaciers no significant bias is detectable for 14C of WIOC, it is of concern for the elemental carbon (EC) fraction combusted at higher temperatures during OC–EC separation. EC – as well as total carbon (TC; the sum of OC and EC) – is thus not recommended to be used for radiocarbon dating (Jenk et al., 2006, 2007, 2009; Sigl et al., 2009; Uglietti et al., 2016). In any case, the carbonate removal efficiency during WIOC sample preparation was never quantified.

Here, the hypothesis that incomplete removal of carbonate may have caused the F14C DOC-WIOC offset remaining after accounting for DO14C in situ production (Sect. 4.2) was tested. Applying an isotopic-mass-balance-based model to our dataset, the carbonate removal efficiency in WIO14C samples was estimated. The Ca2+ concentration in the ice samples was thereby used as a tracer for calcium carbonate (see Supplement for details).

We find a carbonate removal procedure incomplete by around 2 % (i.e. an average removal efficiency of 98±2 %) to be sufficient for explaining the remaining part of the observed F14C DOC-WIOC offset (Fig. 5). In terms of residual carbonate carbon mass on the filter, this equals <2µg C on average (Table S2 in the Supplement). On the one hand, this is in agreement with the findings of previous studies, confirming that the potential carbonate-related bias for 14C dating using WIOC is hardly detectable for ice samples with normal dust loading (effect masked by the analytical uncertainty; see Fig. S2 in the Supplement). For example, Uglietti et al. (2016) did not detect such an effect when successfully validating WIO14C dating results with ages from independent methods. On the other hand, it demonstrates that a removal efficiency slightly below average for ice samples containing visibly high loading of mineral dust can already cause a notable offset (93 %–97 % for Chongce). The likely bigger particle size in such samples will affect their solubility, i.e. increase the dissolution time required in the acid treatment step. In the current procedure, this time is not adjusted accordingly (Sect. 2). Based on these results, we consider a small offset from incomplete carbonate removal to be a very likely reason contributing to the measured F14C DOC-WIOC, i.e. resulting dating offset (Fig. 5). Instead of a correction, which does not seem feasible for this effect because of large uncertainties and likely substantial site-to-site (sample-to-sample) variations, we suggest future improvement in the analytical procedure of the carbonate removal step (e.g. a slight increase in acid concentration and an increase in the reaction time).

4.4 DO14C ages in the context of published chronologies

In the following we discuss our new DO14C results in the context of ages from previous studies. For final calibration of 14C ages, most of those earlier studies took advantage of the assumption of sequential deposition in the archive, i.e. a continuous, undisturbed and preserved sequential deposition of annual snow layers on the glacier surface. Particularly in case of relatively large analytical uncertainties compared to the age difference in the samples, the sequential deposition model can moderately constrain the probability distribution of the calibrated age range in each sample of the dataset. For consistency we applied the same calibration approach here by using the inbuilt OxCal sequence model (Ramsey, 2008). While the underlying assumption may not generally be valid for all sites and individually needs to be carefully assessed, we find no difference in the calibrated ages using the sequence model and the ages from the conventional calibration approach for all DO14C data presented in this study (Table 3). Note that no correction for a potential in situ 14C bias was applied to the DO14C data used here (Sect. 4.2).

Table 5DO14C dating results for near-bedrock ice compared to results from previous studies (visualized in Fig. 6).

a Precise bedrock depth unknown at this coring site. b Sampled depth being closest to depth sampled in this study (CG03 and CG15 drill sites only 16 m apart). c Modelled age at same depth as sampled in this study.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

