the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing based High Resolution Snow Depth Mapping for Western Himalayan Zones using Multifactor Modelling Approach
Dhiraj Kumar Singh
Srinivasarao Tanniru
Kamal Kant Singh
Harendra Singh Negi
Raaj Ramsankaran
Abstract. Spatiotemporal snow depth (SD) mapping in the Indian Western Himalayan (WH) region is essential in many applications pertaining to hydrology, natural disaster management, climate, etc. In-situ techniques for SD measurement are not sufficient to represent the high spatiotemporal variability of SD in WH. Currently, low-frequency passive microwave (PMW) remote sensing-based algorithms are extensively used to monitor SD at regional and global scales. However, only a limited number of PMW SD estimation studies are carried out for WH till date. In addition, the majority of the available PMW SD models for WH locations are developed using limited data and less parameters, therefore cannot be implemented for the entire region. Further, these models have not considered the auxiliary parameters such as location, topography, snow cover days (SCD) into consideration and have poor accuracy (particularly in deep snow), and coarse spatial resolution.
Considering the high spatiotemporal variability of snow depth characteristics across WH region, region wise multifactor models are developed for the first time to estimate SD at high spatial resolution of 500 m x 500 m for three different WH zones i.e., Lower Himalayan Zone (LHZ), Middle Himalayan Zone (MHZ), and Upper Himalayan Zone (UHZ). Multifrequency brightness temperature (TB) observations from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2), SCDs data, terrain parameters (i.e., elevation, slope and ruggedness), geolocation for the winter period (October to March) during 2012–13 to 2016–17 are used for developing the SD models. Different regression approaches (i.e., linear, logarithmic, reciprocal, and power) are developed and evaluated to find if any of these models can address the heterogeneous association between SD observations and PMW TB. The results indicate the following observations: (a) multifactor model developed using power regression has shown improved accuracy in SD retrievals compared to other regression approaches in all WH zones; (b) spatial variability in SD is highly affected by SCDs, terrain parameters, geolocation parameters; (c) compared to the currently operational AMSR2 SD products, the proposed models have shown better SD estimates in all WH zones particularly when SD > 25 cm; (d) the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of multifactor models SD estimates increased with an increase in SCD in all WH zones; The multifactor model of MHZ has shown lesser RMSE (i.e., 27.21 cm) compared to LHZ (32.87 cm) and UHZ (42.81 cm). Overall results indicate that the proposed multifactor SD models have achieved higher accuracy in deep snowpack (i.e., SD >25 cm) of WH when compared to various previously developed SD models.
- Preprint
(2199 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Dhiraj Kumar Singh et al.
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on tc-2023-66', Sartajvir Singh, 11 Jul 2023
reply
Authors have developed a region-wise multifactor model to map the snow depth at 500m spatial resolution in the western Himalayas (particularly three lower, middle and upper zones). This study is essential regarding hydrology, climatology and other natural hazard perspectives and is recommended for consideration. Some of the observations are as follows:
1. Under the abstract, the authors have written about the very limited studies that were conducted on snow depth estimation using the passive microwave dataset. I suggest adding more information for more clarity. I also advised them to shorten the abstract by removing the information about the LHZ, MHZ, and UHZ (this is obvious information). Are you sure about the different regression approaches developed in this study? Recheck this statement. Mention the full form of AMSR2. Results need to be mentioned in a precise manner.
2. Under the introduction part, the authors have covered all the aspects overall. But proofreading is required in some sentences such as their approach (L105), their models are developed (L110) etc. Revision is required for the second objective (L135) due to some grammatical issue. Under the third objective, variables could be mentioned.
3. Under the study area, many terms are repetitively defined such as LHZ, MHZ, and UHZ (165) as you have already explained under L40. Underline 165 Upper Himalayan Zone is incorrectly abbreviated as MHZ. Under the methodology part, the flowchart is well-defined but the five steps need to be mentioned in the flowchart as explained in the subsections. The flowchart must be the stepwise reflection of the subsection (3.1 to 3.5).
4. Results and discussion are well explained. The challenges are also defined in the discussion part. However, could you please also highlight any scope of the advanced machine learning or deep learning approach in the snow depth estimation? (Some of the previous studies also involved the neural network/deep learning approach in snow depth estimation). I think this point may increase the interest of the readers.
5. The conclusion part needs to be specific. However, it has been observed that many contents of the conclusion don't make any significant impact like the WH region is divided into three zones, i.e., LHZ, MHZ, and UHZ. So such types of lines could be removed.
Overall, many aspects have been disclosed in this article and recommended for further consideration.
Best Wishes
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-66-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', RAAJ Ramsankaran, 12 Aug 2023
reply
Thank you for your comments.
Detailed response is attached in the supplement file. Kindly go through it.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Sartajvir Singh, 12 Sep 2023
reply
Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/tc-2023-66-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Sartajvir Singh, 12 Sep 2023
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', RAAJ Ramsankaran, 12 Aug 2023
reply
Dhiraj Kumar Singh et al.
Dhiraj Kumar Singh et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
355 | 88 | 16 | 459 | 12 | 12 |
- HTML: 355
- PDF: 88
- XML: 16
- Total: 459
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1