the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Snow water equivalent retrieved from X- and dual Ku-band scatterometer measurements at Sodankylä using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method
Jinmei Pan
Michael Durand
Juha Lemmetyinen
Desheng Liu
Jiancheng Shi
Abstract. Radar at high frequency is a promising technique for fine-resolution snow water equivalent (SWE) mapping. In this paper, we extend the Bayesian-based Algorithm for SWE Estimation (BASE) from passive to active microwave (AM) application and test it using ground-based backscattering measurements at three frequencies (X- and dual Ku-bands, 10.2, 13.3 and 16.7 GHz), VV polarization obtained at 50° incidence angle from the Nordic Snow Radar Experiment (NoSREx) in Sodankylä, Finland. We assume only an uninformative prior for snow microstructure, in contrast with an accurate prior required in previous studies. Starting from a biased SWE prior from land surface model simulation, two-layer snow state variables and single-layer soil variables are iterated until their posterior distribution could stably reproduce the observed microwave signals. The observation model is the Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks 3 and Active (MEMLS3&a). Results show that BASE-AM achieved a RMSE of ~10 cm for snow depth (SD) and less than 30 mm for SWE, compared with the RMSE of ~20 cm SD and ~50 mm SWE from priors. Retrieval errors are significantly larger when BASE-AM is run using a single snow layer. The results support the potential of X- and Ku-band radar for SWE retrieval and shows that providing a fully-unbiased snow microstructure prior is not the only promise to obtain accurate SWE retrievals.
- Preprint
(2841 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Jinmei Pan et al.
Status: open (until 12 Oct 2023)
-
AC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-85', Jinmei Pan, 20 Jul 2023
reply
On behalf of all co-authors, I want to post two corrections on the published TCD manuscript:
1. in line 220, it should be: Our forward simulation test based on snowpit measurements suggested a Q between 0.08 (corrected from 0.8) and 0.12 (corrected from 1.2) at Sodankylä. Therefore, the prior for Q was set as 0.1±0.01 in Table 1.
2. in line 437, equation (11), it should be: W_U (changed from W_B) = min(A*|T|**B, W). W_U means unfrozen water content.
Sorry for these errors!
Sincerely,
Jinmei Pan
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-85-AC1 -
CC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-85', Yurong Cui, 08 Sep 2023
reply
Why is only using VV polarization chosen? Will incorporating other polarizations yield better results?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-85-CC1
Jinmei Pan et al.
Data sets
Nordic Snow Radar Experiment Juha Lemmetyinen, Anna Kontu, Jouni Pulliainen, Juho Vehviläinen, Kimmo Rautiainen, Andreas Wiesmann, Christian Mätzler, Charles Werner, Helmut Rott, Thomas Nagler, Martin Schneebeli, Martin Proksch, Dirk Schüttemeyer, Michael Kern, and Malcolm W. J. Davidson https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-403-2016
Jinmei Pan et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
219 | 70 | 14 | 303 | 8 | 9 |
- HTML: 219
- PDF: 70
- XML: 14
- Total: 303
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1