We obtained the oldest age of ∼21cal kyr BP for the bedrock ice at Belukha, indicating that this glacier is the oldest and of Pleistocene origin. This is older than the previously reported age of ∼11cal kyr BP (Table 5, Fig. 6). The latter age was obtained for an ice core from the nearby Belukha West Plateau glacier extracted in 2003 (B03) (Aizen et al., 2016; Uglietti et al., 2016) as opposed to the 2018 core extracted from the saddle (B18) analysed in this study. Also, the according sample from B03 was from a slightly shallower depth (0.6–0.3 m above bedrock) than the sample analysed from B18 in this study. The age range modelled for B03 for the same depth above bedrock (0.5–0 m) is in better agreement with ∼28cal kyr BP and a very large uncertainty of ∼15kyr (Uglietti et al., 2016). Overall, our new age for the oldest ice at Belukha thus reasonably agrees with the previous result but yields a much better constrained age, with a reduced uncertainty of ±4kyr. The two glaciers from the Tibetan Plateau (SLNS and Chongce) show very similar bottom ages of ∼5–6 cal kyr BP (Fig. 6), which is in agreement with the previously reported age range of Tibetan Plateau glaciers (Hou et al., 2018). The bottom age of Chongce Core 1 determined here based on DO14C (5.6±0.3cal kyr BP) is slightly younger than the previously reported bottom age in Core 2 based on WIO14C (6.3±0.3cal kyr BP; Hou et al., 2018), which is in agreement with the findings discussed in Sect. 4.2 and 4.3. Nevertheless, our new age is still in the range of the previously estimated bottom age (Table 5, Fig. 6). The bottom-most sample of the Colle Gnifetti 2015 (CG15) core could not be dated because the small amount of ice available yielded an insufficient carbon mass of <10µg for 14C analysis. Previous WIO14C dating of a core obtained at Colle Gnifetti in 2003 (CG03) also revealed ice of Pleistocene origin, with the ice at bedrock being older than 15 cal kyr BP (Jenk et al., 2009). As expected, the age obtained in this study from a shallower depth was much younger with 1.2 cal kyr BP. This is in excellent agreement with the age of CG03 for a similar depth (∼74m below surface; Table 5, Fig. 6). We consider this to be a clear indication that the CG15 ice core did not reach bedrock.

https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1537/2021/tc-15-1537-2021-f06

Figure 6Comparison of our DO14C ages (not corrected for in situ) with dating results from previous studies if available. For the four sites of Belukha (BEL), Colle Gnifetti (CG), Shule Nanshan (SLNS) and Chongce (CC), DO14C ages (green) and previously reported WIO14C ages (open circles) for similar sampling depths are shown. Grey bars indicate previously modelled, 14C-based bedrock age estimates (additionally for CG the modelled age for the bottom sampling depth of this study). Previously published data are from Uglietti et al. (2016) (BEL West Plateau), Jenk et al. (2009) (CG) and Hou et al. (2018) (CC). See Table 5 for underlying data and details.

Download

Overall, the dating with DO14C results in ages which are in good agreement with the age ranges reported in earlier studies. Even though a contribution from in situ 14C to DO14C was not considered in the comparison here, we find that the dating by the DOC fraction does not lead to significantly different results compared to dating by WIO14C or cause a different interpretation of the oldest ice still present for any of the sites.

5 Conclusions

In this study, we evaluated and successfully validated the DO14C dating technique by direct comparison of dating results with the well-established WIO14C method using parallel ice samples. Achieving this goal was not only analytically demanding but also highly challenging due to the very limited availability of the sampling material, requiring ice in rather large quantities and spanning a wide range of ages. The obtained DO14C ages for four different Eurasian glaciers, ranging from 0.2±0.2 to 20.3±4.1cal kyr BP, agreed well with the respective WIO14C ages (0.8±0.4 to 22.4±1.1cal kyr BP) and with previously published chronologies from these ice core sites. This underlines the great potential for applying DO14C analysis for ice core dating. With this new method, an average dating uncertainty of around ±200 years was achieved for samples with an absolute carbon mass of >20µg and ages up to ∼6kyr. For DOC concentrations observed in this study, an initial ice mass of about 250 g was required. Our data confirmed previous results that concentrations of pre-industrial DOC are higher by about a factor 2 compared to WIOC concentrations in high alpine ice cores. This shows that the required ice mass to achieve similar precision is reduced by at least a factor of 2 for 14C dating when using the DOC instead of the WIOC fraction. Accordingly, an improvement in precision can be achieved for the same sample mass. Compared to WIOC, a downside of using the DOC fraction for 14C dating is a more demanding and time-consuming extraction procedure. In addition, because of its higher solubility and a related higher mobility of DOC in case of meltwater formation, this fraction is only applicable for dating ice which had been cold throughout its “lifetime”. Beneficial compared to WIOC, there is no potential for a dating bias by carbonates of mineral dust for DO14C. However, our results confirm previously suggested potential dating biases from in situ 14C causing DO14C dates to shift towards younger ages. While we find the effect to be small (at the level of analytical uncertainty), it may become significant for DO14C dating of ice samples from sites of exceptionally high altitude, for example, experiencing low annual net accumulation rates in addition. For such sites, a reasonably accurate correction to account for the age bias seems feasible according to our results, although at the cost of an increase in the final dating uncertainty. Nevertheless, we think this new dating method has great potential to open up new fields for radiocarbon dating of ice, for example from remote regions, where concentrations of organic impurities in the ice are particularly low.

Data availability

The data are provided in the tables.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-1537-2021-supplement.

Author contributions

LF and TS performed 14C analysis. LF, TMJ and MS wrote the manuscript. All authors, including SH, contributed to the discussion of the results. TMJ assisted and partly developed the modelling. MS designed the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Johannes Schindler for his great work in designing and building the DOC extraction system and the two drilling teams on Colle Gnifetti and Belukha for collecting high-quality ice cores. We acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) for the Sinergia project Paleo fires from high-alpine ice cores (grant no. CRSII2_154450), which allowed ice core drilling on Colle Gnifetti and Belukha; for the project Radiocarbon dating of glacier ice (grant no. 200021_126515); and for the project Reconstruction of pre-industrial to industrial changes of organic aerosols from glacier ice cores (grant no. 200021_182765). We acknowledge the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 91837102, 41830644) for the Tibetan ice core drilling. We dedicate this study to Alexander Zapf, who died tragically while climbing in the Swiss Alps before he could fulfil his dream of ice dating with DO14C.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nos. CRSII2_154450, 200021_126515 and 200021_182765) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 91837102 and 41830644).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Joel Savarino and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Agrios, K., Salazar, G., Zhang, Y.-L., Uglietti, C., Battaglia, M., Luginbühl, M., Ciobanu, V. G., Vonwiller, M., and Szidat, S.: Online coupling of pure O2 thermo-optical methods–14C AMS for source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 361, 288–293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.008, 2015. 

Agrios, K., Salazar, G., and Szidat, S.: A Continuous-Flow Gas Interface of a Thermal/Optical Analyzer With 14C AMS for Source Apportionment of Atmospheric Aerosols, Radiocarbon, 59, 921–932, https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2016.88, 2017. 

Aizen, E. M., Aizen, V. B., Takeuchi, N., Mayewski, P. A., Grigholm, B., Joswiak, D. R., Nikitin, S. A., Fujita, K., Nakawo, M., and Zapf, A.: Abrupt and moderate climate changes in the mid-latitudes of Asia during the Holocene, J. Glaciol., 62, 411–439, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.34, 2016. 

Bolzan, J. F.: Ice flow at the Dome C ice divide based on a deep temperature profile, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 90, 8111–8124, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD05p08111, 1985. 

Fang, L., Schindler, J., Jenk, T., Uglietti, C., Szidat, S., and Schwikowski, M. J. R.: Extraction of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Glacier Ice for Radiocarbon Analysis, Radiocarbon, 61, 681–694, https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2019.36, 2019. 

Fang L., Cao F., Jenk T. M., Vogel A. L., Zhang Y. L., Wacker L., Salazar G., Szidat S., and Schwikowski M.: Enhancement of carbonaceous aerosol during the 20th century by anthropogenic activities: insights from an Alpine ice core, in preparation, 2021. 

Gavin, D. G.: Estimation of inbuilt age in radiocarbon ages of soil charcoal for fire history studies, Radiocarbon 43, 27–44, 2001. 

Gordon, M. S., Goldhagen, P., Rodbell, K. P., Zabel, T. H., Tang, H. H. K., Clem, J. M., and Bailey, P. Measurement of the flux and energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons on the ground, IEEE T. Nucl. Sci., 51, 3427–3434, 2004. 

Hoffmann, H., Preunkert, S., Legrand, M., Leinfelder, D., Bohleber, P., Friedrich, R., and Wagenbach, D.: A New Sample Preparation System for Micro-14C Dating of Glacier Ice with a First Application to a High Alpine Ice Core from CG (Switzerland), Radiocarbon, 60, 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2017.99, 2018. 

Hoffmann H. M.: Micro radiocarbon dating of the particulate organic carbon fraction in Alpine glacier ice: method refinement, critical evaluation and dating applications, thesis, Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00020712, 2016. 

Hou, S., Jenk, T. M., Zhang, W., Wang, C., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Pang, H., and Schwikowski, M.: Age ranges of the Tibetan ice cores with emphasis on the Chongce ice cores, western Kunlun Mountains, The Cryosphere, 12, 2341–2348, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2341-2018, 2018. 

Hou, S., Zhang, W., Fang, L., Jenk, T. M., Wu, S., Pang, H., and Schwikowski, M.: Brief Communication: New evidence further constraining Tibetan ice core chronologies to the Holocene, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-225, in review, 2020. 

Jenk, T. M., Szidat, S., Schwikowski, M., Gäggeler, H. W., Brütsch, S., Wacker, L., Synal, H.-A., and Saurer, M.: Radiocarbon analysis in an Alpine ice core: record of anthropogenic and biogenic contributions to carbonaceous aerosols in the past (1650–1940), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5381–5390, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5381-2006, 2006. 

Jenk, T. M., Szidat, S., Schwikowski, M., Gäggeler, H., Wacker, L., Synal, H.-A., and Saurer, M.: Microgram level radiocarbon (14C) determination on carbonaceous particles in ice, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 259, 518–525, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.196, 2007. 

Jenk, T. M., Szidat, S., Bolius, D., Sigl, M., Gaeggeler, H. W., Wacker, L., Ruff, M., Barbante, C., Boutron, C. F., and Schwikowski, M.: A novel radiocarbon dating technique applied to an ice core from the Alps indicating late Pleistocene ages, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D14305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011860, 2009. 

Lal, D., Nishiizumi, K., and Arnold, J. R.: In situ cosmogenic 3H, 14C, and 10Be for determining the net accumulation and ablation rates of ice sheets, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 92.B6, 4947–4952, 1987. 

Lal, D., Jull, A. T., Burr, G., and Donahue, D.: Measurements of in situ 14C concentrations in Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 ice covering a 17-kyr time span: Implications to ice flow dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 26505–26510, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC02224, 1997. 

Legrand, M., Preunkert, S., Schock, M., Cerqueira, M., Kasper-Giebl, A., Afonso, J., Pio, C., Gelencsér, A., and Dombrowski-Etchevers, I.: Major 20th century changes of carbonaceous aerosol components (EC, WinOC, DOC, HULIS, carboxylic acids, and cellulose) derived from Alpine ice cores, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D23S11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008080, 2007. 

Legrand, M., Preunkert, S., Jourdain, B., Guilhermet, J., Faïn, X., Alekhina, I., and Petit, J. R.: Water-soluble organic carbon in snow and ice deposited at Alpine, Greenland, and Antarctic sites: a critical review of available data and their atmospheric relevance, Clim. Past, 9, 2195–2211, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2195-2013, 2013. 

Licciulli, C., Bohleber, P., Lier, J., Gagliardini, O., Hoelzle, M., and Eisen, O.: A full Stokes ice-flow model to assist the interpretation of millennial-scale ice cores at the high-Alpine drilling site Colle Gnifetti, Swiss/Italian Alps, J. Glaciol., 66, 35–48, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.82, 2020. 

May, B., Wagenbach, D., Hoffmann, H., Legrand, M., Preunkert, S., and Steier, P.: Constraints on the major sources of dissolved organic carbon in Alpine ice cores from radiocarbon analysis over the bomb-peak period, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3319–3327, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50200, 2013. 

May, B. L.: Radiocarbon microanalysis on ice impurities for dating of Alpine glaciers, PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 127 pp., 2009. 

Minguillón, M. C., Perron, N., Querol, X., Szidat, S., Fahrni, S. M., Alastuey, A., Jimenez, J. L., Mohr, C., Ortega, A. M., Day, D. A., Lanz, V. A., Wacker, L., Reche, C., Cusack, M., Amato, F., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Decesari, S., Moretti, F., Hillamo, R., Teinilä, K., Seco, R., Pe Nuelas, J., Metzger, A., Schallhart, S., Müller, M., Hansel, A., Burkhart, J. F., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Fossil versus contemporary sources of fine elemental and organic carbonaceous particulate matter during the DAURE campaign in Northeast Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12067–12084, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12067-2011, 2011. 

Mohn, J., Szidat, S., Fellner, J., Rechberger, H., Quartier, R., Buchmann, B., and Emmenegger, L.: Determination of biogenic and fossil CO2 emitted by waste incineration based on 14CO2 and mass balances, Bioresource Technol., 99, 6471–6479, 2008. 

Nye, J.: On the theory of the advance and retreat of glaciers, Geophys. J. Int., 7, 431–456, 1963. 

Petrenko, V. V., Severinghaus, J. P., Smith, A. M., Riedel, K., Baggenstos, D., Harth, C., Orsi, A., Hua, Q., Franz, P., Takeshita, Y., Brailsford, G., Weiss, R. F., Buizert, C., Dickson, A., and Schaefer, H.: High-precision 14C measurements demonstrate production of insitu cosmogenic 14CH4 and rapid loss of insitu cosmogenic 14CO in shallow Greenland firn, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 365, 190–197, 2013. 

Ramsey, C. B.: Deposition models for chronological records, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 42–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2007.01.019, 2008. 

Ramsey, C. B.: Methods for summarizing radiocarbon datasets, Radiocarbon, 59, 1809–1833, https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2017.108, 2017. 

Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Ramsey, C. B., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P., Guilderson, T., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T., Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Felix Kaiser, K., Kromer, B., Manning, S. W., Niu, M., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M., Southon, J. R., Staff, R. A., Turney, C. S., and van der Plicht, J.: IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 1869–1887, https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947, 2013. 

Ruff, M., Wacker, L., Gäggeler, H., Suter, M., Synal, H.-A., and Szidat, S.: A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV, Radiocarbon 49, 307–314, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200042235, 2007. 

Sigl, M., Jenk, T. M., Kellerhals, T., Szidat, S., Gäggeler, H. W., Wacker, L., Synal, H.-A., Boutron, C., Barbante, C., and Gabrieli, J.: Towards radiocarbon dating of ice cores, J. Glaciol., 55, 985–996, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309790794922, 2009. 

Sigl, M., Abram, N. J., Gabrieli, J., Jenk, T. M., Osmont, D., and Schwikowski, M.: 19th century glacier retreat in the Alps preceded the emergence of industrial black carbon deposition on high-alpine glaciers, The Cryosphere, 12, 3311–3331, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3311-2018, 2018. 

Smith, A., Levchenko, V., Etheridge, D., Lowe, D., Hua, Q., Trudinger, C., Zoppi, U., and Elcheikh, A.: In search of in-situ radiocarbon in Law Dome ice and firn, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 172, 610–622, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00280-9, 2000. 

Steier, P., Fasching, C., Mair, K., Liebl, J., Battin, T., Priller, A., and Golser, R.: A new UV oxidation setup for small radiocarbon samples in solution, Radiocarbon, 55, 373–382, https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16368, 2013. 

Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A.: Discussion reporting of 14C data, Radiocarbon, 19, 355–363, 1977. 

Synal, H.-A., Stocker, M., and Suter, M.: MICADAS: a new compact radiocarbon AMS system, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 259, 7–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.138, 2007. 

Szidat, S., Salazar, G. A., Vogel, E., Battaglia, M., Wacker, L., Synal, H.-A., and Türler, A.: 14C analysis and sample preparation at the new Bern Laboratory for the Analysis of Radiocarbon with AMS (LARA), Radiocarbon, 56, 561–566, https://doi.org/10.2458/56.17457, 2014. 

Thompson, L. G., Tandong, Y., Davis, M. E., Mosley-Thompson, E., Mashiotta, T. A., Lin, P.-N., Mikhalenko, V. N., and Zagorodnov, V. S. J. A. o. G.: Holocene climate variability archived in the Puruogangri ice cap on the central Tibetan Plateau, Ann. Glaciol., 43, 61–69, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756406781812357, 2006. 

Uglietti, C., Zapf, A., Jenk, T. M., Sigl, M., Szidat, S., Salazar, G., and Schwikowski, M.: Radiocarbon dating of glacier ice: overview, optimisation, validation and potential, The Cryosphere, 10, 3091–3105, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-3091-2016, 2016. 

Van de Wal, R., Van Roijen, J., Raynaud, D., Van der Borg, K., De Jong, A., Oerlemans, J., Lipenkov, V., and Huybrechts, P.: From 14C /12C measurements towards radiocarbon dating of ice, Tellus B 46, 91-102, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v46i2.15755, 1994. 

Wacker, L., Fahrni, S. M., Hajdas, I., Molnar, M., Synal, H. A., Szidat, S., and Zhang, Y. L.: A versatile gas interface for routine radiocarbon analysis with a gas ion source, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 294, 315–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.02.009, 2013.  

Woon, D. E.: Modeling gas-grain chemistry with quantum chemical cluster calculations. I. Heterogeneous hydrogenation of CO and H2CO on icy grain mantles, Astrophys. J., 569, 541–548, 2002. 

Yankwich, P. E., Rollefson, G. K., and Norris, T. H.: Chemical Forms Assumed by C14 Produced by Neutron Irradiation of Nitrogenous Substances, J. Chem. Phys., 14, 131–140, 1946. 

Zhang, Y., Yao, Y., Wang, X., Liu, Y., and Piao, S.: Mapping spatialdistribution of forest age in China, Earth Space Sci., 4, 108–116, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000177, 2017. 

Zhang, Y. L., Perron, N., Ciobanu, V. G., Zotter, P., Minguillón, M. C., Wacker, L., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., and Szidat, S.: On the isolation of OC and EC and the optimal strategy of radiocarbon-based source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10841–10856, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10841-2012, 2012. 

Download
Short summary
The interpretation of the ice-core-preserved signal requires a precise chronology. Radiocarbon (14C) dating of the water-insoluble organic carbon (WIOC) fraction has become an important dating tool. However, this method is restricted by the low concentration in the ice. In this work, we report first 14C dating results using the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) fraction. The resulting ages are comparable in both fractions, but by using the DOC fraction the required ice mass can be reduced.